The Name Change: Why We Did It (Paper Drops "Christmas")

Bucks County Courier Times ^ | December 10, 2003 | Editorial Board

[Lancey Howard]

The name change: Why we did it Bucks County Courier Times

Our view: We didn't drop Give-A-Christmas in favor of Holiday Fund in a politically correct effort to minimize religion. We changed in recognition of changing demographics and to broaden the fund's appeal.

We get it. We really do. We understand why some folks are upset about the name change for our annual fund drive. We've read all the letters - and we sympathize.

But replacing Give-A-Christmas with Holiday Fund - a change we implemented last year - wasn't done to minimize the importance of Christianity's most celebrated and joyous holiday. We recognize and accept the monumental impact Jesus Christ had and continues to have on the world. We recognize and accept the profound role Christians played in the founding and development of this nation. Indeed, some came here in order to practice their religion without persecution. Their contribution to this nation is clear and unassailable. To a large degree, we are who we are today because of them.

And we are proud of that heritage. We really are.

We also recognize the good and charitable things Christian churches and organizations do here and around the world. Millions of less fortunate people are better off because of those generous and caring efforts. We recognize all of that.

We also recognize that these are trying times for Christians. Not only has prayer been banned from the public schools, the word, "God," is unwelcome in many public venues. The Nativity scene and The Ten Commandments likewise have been banished from the public square.

We recognize that people are understandably angry over what many view as assaults on religion.

But we also recognize that ours is a nation of mixed cultures and religions. And non-Christians are among the nation's fastest growing populations. That's as true in Bucks County as it is across the rest of America.

So our name change was motivated chiefly by changing demographics. We wanted to maximize the fund's appeal by welcoming the newcomers' participation. Our goal, after all, is to raise as much money as we can, so we can help as many people as possible.

It was a practical decision, not one driven by political correctness or any other ideology, as many of our letter-writing critics have charged. Nor was our intention to water down or in any way neutralize Christmas.

Much of the money contributed did and does buy Christmas gifts for struggling members of our community, but it also is used to pay for staples - food, and fuel, and clothing for people in need. And to pay for other life-sustaining services.

So for quite a few folks the fund doesn't really give a Christmas as much as it gives necessities - and hope. These are causes worthy of our attention.

Our hope is that you won't let the letter writers dissuade you from contributing to the Holiday Fund. We won't keep the critical letters out of the paper because our mission here is to provide a forum for citizens to express their points of view. And we want to hear from you - good or bad.

Still, we hope that those who are angry with us can muster up some understanding - if not, perhaps some forgiveness. Because we meant no harm or disrespect. We really didn't.

Our intention was to maximize inclusion, not minimize the importance of Christmas or Christ or Christians. We wanted to broaden the fund's appeal - because the need is broad and, unfortunately, growing.

December 10, 2003 6:08 AM

[GeronL]

BOYCOTT the charity. Give to the Salvation Army instead!

[ECM]

Amen!

;D

[GeronL]

.... because those who blow up school children in the name of Allah mean just as much to us as you do....

[Timesink]

This is the Mainstream Media Shenanigans ping list. Please freepmail me to be added or dropped.
Please note this is a medium- to high-volume list.
Please feel free to ping me if you come across a thread you would think worthy of this ping list. I can't catch them all!

[Billthedrill]

Well, if the decision was intended to broaden the appeal of the charity, that means they expect that it will increase the donations, right? And so it may, but I sure wouldn't be betting that way at the moment.

[GeronL]

How sad this is.

[dagnabbit]

BOYCOTT the charity. Give to the Salvation Army instead!

Works for me.

[baseballfanjm]

Without Christmas, would they have this fund this time of the year? Enough said.

[ronnieb]

Please don't argue as we shuffle you off the stage, please don't neglect to pay as you leave, please don't argue as we shove you into the dustbin...we love you..please die...quietly, without making a scene....

[GeronL]

I very much hope contributions drop so far that they change the name back. But then, I am in Texas and it shouldn't make me mad, but it does.

[Lancey Howard]

This toilet paper is published in Bucks County, which is a Philadelphia suburban area. The paper is at least as liberal as the Inquirer, but with the kind of 10th-grade writing skills you see above.

Obviously, the problem with the paper's hand-wringing "explanation" is that this time of year IS this time of year - - "the holiday season" - - BECAUSE of Christmas. (I also have no doubt that these mice have no clue that "Holiday" MEANS "Holy Day".)

If this paper wants to have a multi-cultural, politically correct "Holiday Fund", then let them have it during, say, Ramadan. Let Christmas be Christmas. In any event, my wife and I will no longer participate in this paper's charities..... or subscription.

[GeronL]

http://www.phillyburbs.com/pb-dyn/feedback.cfm?tmpl=interact

Feedback form!!!!

[GeronL]

See #13. Write them, write the same thing thats in your post

[Lancey Howard]

Without Christmas, would they have this fund this time of the year? Enough said.

HA!
I was typing and you cut right to the chase. (Please see post #12.)

[GeronL]

write them and tell them so. feedback form is above, but you are a local... so go for it

[WackyKat]

I hope the "Holiday Fund" is down about 50% this year

[PLMerite]

"Without Christmas, would they have this fund this time of the year? Enough said."

Yeah, somebody tell me about all the Kwanzaa charity drives.

[Lancey Howard]

BOYCOTT the charity. Give to the Salvation Army instead!

Yep. We are done with this paper.
The New York Post is available at every Wawa in the area anyway.

[Cicero]

We really do.

We really are.

Psychologically, I'd say these little speech tics are like someone looking you straight in the eye while he lies to you, because he thinks that will make you believe him.

[weeder]

This is my local paper. They changed the name last year, and contributions plummeted. They must have thought that a year passing would settle things down, but the fund is again flagging. Hence, the "can't we just be friends?' editorial.
Sure we can. Change the name back, you liberal simps!

[baseballmom]

We didn't drop Give-A-Christmas in favor of Holiday Fund in a politically correct effort to minimize religion

Oh, really? Who celebrates Christmas? Who exactly is celebrating these "holidays"?

[arasina]

Happy Nothing Day, Members of The Board! You are working December 25th, of course, as "Winter Holiday" has not been designated as a day off. Maasalama!

[#3Fan]

But we also recognize that ours is a nation of mixed cultures and religions. And non-Christians are among the nation's fastest growing populations.

That's the worst news I've heard all day.

[Jaidyn]

I noted the paper stated that non-Christians are among the nation's fastest growing populations. That's as true in Bucks County as it is across the rest of America. Perhaps if liberals had tried to take Christ out of everything, more would have gotten to know God. I find it ironic they chose Christmas. I'd like to see all the poor in Buck's County have a nice Christmas but not at such a high cost. Liberals just don't get it.

[Revolting cat!]

We didn't drop Give-A-Christmas in favor of Holiday Fund in a politically correct effort to minimize religion.

Oh, how clever! They anticipate any person's common sense reaction and they proceed in an attempt to neutralize it from the getgo right there in the very first sentence! Except that it ain't working!

[secret garden]

Is this in your neck of the woods ping?

[Byron_the_Aussie]

..we get it. We really do. We understand why some folks are upset about the name change for our annual fund drive. We've read all the letters - and we sympathize...

It's not enough, to slap our culture in the face. They have to be patronizing about it, too.

[OldFriend]

Liar liar pants on fire.

People should make an effort to give directly to those in need.

[ronnieb]

I did it, thanks for the suggestion!....they want us to die, but to remember them in our wills...of course.

[jaz.357]

We recognize that people are understandably angry over what many view as assaults on religion.

uhh, YEAH!

[GeronL]

Maybe someday, if things get bad enough, lets hope they won't, they'll start catering to christians the same way they do to 'others' (muslims), if it comes to the point where we start throwing real bombs. Lets hope it won't ever become necessary.

[Alberta's Child]

Dear Bucks County Courier Times:

If you are truly interested in "maximizing the fund's appeal by welcoming the newcomers' participation," you can simply create separate funds for each of the growing demographic groups that is allegedly prompting the change in the name of your holiday charity. I suspect that you realize this would have been a useless exercise, since the cost of creating multiple funds like this would have exceeded the combined contributions to the "Give-A-Kwanzaa," "Give-A-Jihad," and whatever other idiotic charities you would have created.

In addition, I strongly suspect that there is a certain amount of hypocrisy going on at your newspaper. If I sat down right now and wrote a check for $50 to the "Give-A-Christmas" fund, I am quite certain that my use of the old name would not keep you from cashing it.

Sincerely,

Alberta's Child

[ronnieb]

people should, of course do that, but other people shouldn't rename those efforts to suit their purposes, those people should instead, start their own charities. No one suggests not giving, simply giving thru another venue, so lets not misrepresent, what is being said, or you are open to being called what you are calling!

[RileyD, nwJ]

What is really funny ...
I mean really funny as in
How many of these fools realize where the word Holiday comes from?

"Holiday" originates form "Holy Day", thus
"Happy Holidays" can easily elicit the following reply, "Happy Holy Days to you as well!!"

I have had some fun with this.

RileyD, nwJ

[maestro]

Bump your#2....

BOYCOTT the charity. Give to the Salvation Army instead!

[weeder]

BUCKS COUNTY COURIER TIMES- LETTERS TO THE EDITOR
How to write:
Letters need: a signature, address and daytime phone number for verification.
Limit: 200 words for letters
Frequency: Writers are eligible for publication every four weeks. Submissions are edited for taste, libel, style, grammar and length.
Not accepted: thank you letters, poetry, classroom assignments, replies to replies, consumer complaints and letters written as part of an organized campaign.
FAX: 215-949-4177
E-mail: gpetroziello@phillyBurbs.com
Send to: Bucks County Courier Times
8400 Route 13
Levittown, Pa. 19057

[John Robertson]

Yeah, but did you notice how, no matter how hard the writer tried, he still couldn't hide his snide, we're-better-than-you-clods attitude?

[Lijahsbubbe]

This is my local paper. They changed the name last year, and contributions plummeted. They must have thought that a year passing would settle things down, but the fund is again flagging. Hence, the "can't we just be friends?' editorial. Sure we can. Change the name back, you liberal simps!

What? Could it possibly be that mainly Christians are contributing to the Give-A-Christmas Fund? Why don't they have a charity for every religious holiday and see how much charity they get from the groups they are so worried about offending.

[expatpat]

You mean like "To tell the truth..." or "Frankly,.." when they are neither truthful or frank.

[McGavin999]

We understand your wanting to broaden your scope, really we do, but we're going to give to another charity that isn't ashamed of it's reason for being. We wish you luck with your new broadened base, really we do.

[Lijahsbubbe]

People should make an effort to give directly to those in need.

That's the best way to go. I cut out the phoney overhead laden charities years ago. It's a great satisfaction to give to someone and know they're actually getting it.

[Inyo-Mono]

This is really sad. My ancestors settled in Bucks County in the 1720s and established the first Lutheran Church there.

[Kiss Me Hardy]

Boycott the charity -- and boycott the firms that advertisein this rag. And let the stores know why you're not buying there.

Ads are why newspapers exist. If they drive customers away instead of bringing them in, management hears about it pretty darn soon.

[Tall_Texan]

Our goal, after all, is to raise as much money as we can, so we can help as many people as possible.

Osama bin Laden says put him down for $20 mil. After all, nobody cares where the charity money comes from or what other aims the givers may have. < /sarcasm>

[Lancey Howard]

Yeah, but did you notice how, no matter how hard the writer tried, he still couldn't hide his snide, we're-better-than-you-clods attitude?

Oh man, this is nothing compared to the way they normally behave on their editorial page. You should see the editorials they have been publishing where they berate Pennsylvania's Republican legislature for not going along with Fast Eddie Rendell's tax hikes and teachers union payoff schemes ("education funding"). The venom drips from the page. See, Fast Eddie was elected, and so he has a "mandate".

The paper does not even bother to hide it's function as a mouthpiece for the DNC. Truly pathetic.

[Reagan is King]

But replacing Give-A-Christmas with Holiday Fund - a change we implemented last year - wasn't done to minimize the importance of Christianity's most celebrated and joyous holiday.

Sure it wasn't. I mean, what does Christ have to do with Christmas anyway? It's just a "holiday" to people like you.

I wish I took that rag of a paper just so I could have the satisfaction of cancelling it tomorrow.

[Lancey Howard]

By the way, did you catch this line?:

We recognize and accept the profound role Christians played in the founding and development of this nation.

Christians "played a role"? I thought it was Christians who pulled the whole thing off?

[ppaul]

It was a practical decision, not one driven by political correctness or any other ideology, as many of our letter-writing critics have charged. Nor was our intention to water down or in any way neutralize Christmas.

B.S.

Forget this "fund."
Give to the Salvation Army instead.

[Lancey Howard]

"We didn't drop Give-A-Christmas in favor of Holiday Fund in a politically correct effort to minimize religion."

They are lying.
This has the stench of political correctness all over it.