Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Albright pans iron fist approach to Iraq
Denver Post ^ | 12/23/03 | Steve Lipshe

Posted on 12/23/2003 2:10:35 AM PST by KentTrappedInLiberalSeattle

ASPEN - Former Secretary of State Madeleine Albright took the Bush administration to task Monday night for its unilateral approach to Iraq, from the run-up to war to the current reconstruction effort, saying the United States needs to maintain its foreign allegiances to successfully fight the war on terror.

"We have to make sure that we work with our allies and that we treat them with respect, and that we understand the importance of the United Nations and that we want to work through NATO and that we think diplomacy is a useful tool,' she said, suggesting that such steps would reflect a "change of approach by this administration.'

Albright, 66, spoke before a sellout crowd of 350 people at the Aspen Institute, a pre-eminent think- tank and global public-policy organization that routinely hosts high- profile speakers. She is a trustee of the institute and, besides being in Aspen on a family vacation, is touring to promote her memoir, "Madam Secretary.' Advertisement

A former ambassador to the U.N., Albright has been outspoken in her criticism of President Bush for sidestepping the international organization in going to war in March. The former secretary of state under President Clinton has questioned whether the United States actually needed to invade at the time it did, with sanctions and enforcement of the no-fly zone apparently keeping Iraqi leader Saddam Hussein in check.

"I didn't think our work was anywhere near done in Afghanistan, and I thought we had to keep our eye on the ball about that,' she said. "I thought that we had Saddam Hussein in a strategic box. I didn't think he was an imminent threat to the United States.'

Although Albright said she was convinced that Iraq, at one point, possessed the weapons of mass destruction that Bush cited as justification for war, she doesn't know whether Hussein moved them or destroyed them.

In a private interview with The Denver Post before the speech - she at one time worked in the newspaper's library - Albright conceded that Iraq and the rest of the world are better off with Hussein's capture but that the U.S. approach needs to include far more diplomacy and far less bravado.

"There are certainly times that this administration is seeing more and more the value (of diplomacy) because reality sets in, and you can't solve everything militarily. But a lot is in the way the president talks, the way Rumsfeld talks,' she said, referring to Defense Secretary Donald Rumsfeld.

Albright, the first female secretary of state and the highest-ranking woman in the history of American government, was known for wearing brooches that were said to reflect her attitude: A snake for discussing Hussein, an eagle for some other foreign officials. In Aspen, she sported a large, gilded angel on her purple suit and donned a matching necklace of large amethyst stones.

She noted that both as U.N. ambassador and as secretary of state, she forged tight alliances with her female counterparts but disputed a suggestion made recently by Ted Turner that the world would be better off if it were controlled entirely by women.

"Whoever says that has forgotten high school. The truth is, there is nothing nastier than girls in high school,' Albright said, eliciting laughter.


TOPICS: Foreign Affairs; Government; News/Current Events; War on Terror
KEYWORDS: albright; appeasement; armchairnobodies; iraq; madelinealbright; notallbright; thepenguin
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-22 next last
Senile Is as Senile Does...
1 posted on 12/23/2003 2:10:35 AM PST by KentTrappedInLiberalSeattle
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: KentTrappedInLiberalSeattle

Wily Gotham super-criminal The Penguin confidently discusses his latest master plan "to wipe out that meddlesome Batman once and for all!" at yesterday's press conference. :)

2 posted on 12/23/2003 2:13:59 AM PST by KentTrappedInLiberalSeattle ("The Clintons have damaged our country. They have done it together, in unison." -- Peggy Noonan)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: KentTrappedInLiberalSeattle
"We have to make sure that we work with our allies and that we treat them with respect, and that we understand the importance of the United Nations . . .

Some people never get it! Bush just demonstrated that the U.S. doesn't NEED the cooperation of the rest of the world. Therefore, worldwide public opinion is much less a factor. Therefore, Bush wins round one.

We are engaged in a raw power struggle with these radical Islamists. The Albright's and Carter's of the world are incapable of handling this type of situation just like they were babes facing the evil of North Korean leadership.

3 posted on 12/23/2003 2:17:19 AM PST by the_Watchman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: KentTrappedInLiberalSeattle

Batman says "Bring it On!"

4 posted on 12/23/2003 2:25:17 AM PST by Fledermaus (Fascists, Totalitarians, Baathists, Communists, Socialists, Democrats - what's the difference?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: KentTrappedInLiberalSeattle
All 350 (notice I didn't say people) agreed with what It said? Those 350 represent a majority....?

Will we never be free of the C(c)urse.........
5 posted on 12/23/2003 2:33:59 AM PST by hmmmmm
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Fledermaus

(You'd think Google would have some nice Neal Adams or Marshall Rogers "Penguin" pics listed somewhere... but NOOOOOOOOOOO...) :)

6 posted on 12/23/2003 2:35:20 AM PST by KentTrappedInLiberalSeattle ("The Clintons have damaged our country. They have done it together, in unison." -- Peggy Noonan)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: KentTrappedInLiberalSeattle

Here's one with the ladies.

7 posted on 12/23/2003 2:39:58 AM PST by Fledermaus (Fascists, Totalitarians, Baathists, Communists, Socialists, Democrats - what's the difference?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: KentTrappedInLiberalSeattle

YOUR CALL.

8 posted on 12/23/2003 2:40:26 AM PST by bullseye1911 (IQ deemed to be somewhere between an idiot-savant and Marilyn Savant.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: KentTrappedInLiberalSeattle
A former ambassador to the U.N., Albright has been outspoken in her criticism of President Bush for sidestepping the international organization in going to war in March.

That's funny -- considering this is exactly what Albright and the Clinton Administration did when they toppled Slobodan Milosevic in Serbia in 1999.

9 posted on 12/23/2003 3:11:02 AM PST by Alberta's Child (Alberta -- the TRUE North strong and free.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Alberta's Child
sidestepping the international organization in going to war in March.

Sidestepping is it? Hmm, correct me if I am wrong, but didn't 90+ countries sign on before? Didn't the Security Council vote unanimously for it? What am I missing here?

10 posted on 12/23/2003 5:01:46 AM PST by Puppage (You may disagree with what I have to say, but I will defend to your death my right to say it)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: KentTrappedInLiberalSeattle
Why does anyone care what this ridiculous kidergarten teacher says about anything?

She is a relic of a failed State Dept. in a failed Administration.
11 posted on 12/23/2003 5:15:07 AM PST by Skooz (If everyone knew everything about everyone, no one would have anything to do with anyone)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: bullseye1911

12 posted on 12/23/2003 5:17:17 AM PST by the gillman@blacklagoon.com (It's not a blanket amnesty, it's amnistia del serape!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Puppage
No, the UN Sec. COuncil did not vote for it.

Notwithstanding this fact, we have several allies working with us in Iraq, which hardly makes it a "unilateral" undertaking.

When the left says we're "unilateralist" they mean that we didn't subordinate our policy to FRANCE and that makes them sick.

Like Dean said the other day, US foreign policy is subject to what France thinks.
13 posted on 12/23/2003 5:19:44 AM PST by Guillermo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: KentTrappedInLiberalSeattle
I'm sure she was joking when she said this...
14 posted on 12/23/2003 5:21:00 AM PST by NittanyLion
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: bullseye1911
Grandpa was a lot smarter and nicer. You should be ashamed of demeaning him so, by the implied association with Albright. ;-)
15 posted on 12/23/2003 5:21:05 AM PST by FreedomPoster (this space intentionally blank)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Guillermo
No, the UN Sec. COuncil did not vote for it

Are you sure about that? Res. 1442? It was unanimous, but they didn't/wouldn't enforce it. So WE did.

16 posted on 12/23/2003 5:23:01 AM PST by Puppage (You may disagree with what I have to say, but I will defend to your death my right to say it)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: FreedomPoster
My apologies to Al...Just thought they were seperated at birth. ;^)
17 posted on 12/23/2003 5:23:04 AM PST by bullseye1911 (IQ deemed to be somewhere between an idiot-savant and Marilyn Savant.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: Puppage
Res. 1442

correction

Res. 1447

18 posted on 12/23/2003 5:28:46 AM PST by Puppage (You may disagree with what I have to say, but I will defend to your death my right to say it)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: KentTrappedInLiberalSeattle

Apparently, THIS is Albright's preferred method for how to deal with mass-murdering dictators.

Qwinn

19 posted on 12/23/2003 5:33:46 AM PST by Qwinn
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Puppage
One day I'll get it right....

RESOLUTION 1441

20 posted on 12/23/2003 5:44:35 AM PST by Puppage (You may disagree with what I have to say, but I will defend to your death my right to say it)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-22 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson