Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

SurveyUSA: San Francisco Mayor's Race Too Close To Call (Greenie Gonzalez Leads)
SFExaminer ^ | December 5, 2003 | J.K. DINEEN

Posted on 12/09/2003 10:51:25 AM PST by Pubbie

As mayoral candidates Gavin Newsom and Matt Gonzalez crisscrossed The City from West Portal to Chinatown in a final weekend sprint to Election Day, a new KPIX-5 poll released Friday shows the race locked in a dead heat.

The poll, conducted by SurveyUSA, showed Gonzalez with 50 percent ofthe voters identified as "certain" and Gavin Newsom with 48 percent.

The automated poll, taken between Dec. 2-4, marks a slight bump upwards for Newsom, who was shown to be trailing by 7 percentage points in a poll by the same company released on Nov. 25.

The survey also shows that the district attorney's race has tightened up, with incumbent Terence Hallinan narrowing challenger Kamala Harris' lead from 12 percentage points to 5 points among "certain" voters.

The mayoral results were based on responses from 534 registered voters who described themselves as "certain to vote" in the Dec. 9 runoff election, and has a 4.3 percent margin of error.

The DA poll was based on responses from 505 voters and has a 4.5 percent margin of error.

Both polls canvassed 1,000 registered voters and filtered out 47 percent who were not defined as definite voters.

Gonzalez spokesman Ross Mirkarimi said the campaign is not making too much of the numbers.

"We're still very encouraged, we take all polls in stride," he said.

"Our aim is to get our voters out between now and Election Day and try to offset the huge machine that Gavin Newsom is importing to try to steal this election."

Newsom campaign manager John Shanley took issue with the automated methodology the nationwide pollster uses, which he said does not identify definite registered voters. But he said that the slight erosion of Gonzalez support was consistent with his analysis.

"I think to some extent the Gonzalez bubble is bursting, the flavor of the moment is getting old," said Newsom spokesman John Shanley.

"(Supervisor) Tom Ammiano experienced a similar thing four years ago against (Mayor) Willie Brown. There is the buzz and excitement when you make the runoff and it's started to fizzle."

Joe Shipman, director of election polling at SurveyUSA, said the race is shaping up into a contest between younger and older voters. The poll showed that likely voters between the ages of 18 to 35 favor Gonzalez by a 2-to-1 ratio, while voters 55 and older are flocking to Newsom by a 2-to-1 ratio.

"The age gap is really striking. Gonzalez is getting younger people excited in politics, many for the first time," Shipman said. "Newsom, who is a young man himself, needs to figure out why he is not appealing to those voters."

Shipman said he doesn't regard Newsom's slight increase as "much of a shift," but said he may have received a bounce by recent support from former vice president Al Gore, Democratic Party Leader Nancy Pelosi and U.S. Sen. Dianne Feinstein, all powerful Democrats who have stumped for Newsom this week.

While Newsom is a Democrat, Gonzalez is a member of the Green Party.

"I think Newsom has been working hard -- the heavy hitters have been coming out for him," Shipman said.


TOPICS: Front Page News; Politics/Elections; US: California
KEYWORDS:
Hopefully Camejo will run for Senate against Boxer next year if Gonzalez wins.
1 posted on 12/09/2003 10:51:26 AM PST by Pubbie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Pubbie
FYI. BillClinton just came to stump against the Green.
2 posted on 12/09/2003 10:54:58 AM PST by finnman69 (cum puella incedit minore medio corpore sub quo manifestus globus, inflammare animos)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Pubbie
The San Francisco mayor's race is between left and lefter; between Karl Marx and Joseph Stalin.
3 posted on 12/09/2003 10:56:09 AM PST by 45Auto (Big holes are (almost) always better.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Pubbie
Can we root against both candidates? Far-lefty and Farther-lefty! No wonder the city of Than Franthithco is swirling into the Bay.
4 posted on 12/09/2003 10:57:07 AM PST by RebelBanker (Deo Vindice)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Pubbie
Go Green!! Bwhahahaha.
5 posted on 12/09/2003 10:58:17 AM PST by Dan from Michigan ("if you wanna run cool, you got to run, on heavy heavy fuel" - Dire Straits)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Pubbie
The Democrats, with all their big names, can't even easily win a mayoral race in S.F.

Pathetic, ain't it?

6 posted on 12/09/2003 10:59:28 AM PST by B Knotts (Go 'Nucks!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: RebelBanker
Maybe San Francisco needs to hit bottom before sanity can be restored. Maybe the Green Party winning will do the trick.
7 posted on 12/09/2003 11:00:46 AM PST by Honestfreedom
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Pubbie
I hope Gonzalez beats Newsom. We know what happens when conservatives become mayors of major cities – it would be a very interesting social experiment and observation to see what happens when a leftist becomes a mayor of a major city.
8 posted on 12/09/2003 11:05:03 AM PST by Isolationist
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Dan from Michigan
I'm rooting for Gonzalez. If he wins, it will be yet another LOSS for Bill Clinton's campaigning. Coming on the heels of Gray Davis's defeat (Bill campaigned for him, too) it could hasten the loss of Clinton influence in California.
9 posted on 12/09/2003 11:05:11 AM PST by Miss Marple
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: RebelBanker
I'm rooting for the guy slick willie's against.
10 posted on 12/09/2003 11:10:11 AM PST by OldFriend (DEMS INHABIT A PARALLEL UNIVERSE)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: 45Auto
San Franciscans appear split on whether to keep the city going down the drain at the present leisurely rate (Newsom), or to accelerate the process (Green boy).
11 posted on 12/09/2003 11:10:27 AM PST by Argus ((Ninety-nine and forty-four one-hundredths percent Pure Reactionary))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Dan from Michigan
I'm rooting for Gonzales, too. If effect, this will be an election on whether the Clintons have the power to influence the voters. I'm betting that SF will reject them just like the whole state did in November. BWAAAAHAHAHAHA indeed!
12 posted on 12/09/2003 11:11:11 AM PST by ex-Texan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Miss Marple
Besides that, it hurts the dems GOTV efforts against Boxhead and might if nothing else, make the dems put more money in California instead of the Midwest.
13 posted on 12/09/2003 11:16:16 AM PST by Dan from Michigan ("if you wanna run cool, you got to run, on heavy heavy fuel" - Dire Straits)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: Pubbie
Watermelon knocks out Donkey.

I can see a cartoon shaping up here. ;^)
14 posted on 12/09/2003 11:31:06 AM PST by headsonpikes (Spirit of '76 bttt!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Honestfreedom
I saw a Gonzalez campaign poster on a lamppost in the Tenderloin yesterday, which said that a vote for Newsom would mean "Four MORE Years of Care Not Cash". In fact, the Care not Cash initiative, which was intended to increase social services aimed a rehabilitation, while putting a huge crimp in the $400 plus per month doled out to junkies and winos to feed their habits, was passed overwhelmingly by the voters last year, but struck down by the court, and never implemented.

In other words, the campaign poster says if you don't like the status quo, the only way to increase the largesse being indiscriminately doled out to junkies and winos, is to vote for Gonzalez.
15 posted on 12/09/2003 11:36:11 AM PST by Flash Bazbeaux
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Pubbie
Maybe the conservatives/Republicans in SF (if there is any) should throw their support behind the Greenie. This will hit the dims real hard and gives the greens more power in Cali. The more powerful the greens are, the less so for the dims. We need a viable Green to siphon off the support in the dims.
16 posted on 12/09/2003 11:44:47 AM PST by FRgal4u
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Flash Bazbeaux
GO GONZALEZ!!!! Newsome got the endorsements of all the rich elitist bastards and their sows for wives. The Klintoons backed Newsom. I hate to say this, but this guy will do something about the homeless while Newsom will attend dinners at wealthy backers homes and do squat.

Then again, Guiliani would just clear the streets and be done with the problem. I miss Rudy

17 posted on 12/09/2003 12:50:40 PM PST by EQAndyBuzz (GORE LOST. DEAL WITH IT!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: All
The enemy of the enemy is not our friend. Greens are Communists re-marketed, and here at Free Republic, we should not be cheering on increased influence of the green-red watermellon bastards.

Even if it hurts the Dems, just think how hard it will be for businessowners and common-sense thinking people to live good productive lives, and provide jobs which help convert the socialist masses, under Green rule.

18 posted on 12/09/2003 12:58:20 PM PST by Yossarian (1 CA Governor down, 1 CA Senate and 1 CA House to go...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: B Knotts
The Democrats, with all their big names, can't even easily win a mayoral race in S.F. Pathetic, ain't it?

Well said.

VOTE GREEN!

19 posted on 12/09/2003 2:55:27 PM PST by PeoplesRep_of_LA (Treason doth never prosper, for if it does, none dare call it treason)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Yossarian
FWIW, I agree with you. We should not be rooting for any Green Party candidate. They stand against everything we stand for as Americans.
20 posted on 12/09/2003 3:31:16 PM PST by B Knotts (Go 'Nucks!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: EQAndyBuzz
I hate to say this, but this guy will do something about the homeless...

Yeah, he'll double the population...once word gets out that the new Communist at City Hall is handing out more free money than ever.

21 posted on 12/09/2003 3:36:10 PM PST by Mr. Jeeves
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: Pubbie
oh yeah..gotta go vote. I'm voting for Newsom. Gonzalez' cadre of fawning, swooning female supporters are hard to stomach. It would be nice to see their fondest wish come crashing down.
22 posted on 12/09/2003 3:38:44 PM PST by GSWarrior
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Yossarian; B Knotts
The enemy of the enemy is not our friend.

In this particular case, you couldn't be more wrong. You guys are simply not thinking long term enough, and missing a golden opportunity. You need to ask yourself "why am I a Conservative?"

It's because right is right. Its not a bumper sticker, or a really cool paper mache puppet that some hippie marches with. Conservatism isn't right because Rush says so, or Dubya, or even Reagan. Its not because Hannity can drone on ad hominem more than his opponent and claim victory. Conservatism is right because time and again it proves out, while Liberalism does not. There's no contest. Its not like there are 2 sides to this; they are wrong and its patently obvious.

Now moderate liberalism is the exception, that is the danger, not the greens, not ever. Like Clinton, its hard to prove to someone economically what a screw up he was because we did alright in the 90s. We can speak of the GOP House being the cause, the dot com bubble, whatever, its still easy for a partisan liberal to say the economy was good. That's because Clinton, for as much frothing at the mouth as there is on here from the hyper partisans wasn't THAT liberal.

Greens are, greens are true believers, and they've never gotten a chance to demonstrate their Leadership til now. I'd say God Bless em, but they hate God.

You 2 need alittle more patience, more long term thinking, and more backbone. Let them try. What better city than San Fran to take to the 10th level of hell.

More importantly than the Green and liberalism getting discredited...(further)this is an outflanking of the Demo's on their Left that they have worried about for over a generation...(since McGovern)and it couldn't possibly come at a worse time for them with their loss of power and all their energy coming from hatefilled Leftist. A Green holding a major city's mayorship? Why this guy will be able to rally the Left and push the Demo's FARTHER off their cliff to maintain the college kids' passion.

And he'll fail. Bad. Gonzo's failure will be blamed entirely on Liberalism, and guess who's going to do it? Our friends' in the media will on the Democrates behalf will help us do it. They will oppose this guy and make him fail more than the GOP could ever hope to. You should understand after all these years Democrates are meaner.

Can you imagine if the Losertarians started getting 20% instead of 2% every election? Why the GOP wouldn't win another office. That is the very real potential here in SF. Its a Godsend, it truely is. You are seeing this as a rise of the Left, but you forget that they WILL fail, its really the beginning of the end of the liberal Democratic Party.

God Bless America.

23 posted on 12/09/2003 4:01:51 PM PST by PeoplesRep_of_LA (Treason doth never prosper, for if it does, none dare call it treason)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: PeoplesRep_of_LA
Well, I'm talking about the really long term. By rooting for these Green loonies, we give them some degree of credibility. Fifty years ago, did anyone think that homos and hippies would be completely running San Francisco?

I must always denounce that which I know to be wrong, and the Green Party is pure evil.

24 posted on 12/09/2003 4:07:33 PM PST by B Knotts (Go 'Nucks!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: PeoplesRep_of_LA
You 2 need alittle more patience, more long term thinking, and more backbone. Let them try. What better city than San Fran to take to the 10th level of hell.

I think very long term, thank you very much.

How has the rise and failure of the Greens positively affected Germany? What was once an ally is now full of spoiled snot-nosed babies.

How has the rise and failure of the left positively affected San Francisco as it stands? It's already full of leftists, and this has greatly harmed a beautiful city - probably the most visually stunning city in this country, if not the world.

What we'll end up with is a major bulkhead on U.S. soil for Greens world-wide. It will be their entry point into the U.S. political system. Oh joy.

You talk about long term thinking - you sound like Diarmait, the off-put 12th century Irish cheiftain who so wisely invited the English to invade Ireland. Diarmait thought that he could play the English against the ruling Irish king to his advantage. Fat lot of good that did the Irish! I don't want it to take 700 years to throw the Greens out...

By the way, never question my backbone, punk.

25 posted on 12/09/2003 4:34:11 PM PST by Yossarian (1 CA Governor down, 1 CA Senate and 1 CA House to go...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: B Knotts
By rooting for these Green loonies, we give them some degree of credibility.

No, we don't have the power to do that. No one does.

But we can give them the chance to embarrass themselves like never before.

Fifty years ago, did anyone think that homos and hippies would be completely running San Francisco?

Well that's your friendly neighborhood Democrates' fault, who you want to vote for, because the Greens have never run ANYTHING yet. You are so full of bitterness that you are making bad decisions, just like Howard Dean voters. Speaking of the Democrates, they are in a lose-lose situation if Gonzo wins. Lose in that they are outflanked on their left side.

And lose that the way they attack them is to criticise LIBERALISM, at a time when their base is getting more extreme every day. You are looking at this entirely too simplisticly, and throwing away happiness with both hands. This is the chance for the national Democratic party to crumble. I cannot begin to overstate the importance of the Greens coming in on their Left and beating them. Its not like its a Green vs a Republican, this is a Civil War and it will only lead to more because these factions have had an uneasy peace for a long time, and the Left has the upperhand.

You don't seem to understand, this might be the begining of the end of the Left being a political force in America! Stop being so binary, its not like the Democrate advances our agenda anyways, but the possibilities of epic failure by the Greens is off the charts.

This is the slick "New" Democrates worst nightmare. Vote Gonzo!

26 posted on 12/09/2003 4:42:49 PM PST by PeoplesRep_of_LA (Treason doth never prosper, for if it does, none dare call it treason)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: Yossarian
How has the rise and failure of the Greens positively affected Germany? What was once an ally is now full of spoiled snot-nosed babies.

Apples and Oranges, America is a conservative country...ever heard of McGovern?

How has the rise and failure of the left positively affected San Francisco as it stands? It's already full of leftists, and this has greatly harmed a beautiful city - probably the most visually stunning city in this country, if not the world.

Blah blah blah, that's your problem, you don't want to see San Fran fail. :-( I don't get it, I visited there and I didn't see the appeal of Frisco, sounds like the pretentious liberal propoganda the media has spun on the city has got to you, its overcrowded, too expensive, too gay, too cold, too wet, too foggy, and too bum infested.

What we'll end up with is a major bulkhead on U.S. soil for Greens world-wide. It will be their entry point into the U.S. political system. Oh joy.

You should be joyous, how do they get to be a major political force winning in that loonball city? Who do they draw their votes from exactly? Last time I checked this campaign was trying to draw from the same exact base; Democrates. If they could do that nationally it would be wonderful, both of them would never top 20%!

You talk about long term thinking - you sound like Diarmait, the off-put 12th century Irish cheiftain who so wisely invited the English to invade Ireland.

Nice rant, like that 2% that the greens get OUTSIDE of SF in the rest of CA is the capacity to win....ANYTHING? The greens got 15% in the 02 Gov election, but overall they were nothing. Do you know why? Because everyone over 22 knows their policies are immature.

By the way, never question my backbone, punk.

Ha, its obvious now that its not backbone, you are simply an idiot.

27 posted on 12/09/2003 4:52:55 PM PST by PeoplesRep_of_LA (Treason doth never prosper, for if it does, none dare call it treason)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: PeoplesRep_of_LA
Well that's your friendly neighborhood Democrates' fault, who you want to vote for, because the Greens have never run ANYTHING yet.

You are so full of bitterness that you are making bad decisions, just like Howard Dean voters

Whoa there, pardner!

I am not talking about voting for Democrats, nor am I bitter about anything. I am simply pointing out that giving any support to out-and-out communists is playing with fire.

28 posted on 12/09/2003 5:06:26 PM PST by B Knotts (Go 'Nucks!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: B Knotts
I am simply pointing out that giving any support to out-and-out communists is playing with fire.

Ahh, but you are bitter, against communists. Its such a slam dunk (hating commies) that maybe its not obvious, but don't let your disdain for their politics prevent you from using them like the $3 whores they are.

No one, outside of the aforementioned San Fran, votes Green in any significant number. I could be wrong because I haven't looked it up, but I think the Losertarians outnumber them nationally. (They're both fringe)

You aren't going to have Republicans or Libertarians getting wobbly and voting Commie, so where is the fire?

You will have liberal Democrates wobblying...lots of them. The whole house of cards that is the "New" Democrates, pretending to be Centrists and fooling the American people come crashing down in a loud, shrill thud.

Then you end up with Canada, where the Conservatives are permanently spread across 2 parties, and the Liberal party is cleaning their clocks. They didn't get magically more Rightwing because a new party gained promenence a few years ago, they went left...Cretin left.

The opposite could happen here in America. Divided-they will fall. Its the Democrates who have been playing with fire since the 1960's accepting and encouraging the Radical-Left. They are now in grave danger, either with the Greens emerging or Dean embarrassing, to get 3rd degree burns.

29 posted on 12/09/2003 6:38:08 PM PST by PeoplesRep_of_LA (Treason doth never prosper, for if it does, none dare call it treason)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]

To: B Knotts
...and the Green Party is pure evil.

Precisely why San Francisco deserves a Green Party mayor...
30 posted on 12/09/2003 6:42:23 PM PST by VOA
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: Pubbie
Sorry, but I gotta go with Gonzo too for precisely the same reasons as stated.

SF is a cesspool and will become an even larger one with a watermelon at the helm. It will showcase everything that is wrong with the left.

I feel sorry for you Freepers that live there, but hey, you wouldn't get a conservative to win anyhow. You're screwed either way.
31 posted on 12/09/2003 6:53:32 PM PST by VeniVidiVici (There is nothing Democratic about the Democrat party.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Pubbie; VOA; VeniVidiVici
Have mercy! Not everyone living in SF is a rabid lefty. It might be fun to root for Gonzalez on ideological grounds, but when it comes down to it, his policies will do more damage to San Francisco. There are times you have to be practical. Besides, I am not willing to throw a bone to those grubby hippies supporting Gonzo.
32 posted on 12/10/2003 12:15:19 PM PST by labbrat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson