Skip to comments.
Tidings of comfort & joy: 10 large charities that shine.
Forbes.Com ^
| 12.08.03 issue
| William P. Barrett
Posted on 12/03/2003 7:02:28 AM PST by yankeedame
Investment Guide
Genuinely Needy
William P. Barrett,
12.08.03
Our annual survey of 200 large charities picks 10 that shine.
We have once again surveyed 200 nonprofits and rated them on how efficiently they collect and distribute charity. A new feature this year: a gold-star list, identifying charities we think are worthy of your consideration. In alphabetical order:
American Kidney Fund: This charity defrays the unreimbursed portions of kidney dialysis treatment, such as medicine and transportation. Last year 42,000 low-income patients received an average $1,000 in grants, for a total of $41 million.
Big Brothers Big Sisters of America: This century-old agency, with 471 chapters nationwide, has found its niche: mentoring troubled children of single parents. With donations running strong, it has set an ambitious goal of serving 1 million kids in 2010--four times its present load.
Brother's Brother Foundation: Anesthesiologist Robert Hingson founded this nonprofit to run Third World immunization and health programs. Now headed by son Luke Hingson, BBF operates largely with donated material.
First Book: The simple goal: Give poor children their own first new book. This nonprofit gets volumes from publishers, then enlists local volunteers to hand them out. In two years it has distributed nearly 15 million books.
Heifer International: This hunger-fighting nonprofit arranges to give needy folk in 47 countries breeding animals--cows, chickens, water buffalo, even bees--plus training. The recipients agree to donate the first-born female to others.
International Rescue Committee: Started in 1933 to help those fleeing Hitler, the IRC is the grande dame of organizations assisting refugees and displaced persons. Recently, it has played a significant role in Kosovo and Afghanistan.
Juvenile Diabetes Research Foundation International: This charity states flatly that its goal is a cure for diabetes and its complications. Extremely efficient financially, this national single-illness research nonprofit pumps more than $100 million to scientists.
Marine Toys for Tots: Started by a Marine Corps reservist in 1947 to funnel toys to needy kids, this charity still operates with official Marine Corps support.
Northwest Medical Teams International: This medical relief group doesn't rely on clinics. It also makes house calls in disaster areas using mobile medical teams.
Salvation Army: Essentially its own religious movement, this helper of the down-and-out is the second-biggest gift recipient ($999 million) on our list. Meager salaries for officers and large numbers of volunteers help keep efficiencies very high and overhead low.
(Excerpt) Read more at forbes.com ...
TOPICS: Extended News; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: bigbrothers; bigsisters; charity; jdf; jdfbigsisters; salvationarmy
Hey, folks, take it easy. I didn't make up this list I just filtched it from the Fobes web site.
To: yankeedame
We always try to give something to the Salvation Army, it does more good with our donations than any other charity we've investigated over the years.
2
posted on
12/03/2003 7:17:03 AM PST
by
CatoRenasci
(Ceterum Censeo [Gallia][Germania][Arabia] Esse Delendam --- Select One or More as needed)
To: yankeedame
To: CatoRenasci
re: We always try to give something to the Salvation Army, it does more good with our donations than any other charity we've investigated over the years.)))
Dittoes bump. My personal favorite charity--I think it's the lack of sentimentality in their attitude.
Recently donated an old clunker--was told these generally go to single moms trying to get on their feet financially and need a way to work.
Excellent "panty" management, too.
4
posted on
12/03/2003 7:34:38 AM PST
by
Mamzelle
To: Mamzelle; CatoRenasci
ARGH! I meant PANTRY management!! (blush)
5
posted on
12/03/2003 7:36:03 AM PST
by
Mamzelle
To: CatoRenasci
Salvation Army: Essentially its own religious movement, this helper of the down-and-out is the second-biggest gift recipient ($999 million) on our list. Meager salaries for officers and large numbers of volunteers help keep efficiencies very high and overhead low.After 9/11, and the charity fiascoes uncovered by O'Reilly, I remember reading an article that listed the salaries of the CEO's of the Red Cross, United Way and Salvation Army.
I remember that the Red Cross and United Way were paying high 6-figure salaries to their CEOs. The head of the Salvation Army was making something like 27 or 28,000 dollars.
That did it for me. It told me all I needed to know about who was actually doing "charity" work, and who had a nice career in the "charity business". I now put money in those little red buckets and know it's going to help someone other than the CEO. I believe, also, that this has to do with Red Cross and United Way people looking at their job as a career path, and the Salvation Army and the Catholic Services look at this work as a vocation. (The Catholic charities also gives a good bang for the buck.)
To: yankeedame
bump
7
posted on
12/03/2003 7:44:53 AM PST
by
VOA
To: yankeedame
Heifer International: This hunger-fighting nonprofit arranges to give needy folk in 47 countries breeding animals--cows, chickens, water buffalo, even bees--plus training. The recipients agree to donate the first-born female to others. Our son's Sunday School class is donating to Heifer this year, they are working to raise enough money to buy a cow I believe for a family in Africa. Definately a very true incarnation of "Teach a man to fish".
Salvation Army is definately the organization that I try to support.. 90%+ gets to the people in need, and they've been doing it for a long long time now.
To: yankeedame
Little know fact - as I understand it (and I might be wrong). After a disaster event, the Red Cross will bill the responsible government agency for all of the supplies used: coffee, donuts, etc. On the other hand, the Salvation Army, that usually arrives before the Red Cross, and almost always stays longer, does not bill anyone for anything.
To: LibertarianLiz
90%+ of money donated to the Salvation Army goes to those in need, not to marketing, or sales, or executives salaries or retirement funds or million dollar office suites or executives mistresses. It is as far as I can tell the most noble and honest of the big charaties and not suprisingly its founded on Christian principles.
To: LiteKeeper
Red Cross is a scam, always has been always will be. Go talk to some veterans of the Pacific Campaign in WWII... they actually charged the soldiers for coffee at their stations!
They are a charity in name only.
To: Mamzelle
ARGH! I meant PANTRY management!! (blush)Comment opportunities abound.... Nawwwww, too easy.... 8^}~
To: anniegetyourgun
Your first link was right on.
The second one, about the Heifer Project was less than explanatory.
It's not that I doubt your opinion, but I didn't find it justified at the link given.
To: yankeedame
Salvation Army! They and the local "Gospel Rescue Mission" (by whatever name) get our help-the-poor donations. (Note to Forbes: The Salvation Army is not "essentially its own religious movement"; it is a Christian denomination, just like Baptists or Lutherans.)
14
posted on
12/03/2003 8:21:14 AM PST
by
Tax-chick
(It's hard to see the rainbow through glasses dark as these.)
To: HamiltonJay
Some soldiers are reported to have actually paid the Red Cross for packages sent by parents to specific soldiers.
To: CatoRenasci
Salvation Army bttt
16
posted on
12/03/2003 8:28:40 AM PST
by
lodwick
( Wake up, America)
To: lodwick
"Salvation Army bttt" Would you care to offer a cogent comment?
To: yankeedame
We always give to the Salvation Army. I have some extra money to donate this year, and was looking around for additional recipients.
I am a lawyer, do a lot of pro bono for Legal Aid, and a lot of people in shelters and otherwise receiving charity don't really meet my standards as charity cases, like the lady with the Porsche who qualifies because it has no equity and she has no job. So I am a mite disgusted with what I percieve as milking the system.
I do like the idea of the Heifer Project, because it is not just money, but a way to make your own money.
To: CobaltBlue
Giving a pregnant cow is the essence of capitalist charity.
19
posted on
12/03/2003 9:00:19 AM PST
by
Doctor Stochastic
(Vegetabilisch = chaotisch is der Charakter der Modernen. - Friedrich Schlegel)
To: Veritas_est
Don't you imagine that Ben & Jerry's foundation is a heavy screener for liberal causes? I do. I also have some first-hand experience with this once fine organization that was born out of good intentions and great ideas. It has been overtaken by liberals, socialists, greens, and the religious left. Couldn't help but notice that the last job they filled in-house was for a "Director of Diversity" - and they aren't talking about the gene pool of their animal stock.
To: anniegetyourgun
Did I miss something on your Heifer project link? I was taken to a page of charities that the Ben and Jerry's foundation donates to. I'm sure all sorts of people I don't like have given to the same charities I have, so I'm not sure what that means about the Heifer project. Seems like a pretty good idea to me -- helping poor people start their own income-producing lines of work, rather than just take a hand-out.
21
posted on
12/03/2003 9:05:08 AM PST
by
laurav
To: Veritas_est; lodwick
Salvation Army bttt" Would you care to offer a cogent comment?
He did. "bttt" means "bump to the top," which is commonly used to keep the thread visible.
22
posted on
12/03/2003 9:09:52 AM PST
by
sinkspur
(Adopt a shelter dog or cat! You'll save one life, and maybe two!)
To: Veritas_est
..paid the Red Cross..Yes, my uncle who was in the service told me the same thing. He also said to never give a dime to Red Cross, give your donation to the Salvation Army.
23
posted on
12/03/2003 10:10:18 AM PST
by
MJemison
To: lodwick; sinkspur
"Salvation Army bttt"Would you care to offer a cogent comment?
Please forgive me for seeming rude. I am obviously a newbie, but I am trying to understand how this works. Thanks to all of you who take time to explain.
24
posted on
12/03/2003 12:08:19 PM PST
by
Veritas_est
(Truth is)
To: Veritas_est
You will probably getthis from someone else before I finish typing; BTTT is shorthand for Bump To The Top; it is not a disparaging phoneme.
To: anniegetyourgun
The Heifer project has turned into nothing more than a liberal cause in 'diversity' and is now populated by left-leaning zealots.Is there anything other than the fact that Ben & Jerry's donated to them that makes this so? My church works with them and they seem like a fine charity.
26
posted on
12/05/2003 1:04:05 PM PST
by
jmc813
(Help save a life - www.marrow.org)
To: yankeedame
A good friend of mine who was heavily involved in rescue operations and forensic investigation at the Pentagon, post Sept. 11, has naught but praise for the Salvation Army. His opinion of the Red Cross is not fit to be printed.
To: jmc813
My former church used to also contribute. See #20 above. I'm afraid I can't go into great detail, but am aware of how much the organization has been overtaken by leftists. There is not much left of the original Christian foundation in the organization - unless you are one who also considers The World Council of Churches to be a "Christian" organization.
To: Veritas_est
Welcome, newbie. You'll find there are a lot of good things to learn here--and many able teachers.
Onse more BTTT for the Salvation Army!
29
posted on
12/05/2003 1:14:58 PM PST
by
exit82
(Sound off to your elected reps in DC: Capitol switchboard toll free number 1-800-648-3516.)
To: Veritas_est
Welcome to FR!
To: HamiltonJay
You mention one of the criticisms that is often made against the Red Cross, and I have no doubt that it is true. I won't speak of the Red Cross today, but in regard to WWII there was another side of the picture that I also know was true. My father was a POW in the European theater for about a year, and he had nothing but the highest praise for what the Red Cross did for him. He credited his very survival to the parcels that they sent him. Those parcels kept him alive. He ate the foodstuff that was sent, and bartered the cigarettes for a bit more food. His normal weight was 160 pounds, and he weighed about 120 when he was liberated in April 1945. The Red Cross was the margin of survival for him. In a way, I wouldn't be writing this if it had not been for the Red Cross.
By the way, I have no particular love for the Red Cross of today. Insofar as they do a service for our active duty military some good is done, but I'm afraid that they are an overgrown bureaucracy
31
posted on
12/05/2003 1:29:11 PM PST
by
Cap Huff
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson