Skip to comments.
Flu shot unable to combat virus strain
Associated Press ^
| Mon, Dec. 15, 2003
| DANIEL Q. HANEY
Posted on 12/15/2003 2:44:36 PM PST by ask
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80 ... 121-132 next last
1
posted on
12/15/2003 2:44:36 PM PST
by
ask
To: ask
F**** the FLU shot!
2
posted on
12/15/2003 2:45:58 PM PST
by
ConservativeMan55
(A tiger is a tiger. Some things you can't change no matter how hard you try.)
To: ConservativeMan55
Heheheh. That boy DOES get around don't he?
To: ask
I am sure Bush is to blame...
To: EggsAckley
LOL!
5
posted on
12/15/2003 2:49:42 PM PST
by
ConservativeMan55
(A tiger is a tiger. Some things you can't change no matter how hard you try.)
To: EggsAckley
6
posted on
12/15/2003 2:50:38 PM PST
by
ConservativeMan55
(A tiger is a tiger. Some things you can't change no matter how hard you try.)
To: ask
I'm sick as a dog right now. I think it's SARS. Or Monkeypox. Maybe even that stuff they're talking about on 24. I bet I got it from those chemtrail thingys. I did NOT get a flu shot this year. Never have, never will. I have to go back to bed now, and ponder the wisdom of that decision.
7
posted on
12/15/2003 2:54:07 PM PST
by
thatdewd
To: ask
IMHO, it's best to let our bodies naturally build a resistance to these viruses.
Best way to avoid the flu, wash your hands.
8
posted on
12/15/2003 2:54:23 PM PST
by
appalachian_dweller
(If we accept responsibility for our own actions, we are indeed worthy of our freedom. – Bill Whittle)
To: ask
Hillarys socialized medicine plan - for the sake of the children - broke the back of pharmacudical companies. We're seeing the results of government interferance again. Failure.
Hillary's Flu Vaccine Crisis (News Max)
To: ask
Seriously, though, doesn't this just illustrate how precarious things can be for us? What if a flu virus mutated so severely that it cause a 25-30% death rate? Could modern medicine be able to prevent it? This story appears to answer no, at least not very quickly.
To: ask
It's a bit strange that no one bothered to tell people that the flu shot was the same as last year until the stuff was all gone. I don't think I would have gotten a shot if I had known that, because I had one last year, and it was still probably doing its job.
I should have thought that would have been a consideration for the committee as well. I have no expertise and don't like to second-guess their decision, but it seems peculiar to me. I wonder how much of this was pushed by the drug companies?
I wonder who appointed Nancy Cox. She's all over the internet, but I can't seem to find a biography.
11
posted on
12/15/2003 2:55:40 PM PST
by
Cicero
(Marcus Tullius)
To: thatdewd
I've got it, too.
12
posted on
12/15/2003 2:56:37 PM PST
by
EllaMinnow
(I miss Chancellor Palpatine. Heck, I even miss Illbay.)
To: Cicero
I had a shot last year, and I've got the flu right now.
13
posted on
12/15/2003 2:57:36 PM PST
by
EllaMinnow
(I miss Chancellor Palpatine. Heck, I even miss Illbay.)
To: Cicero
>> It's a bit strange that no one bothered to tell people that the flu shot was the same as last year until the stuff was all gone. <<
Execellent point. Now that the drug companies have made their profit they'll come clean w/ the truth.
14
posted on
12/15/2003 2:58:18 PM PST
by
appalachian_dweller
(If we accept responsibility for our own actions, we are indeed worthy of our freedom. – Bill Whittle)
To: Cicero
Kind of makes me feel glad that I didn't wait in the doctor's office waiting room filled with sick people who could have given me the same flu that the vaccine would not have prevented.
15
posted on
12/15/2003 2:59:00 PM PST
by
Orangedog
(Remain calm...all is well! [/sarcasm])
To: redlipstick
The shot you got last year is the same one they gave this year but you got a different type of flu.
I wish I'd known this sooner and I could have saved the twenty bucks it cost me.
16
posted on
12/15/2003 3:01:37 PM PST
by
muggs
To: redlipstick
I've got it, too.My sympathies. It's horrible.
17
posted on
12/15/2003 3:03:23 PM PST
by
thatdewd
To: ask
I wonder how many here actually get a flu shot?
I have never in my life and I have but once got the flu (at 15).
18
posted on
12/15/2003 3:04:14 PM PST
by
CyberCowboy777
(I don't know... But some people without brains do an awful lot of talking... don't they?)
To: thatdewd
Flu Shot Demand Rises Sharply BUT Don't Be Fooled
The deaths of at least five Colorado children in the past two weeks to the influenza virus, coupled with what experts predict will be an especially miserable flu season, have ratcheted up demand for the vaccine and stirred fear among some parents.
Over five years ago, I posted a warning on the flu vaccines. Now we have an advertising campaign for Flumist that will cost an estimated $25 million. Sounds like a lot but Wyeth, the flu vaccine maker, will be spending another $75 million to promote this vaccine to doctors, for a grand total of $100 million.
Now, $100 million may seem like a ton of money to spend on ads, but does anyone care to guess how much they anticipate making on this vaccine?
The answer is a cool $1 billion.
The "experts" will use fear to motivate people to get a flu vaccine, but this is yet another health care illusion. Let's be clear, flu can definitely be a killer disease and is not something that should be easily dismissed. But, remember that flu shots don't prevent illness -- never have, never will.
The flu vaccine can actually weaken the immune system and make you more predisposed to the illness.
Just remember, the flu vaccine is not the answer to avoiding the flu.
People are dying from the flu because they are already sick and have compromised immune systems. The majority of the cause is surely related to eating too much sugar and too many grains, getting inadequate rest.
19
posted on
12/15/2003 3:04:34 PM PST
by
chicagolady
(Merry Christmas to all and to all a Good Night)
To: Cicero
I should have thought that would have been a consideration for the committee as well. I have no expertise and don't like to second-guess their decision, but it seems peculiar to me. I wonder how much of this was pushed by the drug companies? The companies are unable to make a profit because of Hillarys price caps. What they throw away they lose financially. They have a business to run, and took the chance they'd survive and it would work.
There's no reason for the two companies that are left to work for free. They have no motovation.
These are the only two businessess we have left. The other four went out of the business all together. Hillary said it was for the sake of the children.
Everything she touches she destroys.
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80 ... 121-132 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson