Skip to comments.
A Familiar Dilemma on the Pothead Left
The Washington Times ^
| January 2, 2004
| Wesley Pruden
Posted on 01/01/2004 10:15:06 PM PST by quidnunc
The Democrats have an image problem, but it's not, as some pundits insist, a mcgovern. The image problem is a goldwater.
Anyone who was around in the winter of 1964 appreciates it at once. Barry Goldwater thrilled angry Republicans, conservatives and political correspondents with deliciously quotable remarks, fired from the lip (not even the hip). This chilled the Republican barons who could recognize a fatal self-inflicted wound when they saw one.
The senator from Arizona, unlike the former governor of Vermont, was personally likable and had a gift for saying sensible things in an outrageous way. This was poison at the polls and the pols knew it. The party pros also understood that nobody could stop him, and when Bill Scranton, the patrician governor of Pennsylvania, tried he was humiliated. Nelson Rockefeller, the scion of the rotting Northeastern Republican establishment, was all but thrown out of the Cow Palace in San Francisco. The Republican usurpers of the early '60s, like the Democratic usurpers of the present day, were determined to remake the party, and they did.
That's what terrifies the Democratic barons now. They see how Howard Dean and the noisy pothead left can remake their party, and, unlike the youthful Republicans who powered Barry Goldwater to the nomination in 1964, will remake it into a permanent minority party a caucus of gays, feminists, angry blacks and any other bellyacher with a nurtured grievance or unrequited gripe. Not even Hillary could revive it.
Mr. Dean is the perfect candidate for this small but noisy caucus. He may not be, as some of his supporters insist he is not, the goofball liberal that the Republican machinery will portray him to be. But he has made both science and art of transforming reckless rhetoric into the pheromone to seduce San Francisco Democrats.
-snip-
(Excerpt) Read more at washtimes.com ...
TOPICS: Editorial; Extended News; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: 1964; 2004; angrydems; dean; electionpresident; goldwater; howarddean; wesleypruden
1
posted on
01/01/2004 10:15:07 PM PST
by
quidnunc
To: quidnunc
The Republican usurpers of the early '60s, like the Democratic usurpers of the present day, were determined to remake the party, and they did. And this set the stage for the Republican take over we enjoy today. The Dems remaking the party farther to the left will set the stage for the next Second Turning.
2
posted on
01/01/2004 10:26:44 PM PST
by
farmfriend
( Isaiah 55:10,11)
To: quidnunc
The title is going to anger the libertarians.
To: quidnunc
any other bellyacher with a nurtured grievance or unrequited gripe.Well, I fit that description, but it doesn't make me a Democrat
4
posted on
01/01/2004 10:32:09 PM PST
by
WackyKat
To: quidnunc
Rest of the article (Wash Times doesn't have to be excerpted)
Saying or doing silly things usually kills a presidential candidacy. George Romney declared that he had once been a Vietnam War hawk but only because he had been brainwashed by military briefers in Saigon. He was laughed out of the race for the Republican nomination in 1968 within four days. Edmund Muskie denounced the cad he thought was disrespectful to his wife (good), but cried doing it (bad). He was gone from the 1972 campaign within a week. Joe Biden got caught in 1984 cribbing campaign speeches from a British parliamentary candidate, of all people, and was banished overnight. Michael Dukakis finished himself off with the answer to a single question in a presidential debate in 1988, when he said he would respond to a rapist in his wife's bedroom at 3 o'clock in the morning by appointing a task force to study the root causes of crime.
Howard Dean rambled on to a radio interviewer about conspiracy theories ("The most interesting theory that I have heard so far, which is nothing more than a theory, I can't think, it can't be proved, is that [President Bush] was warned ahead [of September 11] by the Saudis"). This would have put anyone else in the graveyard of presidential wannabes before his body cooled. Mr. Dean pays no price for anything he says because he says them to an audience of gluttons with an insatiable appetite for poisoned mashed potatoes.
This drives his rivals in the primaries mad with frustration because they can't get by with it, and the party barons to a fury because they understand the price all Democrats will pay for it. Their faithful acolytes in the media are trying to fit him with a fig leaf. It's not easy and may not be possible. Richard Cohen of The Washington Post, ever eager "to provide context" for rascals and rogues of the left, scolds Mr. Dean for spinning conspiracy trash but insists it's really George W.'s fault ("the Bush administration has been very stingy about revealing just what it knew about terrorist activities before September 11").
E.J. Dionne gamely keeps on keeping on, promising the gang to "watch for the appearance of the new, pragmatic Howard Dean." The New York Times concedes that most people see Mr. Dean as an opportunist appealing to the most unsavory elements of a partisan constituency, but the real story is "more complicated."
Of course. The real story always is. "Context" was the dilemma for the Republicans in the great watershed year of 1964. They didn't solve it, either.
To: quidnunc
They see how Howard Dean and the noisy pothead left can remake their party, and, unlike the youthful Republicans who powered Barry Goldwater to the nomination in 1964, will remake it into a permanent minority party; a caucus of gays, feminists, angry blacks and any other bellyacher with a nurtured grievance or unrequited gripe. This is a great article.
6
posted on
01/02/2004 12:00:24 AM PST
by
KC_Conspirator
(This space for rent)
To: I still care
Edmund Muskie denounced the cad he thought was disrespectful to his wife (good), but cried doing it (bad). He was gone from the 1972 campaign within a week. I thought it was '68 when Muskie cried like a baby.
7
posted on
01/02/2004 12:02:11 AM PST
by
Defiant
(A metrosexual is a nancy-boy.)
To: Defiant
No, it was '72. '68 was when LBJ bowed out, leaving Humphrey and Robert Kennedy to slug it out. Kennedy was ahead until he got his brains blown out, leaving the field to Humphrey. The Chicago Dem convention was marred by riots started by the Weathermen, and Richard Nixon won the election with less than 50% of the vote. Muskie was Humphrey's VP candidate in '68.
To: Defiant
I thought it was '68 when Muskie cried like a baby. Muskie was 72. In 68, the Democrat candidates in the primaries were Robert Kennedy, Hubert Humprey, and Gene McCarthy. When Kennedy was killed, I believe McGovern attempted to resurrect his banner at the convention but didnt get too far.
9
posted on
01/02/2004 12:18:00 AM PST
by
Dave S
To: Defiant
I don't remember the incident (I was still in grade school) but Muskie was the vice presidental candidate with Humphrey in '68. Maybe he was a candidate for president in '72?
To: I still care
bump
11
posted on
01/02/2004 2:44:26 AM PST
by
patj
To: quidnunc
Howard Dean rambled on to a radio interviewer about conspiracy theories ("The most interesting theory that I have heard so far, which is nothing more than a theory, I can't think, it can't be proved, is that [President Bush] was warned ahead [of September 11] by the Saudis"). This would have put anyone else in the graveyard of presidential wannabes before his body cooled. Mr. Dean pays no price for anything he says because he says them to an audience of gluttons with an insatiable appetite for poisoned mashed potatoes.
The difference between Dean and Goldwater is that the press was actively quoting each of Goldwater's "extremist" remarks... while Dean gets a pass on everything he says and does.
To: WackyKat
Yeah, I have both nurtured grievances and unrequited gripes about Democrat traitors looking to assist Islamofascists and their French and German allies in sacrificing Americans on the altar of political power.
13
posted on
01/02/2004 8:09:30 AM PST
by
thoughtomator
("I will do whatever the Americans want because I saw what happened in Iraq, and I was afraid"-Qadafi)
To: CWOJackson
Nah, we can distinguish the 'pothead left' from the 'Goldwater-loving decriminalization right' with no problems at all.
I can sort out the beer-swillign commies from the beer-swilling patriots, as well.
To: quidnunc
Mr. Dean pays no price for anything he says because he says them to an audience of gluttons with an insatiable appetite for poisoned mashed potatoes.Good line. Love watching the left self-destruct.
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson