Cops play 'cat and mouse' with criminals

Valley Press ^ | December 24, 2003. | HEATHER LAKE

[The Red Zone]

Was there ever anything wrong with the alcohol laws? If not, why did anyone ever bother to repeal them?

[flashbunny]

laugh it off, it just proves you lack of debating and logic skills.

[flashbunny]

BTW, if someone breaks the newly ruled constitutional CFR laws by running an ad 60 days before the election, should they be sent to jail for exercising the constitutional right of free speech?

The law is the law, you know...

[flashbunny]

Actually, that part should either be "it just proves your lack of debating and logic skills" or "it just proves you lack debating and logic skills". Either one is appropriate in this case.

[Dr.Zoidberg]

You guys haven't figured him out yet have you? Take some time to read Mr. CWOJackson's previous posts, you'll see what I mean. He comes to these threads to agitate and nothing more. You'll not get any replies other than condescension and rudeness.

I did a ransom sampling of his posts and they all follow the same pattern. You fellows just happen to be his latest targets. Once you read up on him, you will know what to expect when he comes out of hiding again..

It's actually quite amusing to watch.

[flashbunny]

Thanks for doing the research. I figured as much, the name rung a bell but not any good ones. Too many people like that around here - low candle power upstairs, so instead of actually getting into a real debate and arguing the facts, they just try to agitate everyone and run away. I guess it proves to themselves that they are superior to us idiots who take the time to back up their positions with facts and logic.

[Dr.Zoidberg]

No worries, I just dislike watching people get worked up over silliness.

Anytime you see The august Mr. CWOJackson post to a thread, you can expect more of the same. He's a one trick pony thats a little long in the tooth.

Happy New Year :-)

[CWOJackson]

Thanks for the vote of confidence. With a barometer like you and your kind folks know their on the right track.

[eno_]

Keep things simple: Build more prisons.

The problem with the Drug War is that you would need an upsupportable number of prisons. And, consequently, as this article points out, police are swimming in a sea of criminals. They don't have the time to sort out the ones that will burglarize your house from the drug runners. Sometimes they overlap, sometimes they don't. Until we end the Drug War, the current situation, where it is impossible for police to bring property crime solution rates up out of the toilet, will continue.

We need as many prisons as it takes to keep habitual criminals inside until they are too old for the game. But with the Drug War, we already imprison more people than just about anyplace else, and we have twice as many LEOs as Communist Police State Red China.

[Dr.Zoidberg]

Well, I thank you. I appreciate your taking the time to express your support. God knows there's not enough positive reenforcement for those just trying to help. It warms the heart.

I expect I'll hear more of your wonderfully witty and well reasoned replies to similar threads in the future. As always, I'll give them the time and consideration they so richly deserve.

Too All, may God bless you and yours in the year to come. - Dr. John Zoidberg.

[CWOJackson]

"As always, I'll give them the time and consideration they so richly deserve."

And I can assure you I will give your posts the consideration and response they so richly deserve.