Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: RadioAstronomer
I know caseless rounds have been experimented with before. Does anyone know if that is still a good idea? I think it would be less weight and bulk for the infantryman.

They've been pretty much put on the shelf as no one appreciated the amount of heat exiting the weapon along with the spent case during development. Caseless had cook-off problems.

82 posted on 11/22/2003 4:47:15 PM PST by Woahhs
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 36 | View Replies ]


To: Woahhs
Thanks. I had not realised this until this thread. But it sure makes sense.
83 posted on 11/22/2003 4:51:47 PM PST by RadioAstronomer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 82 | View Replies ]

To: Woahhs; FreedomPoster; Eaker
I know caseless rounds have been experimented with before. Does anyone know if that is still a good idea? I think it would be less weight and bulk for the infantryman.

They've been pretty much put on the shelf as no one appreciated the amount of heat exiting the weapon along with the spent case during development. Caseless had cook-off problems.

As well as problems with extraction/ejection of unfired rounds when a caseless round had been chambered but it was not necessary to fire, and it was washed to unload the weapon without firing it.

There are still some interesting caseless ammunition applications going on in the fields of submachineguns and shotguns. But insofar as the infantryman's primary rifle, the ammunition technology is not developed to that extent yet.

86 posted on 11/22/2003 5:15:41 PM PST by archy (Angiloj! Mia kusenveturilo estas plena da angiloj!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 82 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson