Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

MELISSA: CALL ME THE HUSBAND (isn't that SPECIAL?)
NY Post ^ | December 26, 2003 | Dick Johnson

Posted on 12/26/2003 7:44:57 AM PST by presidio9

Edited on 05/26/2004 5:18:02 PM PDT by Jim Robinson. [history]

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-93 next last
To: Joe Boucher
What a sick freak she is...

What a sick, talentless freak she is...

61 posted on 12/26/2003 12:38:45 PM PST by gg188
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: tacticalogic
I used to wear my utilikilt around the yard but the neighbors started complaining it was upsetting the horses.

You are joking, I am sure, but dont be surprised what may happen in the future.

Women are now in process of taking control. The majority of people in college are women, in law school, soon to be in medical school, in vetinary school, etc. Women withing the next 20 years will have the majority of high paying jobs, and will be in the majority of political and government positions, as well as the head of the household in any family where the wife makes more money than the husband.

Those who think todays male is being feminized by todays schools and laws, havent seen anything yet.

It wouldnt surprise me one bit to see males eventually being made/required to wear skirts at sometime in the future just like females were once required by the men to wear them until the 1970's.

I personally know/saw women who were fired from their jobs for coming to work wearing pants as recently as 1971, and I remember women being prohibited from entering a church, a school, and even restaurants if they were wearing pants until the mid-1970's.

Regardless, women are in process of taking control, they are now even entering the once all male-dominated fields like police, military, postal workers, even construction. If men dont start going to college and start getting good high paying jobs once again, men are voluntarily giving up control.

If you are not old enough to remember the 1950's, you dont know how much things have changed since then. Todays society is nothing like the male-dominated-ruled 1950's, and most of the changes are yet to come.

62 posted on 12/26/2003 12:43:08 PM PST by waterstraat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 46 | View Replies]

To: waterstraat
Maybe. Other times I get the sneaking suspicion that women have been making men do exactly what they want for ages, and making us think it was our idea all along.
63 posted on 12/26/2003 12:59:50 PM PST by tacticalogic (Controlled application of force is the sincerest form of communication.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 62 | View Replies]

To: tacticalogic
Maybe. Other times I get the sneaking suspicion that women have been making men do exactly what they want for ages, and making us think it was our idea all along.

Thats because you were never forced to go to school in a skirt every day no matter how much snow there was or how cold it was outside and you were never fired or denied employment in any good paying job.

As soon as the majority of our judges and mayors and governors and school boards become female, you will see lots more changes in our society, not only in our court system, not only in divorce court, not only in our schools, not only in the composition of our workforce, but in other ways as well.

64 posted on 12/26/2003 1:08:50 PM PST by waterstraat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 63 | View Replies]

To: thoughtomator
I absolutely agree with you. I guess they would like to be able to manufacture their own sperm but instead they have to "borrow" some to make it possible to have kids. If God (or "Nature"..if you prefer) meant for two women to have kids, He/it would have arranged it that way. The fact is that neither God nor nature has allowed for this outrage. Only man's idiocy. I am purely disgusted with minority rule in this country on all subjects. I don't want to see this country fall into socialism, but it is headed that way. And then what........?
65 posted on 12/26/2003 1:11:00 PM PST by MistyCA (For some...it's always going to be "A Nam Thing!")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: MistyCA
And then what........?

Nature and God will correct the slight problem of going against God and nature. It should be a spectacular show when it happens.
66 posted on 12/26/2003 1:16:53 PM PST by bulldogs
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 65 | View Replies]

To: waterstraat
Savage calls it rule by She-tocracy.
67 posted on 12/26/2003 1:18:11 PM PST by riri
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 64 | View Replies]

To: waterstraat
There may be some changes, but I don't see a total role reversal working. To some degree societal roles arise from a natural order that is based on basic underlying differences between men and women. They aren't and never will be interchangeable outside of very narrow contexts, IMHO.
68 posted on 12/26/2003 1:22:42 PM PST by tacticalogic (Controlled application of force is the sincerest form of communication.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 64 | View Replies]

To: presidio9
where's the

barf

alert?
69 posted on 12/26/2003 1:23:49 PM PST by the invisib1e hand (do not remove this tag under penalty of law.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: cyncooper
I agree with you that being molested at a young age can effect a person's sexuality.

I have several gay friends and more than one has admited to having been molested by a person of the same sex in their youth.
70 posted on 12/26/2003 1:24:22 PM PST by Clintons Are White Trash (Helen Thomas, Molly Ivins, Maureen Dowd - The Axis of Ugly)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 48 | View Replies]

To: chookter
LOL. You said it not me :)
71 posted on 12/26/2003 1:42:31 PM PST by Hannity4prez
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 42 | View Replies]

To: presidio9
"Etheridge is more interested in politics, and had to interrupt the interview to conduct a phone press conference supporting Howard Dean."

Oh, well her endorsement should really help Howard in the heartland. ;)

Seriously, though, I used to enjoy her music. But then, when I found out her "orientation," her lyrics about love just didn't appeal to me.

She was very popular in Canada, and ten years ago my husband and I went to see her in Montreal.

I suppose I should have realized that she was a lesbian when several dozen women in the audience threw their underwear up on stage (true story).

It would be interesting to see the statistics, but I bet her sales went down dramatically after she came out.

72 posted on 12/26/2003 1:53:30 PM PST by proud American in Canada (Take back the First Amendment! Call today! U.S. Capitol Switchboard (202) 224-3121)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: little jeremiah
You're doing fine, my friend. I can't seem to break this FR habit for a day, even when I'm as sick as a dog. Apologies to all dogs.
73 posted on 12/26/2003 2:08:28 PM PST by scripter (Thousands have left the homosexual lifestyle)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 58 | View Replies]

To: tacticalogic
There may be some changes, but I don't see a total role reversal working. To some degree societal roles arise from a natural order that is based on basic underlying differences between men and women.

But dont you see that that is exactly what is changing.

It used to be that the man was strong, powerful, in control, and was running things, and the female was submissive, and under male domination.

In todays society, women are now more educated than men, thus some would say smarter, if you will, than men(at least women are far more educated than men in the United States since women have outnumbered men in college for 30 years).

The "natural order" has been disrutped, men no longer hunt for the food, nor do they get the bigger paychecks.

Women have for centuries wanted men who were successful, had money and power, etc. Now, it is women who are in positions of power at many corporations, and it is women who are getting bigger paychecks than men(if they get any at all after being laid off from the factories).

Women are not used to marrying men who make less money than they do, who have lower status jobs than they do, who are less educated than they are.

There are only so many (few) men left out there today who are taller than women, who have more college than women, who have better and higher paying jobs than women, etc.

Perhaps some women are just continuing to do what they have always done for thousands of years: marrying someone who is more educated than they are, making more money than they do, is more assertive than they are, has more social and work status than they do......

, but that no one with biological male organs fits that description anymore?

Just a thought. Frankly, I am deeply disappointed in todays males, who are for the most part, uneducated, anti-gun, anti military, and basically just plain sissy for the most part, esp among the younger males who are not old enough to have been in ww2.

When most of todays young males do not carry guns, do not serve in the military, do not go to college, do not have good high paying jobs, do not get into fist fights anymore, do not race cars, just what do you expect a young girl to do?

If you are young, and you want someone who is tough, assertive, smart, eduucated, has a good high paying job, who is actively involved/engaged in politics, who may even have been a cop or in the army at one time, who probably played on the high school varsity sports team, then you are more likely to find a biological woman that meets that description as you would find a biological male who fits that description.

Dont blame me, I am from another generation, I just happen to see a lot of todays young males and females.

74 posted on 12/26/2003 2:22:15 PM PST by waterstraat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 68 | View Replies]

To: waterstraat
Personally, I don't see all that from where I am (central fly-over).
75 posted on 12/26/2003 2:31:29 PM PST by tacticalogic (Controlled application of force is the sincerest form of communication.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 74 | View Replies]

To: presidio9
If you have two mommies maybe you should call them the mammaries
76 posted on 12/26/2003 2:37:21 PM PST by woofie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: presidio9; riri
Ala Ann Heche. Only Ann's story didn't turn out so good!

????. She seems to doing all right now.

The Hollywood Exclusive: For new mom Anne Heche, ‘magical year’ led to ‘Twentieth Century’
22-Dec-2003

By Marilyn Beck and Stacy Jenel Smith

Anne Heche, hubby Coley Laffoon and baby Homer are off for Christmas with Coley's family in Saratoga, Calif., this week – with the actress looking forward to diving into her role opposite Alec Baldwin in the March-opening Broadway revival of "Twentieth Century."
...
In fact, the actress formerly known as Ellen DeGeneres' significant other declares that 2003 has been a "magical" year for her, both professionally and personally. She gave birth to son Homer in March, completed New Line's supernatural thriller "Birth," with Nicole Kidman (due in April), the indie ensemble feature "Sexual Life," and the Jan. 12 Lifetime telepic that deals with child abuse and neglect, "Gracie's Choice."

And why is it that the less successful member of a lesbo celbrity duo always gets the job of breeder?

What's Ellen doing now to make her more successful?

77 posted on 12/26/2003 4:01:38 PM PST by Oztrich Boy (Merry Yuletide Festival to All!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: presidio9
When they finally let the 'coloreds' use their bathroom or their washroom, we all didn't die, did we? No. It's the same thing."

My nomination for the dumbest comment by a suedo celebrity in 2003.

78 posted on 12/26/2003 4:12:41 PM PST by LisaMalia (Buckeye Fan since birth!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: cyncooper
Happy Holidays to you too cyn!! ;o)
79 posted on 12/26/2003 4:34:49 PM PST by Jackie-O ("The horror...the horror"- Col. Kurtz)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 54 | View Replies]

To: waterstraat
I just happen to see a lot of todays young males and females.

You must live in San Francisco
80 posted on 12/26/2003 4:37:29 PM PST by bulldogs
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 74 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-93 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson