To: dep
I just saw this on Special Report. Where is the focus on what is IN the memos? That is very important.
2 posted on
11/25/2003 4:02:12 PM PST by
mathluv
To: mathluv
i couldn't agree more, especially in this case. leaking for its own sake is not a good thing, but there is a qualitative test that needs to be applied. in this case, i think the test is met.
5 posted on
11/25/2003 4:04:16 PM PST by
dep
(Ense Petit Placidam Sub Libertate Qvietem)
To: mathluv
If this is the staffer that leaked the memos, he should be awarded the Congressional Medal of Freedom. His good works exposed the Dem Party for what they really are...
RATS!
To: mathluv
Let's keep in mind that Hannity was practically begging to be subpoenaed, while dropping the most thinly veiled hints possible that it wasn't a Republican that leaked that memo to him. My guess is this guy has been suspended for a completely different incident.
24 posted on
11/25/2003 4:10:39 PM PST by
Timesink
(I'm not a big fan of electronic stuff, you know? Beeps ... beeps freak me out. They're bad.)
To: mathluv
"Where is the focus on what is IN the memos? That is very important."
==
Exactly -- if this had been the other way around, having unearthed Republican improprieties, he would be hailed as a hero whistleblower.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson