Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Researcher Says Homosexuals Can Change
Agape Press ^ | 12/11/03 | Ed Vitagliano

Posted on 12/11/2003 7:30:32 AM PST by truthandlife

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-37 last
To: truthandlife
Throughout history, the major civilizations major religions condemned homosexuality.1 Until 1961 homosexual acts were illegal throughout America.

Gays claim that the "prevailing attitude toward homosexuals in the U.S. and many other countries is revulsion and hostility....for acts and desires not harmful to anyone."3 The American Psychological Association and the American Public Health Association assured the U.S. Supreme Court in 1986 that "no significant data show that engaging in...oral and anal sex, results in mental or physical dysfunction."4

What Homosexuals Do

The major surveys on homosexual behavior are summarized below. Two things stand out 1) homosexuals behave similarly world-over, and 2) as Harvard Medical Professor, Dr. William Haseltine,33 noted in 1993, the "changes in sexual behavior that have been reported to have occurred in some groups have proved, for the most part, to be transient. For example, bath houses and sex clubs in many cities have either reopened or were never closed."

Homosexual Activities (in %)

		US16 US13  US    US18 Denmark20 US19  London27  Sydney/London26                                                            Canada25                                                      
		1940s1977 83/84  1983  1984   1983    1985       1991                       
		ever ever  ever in yr in yr  in mo   in mo   last 6mo                                                                                  
oral/penile       83   99  100/99  99    86             67                 
anal/penile       68   91   93/98  95    92     95     100                 
oral/anal         59   83   92/92  63           69      89       55/65       
urine sex         10   23    29/                                              
fisting/toys      22   41/47 34                                       
fecal sex-eating        4     8                                                       
enemas        	       11    11                                               
torture sex       22   37    37                                              
public/orgy sex   61   76    88                                               
sex with minors   37   23    24/                                          

ORAL SEX Homosexuals fellate almost all of their sexual contacts (and ingest semen from about half of these). Semen contains many of the germs carried in the blood. Because of this, gays who practice oral sex verge on consuming raw human blood, with all its medical risks. Since the penis often has tiny lesions (and often will have been in unsanitary places such as a rectum), individuals so involved may become infected with hepatitis A or gonorrhea (and even HIV and hepatitis B). Since many contacts occur between strangers (70% of gays estimated that they had had sex only once with over half of their partners17,27), and gays average somewhere between 106 and 1105 different partners/year, the potential for infection is considerable.

RECTAL SEX Surveys indicate that about 90% of gays have engaged in rectal intercourse, and about two-thirds do it regularly. In a 6-month long study of daily sexual diaries,3 gays averaged 110 sex partners and 68 rectal encounters a year.

Rectal sex is dangerous. During rectal intercourse the rectum becomes a mixing bowl for 1) saliva and its germs and/or an artificial lubricant, 2) the recipient's own feces, 3) whatever germs, infections or substances the penis has on it, and 4) the seminal fluid of the inserter. Since sperm readily penetrate the rectal wall (which is only one cell thick) causing immunologic damage, and tearing or bruising of the anal wall is very common during anal/penile sex, these substances gain almost direct access to the blood stream. Unlike heterosexual intercourse (in which sperm cannot penetrate the multilayered vagina and no feces are present),7 rectal intercourse is probably the most sexually efficient way to spread hepatitis B, HIV syphilis and a host of other blood-borne diseases.

Tearing or ripping of the anal wall is especially likely with "fisting," where the hand and arm is inserted into the rectum. It is also common when "toys" are employed (homosexual lingo for objects which are inserted into the rectum--bottles, carrots, even gerbils8). The risk of contamination and/or having to wear a colostomy bag from such "sport" is very real. Fisting was apparently so rare in Kinsey's time that he didn't think to talk about it. By 1977, well over a third of gays admitted to doing it. The rectum was not designed to accommodate the fist, and those who do so can find themselves consigned to diapers for life.

FECAL SEX About 80% of gays (see Table) admit to licking and/or inserting their tongues into the anus of partners and thus ingesting medically significant amounts of feces. Those who eat or wallow in it are probably at even greater risk. In the diary study,5 70% of the gays had engaged in this activity--half regularly over 6 months. Result? --the "annual incidence of hepatitis A in...homosexual men was 22 percent, whereas no heterosexual men acquired hepatitis A." In 1992,26 it was noted that the proportion of London gays engaging in oral/anal sex had not declined since 1984.

While the body has defenses against fecal germs, exposure to the fecal discharge of dozens of strangers each year is extremely unhealthy. Ingestion of human waste is the major route of contracting hepatitis A and the enteric parasites collectively known as the Gay Bowel Syndrome. Consumption of feces has also been implicated in the transmission of typhoid fever,9 herpes, and cancer.27 About 10% of gays have eaten or played with [e.g., enemas, wallowing in feces]. The San Francisco Department of Public Health saw 75,000 patients per year, of whom 70 to 80 per cent are homosexual men....An average of 10 per cent of all patients and asymptomatic contacts reported...because of positive fecal samples or cultures for amoeba, giardia, and shigella infections were employed as food handlers in public establishments; almost 5 per cent of those with hepatitis A were similarly employed."10 In 1976, a rare airborne scarlet fever broke out among gays and just missed sweeping through San Francisco.10 The U.S. Centers for Disease Control reported that 29% of the hepatitis A cases in Denver, 66% in New York, 50% in San Francisco, 56% in Toronto, 42% in Montreal and 26% in Melbourne in the first six months of 1991 were among gays.11 A 1982 study "suggested that some transmission from the homosexual group to the general population may have occurred."12

URINE SEX About 10% of Kinsey's gays reported having engaged in "golden showers" [drinking or being splashed with urine]. In the largest survey of gays ever conducted,13 23% admitted to urine-sex. In the largest random survey of gays,6 29% reported urine-sex. In a San Francisco study of 655 gays,14 only 24% claimed to have been monogamous in the past year. Of these monogamous gays, 5% drank urine, 7% practiced "fisting," 33% ingested feces via anal/oral contact, 53% swallowed semen, and 59% received semen in their rectum during the previous month.

OTHER GAY SEX PRACTICES

SADOMASOCHISM as the Table indicates, a large minority of gays engage in torture for sexual fun. Sex with minors 25% of white gays17 admitted to sex with boys 16 or younger as adults. In a 9-state study,30 33% of the 181 male, and 22% of the 18 female teachers caught molesting students did so homosexually (though less than 3% of men and 2% of women engage in homosexuality31). Depending on the study, the percent of gays reporting sex in public restrooms ranged from 14%16 to 41%13 to 66%,6 9%16, 60%13 and 67%5 reported sex in gay baths; 64%16 and 90%18 said that they used illegal drugs.

Fear of AIDS may have reduced the volume of gay sex partners, but the numbers are prodigious by any standard. Morin15 reported that 824 gays had lowered their sex-rate from 70 different partners/yr. in 1982 to 50/yr. by 1984. McKusick14 reported declines from 76/yr. to 47/yr. in 1985. In Spain32 the average was 42/yr. in 1989.

Medical Consequences of Homosexual Sex

Death and disease accompany promiscuous and unsanitary sexual activity. 70%25 to 78%x,13 of gays reported having had a sexually transmitted disease. The proportion with intestinal parasites (worms, flukes, amoeba) ranged from 25%18 to 39%19 to 59%.20 As of 1992, 83% of U.S. AIDS in whites had occurred in gays.21 The Seattle sexual diary study3? reported that gays had, on a yearly average:

  1. fellated 108 men and swallowed semen from 48;
  2. exchanged saliva with 96;
  3. experienced 68 penile penetrations of the anus; and
  4. ingested fecal material from 19.

No wonder 10% came down with hepatitis B and 7% contracted hepatitis A during the 6-month study.

Effects on the Lifespan

Smokers and drug addicts don't live as long as non-smokers or non-addicts, so we consider smoking and narcotics abuse harmful. The typical life-span of homosexuals suggests that their activities are more destructive than smoking nd as dangerous as drugs.

Obituaries numbering 6,516 from 16 U.S. homosexual journals over the past 12 years were compared to a large sample of obituaries from regular newspapers.23 The obituaries from the regular newspapers were similar to U.S. averages for longevity; the medium age of death of married men was 75, and 80% of them died old (age 65 or older). For unmarried or divorced men the median age of death was 57, and 32% of them died old. Married women averaged age 79 at death; 85% died old. Unmarried and divorced women averaged age 71, and 60% of them died old.

The median age of death for homosexuals, however, was virtually the same nationwide--and, overall, less than 2% survived to old age. If AIDS was the cause of death, the median age was 39. For the 829 gays who died of something other than AIDS, the median age of death was 42, and 9% died old. The 163 lesbians had a median age of death of 44, and 20% died old.

Two and eight-tenths percent (2.8%) of gays died violently. They were 116 times more apt to be murdered; 24 times more apt to commit suicide; and had a traffic-accident death-rate 18 times the rate of comparably-aged white males. Heart attacks, cancer and liver failure were exceptionally common. Twenty percent of lesbians died of murder, suicide, or accident--a rate 487 times higher than that of white females aged 25-44. The age distribution of samples of homosexuals in the scientific literature from 1989 to 1992 suggests a similarly shortened life-span.

The Gay Legacy

Homosexuals rode into the dawn of sexual freedom and returned with a plague that gives every indication of destroying most of them. Those who treat AIDS patients are at great risk, not only from HIV infection, which as of 1992 involved over 100 health care workers,21 but also from TB and new strains of other diseases.24 Those who are housed with AIDS patients are also at risk.24 Those who are housed with AIDS patients are also at risk.24 Dr. Max Essex, chair of the Harvard AIDS Institute, warned congress in 1992 that "AIDS has already led to other kinds of dangerous epidemics...If AIDS is not eliminated, other new lethal microbes will emerge, and neither safe sex nor drug free practices will prevent them."28 At least 8, and perhaps as many as 30 29 patients had been infected with HIV by health care workers as of 1992.

The Biological Swapmeet

The typical sexual practices of homosexuals are a medical horror story --imagine exchanging saliva, feces, semen and/or blood with dozens of different men each year. Imagine drinking urine, ingesting feces and experiencing rectal trauma on a regular basis. Often these encounters occur while the participants are drunk, high, and/or in an orgy setting. Further, many of them occur in extremely unsanitary places (bathrooms, dirty peep shows), or, because homosexuals travel so frequently, in other parts of the world.

Every year, a quarter or more of homosexuals visit another country.20 Fresh American germs get taken to Europe, Africa and Asia. And fresh pathogens from these continents come here. Foreign homosexuals regularly visit the U.S. and participate in this biological swapmeet.

The Pattern of Infection

Unfortunately the danger of these exchanges does not merely affect homosexuals. Travelers carried so many tropical diseases to New York City that it had to institute a tropical disease center, and gays carried HIV from New York City to the rest of the world.27 Most of the 6,349 Americans who got AIDS from contaminated blood as of 1992, received it from homosexuals and most of the women in California who got AIDS through heterosexual activity got it from men who engaged in homosexual behavior.23 The rare form of airborne scarlet fever that stalked San Francisco in 1976 also started among homosexuals.10

Genuine Compassion

Society is legitimately concerned with health risks-- they impact our taxes and everyone's chances of illness and injury. Because we care about them, smokers are discouraged from smoking by higher insurance premiums, taxes on cigarettes and bans against smoking in public. These social pressures cause many to quit. They likewise encourage non-smokers to stay non-smokers.

Homosexuals are sexually troubled people engaging in dangerous activities. Because we care about them and those tempted to join them, it is important that we neither encourage nor legitimize such a destructive lifestyle.



21 posted on 12/11/2003 8:24:26 AM PST by Happy2BMe (2004 - Who WILL the TERRORISTS vote for? - - Not George W. Bush, THAT'S for sure!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ElkGroveDan
Alcoholism in not hereditary -- that's just more of the same psychobabble/liberal propaganda.

There are obsessive/compulsive personality disorders which manifest themselves in harmful behavior, like abusing alcohol, drugs, sex, other people, etc.

But it is impossible for human beings to be hard-wired genetically to become alcoholics because alcohol is not found in the environment naturally. It is man-made, and thus cannot be something the human gene code recognizes instinctually as positive or negative.

22 posted on 12/11/2003 8:25:14 AM PST by Dr. Eckleburg (There are very few shades of gray.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: Dr. Eckleburg
"But it is impossible for human beings to be hard-wired genetically to become alcoholics because alcohol is not found in the environment naturally."

Not so fast. Many babies, unfortunately, are born addicted to drugs and must undergo long, horrible withdrawals in the hospital before going home. The hospital slowly weens them off the the drug, often times it takes a month or so. It's not much of a stretch to reason that if this baby should experiment with that drug in later years that the addiction would be triggered, or re-ignited. Same thing probably holds true with alcohol, which is just a the drug ether in liquid form. Alcoholism seems very much to be a 'family disease', for lack of a better term.

23 posted on 12/11/2003 8:58:45 AM PST by TheCrusader
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: TheCrusader
The babies were not "genetically" predisposed to drug addiction. Their bodies were injected with the drugs.

Apples and oranges.

The "family disease" of alcoholism is a learned behavior.

24 posted on 12/11/2003 9:04:44 AM PST by Dr. Eckleburg (There are very few shades of gray.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: ElkGroveDan
"Could it be that the Lord created us with many different crosses to bear and that different people are faced with different weaknesses?"

Well said. That has always been my thoughts regarding homosexuality especially when faced with the argument that "God made them that way".
25 posted on 12/11/2003 9:13:30 AM PST by OldBlondBabe
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: Dr. Eckleburg; truthandlife
These reports come out all the time (because they're true).

Yep. Thousands have left the homosexual lifestyle. It's really sad that more folks don't discourage homosexual behavior and encourage those who engage in such behavior to seek the help that's available.

Help for homosexuals can be found from many organizations.

26 posted on 12/11/2003 9:49:44 AM PST by scripter (Thousands have left the homosexual lifestyle)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: Happy2BMe
Since you are getting graphic, I hope you don't mind if I am blunt as well. I am straight and I have engaged (with women) in:

Oral Sex

Anal Sex

'Fecal Sex'?

Sadomasochism

Is it the act itself that you don't like or the fact that it is homosexual?

I do agree with you that engaging in these activities with multiple strangers (men or women) is not a good idea.

27 posted on 12/11/2003 10:25:11 AM PST by conserv13
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: conserv13
Animals. Do you like animals too?
28 posted on 12/11/2003 10:28:14 AM PST by Happy2BMe (2004 - Who WILL the TERRORISTS vote for? - - Not George W. Bush, THAT'S for sure!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: Happy2BMe
Animals. Do you like animals too?

No.

29 posted on 12/11/2003 10:34:51 AM PST by conserv13
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]

To: conserv13
Why not? Don't be limited, why follow "rules"? Morality is bendable, just because some people say it's wrong or weird. Try it, you might like it!
30 posted on 12/11/2003 11:06:28 AM PST by little jeremiah
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]

To: little jeremiah
I hope you are being facetious and can tell the difference between sex between 2 consenting adults of the same species and bestiality.

Morality is bendable, just because some people say it's wrong or weird.

Where does morality come from?

31 posted on 12/11/2003 11:13:47 AM PST by conserv13
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies]

To: Happy2BMe
sinkspur is going to be pissed that you posted that. A priest was recently enjoined by his diocese from handing out this pamphlet. A female repesentative called it "almost pornographic".
32 posted on 12/11/2003 11:49:02 AM PST by jimt
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: conserv13
I hope you are being facetious and can tell the difference between sex between 2 consenting adults of the same species and bestiality.

Why should it be limited to two? And if the animal's not injured or discomfited in any way, why is bestiality wrong?

33 posted on 12/11/2003 11:54:07 AM PST by jimt
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies]

To: jimt
Why should it be limited to two? And if the animal's not injured or discomfited in any way, why is bestiality wrong?

I don't think there is anything wrong with safe group sex. As long as everyone knows everyone else well and everyone is into it.

animals cannot consent to sex. Baaaahhhhh means 'no'

34 posted on 12/11/2003 12:06:38 PM PST by conserv13
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies]

To: conserv13
"Where does morality come from?"

You sure opened a can of worms there. We risk delving into theology, and education, and law codes, and a lot of other seemingly unrelated topics. But let us take this down to the most pragmatic level, just learning from experience. What works, and what doesn't? Should we confine ourselves to what works, or do we experiment continually? Continual experimentation generally results in something like the Darwinian competition, resulting in removing the overly adventurous from the gene pool. On the other hand, confining oneself to only known and proven ways is a sure sign of stagnation, and eventually some rather close inbreeding. Neither position would be particularly "moral" in that a bad outcome occurs with either course, both of which may be considered to be "extreme". But somewhere in that gray area between too much innovation and too little, there is a range of acceptable behavior that ought to be emulated and encouraged. Some things are not done, because of the overall hurtful effects that greatly outweigh any potential benefits. Some things are so overwhelming useful and the outcomes so brilliantly admirable that great effort should be made to repeat the behavior. And note that I never once mentioned God, or mother, or policemen. Doing the right thing, even when nobody is looking, is the definition of personal morality. Also defines character.

35 posted on 12/11/2003 12:06:55 PM PST by alloysteel
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies]

To: alloysteel
That was great. Thanks!
36 posted on 12/11/2003 12:28:47 PM PST by conserv13
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies]

To: Dr. Eckleburg
"The babies were not "genetically" predisposed to drug addiction. Their bodies were injected with the drugs. Apples and oranges."

The thrust of my post implied that these babies are born addicted through absorbing the drug from their mother's blood stream; mothers taking methodone in pill form throughout their pregnancy will addict their babies. These chidlren can possibly get triggered back to addiction later in life by experimenting with a chemically similar substance. There are only two basic elements of addiction to a substance. (1). WITHDRAWAL SYMPTOMS - The person goes through withdrawal symptoms when the substance is no longer present in the body. (2). TOLERANCE - The person requires more and more of the substance to do what it only a small amount of it used to do.

"The "family disease" of alcoholism is a learned behavior."

Actually, I believe it's both. How do you account for the son or daughter of an alcoholic who, out of fear, never touched a drop until they reached their thirties, at which time they became alcoholics almost overnight? I have heard many such stories, and have met many such individuals.

37 posted on 12/11/2003 4:11:41 PM PST by TheCrusader
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-37 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson