Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Authorities Eye Whether Rush Limbaugh Laundered Money Used to Pay for Drugs
ABC News ^ | Nov. 18 | Brian Ross

Posted on 11/18/2003 4:23:09 PM PST by scarface367

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-6061-8081-100 ... 381-395 next last
To: demlosers
Hey, does the law say report cash movement to the Gov for less than $10,000?

I wondered this too. It is quite the eye-opener when you realize that banking transactions are being monitored for "suspicious activity" - however they choose to define that on a given day.

Hello Nicaragua/Costa Rica. My money is my own.

61 posted on 11/18/2003 4:55:50 PM PST by Principled
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: Peace will be here soon
Let me get this straight. If you withdrawl cash from your bank account ( clean money ), and then use that money to buy prescription pain medication illegally, you can be charged with money laundering. How is that ??? What am I missing here ?

Has he actually been charged? The article doesn't really say that, although the lawyer mentions the word "charge" in his statement (which was probably taken out of context). I also wonder if he actually obtained prescription meds illegally, or if he was prescribed the medications in increasing amounts. Regardless, its not money laundering.

I'll bet that ABC is giddy about this!

62 posted on 11/18/2003 4:56:08 PM PST by meyer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: scarface367
NEWSFLASH: It’s not against the law to withdraw money from your bank account. It’s your money and you can withdraw any amount you wish.

NEWSFLASH: Laundering money is the process of concealing illicitly acquired funds. Laundering is what drug dealers do. They don’t think it’s a good idea to tell the IRS they have committed a crime.

Assuming (for sake of argument) that Rush illegally purchased prescription drugs:

ABC is claiming investigators are seeking to prove that Rush is somehow responsible for the tax returns filled by the person selling the prescription drugs. Huh? When you report your income to the IRS, the only person legally responsible for that filling is you – just ask the boys and girls at H&R Block.

63 posted on 11/18/2003 4:56:09 PM PST by DrKnow
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SeeRushToldU_So
I have an account in which I withdraw and deposit money in the range suggested.

I purposely avoid the $10k limit, because it is none of the damn government's business.

I will continue to do so.

64 posted on 11/18/2003 4:57:25 PM PST by MonroeDNA (Please become a monthly donor!!! Just $3 a month--you won't miss it, and will feel proud!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 48 | View Replies]

To: L.N. Smithee
That caught my eye too. Either the limit is $10,000 or it's not. How far below $10,000 is below the threshold of suspicion?

Good question - I'm getting the urge to make a cash withdrawel and I'd like to know how much I can remove without raising an eyebrow.

65 posted on 11/18/2003 4:57:38 PM PST by meyer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: scarface367
The left are just digging themselves deeper with this crap. Notice how they conveniently what until furthur down the article to detail the charges, which seem to me to place the bank at fault if anyone.

I remember a story in the Florida news a few years ago where two people went to jail for twenty plus years for doing the same thing. This is a serious charge with heavy consequences.

66 posted on 11/18/2003 4:57:41 PM PST by LPM1888 (What are the facts? Again and again and again -- what are the facts? - Lazarus Long)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: clintonh8r
Hey, your recollection of the law in this matter matches mine. That is reassuring. ;O)
67 posted on 11/18/2003 4:58:03 PM PST by Petronski (I'm *NOT* always *CRANKY.*)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 54 | View Replies]

To: dts32041
"Don't you just love these johhny come lately to free republic."

Hey Jonny-come-lately, how's it going?

68 posted on 11/18/2003 4:59:02 PM PST by MonroeDNA (Please become a monthly donor!!! Just $3 a month--you won't miss it, and will feel proud!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: SeeRushToldU_So
"The true test of weather you own something is: Being able to do what you want with the object you own."

I actually like Walter E. Williams definition bettter "The true test of wether you own something is: Being able to sell it."

69 posted on 11/18/2003 4:59:06 PM PST by dts32041 (Is it time to practice decimation with our representatives?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 48 | View Replies]

To: clintonh8r
I understand about the reporting requirements, but those requirements are on the bank to file the report are they not? Not the depositor.
70 posted on 11/18/2003 4:59:49 PM PST by Ramius
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 54 | View Replies]

To: Shermy
I'll admit, I thought the govt. sold me on the Patriot Act because it was only to address terrorism.

The 'structured transactions' and reporting requirements and for that matter asset seizure provisions predate the Patriot act by years and years, as I'm sure you well know, and are a product of the WOD in the late 80s, IIRC.

71 posted on 11/18/2003 4:59:53 PM PST by Petronski (I'm *NOT* always *CRANKY.*)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 55 | View Replies]

To: meyer
It's a catch-22...from what I see any "unusual activity" can and is supposed to be reported to the gov't...now define unusual...
72 posted on 11/18/2003 5:01:13 PM PST by gdc314
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 65 | View Replies]

To: meyer
Has he actually been charged?
Rush is only being investigated. No charges have been filed, yet.. So all of this could be a bunch of garbage. The truth will come out eventually.
73 posted on 11/18/2003 5:01:16 PM PST by Peace will be here soon
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 62 | View Replies]

To: Cosmo
Roger that. Seems to me that "laundering" is the process of taking *illegally* gotten moneys, and hiding the source. Nothing about that here. Don't get it.
74 posted on 11/18/2003 5:01:51 PM PST by Ramius
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 40 | View Replies]

To: Ramius
I understand about the reporting requirements, but those requirements are on the bank to file the report are they not? Not the depositor.

There is liability (criminal or civil, I don't recall) on the bank for failing to report a reasonable suspicion of 'structuring to avoid' and there is also criminal liability on the customer for 'structuring to avoid.'

75 posted on 11/18/2003 5:02:03 PM PST by Petronski (I'm *NOT* always *CRANKY.*)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 70 | View Replies]

Comment #76 Removed by Moderator

To: scarface367
As I recall, one of the Clinton lawyers also did work for the National Enquirer.

Do you suppose there's a connection?

77 posted on 11/18/2003 5:02:25 PM PST by Anarchist
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Peace will be here soon; Steve0113; Ramius; Cosmo
Here's my guess on the money laundering:

Rush was paying cash to someone/dealer to illegally purchase drugs. Rush should've known that the seller was not going to claim that money as income so that makes Rush part of a "plot" to hide income from the Feds.

How does that sound?

78 posted on 11/18/2003 5:02:31 PM PST by DumpsterDiver
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: Mannaggia l'America
Well, I do have $222.00 worth of rolled coins. I am still trying to figure out how to launder that! ;-)
79 posted on 11/18/2003 5:03:17 PM PST by Normal4me
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 57 | View Replies]

To: MonroeDNA
My gosh someone who still remembers when Free Republic used tin cans to post.

You became a member about the time I started lurking, my hats off to you.

80 posted on 11/18/2003 5:04:16 PM PST by dts32041 (Is it time to practice decimation with our representatives?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 68 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-6061-8081-100 ... 381-395 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson