The Perverted State Of America

Toogood Reports ^ | 11/25/03 | Allan C. Stover

[My2Cents]

As with abortion, the slippery slope into perversion is being pursued through the courts. This is the #1 reason to re-elect Pres. Bush next year, and to send a large number of newly elected Republican Senators to Washington -- to remake the judiciary.

[LiteKeeper]

read later

[Protagoras]

Or the Supreme Court endorsing sodomy?

That didn't happen. Credibilty went out the window early.

[Centurion2000]

bump

[weegee]

The Supreme Court certainly didn't hold up privacy rights when they made their decision. Drugs laws and prostitution laws still hold.

Consenting adults are not permitted to pay for sexual services yet as we are learning with the norming of "age of consent" for homosexuals and heterosexual, we aren't even talking about consenting "adults" (minors aged 16 and 17 are legally consenting to have same sex relations with persons over 18, even younger minors in states that have "Romeo & Juliet" or "Romeo & Romeo" exceptions to statutory rape laws).

[Old Sarge]

A very good idea that won't ever happen.

[Protagoras]

They didn't endorse sodomy.

[EdReform]

Bump & Ping

[weegee]

They said that their decision didn't legitimize any other acts between consenting adults in private (including other sex acts). The only "private" act endorsed by the activist judges WAS sodomy.

[oust the louse]

Boy,when put on paper like that to see and think deeper about it...it makes you really disgusted...I hope.

I sure hope we have enough sense to get our Judiciary in that we need to uphold some sanity in this wacked out version we call society.Otherwise the future looks bleak from a morality standpoint for my children and thiers as well.I wonder what my Grandma and Grandpa would be thinking now if they were alive?

[weegee]

Putting government in charge of morality is like putting pedophiles in charge of children

Ah yes, life is so much better under the Anarchists' model. No gods no masters, eh?

[Protagoras]

No one endorsed any activity. And you know it.

[weegee]

A friend who works for a university told me that a male employee took a leave of absence to change his sex. When he/she returned, complete with panty hose and makeup, the issue of bathroom usage came up. The men didn't want him/her in their bathroom, and he/she didn't want to use it either. The women didn't want someone they had known as a man to use their bathroom. In a typical case of official wimping out, the university built him/her an exclusive bathroom.

That's not all. Transvestites are lumped together with transexuals as members of transgender identity (crisis, the forgotten word).

If that man never had the sex change but simply wore women's clothes he would still be able to argue for use of the bathroom that meets the sexual identity of his chosen fetish. We are born naked, there is no genetic component to wearing clothes of the opposite sex. It is fashion and nothing else.

Extending the argument, he could still argue for use of the women's facilities if all he wore were panties and a bra or pantyhose under his street clothes. He might not even need to wear such clothes if his mental "identity" was that of a female.

[Protagoras]

Ah yes, life is so much better under the Anarchists' model. No gods no masters, eh?

Off topic attack on anyone who disagrees with you is a sure sign of an arrested development.

I guess you want a flame war. Grow up son.

[weegee]

Off topic to discuss your tagline? Just points to a side of your argument.

If the framework of civilization (government) is not fit to enforce (moral) law, then no one is. Unfortunately for you, that is not true of the history of this country (even the founding fathers).

[microgood]

Ah yes, life is so much better under the Anarchists' model. No gods no masters, eh?

Government may be your god and your master...but not mine. Someone else has that job.

[weegee]

Anarchists don't believe in God or god. No gods no masters.

Government would be a "master" in their worldview.

[Protagoras]

Off topic. A personal attack by a twit who can't make a valid point. Grow up son.

[EagleMamaMT]

Read later.