Skip to comments.Meet the Greedy Grandparents
Posted on 12/11/2003 10:48:56 AM PST by luckydevi
When Social Security was founded, offering a federal pension at age 65, most of the people born 65 years earlier couldn't take advantage of it. They were dead. For the lucky ones who lived long enough to collect, the new pension system, founded in 1935, was meant as a modest support in the brief span before they passed on to glory. No more. Since then, life expectancy at birth in America has increased to more than 77 years. For the majority of people, that means lots of time being supported by the government. A working life is now just a tedious interregnum between two long periods of comfortable dependence.
America's elderly have never had it so good. They enjoy better health than any previous generation of old people, high incomes and ample assets, access to a host of medical treatments that not only keep them alive but let them enjoy their extra years, and a riotous multitude of ways to spoil their grandchildren. Still they are not content. From gratefully accepting a basic level of assistance back in the early decades of Social Security, America's elderly have come to expect everything their durable little hearts desire.
They often get their way, as they did recently when years of complaints finally induced Congress and the president to agree to bear much of the cost of their prescription drugs. From the tenor of the debate, you would think these medications were a terrible burden inflicted by an uncaring fate. In fact, past generations of old people didn't have to make room in their budgets for pharmaceuticals because there weren't many to buy. If you suffered from high cholesterol, chronic heartburn, or depression, you were left to primitive remedies, or none. Today, there are pills and potions for just about any complaintexcept the chronic complaint that many of them are pricey. It's not enough to be blessed with medical miracles. Modern seniors also want them cheap, if not free.
That's on top of everything else they get. Retirement benefits used to be just one of the federal government's many maternal functions. But in recent years, the federal government has begun to look like an appendage of Social Security. In 2000, 35 percent of all federal spending dollars went to Social Security and Medicare. By 2040, barring an increase in total federal outlays, they'll account for more than 60 percent of the budget. And that's before you add in the prescription drug benefit. Most of the projected growth is due to rising health-care costs, not to the aging of the population, according to the Congressional Budget Office. Retirees eyeing this bounty feel no pangs of guilt, thanks to their unshakable conviction that they earned every dime by sweat and toil. In fact, economists Laurence Kotlikoff and Jagadeesh Gokhale say that a typical man reaching age 65 today will get a net windfall of more than $70,000 over his remaining years. A luckless 25-year-old, by contrast, can count on paying $322,000 more in payroll taxes than he will ever get back in benefits.
Why do we keep indulging the grizzled ones? The most obvious reason is that they are so tireless and well-organized in demanding alms. No politician ever lost an election because he was too generous to little old ladies. A lot of people are suckered by the image of financially strapped seniors, even though the poverty rate among those 65 and over has been lower than that for the population as a whole since 1974. But it's not just the interests of old coots that are being served here. Young and middle-aged adults tend to look kindly upon lavish federal generosity to Grandma because it means she won't be hitting them up for help. Paying taxes may be onerous, but it's nothing compared to the cost, financial and otherwise, of adding a mother-in-law suite to the house. Working-age folks also assume that whatever they bestow upon today's seniors will be likewise bestowed on them, and in the not too distant future. It's not really fair to blame the greatest generation for this extravagance. They are guilty, but they have an accomplice.
It's surely no coincidence that the new drug benefit is being enacted just as the first baby boomers are nearing retirement age. Nor can it be forgotten that the organization formerly known as the American Association of Retired Peopleit's now just AARPhas lately broadened its membership to include all the boomers it can get its wrinkled hands on. AARP, to the surprise of many, endorsed the plan. And what a surprise it is that the prescription drug program, which will cost some $400 billion over the next 10 years, could balloon to $2 trillion in the 10 years following thatwhen guess-who will be collecting. You would expect taxpayers in their peak earning years to recoil in horror from a program that will vastly increase Washington's fiscal obligations for decades to come. In fact, theymake that wecan see that the time to lock in a prosperous old age is now, before twentysomethings know what's hit them.
Boomers have gotten our way every since we arrived in this world, and the onset of gray hair, bifocals, and arthritis is not going to moderate our unswerving self-indulgence. We are the same people, after all, who forced the lowering of the drinking age when we were young, so we could drink, and forced it back up when we got older, so our kids couldn't. On top of that, we're used to the best of everything, and plenty of it. We weren't dubbed the Me Generation because we neglect our own needs, Junior. If politicians think the current geezers are greedy, they ain't seen nothin' yet.
But responsible middle-aged sorts may yet be brought to their senses when they realize that their usual impulse to get all they can will sooner or later collide with another boomer obsession: the insatiable desire to furnish our kids with every advantage known to humanity. Load Social Security with more obligations than it can bear, and our precious offspring will be squashed under the weight. To fund all the obligations of the Social Security system, payroll taxes will have to more than double by 2040on top of whatever it costs to buy all those prescription drugs. At that point, our children will realize the trick we've pulled and start to hate our guts. That would be a cruel blow to a generation that thinks of itself as the most wonderful parents in history.
To avoid that fate, boomers need to recognize the need to stop writing checks that today's youngsters will have to cash. With the eager help of our own parents, we've created an entitlement that is fast becoming unaffordable. To bring Social Security into conformity with reality, we'll have to resign ourselves to a higher retirement age reflecting our prospective vigor and life expectancy. We'll have to accept more stringent controls on Medicare spending and take more responsibility for our own medical needs. We'll have to abandon our assumption that the point of the health-care system is to keep each of us alive forever. At some pointdon't worry, not anytime soonwe will have to embrace a duty to stop functioning as a fiscal burden on our children and start serving as a nutritional resource for worms.
Ummm... Maybe for sufficiently incorrect values of "GenX". Every definition I've ever seen would have GenX currently roughly between the mid- to late-20s and late-30s.
Would it be expecting too much of the kiddies to expect them to know that you were too young to even vote when these things came to be?
Growing up (I'm a couple of years younger than you, but only a couple) we knew tons of kids who were truly messed up. They usually blamed their own parents, you know, the gods of the Greatest Generation. We used to hope that these bozos would never have kids of their own...it looks like a bunch of them did.
(Pity I won't be around when you reach the "greedy" age, and start howling for your "entitlements".)
PS: FYI, I started working-and contributing to SS-at the age of 14. I retired at 63-could have waited another 2 years and increased my ill-gotten gains,but decided to save some for the greedy whiners who would follow.
*VBG*Very good. And I will take it as early as I can get it, to make sure I get as much of it as I can, before it runs out. I still won't get out of it what I put into it.
My luck I'll have a stroke and die early. Nothing ever works out.
In God We Trust
Answer...ZERO in '64 and @ 1% in '68.
A51, one more under-educated, hate-filled permanent adolescent struggling through the oedipal thing. Good luck.
Not exactly. On the Social Security issue, three generations of Americans have systematically elected liars and defeated truth tellers. Future generations are under no obligation to redeem the corrupt bargains made by their predecessors.
Excellent point. Ironically, I believe this narcissism is rooted in nothing more than accidents of history. Baby Boomers were coming of age just as monumental changes were occurring in our economic, political, and social order (the civil rights movement, space travel, the movement of large segments of our population from the cities to the suburbs, etc.). What makes these "accidents of history" from the Baby Boomers' perspective is that they really didn't have anything to do with these things, but they are the defining moments of their formative years.
This, by the way, is one reason why I refused to pay a nickel to see the movie Saving Private Ryan -- not because this self-described tribute to "The Greatest Generation" wasn't worthwhile, or well-deserved, but because a jack@ss like Steven Spielberg did us all a great disservice by making a movie like this instead of making a blunt, accurate movie as a "tribute" to his own generation.
btw...first fica payment at age seventeen, know what all the $$ since would be worth if invested privately?
Enjoy your retirement and make it last.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.