Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

THE HILLARY CLINTON STORY YOU SHOULD NEVER FORGET -- Children at the Hospital
American Spectator | March 1997

Posted on 12/05/2003 6:52:50 PM PST by doug from upland

(Story originally appreared in the American Spectator, March 97)

It seems that Hillary, who's had her fingerprints found on all the new scandals that are breaking on a daily basis is trying to fix her public image.

So, to promote the new effort, showing how deeply Hillary cares about children, especially sick children in hospitals, Georgetown University Medical Center in Washington got a call. Hillary Clinton would be coming over soon with children's author Maurice Sendak. Hillary's advance team would be showing up arranging the security and logistics. The team did show up. What they saw horrified them.

The kids in the hospital children's ward really looked sick! Some of them had tubes sticking out. Some had lost their hair to chemotherapy. Some were groggy because of the pain killers they had to take.

Hospital officials were quickly told this would not do. Hillary would look bad in a newspaper photo if she posed with sickly looking children. They were told. "No children that look drowsy, skip bald kids, sick looking kids, or kids with tubes sticking out."

So here's what the hospital actually did. They outfitted a hospital conference room with toys and kids decorations. They ordered hospital staff members to bring in their healthy children who would pose as sick children in photos with the great St. Hillary.

So, on January 10th, Hillary Clinton showed up to Georgetown University Medical Center and read to a bunch of kids with author Maurice Sendak. Had you read the papers or heard the news the next day, you might have been bowled over by her compassion. Actually she demonstrated the opposite. You see the real sick kids, who were originally told they would be visited by the first lady were originally extremely happy and excited at the prospect of her visit.

When they were later told, they were too sick looking to be with the great Hillary, some became deeply depressed. After all how would anyone feel not being good enough for Ms. compassion herself.

Of course the press published the photos of Hillary reading to the cute kids the next day. They just forgot to tell you that Hillary, in the quest of the perfect photo could not bring herself to be photographed with an actual sick child.

The phony mask of compassion that Hillary hides behind has slipped once again. Just around Purim time too!


TOPICS: Crime/Corruption; Culture/Society; Government; News/Current Events; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: ankle; children; evilwitch; hipocriteopotamus; hospital; sick
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 101-103 next last
To: doug from upland
How do you smoke the clinton worshippers out so fast.

It only took 4 posts for you to get this one.
21 posted on 12/05/2003 7:19:25 PM PST by sport
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: CalvaryJohn
"I'm not buying every wild allegation"

I'm with you. NewsMax used to be a very UNreliable source. They have improved but this was 1997. I'm dubious.

22 posted on 12/05/2003 7:21:09 PM PST by groanup (Whom the market gods humble they first make proud.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: All
For the naysayers, does anyone have a hard copy of the March 1997 American Spectator?
23 posted on 12/05/2003 7:25:24 PM PST by doug from upland (Hillary would get 100% of the Islamist Terrorist vote)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: doug from upland
I wonder if the kids were allowed to look Mrs. Clinton in the eyes or were they told to look away, like White House staff.
24 posted on 12/05/2003 7:31:38 PM PST by Tymesup
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: doug from upland
This story needs to be on the front page of every newspaper!
25 posted on 12/05/2003 7:32:08 PM PST by Salvation (†With God all things are possible.†)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: 11B3
ANKLE Alert!

Correction...those are actually called Cancles, where your calves and your ankles are the same. :)
26 posted on 12/05/2003 7:37:19 PM PST by BriarBey
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: Tymesup
You can't look at her in the eyes--very bad things will happen if you do. Someone post the Medusa pic.
27 posted on 12/05/2003 7:46:38 PM PST by beaversmom
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: doug from upland
...Of course the ...forgot to tell you ...

Just like the mag that was preparing to name Bill and Hill America's Most Romantic Couple in their Valentine's Day issue. Too bad Monicagate interfered! ROTFLMAO!

28 posted on 12/05/2003 7:48:58 PM PST by Jeff Chandler (Chilling Effect-1, Global Warming-0)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: doug from upland
Yesterday, I didn't think my revulsion of the Clinton's could by magnified. But as a person with cancer, I am even more repulsed by Hillary after reading this article.
29 posted on 12/05/2003 7:58:01 PM PST by reed_inthe_wind
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: doug from upland
I hate her so much.

There, I said it again!

Bill and Hillary Clinton are our national curse.
They just won't go away.
30 posted on 12/05/2003 8:03:55 PM PST by ladyinred (The Left have blood on their hands!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: doug from upland
I am prepared to think the worst of the bitch but can you cite any references? It sounds like an urban legend to me.
31 posted on 12/05/2003 8:06:01 PM PST by muir_redwoods
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: BriarBey
lol
32 posted on 12/05/2003 8:08:25 PM PST by meanie monster
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: muir_redwoods
I found several sources which referenced the AMERICAN SPECTATOR article in March 1997. I don't think the A.S. is still being published or I would search its archives. Surely, a FReeper somewhere must have it in his/her library archives.
33 posted on 12/05/2003 8:17:37 PM PST by doug from upland (Hillary would get 100% of the Islamist Terrorist vote)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies]

To: doug from upland
I don't understand why it would look bad to pose with really sick or sick looking children, wouldn't that look compassionate?
34 posted on 12/05/2003 8:23:24 PM PST by Contra
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: muir_redwoods
Phyllis Schafly reported it here ---
http://texaseagle.org/torch/04-97.html

Reported here, referencing the WASHINGTON TIMES OF 2-19-97 --
http://www.all.org/communique/cq970307.htm

35 posted on 12/05/2003 8:24:51 PM PST by doug from upland (Hillary would get 100% of the Islamist Terrorist vote)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies]

To: Contra
Same mindset that had her not serving the troops while Dubya did.
36 posted on 12/05/2003 8:25:25 PM PST by squidly
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies]

To: doug from upland
bttt
37 posted on 12/05/2003 8:26:43 PM PST by Lancey Howard
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: doug from upland
Can you imagine the kind of people who serve on Hillary's staff? How does she find people who have absolutely no shame or self-esteem to fetch for her? I mean, they have to be scumbags too, right?
38 posted on 12/05/2003 8:29:51 PM PST by Lancey Howard
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Lancey Howard
Those who work for her are true believers or just plain scum. Who else would the Clintons hire for head of WH security besides Craig Livingstone, former bar bouncer. The people around them are as slimy as they are.
39 posted on 12/05/2003 8:35:12 PM PST by doug from upland (Hillary would get 100% of the Islamist Terrorist vote)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 38 | View Replies]

To: reed_inthe_wind
Our prayers for you.
40 posted on 12/05/2003 8:40:40 PM PST by doug from upland (Hillary would get 100% of the Islamist Terrorist vote)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 101-103 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson