Free Republic
Browse · Search
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Mass. won't OK nonresident gays to wed
AP | 11/27/03 | JENNIFER PETER

Posted on 11/27/2003 1:57:41 AM PST by kattracks

BOSTON (AP) The shores of Cape Cod and vistas of the Berkshires have long been the backdrop for out-of-state couples exchanging "I do's."

But same-sex partners who aren't from Massachusetts shouldn't pack their bags with the idea that last week's gay marriage decision means a walk down the aisle for them, too.

Massachusetts law does not allow nonresidents to get married if the union would not be legal in the state where they live. Only the Bay State has legalized gay marriage.

"Certainly, you couldn't just come to Massachusetts and say, 'Hey, I want to get married,'" said Paul Martinek, editor of Lawyers Weekly USA. "My reading is that it's not going to be easy unless the clerks aren't diligent and don't check to see where people are residing."

Though Gov. Mitt Romney and several lawmakers are trying to use a court-imposed 180-day waiting period to pass a civil union law, which would convey the benefits of marriage without the title, many legal experts believe Massachusetts, come mid-May, will host the first same-sex weddings in the United States.

"Couples are going to come to Massachusetts to get married for the same reason they went to Vermont to get civil unions and to Canada to get married, because marriage is such an important right," said Josh Friedes of the Freedom to Marry Coalition of Massachusetts.

Whether the Massachusetts marriages would be recognized in other jurisdictions is in question because of the Defense of Marriage Acts adopted by 37 other states and the federal government.

According to legal experts, Massachusetts' restriction on out-of-state residents was placed out of respect for nearby states, which might have different age restrictions or other limitations on marriage. It is rarely invoked because most states have uniform marriage laws.

Determining whether someone lives in Massachusetts, though, is murky process that probably would be left to the city or town clerk.

There is nothing in state law that defines residency as it pertains to marriage, according to legal observers. A couple therefore must only indicate that they are residents and intend to remain residents.

It is unclear what would happen if the day after the marriage, their intentions change and they return to the state they came from.

Plymouth Town Clerk Laurence Pizer, past president of the Massachusetts Town Clerk Association, said he would take a couples' word.

"History says that it's not our job to sleuth," Pizer said. "It's our job to accept oaths."

A clerk could be fined if he or she authorized a same-sex marriage knowing the two parties weren't Massachusetts residents, Pizer said.

Since Vermont approved civil unions in 2000, about two-thirds of the couples who have taken their vows have been from out-of-state.

Vermont lawmakers specifically rejected a provision that would have invalidated any same-sex union of a couple from a state that did not recognize such unions.

Beyond the legal technicalities, gay couples are likely to come to Massachusetts for ? at the very least ? the symbolism of marriage. Gay Connecticut couples will be headed north to tie the knot, said officials of the Connecticut-based Love Makes a Family.

TOPICS: Culture/Society; Front Page News; News/Current Events; US: Massachusetts
KEYWORDS: goodridge; homosexualagenda; mittromney; prisoners; samesexmarriage

1 posted on 11/27/2003 1:57:41 AM PST by kattracks
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: kattracks; MeeknMing; potlatch; nopardons; PhilDragoo
Boycott Vermont

Boycott Massachusetts

Hit 'em in the wallet

No business, no tourism

48 other states, who need 'em?

I'll never visit them, buy from them, sell to them
2 posted on 11/27/2003 2:04:05 AM PST by autoresponder (<html><center><img src="" width="450"></center></html>)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: autoresponder
Amen! Me and all my family will also Boycott.
3 posted on 11/27/2003 2:08:28 AM PST by gakrak
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: autoresponder
Boycott? No problemo!

BUT...Dontcha get it? This will bring all the Hardcore Kennedy fans 'home' to roost, just so they can get the paper. HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAAHA! Serves 'em right. LOL!

4 posted on 11/27/2003 3:09:50 AM PST by Smokin' Joe
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: kattracks
What's the big deal here? I always thought Mass. was full of gays anyways. Maybe if we let them try to breed they will die out. < / sad sence of humor>
5 posted on 11/27/2003 3:10:46 AM PST by milan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: kattracks
If I understand the subtext of this article, it's that gays from other states will go to Massachusetts to make false oaths and execute fradulent marriages in violation of state law.

This isn't at all surprising given the fundamentally ugly and false premise of gay "marriage."

The criminal statues of Massachusetts cover perjury in other areas where residency is required (e.g., perjury on the voter residency oath is $10,000 and imprisonment of up to five years, or both).

6 posted on 11/27/2003 3:26:15 AM PST by angkor
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: kattracks
Wonder why Mass thinks it is OK to discriminate against out of state citizens?
7 posted on 11/27/2003 3:38:23 AM PST by Always Right
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Smokin' Joe; gakrak; MeeknMing
I selectively boycott San Francisco (Willie Brown dem/lib/gay mandates), Vermont (Turncoat Jeffords), Massachusetts (Teddy), Rhode Island (RINO!), and various ultra-lib areas and cities in the USA.

Will not order from or sell to them period. These places actually end up costing more to deal with and libs always have the highest taxes.

Avoid NYC too although close to me.

Gay agenda has caused me to filter out any gay lefties; I will not buy from them, will not shop where they obviously work. I know I canot screen them all out, but I do most. Free association.

Press your leftie agendas as pay the price. I turn down business fron lefties all the time; most are not worth the trouble and are bad clients with a scam in mind.

Too many great people out there to deal with; why deal with socialist rabble and liberal troublemakers.

Nothing worse then a white liberal in a business transaction. Corruption runs deep. Plan on it.
8 posted on 11/27/2003 3:39:15 AM PST by autoresponder (<html><center><img src="" width="450"></center></html>)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: milan
Maybe if we let them try to breed they will die out.

Most of them end up dying in the attempt.

9 posted on 11/27/2003 5:12:12 AM PST by Agnes Heep
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: autoresponder; *Homosexual Agenda

10 posted on 11/27/2003 7:21:04 AM PST by MeekOneGOP (George Soros "MINOB":
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Always Right
This is outrageous! Such mean-spirited intolerance! Please, someone notify the ACLU so that a class action discrimination lawsuit can be filed immediately.
11 posted on 11/27/2003 9:41:26 AM PST by reagandemocrat (from a Proud Recallian)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794 is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson