Marriage Ruling Causes Dems 'Heartburn,' Analyst Says

CNSNEWS.com ^ | 11/19/03 | Marc Morano

[BibChr]

So a court defines a particular act of sexual perversion as "marriage." And that is supposed to make it so.

Do you think I can get a court to define Breyer's ice cream, chocolate chip cookies, Oreos, and sourdough bread as low-carb, so I can eat all I want without gaining weight?

Dan

[Steely Tom]

I heard Nina Totenberg's story about the Massachusetts court's decision this morning on NPR. Most of her coverage consisted of crowing about it, but buried among her quotes of various activists and advocates, she reported that an unnamed democrat campaign strategist had described the ruling as "nothing but trouble." Understatement of the day.

(steely)

[shhrubbery!]

So a court defines a particular act of sexual perversion as "marriage." And that is supposed to make it so.

Exactly right. It is the very definition of the word marriage that is being destroyed here.

It is clear that the Left is again up to its old tricks, forcing revolutionary social change by inundating the public with a literally nonsensical idea, "gay marriage," by repeating that phrase over and over and over again.

It is Goebbels's Big Lie technique: Keep repeating the lie, and eventually the public will accept it.

The lie is that there can be any such thing as "gay marriage."

It makes just as much sense to say "orange mathematics" or "oligarchic democracy" as to say "gay marriage."

But with the Left's willing accomplices in the media, and the Left's indoctrination of the masses through public schools, we are having this absurd abomination forced down our throats. (Figuratively, at least.)

[BibChr]

Good points.

Even more, it's like saying "dry water."

If it's dry, it's not water. And if it's water, it's not dry.

Similarly, if it's homosexual, it's not marriage.

And if it's marriage, it's not homosexual.

Dan

[MissAmericanPie]

Chickens are coming home to roost for both parties over this issue. The demoncrats will only look rediculous attempting to parse the difference between civil union and marriage.

[shhrubbery!]

Know how pro-abortionists have persuaded the media to say, "so-called partial-birth abortion," or "what opponents call partial birth abortion" ?

We should launch a media-awareness campaign to get the media to say "so called gay marriage."

It's probably too late, though. If we'd done that ten years ago we might have been successful, but the nonsensical phrase "gay marriage" is already ingrained in the culture.

[BibChr]

Another really great point.

Washington Times, as I recall, puts it in quotation marks: gay "marriage."

Of course, if I had my way, it'd be "gay" "marriage" -- since neither term is apt.

Dan

[Blood of Tyrants]

I don't know why it is a problem with the Rats. After all, they KNEW what endorsing the homo lifestyle eventually meant (mainly because we have been telling them for over 20 years).

[onyx]

Reaping what they've sown. LOL! What's next? Why reparations of course. Gotta cater to their voting blocks.