Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

U.S. Officials Fear Socks Represent New Way to Smuggle Bombs Aboard Planes
ABC News ^ | ABCNEWS Investigative Unit

Posted on 12/05/2003 4:14:37 PM PST by freeperfromnj

A New Tactic?

Dec. 5— Authorities in the United Kingdom are examining a pair of blue socks, which they believe contain key components of an improved explosive device that could be used in future terrorist airline hijackings, intelligence sources told ABCNEWS.

Intelligence officials believe the socks were designed to be filled with explosives and tethered and worn around a potential bomber's neck, a source told ABCNEWS. With the explosives concealed in this fashion, a bomber could gain access to an aircraft and assemble the improvised device once on board.

The socks were seized during the Nov. 20 arrest of Sajid Badat, 24, in Gloucester, England. British authorities have charged Badat with conspiring with would-be "shoe bomber" Richard Reid in an explosives plot.

Reid was sentenced to life in prison in the United States for attempting to detonate explosives concealed in one of his shoes during an American Airlines flight from Paris to Miami in December 2001. Badat is also accused of "unlawfully and maliciously" possessing explosives with intent to endanger life or damage property.

Forensic evaluation of the socks by British police revealed traces of several explosives, including TNT, PETN and RDX.

A Department of Homeland Security bulletin circulated Wednesday to aviation authorities in numerous U.S. jurisdictions said: "The socks, which were held together with a string, appeared to be elongated as if they were stretched out from carrying something.

"While it is not clear exactly in what capacity the individual may have been using the socks, it is possible the suspect may have been suspending the socks from around his/her neck or under outer garments in an effort to conceal explosives carried in them," said the bulletin. "It also cannot be discounted that these tethered socks were components of an improvised explosive device in the making. "

An additional bulletin, the FBI weekly circular to law enforcement, warned that recent intelligence "indicates that terrorists continue to develop plans to hijack aircraft and use them as weapons" despite improved security and vigilance since the Sept. 11, 2001, attacks.

"Intelligence indicates terrorists are considering the use of improvised explosive devices (IEDs) assembled on board to hijack an aircraft, or, alternatively, destroy it over heavily populated areas in the event of passenger or crew resistance," the FBI bulletin said.

According to sources, there has been increased discussion in the intelligence community this week concerning the use of explosives that a would-be attacker could wear on board an airplane and then assemble into a bomb. U.S. authorities reportedly are meeting in Britain with British counterintelligence officials to review whether Badat and his suspected device may have had any possible connection to New York and the northeastern United States.

Past Incidents of Using Carry-On Explosives

The recent seizure is of great concern because al Qaeda terrorists have in the past used, or tried to use, carry-on explosives to evade airport security.

Al Qaeda terrorist Ramzi Yousef successfully detonated a bomb on board a Philippine Airlines flight in December 1994. He constructed the bomb in an aircraft lavatory from components smuggled in his clothing and carry-on items. The explosion killed a Japanese tourist and blew a hole in the fuselage of the plane, but the plane landed safely. Yousef was later convicted for his role in the 1993 World Trade Center bombing.

Another al Qaeda operative, Ahmed Ressam, who was convicted of plotting to attack the Los Angeles International Airport during the 2000 millennium celebrations, had attempted to conceal components of a device inside shampoo and medicine bottles.

These incidents, and others, suggest terrorist operatives believe they have a greater chance of getting past airport security if they conceal the explosives and other bomb components separately, rather than as a fully assembled bomb.

The FBI this week warned authorities: "Components of IEDs can be smuggled onto an aircraft, concealed in either clothing or personal carry-on items such as shampoo and medicine bottles, and assembled onboard. In many cases of suspicious passenger activity, incidents have taken place in the aircraft's forward lavatory. It is conceivable terrorists may plan to use this private area to construct IEDs in order to facilitate access to the cockpit, or position themselves in front of passengers."


TOPICS: Front Page News; United Kingdom; War on Terror
KEYWORDS: airlinesecurity; badat; bomb; hijack; ied; islam; jihad; petn; rdx; reid; ressam; shoebomber; sockbomb; socks; terror; terrorist; tnt; yousef
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-60 next last

1 posted on 12/05/2003 4:14:37 PM PST by freeperfromnj
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Calpernia; JustPiper; tubavil; Cindy; appalachian_dweller; LayoutGuru2; LikeLight; Sabertooth; ...
FYI
2 posted on 12/05/2003 4:21:10 PM PST by freeperfromnj
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: freeperfromnj
Plastique could be shaped and painted to look like almost anything. Raising the alarm over this has to bring a chuckle to true terrorists, doing their work for them.

What is that?
-A cordless optical mouse
Okay, seems to work as it should
-Ahh, don't right-click . . .

3 posted on 12/05/2003 4:21:10 PM PST by RightWhale (Close your tag lines)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Comment #4 Removed by Moderator

To: freeperfromnj
The FBI this week warned authorities: "Components of IEDs can be smuggled onto an aircraft, concealed in either clothing..."

Clothing must be banned from passenger aircraft.

That's right, from now on, all passengers must travel in the nude.

Homeland Security should also require body cavity searches to insure that no explosive material is taken aboard an aircraft.

5 posted on 12/05/2003 4:32:44 PM PST by vox humana
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: vox humana
"That's right, from now on, all passengers must travel in the nude."

When I think back to some of the people I've had to sit next to, I think this would mean the end of my traveling days.
6 posted on 12/05/2003 4:35:58 PM PST by diamondjoe
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: freeperfromnj
Gives new meaning to "blow your socks off".
7 posted on 12/05/2003 4:36:12 PM PST by LurkedLongEnough (Oh no, I won't leave no stone un-turned...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: freeperfromnj
"It's the old 'Exploding Socks' Trick."

/Maxwell Smart
8 posted on 12/05/2003 4:37:01 PM PST by Riley
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: freeperfromnj
"U.S. authorities reportedly are meeting in Britain with British counterintelligence officials to review whether Badat and his suspected device may have had any possible connection to New York and the northeastern United States."

Does this seem like one of those "there's more here than meets the eye" pieces of info? Why the specific info about New York and "the northeastern United States?" Strange.
9 posted on 12/05/2003 4:37:10 PM PST by diamondjoe
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: seamole
Let's just build a separate global air transportation network--just for people who fit the terrorist "profile".

We already have the security in place. Little old ladies and WASP businessmen get the terrorist profile treatment. Anyone that looks like Osama or Arafat gets a free pass by the Transportation Insecurity Agency.

10 posted on 12/05/2003 4:37:20 PM PST by Young Rhino (http://www.artofdivorce.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: vox humana
This means no more "Mr Happy Sock!"

Whats the world coming to..




**Mr Happy Sock is a description we used during barracks inspections for..well...you know...
11 posted on 12/05/2003 4:37:25 PM PST by Stopislamnow (Islam-Founded by Evil, and thriving on death. Just like the modern democrats.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: freeperfromnj
U.S. Officials Fear Socks Represent New Way to Smuggle Bombs Aboard Planes

Solution: Maditory strip searches for Socks the cat.

12 posted on 12/05/2003 4:37:29 PM PST by 11th Earl of Mar
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: seamole
There are so many soft targets they could hit using the same technique but they are so be obsessed with taking down planes.
13 posted on 12/05/2003 4:39:06 PM PST by freeperfromnj
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Stopislamnow
Sock puppets, revolt!
14 posted on 12/05/2003 4:39:50 PM PST by LurkedLongEnough (Oh no, I won't leave no stone un-turned...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: freeperfromnj
U.S. Officials Fear Socks Represent New Way to Smuggle Bombs Aboard Planes

It's sad to hear that he has turned evil:


15 posted on 12/05/2003 4:41:04 PM PST by Ichneumon
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: vox humana
Clothing must be banned from passenger aircraft. That's right, from now on, all passengers must travel in the nude.


16 posted on 12/05/2003 4:42:25 PM PST by Ichneumon
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: freeperfromnj
Gives new meaning to

Blow your socks off!

17 posted on 12/05/2003 4:43:27 PM PST by Salvation (†With God all things are possible.†)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: freeperfromnj
They need to profile the passengers like Israel does not the socks.
18 posted on 12/05/2003 4:54:46 PM PST by Dialup Llama
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: freeperfromnj
Trace Detectors Work! The cited (1994) case was well before the mass deployment of the checkpoint ETD. The bad news is that the current protocol does not require a 100% sample, to avoid further delaying the traveling public.

Here's a "liberty vs. security" question for you. Is it worth the 30 seconds per passenger (assuming the sampling is done by a well-trained Federal operator [LOL]) to stop this threat dead...er, completely?
19 posted on 12/05/2003 5:14:17 PM PST by j_tull
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: freeperfromnj; FairOpinion; Pro-Bush; BagCamAddict; ganeshpuri89; pokerbuddy0; cgk; Sabertooth; ...
FYI BumPing!
20 posted on 12/05/2003 5:16:04 PM PST by JustPiper (Teach the Children to fight Liberalism ! They will be voting in 2008 !!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-60 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson