Skip to comments.
Marriage Ruling Causes Dems 'Heartburn,' Analyst Says
CNSNEWS.com ^
| 11/19/03
| Marc Morano
Posted on 11/19/2003 4:35:01 AM PST by kattracks
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-29 next last
1
posted on
11/19/2003 4:35:02 AM PST
by
kattracks
Comment #2 Removed by Moderator
To: JohnGalt; ninenot; u-89; sittnick; steve50; Hegemony Cricket; Willie Green; Wolfie; ex-snook; ...
"[...]marriage is a special institution that should be reserved for a man and a woman," Romney said on Tuesday. Eventual amendment should specify - "one man and one woman" as well as "excluding close blood relatives". Just in case.
3
posted on
11/19/2003 4:46:54 AM PST
by
A. Pole
To: kattracks
Heartburn? GOOD! ROFLMAO!
4
posted on
11/19/2003 4:47:16 AM PST
by
onyx
Comment #5 Removed by Moderator
To: kattracks
These are the kinds of decisions that force even a certain percentage of the Great Army of Clueless to take notice and realize what is at stake here. Especially sweet that the Rat convention is in Boston next summer -- they are that much more likely to have to face the issue and risk alienating their key weirdo constituency. The cultural gap widens further.
6
posted on
11/19/2003 4:52:16 AM PST
by
speedy
To: kattracks
Clinton criticized President Bush for supporting a constitutional amendment that would define marriage as the union of one man and one woman and said the amendment would be pushed by people "who try to drive wedges between Americans." The "wedge" was driven a long time ago between 98% of the population and the 2% who are homosexuals.If the democrats embrace the homosexual agenda they will lose big time.
7
posted on
11/19/2003 4:55:29 AM PST
by
Holly_P
Comment #8 Removed by Moderator
To: kattracks
We allowed the extreme right to define this as a religious issue, and it's not. It's a civil issue It's very much both.
9
posted on
11/19/2003 4:57:29 AM PST
by
Holly_P
To: kattracks
But Mark Mead, spokesman for the homosexual Republican group Log Cabin Republicans, believes that GOP opposition to homosexual marriage could harm the party's chances of keeping the White House Yeah, we really need to worry about losing the votes of the 2% of the population that are homosexuals don't we?
10
posted on
11/19/2003 5:00:17 AM PST
by
Holly_P
Comment #11 Removed by Moderator
To: Holly_P
If they don't they lose big time.
12
posted on
11/19/2003 5:09:20 AM PST
by
Maelstrom
(To prevent misinterpretation or abuse of the Constitution:The Bill of Rights limits government power)
To: Maelstrom
If they don't they lose big time Sure is fun when the dims get between a rock and a hard place!
13
posted on
11/19/2003 5:15:35 AM PST
by
Holly_P
To: kattracks
This should really be fun to watch...
...who among the nine dwarves will be the first to embrace the Mass SC decision??
...who will be the first to decry it??
I love it when liberals are forced to eat their own.
14
posted on
11/19/2003 5:15:35 AM PST
by
TheRightGuy
(ERROR CODE 018974523: Random Tagline Compiler Failure)
To: kattracks
He added that misinformation propagated by the "extreme right left" is to blame for much of the opposition to support for same-sex marriage.
15
posted on
11/19/2003 5:27:31 AM PST
by
auboy
(I'm out here on the front lines, sleep in peace tonight–American Soldier–Toby Keith, Chuck Cannon)
To: Holly_P
That's one cabin I wouldn't care if it burned to the groung.
16
posted on
11/19/2003 5:38:39 AM PST
by
Vaduz
To: Holly_P
Yes! so true! Beating a dead horse is more fun than you think! LOL
17
posted on
11/19/2003 5:52:55 AM PST
by
buffyt
(Can you say President Hillary? Me Neither!!!!)
To: kattracks
Log Cabin Republicans are "pleased with the (Massachusetts Supreme Court) ruling" and believe the issue to be "strictly a civil issue that will protect all families in America," according to Mead. Karl Rove's replacement for the Religious Right. After all Dick Morris claims that Arnold's election proves that republicans no longer need the religious right, so they can just dump them.
When this is over the Religious Right will have some soul searching to do.
18
posted on
11/19/2003 7:29:09 AM PST
by
itsahoot
(The lesser of two evils, is evil still...Alan Keyes)
To: TonyRo76
I believe the LCR's are a 5th-column attempting to destroy the party from within. We don't need their help, we're doing just fine all by ourselves.
19
posted on
11/19/2003 7:31:38 AM PST
by
itsahoot
(The lesser of two evils, is evil still...Alan Keyes)
To: kattracks
"The past is a really good predictor of the future. When we ran a culture war campaign led by Pat Buchanan in 1992, we lost, and we handed the White House to Bill Clinton and Hillary Clinton for eight years," Mead told CNSNews.com. President Bush's approval rating had fallen below 40% well before Pat Buchanan made his culture-war comments. While Buchanan's primary challenge certainly didn't help Bush, it's a real stretch to say that's why he lost.
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-29 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson