Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Republicans get over 'Mediscare'
Chicago Sun Times ^ | November 30, 2003 | JON FRANDSEN

Posted on 11/30/2003 7:52:59 AM PST by RJCogburn

Is ''Mediscare'' dead?

The term was coined by Republicans who angrily believe Democrats have tried to frighten seniors into thinking that GOP lawmakers have only slightly more use for Medicare than they would for something they might scrape off their shoes.

But Republicans are now confident that enacting a new and long-sought prescription drug benefit under the government-run Medicare health insurance program for seniors will make them close to bulletproof during the 2004 presidential and congressional elections.

''It is an advantage,'' said Senate Majority Leader Bill Frist (R-Tenn.), ''because we were able to accomplish what Democrats have talked about for a long time.''

Democrats believe the bill is nothing less than an attempt to undermine Medicare. A new scare campaign is exactly what many Democrats have in mind.

''We're going to fight it next year. We're going to fight it in the congressional elections, and we're going to fight it in the presidential elections,'' vowed Sen. Edward Kennedy (D-Mass.).

But fighting over Medicare with 30-second campaign sound bites is difficult because the issue is so complex. Finding broad themes that resonate with voters is crucial.

''Who is the best salesman? Who makes the case to seniors better?'' asked Amy Walter, an analyst with the nonpartisan Cook Political Report.

She cautioned that the importance of Medicare as an issue would depend largely on what weighs most heavily on voters' minds and whether Iraq and the economy dominate the scene.

Republican pollster David Winston said health care is almost always a key issue to at least some voters, and the Medicare passage could help the GOP eat into the Democrats' usual advantage on health care.

But Carroll Doherty of the Pew Research Center for the People & the Press said voters tend to view Medicare as a retirement issue, not a health care one.

'We're acting'

Doherty and Winston agree the political impact of the bill may have less to do with the issue than with making the GOP look effective.

''The bottom line is that more seniors will have access to prescription drugs and those drugs will be more affordable. The American people were looking for progress ... and that's genuine progress,'' Winston said.

Doherty said, ''The Republicans have delivered on a huge issue.''

In heralding passage of the Medicare bill, President Bush made clear that he believed he was on the verge of putting a dependable Democratic boogeyman to rest.

''Year after year, the problems in the Medicare system were studied and debated. And yet, nothing was done. As a matter of fact, they used to call Medicare 'Mediscare' for people in the political process. Some said Medicare reform could never be done,'' Bush said in Las Vegas. ''For the sake of our seniors, we've gotten something done. We're acting.''

Democrats are hoping the aura of accomplishment will tarnish as people absorb details of the bill.

They point out that the primary benefit does not take effect until 2006. They also note that it is far less generous, except for low-income seniors and those with high drug costs, than many seniors had hoped. Democrats say reform measures in the bill are just the first step toward privatizing Medicare, a term that worries many recipients.

A revolt?

The ultimate Democratic aim is to create a backlash along the lines of what happened with a so-called catastrophic health plan passed by Congress in 1988. Seniors disliked the mandatory premiums associated with that plan so much that Congress was forced to repeal the law less than a year later.

''We have to see if members are going home and being beat over the head with this,'' said Walter. ''I think it could be a problem. Seniors want something, and they want it now. What are they going to say when they see they won't get much and they won't get that until 2006?''

Rep. Jeff Flake (R-Ariz.), who opposed the bill because of its cost, said he fears the worst.

''It is obviously bad policy, but it is bad politics, as well,'' he said. ''When seniors understand how cumbersome this thing is, they will be very disappointed. And they will blame those who passed it.''

Flake and other GOP conservatives also raised another concern: How would Republican gloating about a huge expansion of a government entitlement go over with the conservative base?

Rep. Mike Pence (R-Ind.), who turned down personal appeals from Bush to support the bill, said, ''It will be very troubling to the Republican base. Our voters sent us here to be different.''


TOPICS: Government; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: medicarereform
''It is an advantage,'' said Senate Majority Leader Bill Frist (R-Tenn.), ''because we were able to accomplish what Democrats have talked about for a long time.''

Only in Bushbotland would Repubs think that's a good thing.

1 posted on 11/30/2003 7:53:00 AM PST by RJCogburn
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: RJCogburn
"It is an advantage," said Senate Majority Leader Bill Frist (R-Tenn.), "because we were able to accomplish what Democrats have talked about for a long time."

I wonder if Frist realized how that would look in print at the time he made the statement. That's a world-class slip...

2 posted on 11/30/2003 7:57:29 AM PST by NittanyLion
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: RJCogburn
Why do Republicans try to win by buying votes? Don't they know the Democrats have decades more experience at that?
3 posted on 11/30/2003 8:00:21 AM PST by Joe Bonforte
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: RJCogburn
Newt Gingrich wrote an interesting column on the Medicare Bill
4 posted on 11/30/2003 8:08:11 AM PST by Ben Ficklin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Joe Bonforte
Hello. This Medicare bill is going to backfire sooner or later, and will hurt the Economy and Fiscal Policy; in few years taxes will be incremented. The effect of this bill is "More Government", and moving to socialism. Who would think it ? The Russians are trying to get lower taxes moving to capitalism, and the US is moving to socialism.

Every conservative has to read the books written by Peter Drucker, specially the following ones:
Post-Capitalist Society.
Managing in a Time of Great Change.

Peter Drucker is an expert on management and leadership. After reading his books you will be happy to know that you are on the right side, on the conservative side. He predicts that when people realize the effects of more government the Democratic Party will die. I highly recommend that every conservative/republican reads his books.
5 posted on 11/30/2003 8:58:41 AM PST by Spartano
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: RJCogburn
Passage of the new Medicare prescription drug entitlement program is a clear political victory for the GOP. The question is, at what price?

During the 2000 campaign for POTUS, Bush`s original pricetag for reforming and modernizing Medicare, along with adding a limited, but market driven prescription drug component, was $158 billion. Today that 10-year cost has risen to over $400 and will probably double or triple before the time frame has run out.

I'm afraid the Congressional GOP and PresBush has created another layer onto the federal bureaucracy that is nothing more then a boondoggle and a waste of the taxpayers money.

6 posted on 11/30/2003 9:53:37 AM PST by Reagan Man (The few, the proud, the conservatives.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Reagan Man
The question is, at what price?

Higher payroll taxes for my generation later on down the road, less discretionary spending ablility within a decade, more illegal immigration as more people attempt to enter the US to take advantage of this new benefit, and (forgive me for sounding like a paranoid kook) but possibly the first steps for nationalized medicine.

7 posted on 11/30/2003 10:05:05 AM PST by Sparta ("General" Wesley Strangelove "Let me start World War III, vote for me as president.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Sparta
>>> ... possibly the first steps for nationalized medicine.

Well, you know what happens when some folks get a taste of other people's money.

8 posted on 11/30/2003 10:13:16 AM PST by Reagan Man (The few, the proud, the conservatives.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: RJCogburn
Much of the bill is bad policy - but the general concept of helping low income seniors I do support. If we're going to continue the reform of Medicare, we certainly should help out parents and grandparents. Its our obligation to those who helped us. I regard the legislation the President received as simply the beginning of a process, not the final word on the future of Medicare. There's a lot more work ahead.
9 posted on 11/30/2003 10:18:24 AM PST by goldstategop (In Memory Of A Dearly Beloved Friend Who Lives On In My Heart Forever)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: goldstategop
Its our obligation to those who helped us.

Yes, my parents and grandparents certainly helped me. It is an obligation based on my respect and love.

Btw, it was they who helped me, not the government by way of them and my obligation is the same. The government is not part of my obligatory equation.

10 posted on 11/30/2003 11:00:42 AM PST by RJCogburn ("You've bested no one when you've bested a fool"........Texas Ranger LeBoeuf)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: AdmSmith; Berosus; bigheadfred; Convert from ECUSA; dervish; Ernest_at_the_Beach; Fred Nerks; ...

Note: this topic is from November 30, 2003.
11 posted on 02/08/2010 1:30:50 PM PST by SunkenCiv (Happy New Year! Freedom is Priceless.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson