Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Our Shameful Money
Oregon Magazine ^ | December 6, 2003 | Larry Leonard

Posted on 12/06/2003 12:11:00 AM PST by WaterDragon

Friday, December 5, 2003, Wall Street Week on PBS --

Nelson W. Aldrich, Jr. wrote the book. He is, it seems shocked at the gap between the rich and the poor.

He said on PBS’s Wall Street Week Without Louis Rukeyser, that he hoped the new rich kids would turn out more like the 1910 generation, aware of the responsibility that being rich puts on them.

What is this “responsibility?”

Why, giving the money to foundations.

Now, we know the difference between WSW with Louie and WSW without Louie. It is the difference between a capitalist and a Bolshevik who is out of ammunition.

Shall we attribute the appearance of this particular author on this particular network on this particular Friday to the fact that this was pledge week? Why not?

PBS is a collection of wireless socialist morons with delusions of philosophical grandeur, greedy fingered slavering redistributionist tree-dwelling hominids who believe that if they don’t control all the money, all the money isn’t being controlled properly....(Snip)

Click Here For Immediate Link To Full Article

(Excerpt) Read more at oregonmag.com ...


TOPICS: Business/Economy; Crime/Corruption; Culture/Society; Editorial; Extended News; Government; Miscellaneous; News/Current Events; US: California; US: Oregon; US: Washington
KEYWORDS: donate; foundations; guilt; left; liberals; pbs; richkids; wallstreetweekly
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-37 next last

1 posted on 12/06/2003 12:11:01 AM PST by WaterDragon
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: WaterDragon
Well it's either "foundations" route or they end up like Paris Hilton. Paris loves her mother and shopping. And, uh, being the center of attention.
2 posted on 12/06/2003 12:24:28 AM PST by I_Love_My_Husband (Borders, Language, Culture - now more than ever)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: WaterDragon
PBS is a collection of wireless socialist morons with delusions of philosophical grandeur, greedy fingered slavering redistributionist tree-dwelling hominids who believe that if they don’t control all the money, all the money isn’t being controlled properly.

O_O Whoa, now that is a statement. :D

3 posted on 12/06/2003 12:27:12 AM PST by Paul C. Jesup
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: WaterDragon
The very sight of a classic American Al Smith ?progressive? suggesting rich people?s kids should feel guilty about having money

The author ought to read up a little on history. Al Smith never suggested that, and in fact was the major democrat to oppose FDR's New Deal through the Liberty League.
4 posted on 12/06/2003 1:43:45 AM PST by lelio
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: free me
Now that's writing!
6 posted on 12/06/2003 4:41:36 AM PST by TenthAmendmentChampion (Free! Read my historical romance novels online at http://Writing.Com/authors/vdavisson)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: WaterDragon
PBS. Public Begging Stations.
7 posted on 12/06/2003 5:55:14 AM PST by eternity (From here to...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: WaterDragon
Somebody please send this nitwit the "Money" Soliloquy by Ayn Rand from "Atlas Shrugged" I think it was a whole chapter spoken by Francisco D'Ancona (Sp?) but it summed up the value and righteous worth of money.

Those who are embarrassed by the money they possess are not worthy of it's possession and are not fit to decide how to dispense it. That's why second and third class brains concoct criminal enterprises like the Ford Foundation and the Pew Charitable Trust.

I need more coffee.

8 posted on 12/06/2003 6:11:07 AM PST by muir_redwoods
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: I_Love_My_Husband
"Well it's either "foundations" route or they end up like Paris Hilton. Paris loves her mother and shopping. And, uh, being the center of attention."

Who is this person? I get spam too fast to filter. I presume she (it?) is a porn star. I filter "Paris Hilton" out and they start spelling it P!ARIS Hi1t0N...

It is as bad as Viagra and, ahem, "member enlargement" spam.

--Boris

9 posted on 12/06/2003 5:07:23 PM PST by boris (The deadliest Weapon of Mass Destruction in History is a Leftist With a Word Processor)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: muir_redwoods
Rearden heard Bertram Scudder, outside the group, say to a girl who made some sound of indignation, "Don't let him disturb you. You know, money is the root of all evil – and he's the typical product of money."

Rearden did not think that Francisco could have heard it, but he saw Francisco turning to them with a gravely courteous smile.

"So you think that money is the root of all evil?" said Francisco d'Aconia. "Have you ever asked what is the root of money? Money is a tool of exchange, which can't exist unless there are goods produced and men able to produce them. Money is the material shape of the principle that men who wish to deal with one another must deal by trade and give value for value. Money is not the tool of the moochers, who claim your product by tears, or of the looters, who take it from you by force. Money is made possible only by the men who produce. Is this what you consider evil?

"When you accept money in payment for your effort, you do so only on the conviction that you will exchange it for the product of the effort of others. It is not the moochers or the looters who give value to money. Not an ocean of tears nor all the guns in the world can transform those pieces of paper in your wallet into the bread you will need to survive tomorrow. Those pieces of paper, which should have been gold, are a token of honor – your claim upon the energy of the men who produce. Your wallet is your statement of hope that somewhere in the world around you there are men who will not default on that moral principle which is the root of money. Is this what you consider evil?

"Have you ever looked for the root of production? Take a look at an electric generator and dare tell yourself that it was created by the muscular effort of unthinking brutes. Try to grow a seed of wheat without the knowledge left to you by men who had to discover it for the first time. Try to obtain your food by means of nothing but physical motions – and you'll learn that man's mind is the root of all the goods produced and of all the wealth that has ever existed on earth.

"But you say that money is made by the strong at the expense of the weak? What strength do you mean? It is not the strength of guns or muscles. Wealth is the product of man's capacity to think. Then is money made by the man who invents a motor at the expense of those who did not invent it? Is money made by the intelligent at the expense of the fools? By the able at the expense of the incompetent? By the ambitious at the expense of the lazy? Money is made – before it can be looted or mooched – made by the effort of every honest man, each to the extent of his ability. An honest man is one who knows that he can't consume more than he has produced.

"To trade by means of money is the code of the men of good will. Money rests on the axiom that every man is the owner of his mind and his effort. Money allows no power to prescribe the value of your effort except by the voluntary choice of the man who is willing to trade you his effort in return. Money permits you to obtain for your goods and your labor that which they are worth to the men who buy them, but no more. Money permits no deals except those to mutual benefit by the unforced judgment of the traders. Money demands of you the recognition that men must work for their own benefit, not for their own injury, for their gain, not their loss – the recognition that they are not beasts of burden, born to carry the weight of your misery – that you must offer them values, not wounds – that the common bond among men is not the exchange of suffering, but the exchange of goods. Money demands that you sell, not your weakness to men's stupidity, but your talent to their reason; it demands that you buy, not the shoddiest they offer, but the best your money can find. And when men live by trade – with reason, not force, as their final arbiter – it is the best product that wins, the best performance, then man of best judgment and highest ability – and the degree of a man's productiveness is the degree of his reward. This is the code of existence whose tool and symbol is money. Is this what you consider evil?

"But money is only a tool. It will take you wherever you wish, but it will not replace you as the driver. It will give you the means for the satisfaction of your desires, but it will not provide you with desires. Money is the scourge of the men who attempt to reverse the law of causality – the men who seek to replace the mind by seizing the products of the mind.

"Money will not purchase happiness for the man who has no concept of what he wants; money will not give him a code of values, if he's evaded the knowledge of what to value, and it will not provide him with a purpose, if he's evaded the choice of what to seek. Money will not buy intelligence for the fool, or admiration for the coward, or respect for the incompetent. The man who attempts to purchase the brains of his superiors to serve him, with his money replacing his judgment, ends up by becoming the victim of his inferiors. The men of intelligence desert him, but the cheats and the frauds come flocking to him, drawn by a law which he has not discovered: that no man may be smaller than his money. Is this the reason why you call it evil?

"Only the man who does not need it, is fit to inherit wealth – the man who would make his own fortune no matter where he started. If an heir is equal to his money, it serves him; if not, it destroys him. But you look on and you cry that money corrupted him. Did it? Or did he corrupt his money? Do not envy a worthless heir; his wealth is not yours and you would have done no better with it. Do not think that it should have been distributed among you; loading the world with fifty parasites instead of one would not bring back the dead virtue which was the fortune. Money is a living power that dies without its root. Money will not serve that mind that cannot match it. Is this the reason why you call it evil?

"Money is your means of survival. The verdict which you pronounce upon the source of your livelihood is the verdict you pronounce upon your life. If the source is corrupt, you have damned your own existence. Did you get your money by fraud? By pandering to men's vices or men's stupidity? By catering to fools, in the hope of getting more than your ability deserves? By lowering your standards? By doing work you despise for purchasers you scorn? If so, then your money will not give you a moment's or a penny's worth of joy. Then all the things you buy will become, not a tribute to you, but a reproach; not an achievement, but a reminder of shame. Then you'll scream that money is evil. Evil, because it would not pinch-hit for your self-respect? Evil, because it would not let you enjoy your depravity? Is this the root of your hatred of money?

"Money will always remain an effect and refuse to replace you as the cause. Money is the product of virtue, but it will not give you virtue and it will not redeem your vices. Money will not give you the unearned, neither in matter nor in spirit. Is this the root of your hatred of money?

"Or did you say it's the love of money that's the root of all evil? To love a thing is to know and love its nature. To love money is to know and love the fact that money is the creation of the best power within you, and your passkey to trade your effort for the effort of the best among men. It's the person who would sell his soul for a nickel, who is the loudest in proclaiming his hatred of money – and he has good reason to hate it. The lovers of money are willing to work for it. They know they are able to deserve it.

"Let me give you a tip on a clue to men's characters: the man who damns money has obtained it dishonorably; the man who respects it has earned it.

"Run for your life from any man who tells you that money is evil. That sentence is the leper's bell of an approaching looter. So long as men live together on earth and need means to deal with one another – their only substitute, if they abandon money, is the muzzle of a gun.

"But money demands of you the highest virtues, if you wish to make it or to keep it. Men who have no courage, pride, or self-esteem, men who have no moral sense of their right to their money and are not willing to defend it as they defend their life, men who apologize for being rich – will not remain rich for long. They are the natural bait for the swarms of looters that stay under rocks for centuries, but come crawling out at the first smell of a man who begs to be forgiven for the guilt of owning wealth. They will hasten to relieve him of the guilt – and of his life, as he deserves.

"Then you will see the rise of the double standard – the men who live by force, yet count on those who live by trade to create the value of their looted money – the men who are the hitchhikers of virtue. In a moral society, these are the criminals, and the statutes are written to protect you against them. But when a society establishes criminals-by-right and looters-by-law – men who use force to seize the wealth of disarmed victims – then money becomes its creators' avenger. Such looters believe it safe to rob defenseless men, once they've passed a law to disarm them. But their loot becomes the magnet for other looters, who get it from them as they got it. Then the race goes, not to the ablest at production, but to those most ruthless at brutality. When force is the standard, the murderer wins over the pickpocket. And then that society vanishes, in a spread of ruins and slaughter.

"Do you wish to know whether that day is coming? Watch money. Money is the barometer of a society's virtue. When you see that trading is done, not by consent, but by compulsion – when you see that in order to produce, you need to obtain permission from men who produce nothing – when you see that money is flowing to those who deal, not in goods, but in favors – when you see that men get richer by graft and by pull than by work, and your laws don't protect you against them, but protect them against you – when you see corruption being rewarded and honesty becoming a self-sacrifice – you may know that your society is doomed. Money is so noble a medium that it does not compete with guns and it does not make terms with brutality. It will not permit a country to survive as half-property, half-loot.

"Whenever destroyers appear among men, they start by destroying money, for money is men's protection and the base of a moral existence. Destroyers seize gold and leave to its owners a counterfeit pile of paper. This kills all objective standards and delivers men into the arbitrary power of an arbitrary setter of values. Gold was an objective value, an equivalent of wealth produced. Paper is a mortgage on wealth that does not exist, backed by a gun aimed at those who are expected to produce it. Paper is a check drawn by legal looters upon an account which is not theirs: upon the virtue of the victims. Watch for the day when it becomes, marked: 'Account overdrawn.'

"When you have made evil the means of survival, do not expect men to remain good. Do not expect them to stay moral and lose their lives for the purpose of becoming the fodder of the immoral. Do not expect them to produce, when production is punished and looting rewarded. Do not ask, 'Who is destroying the world?' You are.

"You stand in the midst of the greatest achievements of the greatest productive civilization and you wonder why it's crumbling around you, while you're damning its life-blood – money. You look upon money as the savages did before you, and you wonder why the jungle is creeping back to the edge of your cities. Throughout men's history, money was always seized by looters of one brand or another, but whose method remained the same: to seize wealth by force and to keep the producers bound, demeaned, defamed, deprived of honor. That phrase about the evil of money, which you mouth with such righteous recklessness, comes from a time when wealth was produced by the labor of slaves – slaves who repeated the motions once discovered by somebody's mind and left unimproved for centuries. So long as production was ruled by force, and wealth was obtained by conquest, there was little to conquer. Yet through all the centuries of stagnation and starvation, men exalted the looters, as aristocrats of the sword, as aristocrats of birth, as aristocrats of the bureau, and despised the producers, as slaves, as traders, as shopkeepers – as industrialists.

"To the glory of mankind, there was, for the first and only time in history, a country of money – and I have no higher, more reverent tribute to pay to America, for this means: a country of reason, justice, freedom, production, achievement. For the first time, man's mind and money were set free, and there were no fortunes-by-conquest, but only fortunes-by-work, and instead of swordsmen and slaves, there appeared the real maker of wealth, the greatest worker, the highest type of human being – the self-made man – the American industrialist.

"If you ask me to name the proudest distinction of Americans, I would choose – because it contains all the others – the fact that they were the people who created the phrase 'to make money'. No other language or nation had ever used these words before; men had always thought of wealth as a static quantity – to be seized, begged, inherited, shared, looted, or obtained as a favor. Americans were the first to understand that wealth has to be created. The words 'to make money' hold the essence of human morality.

"Yet these were the words for which Americans were denounced by the rotted cultures of the looters' continents. Now the looters' credo has brought you to regard your proudest achievements as a hallmark of shame, your prosperity as guilt, your greatest men, the industrialists, as blackguards, and your magnificent factories as the product and property of muscular labor, the labor of whip-driven slaves, like the pyramids of Egypt. The rotter who simpers that he sees no difference between the power of the dollar and the power of the whip, ought to learn the difference on his own hide – as, I think, he will.

"Until and unless you discover that money is the root of all good, you ask for your own destruction. When money ceases to be the tool by which men deal with one another, then men become the tools of men. Blood, whips and guns – or dollars. Take your choice – there is no other – and your time is running out."

10 posted on 12/06/2003 5:10:46 PM PST by boris (The deadliest Weapon of Mass Destruction in History is a Leftist With a Word Processor)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: WaterDragon
Oh my, this is just excellent, well done!

PBS is a collection of wireless socialist morons with delusions of philosophical grandeur, greedy fingered slavering redistributionist tree-dwelling hominids who believe that if they don’t control all the money, all the money isn’t being controlled properly..
11 posted on 12/06/2003 5:13:35 PM PST by tet68
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: WaterDragon
He said on PBS’s Wall Street Week Without Louis Rukeyser, that he hoped the new rich kids would turn out more like the 1910 generation, aware of the responsibility that being rich puts on them.

I need somebody with a seasoned approach to help guide me as to how to use my wealth..../sarcasm

12 posted on 12/06/2003 5:17:10 PM PST by EGPWS
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: boris
"You know, money is the root of all evil "

It's 'The love of money is the root of all evil.

13 posted on 12/06/2003 5:45:18 PM PST by Looking4Truth (I've earned and lost more fortunes than most will ever know.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: boris
Thank you. You're a gentleman and more people should have access to these sentiments.
14 posted on 12/07/2003 9:16:55 AM PST by muir_redwoods
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: Looking4Truth
I thought women were the root of all evil. (running)
15 posted on 12/07/2003 9:18:56 AM PST by squidly
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: Looking4Truth; dixiechick2000; onyx; blackie; Salvation; Landru; Darksheare; Alamo-Girl; ...
I've always wondered......most of us are fully aware that we are the best judges for how to spend our own money, and we're also good at choosing how to use our own resources to help those less fortunate.

Why would ANYone hand big chunks of money over to a gang of charity and foundation folks who use it mostly to become wealthy themselves?
16 posted on 12/07/2003 6:40:03 PM PST by WaterDragon (GWB is The MAN!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: WaterDragon
Nelson W. Aldrich, Jr. wrote the book

He is almost certainly related to Nelson Rockefeller, whose middle name was Aldrich.

17 posted on 12/07/2003 7:12:24 PM PST by governsleastgovernsbest
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: WaterDragon
Thanks WaterDragon for the ping to another good read in Oregon magazine. I don't understand why these large charity foundations allow their directors to get PAID such large salaries. Can't they find anyone to volunteer to help. So many of them are in it for the wrong reasons.

I'd rather stick to local places and of course the Salvation Army.
18 posted on 12/07/2003 8:16:56 PM PST by snippy_about_it (Fall in --> The FReeper Foxhole. America's History. America's Soul.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: WaterDragon
Louis Rukeyser! My dad likes that guy! And if he and LL like that guy, I think I like that guy too! :)

(Wails of "chartiable" socialists ringing thru my room.)

"Charity does not start with the government" Said by Me. (Well, I hope I'm the first to say it.)

Informative and entertaining. You've done it again WaterDragon. Thank you. :)
19 posted on 12/07/2003 9:17:26 PM PST by Killborn (I'd rather have Big Bizniz than Big Guvmint.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: WaterDragon
Excellent post and a thoroughly enjoyable read. Thanks for the ping.
20 posted on 12/07/2003 9:24:39 PM PST by onyx
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-37 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson