Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

What have Republicans done for us lately?
MensNewsDaily.com ^ | December 9, 2003 | Roger F. Gay

Posted on 12/09/2003 7:41:48 AM PST by RogerFGay

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-67 next last

1 posted on 12/09/2003 7:41:49 AM PST by RogerFGay
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: JimKalb; Free the USA; EdReform; realwoman; Orangedog; Lorianne; Outlaw76; balrog666; DNA Rules; ...
ping
2 posted on 12/09/2003 7:42:29 AM PST by RogerFGay
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: RogerFGay
To do so leaves us with nothing but an illusion that we have supported the lesser of two evils. It is time to ask, what have the parties done for me lately? Evil is not what we want and we should not give our support without concrete chang

When you reach your destination called "perfect political world", how about sending me a post card. JMO, but I think I will be waiting by the mail box for a long time.

3 posted on 12/09/2003 7:46:19 AM PST by Dane
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: RogerFGay
>To do so leaves us with nothing but an illusion that we have supported the lesser of two evils.

Which course is the more
rational: elect someone
you know is evil,

and then use all the
checks and balances to keep
the evil in line;

Or elect someone
who is supposed to be good
and who thereby flies

below the radar
of the checks and balances
and can do real harm?!

4 posted on 12/09/2003 7:49:25 AM PST by theFIRMbss
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Dane
When you reach your destination called "perfect political world", how about sending me a post card. JMO, but I think I will be waiting by the mail box for a long time.

Yes, that's it exactly. The article comes out very strongly and explicitly in favor of a "perfect political world." Exactly, that's why your reference to a "perfect political world" has quotes around it, right?
5 posted on 12/09/2003 8:01:04 AM PST by RogerFGay
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: RogerFGay
Yes, that's it exactly. The article comes out very strongly and explicitly in favor of a "perfect political world." Exactly, that's why your reference to a "perfect political world" has quotes around it, right?

No the reason for the quotes is to emphasize what you are implying. You are looking for perfect political world and it is my contention that you will never find it. Life is all about making a choice between things. Have you found the perfect car, the perfect house, or the perfect diet? You call it the choice of the lesser of two evils. I call it making the best choice and making an educated decision within the realm of possibilty.

Oh BTW, is using bold fonts ok with you?

6 posted on 12/09/2003 8:09:26 AM PST by Dane
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: RogerFGay
Just remember to drop principles by the door on election day. A vote for anyone other than George W. Bush will not be a principled vote it will be a vote for Howard Dean or Hitlery Clinton depending on how the primary comes out.
7 posted on 12/09/2003 8:16:31 AM PST by Naspino (I am in no way associated with the views expressed in your posts.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Naspino
Just remember to drop principles by the door on election day.

Exactly. In politics, common sense trumps principles, morals, conscience, and personal views, etc. because politicians are like poets and taxi drivers....they make their own rules and regulations, they follow no existing laws and statutes, and they operate within their own set of parameters as defined by them at any given time.

8 posted on 12/09/2003 8:33:38 AM PST by Consort
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Naspino
A vote for anyone other than George W. Bush will not be a principled vote it will be a vote for Howard Dean or Hitlery Clinton depending on how the primary comes out.

And the GOP has about one election cycle left to rely on that as the overriding reason to keep returning them to power. The GOP leadership in Congress is just about moved "off the reservation" completely regarding spending and growing non-military spending and growth of government. How much of the base can the party afford to p*ss off in 2004 in the hopes of gaining the votes of the insipid soccer-moms who will turn on them the second the dems top them with the "...for the children" line of BS?

The party faithful will sit around and bitch about one segment of the right cost them them election instead of wondering why those people who had always been in their camp stayed home instead of going to the polls.

9 posted on 12/09/2003 8:58:00 AM PST by Orangedog (difference between a hamster & a gerbil?..there's more dark-meat on a hamster!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Naspino
Just remember to drop principles by the door on election day

The party without principles. I like it. Has a ring to it.

10 posted on 12/09/2003 9:19:22 AM PST by Soren
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Naspino
Why do you think we have to vote for either party ? We don't have to vote for Dean or Bush.
11 posted on 12/09/2003 9:21:25 AM PST by Independentamerican (Independent Freshman at the University of MD)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Dane
I call it making the best choice and making an educated decision within the realm of possibilty.

So if two candidates are running and both are equally repugnant to you, you make an informed decision to vote for one because they are the only ones possible?

12 posted on 12/09/2003 9:25:04 AM PST by Protagoras (Vote Republican, we're not as bad as the other guys.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: RogerFGay
It is time to ask, what have the parties done for me lately?

This may come as a shock, but the parties were not created to do anything thing for you. They are there to assist their candidates; they are political entities, not municipal or charitable organizations.

If you've got issues, raise them with your elected reps. If you really want to ask that "what have you done for me lately", why not ask them?

13 posted on 12/09/2003 9:31:56 AM PST by Mr. Bird
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Independentamerican
Why do you think we have to vote for either party ? We don't have to vote for Dean or Bush.

Great. Let's reinvent the wheel. Let's add a Third Party to mix so that they can do exactly what the major parties are doing, and further confuse the voters in the process. Why didn't we all think of that?

14 posted on 12/09/2003 9:32:10 AM PST by Consort
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

A lot of conservatives said "screw you" to the GOP in '92 and stayed home on election day or voted for Perot or other Third Party. Now the GOP is appealing to the center for votes and the conservatives are wondering why.
15 posted on 12/09/2003 9:37:38 AM PST by Consort
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: Consort
Libertarians abound

"Perfectionists" abound

immature, irrational, childlike

They celebrated the 8 years of Clinton?

If they were so principled and viable they would run for elected office and create a perfect political America

Easier to disrupt, stay home, or vote Perot/Buchanan and blame Republicans for what they cause

Single issue basically

The LB goes round the circle and joins the radical leftists, Greenies, Naderites, drug gangs.

Write down their respective agendas

LBs do not like taxes (who does?)

Lefties don't pay taxes!
16 posted on 12/09/2003 9:49:34 AM PST by autoresponder (<html> <center> <img src="http://0access.web1000.com/HV.gif"> </center> </html> HILLARY SHOOTS!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: Independentamerican
Bush and whoever may be sacrificed by the Demo party are the parties that will compete. The rest of the parties are ust for show and we all know they will not get near being close to having anyone elected. So, make your vote count by voting Republican or the disgraced demos.
17 posted on 12/09/2003 12:08:31 PM PST by Hila
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: Independentamerican
Why do you think we have to vote for either party ? We don't have to vote for Dean or Bush.

Thats exactly what I said. If you do not vote for Bush then by default you've voted for Dean.

18 posted on 12/10/2003 6:43:59 AM PST by Naspino (I am in no way associated with the views expressed in your posts.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: Mr. Bird
This may come as a shock, but the parties were not created to do anything thing for you. They are there to assist their candidates; they are political entities, not municipal or charitable organizations.

LOLRH -- Ah ... ok, since you don't agree with me, I'll pretend this isn't an election season. DA-OH!
19 posted on 12/10/2003 8:56:12 AM PST by RogerFGay
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: Naspino
Just remember to drop principles by the door on election day. A vote for anyone other than George W. Bush will not be a principled vote it will be a vote for Howard Dean or Hitlery Clinton depending on how the primary comes out.

The Republicans have adopted so much of the Democrats domestic agenda, that I'm not sure many people care.
20 posted on 12/10/2003 8:57:44 AM PST by RogerFGay
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-67 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson