Skip to comments.
Reviewing 2003, Bush Emphasizes Medicare, Not War
yahoo news ^
| 12/13/03
Posted on 12/13/2003 8:12:50 AM PST by RJCogburn
Seeking to highlight his accomplishments ahead of next year's election, President Bush on Saturday touted the overhaul of the Medicare health program and played down the war in Iraq.
In a radio address devoted to the "milestones" of 2003, Bush gave top billing to the passage of a Medicare bill that adds a prescription drug benefit to the national health program for the elderly and disabled.
He then cited his tax cuts and credited them for a pickup in the U.S. economy, which suffered a recession in 2001 and grew sluggishly in its wake.
Only toward the end of four-minute radio address did Bush mention the war in Iraq, which marked one of the defining moments of his presidency.
In discussing the Iraq conflict, Bush cited it as an accomplishment in his administration's "war on terror."
Bush said his administration "took urgent action on every front in the war on terror," and he mentioned the creation of the new Department of Homeland Security along with the Iraq war and the reconstruction of Afghanistan as part of that effort.
Democrats have increasingly attacked Bush on the issue of the war in Iraq, which he launched in March 2003.
Guerrilla attacks and difficulties securing enough international support to help the country rebuild have posed challenges for Bush, who in May declared the end of major combat operations in Iraq.
TOPICS: Government; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: 2003review; bush43; radioaddress
Bush gave top billing to the passage of a Medicare bill that adds a prescription drug benefit to the national health program for the elderly and disabled. Craven political calculation. I had hoped for more from GWB. He is a huge disappointment.
1
posted on
12/13/2003 8:12:50 AM PST
by
RJCogburn
To: RJCogburn
My 80 year old mother is very angry about Bush's Medicare bill. She is normally inclined to vote Democrat, and is so mad that she is quitting AARP.
Whatever political calculation Bush made about winning the liberal senior citizen votes, he screwed up big time.
No political gain, and saddling the US with $400 billion (probably trillions, actually) in new spending.
My respect for Bush is sinking rapidly.
2
posted on
12/13/2003 8:21:51 AM PST
by
Maceman
(Too nuanced for a bumper sticker)
To: RJCogburn
Here's the letter I faxed to Bush on CFR:
You have attained success in your attempt to restrict the ability of your constituents to comment upon or criticize your political behavior. The USSC upheld your traitorous, evil, affirmative signature on the CFR legislation.
As Scalia so eloquently stated:
"The first instinct of power is the retention of power, and, under a Constitution that requires periodic elections, that is best achieved by the suppression of election time speech. We have witnessed merely the second scene of Act I of what promises to be a lengthy tragedy. In scene 3 the Court, having abandoned most of the First Amendment weaponry that Buckley left intact, will be even less equipped to resist the incumbents' writing of the rules of political debate. The federal election campaign laws, which are already (as today's opinions show) so voluminous, so detailed, so complex, that no ordinary citizen dare run for office, or even contribute a significant sum, without hiring an expert advisor in the field, can be expected to grow more voluminous, more detailed, and more complex in the years to come and always, always, with the objective of reducing the excessive amount of speech. "
The key point here is that you and the rest of the ruling political class have now legally constrained who can speak about you and when. The rest of the act is just fluff.
Repeat: We are now restricted, by law (by you), from speaking about political candidates prior to an election upon pain of imprisonment.
Some will argue that, oh it's only certain groups of people who cannot speak, but that is a red herring. Once the ability of the American people to manifest political speech has been limited, it is only a matter of time until that freedom to speak is reduced to complete uselessness. Indeed, ultimately we will be told we have the freedom of political speech but the only situation in which we will be able to exercise that 'freedom' will be when we are alone in the toilet.
You, the political class, have now made it clear you are separated from us common folk. You have established the precedent of yourselves as the new feudal aristocracy in America and objections from us common folk will not be tolerated upon penalty of imprisonment.
In 2000 I prayed for your victory. I voted for you. I rejoiced when you won.
You have betrayed that support.
From this point on I will publicly oppose your position as President. I will actively work against your re-election attempt - due primarily to your decision to impose an untouchable political aristocracy upon your constituents. I will do all in my power to assure that neither you nor your progeny will ever again subvert and corrupt the freedom given us by God and protected by the blood of our citizens.
You have earned the enmity of all who love liberty and resist tyranny. You have made it clear you represent the same evil that gave the world Lenin, Stalin, Mao, Pol Pot and Hitler. You have subverted liberty. You have imposed tyranny upon your constituents.
May God have mercy on your soul.
3
posted on
12/13/2003 8:48:38 AM PST
by
jimkress
(America has become Soviet Union Lite)
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson