CA Legislature Fails to Agree on Governor Schwarzenegger's Fiscal Proposals (more detail on votes)

LA Times ^ | Dec. 6, 2003 | Nancy Vogel, Gregg Jones and Evan Halper

[Hoverbug]

Thanks for showing your true colors.

Hb

[Kevin Curry]

I was a supporter for years.

LOL!

Sure you were.

[Kevin Curry]

Psst. McClintock voted against the Democratic proposal.

[FairOpinion]

McClintock also voted with the Democrats against Arnold proposal. The only Repulican in the Senate to do so -- all other Republicans had at least the decency to abstain.


"There were 14 votes against the governor's proposal: those of 13 Democrats and Sen. Tom McClintock (R-Thousand Oaks)."

http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1035237/posts

[FirstPrinciple]

Politics makes strange bedfellows. I am sure you have heard of that. It is possible for conservatives and liberals to agree on something coming from totally different directions. But, what do you call a move that actually asks conservatives to vote for increasing the size of the govt? It is called selling out/infiltrating. Bushism/RINOism has infiltrated the Republican party and must be defeated at all costs.

[Kevin Curry]

McClintock voted against funding a bloated government with more debt. If you are a conservative, why does that anger you?

[FirstPrinciple]

Thank God for people like McClintock. Can we clone him and have thirty more of him in the CA Senate? He is such a bright and intelligent guy. I wish Californians had enough brain-power to elect him.

[Hoverbug]

Yes, all the oters except McCintock are gutless wonders. Their job is to vote, not abstain.

Keep diggin'

Hb

[Hoverbug]

. I guess he wanted to send the message, that he is WITH the Dems against all other Republicans.

Here is a perfect example of your spin. Tom voted against it because he was against spending. The dems voted against it because it had a spending cap and didn't contain enough spending.

Now you come along and slam Tom, saying he's with the democrats "against all other Republicans".

Didn't "all other Republicans" later change their vote and vote the same way as Tom? Are they siding with dems against "all other Republicans?" How come you're not blasing them like you are Tom?

You either have absolutely NO idea of what this whole thing was about, or worse yet, you do and lied about it, trying to sway opinion againt McClintock.

Either way, your "fair opinion" is worthless.

Hb

[Hoverbug]

bump
cat got yer tongue?

Hb

[giotto]

McClintock voted against the Democratic counterproposal

Oh.

[djreece]

Marking

[Hoverbug]

FO,
Did you miss this?

You started this thread. You falsely accused McClintock of being in league with dems, just as you did during the election. Now, when you're proven wrong, you run and hide. You don't defend your position, nor do you admit you were wrong. You just disappear. Very cowardly in my opinion.

You seem to fall into trouble anytime you move away from your normal MO of posting articles written by someone else and then merely spouting talking points.

If you're an RNC operative, they're not getting their money's worth.

I know you want this thread to die and not get bumped to the top, but here it is again.

Hb

[Hoverbug]

bump