Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Uzbek or Dari? Military learns new tongues
Christian Science Monitor ^ | 01/02/04 | Ann Scott Tyson

Posted on 01/03/2004 3:23:50 PM PST by Holly_P

Defense Language Institute alters its curriculum for soldiers in post-9/11 world.

MONTEREY, CALIFORNIA - When 1st Lt. Aaron Wiggins graduates from language school, proficient in Pashto, he knows an Afghanistan deployment won't be far off.

And Airman 1st Class Jennifer Burnside, a student of Arabic, expects she'll soon be flying 18-hour eavesdropping missions over the Middle East as a "listener" with an airborne intelligence unit.

Insurgencies in Afghanistan and Iraq, along with a broadening terrorist threat, are increasing demands on the ranks of US military linguists capable of gathering intelligence in foreign languages.

Indeed, an Army report released last fall found that "the lack of competent interpreters throughout the theater impeded operations" in both countries. "The US Army does not have a fraction of the linguists required," concludes the report by the Center for Army Lessons Learned at Fort Leavenworth, Kansas.

To ease the crunch, the military's main language-training center, the Defense Language Institute (DLI) here, is dramatically altering the mix of foreign tongues it teaches. With a faculty of more than 1,000 and 3,800 full-time students attending classes each year, DLI teaches 80 percent of the government's foreign language classes.

Since the Sept. 11 terrorist attacks, DLI has added ten new languages to the curriculum, which it anticipates will be vital to curbing terrorism, such as the Afghan dialects of Dari and Pashto, as well as Chechen, Uzbek, Armenian and Urdu.

At the same time, the Institute has sharply increased the number of students learning Persian (up 70 percent), Korean (up 50 percent) and Arabic (up 40 percent) - as if tailoring the production of linguists for the three countries dubbed "the axis of evil" by President Bush: Iran, Iraq, and North Korea.

"Korean may seem disproportionately high compared to Arabic, but there's always the potential for things to go bad on the Korean Peninsula and we'd need that pool in place," says Col. Michael Simone, Commandant of DLI.

Meanwhile, DLI is adapting new technology and instruction methods aimed at speeding the study of difficult and obscure languages while making the content more realistic and relevant.

Many of the advances come together at DLI's newest branch, the Global War on Terrorism (GWOT) Task Force, set up soon after the Sept. 11 strikes. "There was a lot of leaning forward in the foxhole, guessing what might be needed," says task force Associate Dean Maj. David Tatman.

Urgent needs On one hand, the task force responded to urgent demands for translations from the US military in the field. For example, it translated the Army's Ranger Handbook into Dari for use in training the Afghan army, and also translated letters home from detainees classified as "enemy combatants" at the US Naval Base in Guantanamo Bay, Cuba.

Meanwhile, in order to launch new DLI programs quickly in rarely studied languages such as Dari, the task force had to create curricula from scratch, hunt for the few qualified faculty, and begin training students at the same time.

Mahmood Taba-Tabai, dean of the task force and a native of Iran, says he quickly realized there were few commercially available Dari materials. Chapters on "picking cherries in spring" and "how to cut mullah's beard" were ill suited for his US military students.

"We can still cut the mullah's beard, but we also have to clear the minefields," quips Mr. Taba-Tabai. DLI students must learn a range of military terms along with basic proficiency in a language.

An innovative technology introduced last year known as the "SMART board" is also helping DLI compress the time needed to master foreign languages. The SMART boards are large classroom screens that take the place of blackboards, overhead projectors, and the language lab. The boards can display Internet content, textbook pages, or even the zigzags of sound waves, allowing teachers to dissect individual phrases.

Lessons designed on computers by teachers are saved on a server, then broadcast on the SMART boards, as well as to tablet PCs used by each student in the classroom and to the students' dormitory work stations.

"We can get streaming video from Al Jazeera, BBC in Arabic, and newspapers from the Middle East and import it into the classroom," says Dr. Christine Campbell, head of one of DLI's Middle East departments. "This lets us expose students to what the natives are seeing and listening to every day."

Today's news not only keeps classes lively but also provides a grounding in current events for students, 90 percent of whom will take jobs in military intelligence. Of these, 70 percent specialize in cryptology, or signals intelligence, and 20 percent in human intelligence.

After DLI, students have additional training in skills such as number dictation, reading hand-written texts, and weapons vocabulary before deployment to overseas hot spots.

"I wish we had the ranges to do weapons training," says Col. Simone from his office on the DLI campus at the Presidio of Monterey, which traces its origins to an 18th-century Spanish fort. "So many of our graduates are going off in short order to dangerous places."

Hilly campus Set on a hill overlooking the rocky Pacific coastline, DLI has the look of a community college but the regimented feel of a military base. DLI courses are highly demanding, students say. "It's definitely a full-time job," says Lieutenant Wiggins after a Pashto class in which his teacher role-played an Afghan refugee seeking help after an earthquake.

Students have more than six hours of language training and two to three hours of homework per day. On average, each class of 30 students is taught by a team of six teachers. Reaching proficiency requires 18 months of study for the most difficult languages such as Arabic, Korean and Chinese, compared to six months for Spanish and French.

"This is the most intensive education I've ever received. It makes the college courses I've taken look ridiculous," says Airman Burnside from Yuma, Ariz. "I try to talk and all that comes out is Arabic."


TOPICS: Extended News; Foreign Affairs; War on Terror
KEYWORDS: intelligence; translators; usmilitary
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-32 last
To: Criminal Number 18F
The problem is in peacetime the military cuts the hell out of this program.

Oh, man... Tell me about it.

When I was an MI LT in 1991 (force-branched MI, can you believe?) they gave us the DLAT (Language aptitude test).

I damned near aced it. I loved that goofy test with the made-up vocabulary and stuff...

I talked to my branch officer and told him I want to learn a 'Cat IV' language--I want to learn Arabic, Mandarin, Korean--whatever there is a need for...

No dice. I couldn't get in by hook or crook...

I guess I ended up using that language skill by teaching myself to play the bagpipe...

The Army 1991-1996 was misery. So politically correct and stupid ('specially MI) that, honestly, I have had a hard time feeling at all proud of my service. I look back on it and think: "What a stupid, stupid waste of time that was..."

21 posted on 01/03/2004 5:39:23 PM PST by Cogadh na Sith (The Guns of Brixton)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: Steel Wolf
"Chinese is a smarter move"

I've always wanted to visit China. I took a Chinese history course in college from an inspiring professor and in high school hung out at Joyce Chen's restaurant in Cambridge. China rocks.

But I can't rationalize a visit to a country that still has so many totalitarian, undemocratic cooties.

I feel guardedly optimistic though, that I'll be able to visit China and take my family there while they are still school aged.

22 posted on 01/03/2004 5:44:56 PM PST by billorites (freepo ergo sum)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: Criminal Number 18F
If you wanna get into usage, I'd add some more

- Lauging at a joke that you weren't supposed to understand.

- Catching someone complain about the presence of foriegn devils, turning around, and agreeing with him completely. "Yeah, I thought this was such a nice place, but I wish they would do something about all these dirty foriengers."

- Haggling with someone in English, then switching to target language and saying 'Okay, enough of the tourist prices, I'll give you half or I'm leaving'.

- Making a joke in a foriegn language that would make no sense in English.

and my personal favorite

- Catching someone tell you one thing in English, then try and double cross you when he talks to his buddy next to him. Relpying with "Don't worry, it's safe to speak xxxx in front of me, I don't understand a word" in xxxx, and watching the phrase register with one guy but not the other made months of effort pay off. (It also helped in avoiding a nasty double crossing, but that's another story entirely)

23 posted on 01/03/2004 5:47:43 PM PST by Steel Wolf ("Ah, this is obviously some strange usage of the word 'safe' that I wasn't previously aware of.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: Holly_P
Really (*&^&(* brilliant of this reporter to splash the name & rank of Special Intel people.

It wasn't long ago that those that did asinine things like this were found floating up on the beach after the crabs had dinner for a few days.

The reporter has just put a price tag on those that were named in this article.

.
24 posted on 01/03/2004 5:56:33 PM PST by steplock (www.FOCUS.GOHOTSPRINGS.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: billorites
China was nice. If you don't speak any Chinese I wouldn't wander too far of the beaten path, though. If you do, by all means wander around and get a feel for the place.

They will try and rip you off, though. Not violently, but they'll try and trick you at literally every turn.

As far as totalitarian shenanigans, I did get to see their police in action on a few occasions (which they try and hide from foreigners) and I felt very, very thankful that I was an American.

25 posted on 01/03/2004 5:58:26 PM PST by Steel Wolf ("Ah, this is obviously some strange usage of the word 'safe' that I wasn't previously aware of.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: Holly_P
Hmmmmm...
26 posted on 01/03/2004 6:45:39 PM PST by happygrl
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Holly_P
Been there, done that, would do it again if I could. Thanks for the post.
27 posted on 01/03/2004 7:06:17 PM PST by msdrby (US Veterans: All give some, but some give all.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Criminal Number 18F
they might wind up with stories they can't tell the grandkids.

Beat me to it. I was gonna say that. Sure I have loads of stories, not a one am I gonna remember for my grandkids under penalty of Fort Leavenworth.

28 posted on 01/03/2004 7:12:05 PM PST by msdrby (US Veterans: All give some, but some give all.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: Steel Wolf
She already had 5 years of Japanese under her belt and tells me the similarities/differences with Chinese are quite fascinating.

She has a few years of training ahead of her but so far she's taking to it like a duck-to-water.
29 posted on 01/03/2004 7:25:44 PM PST by Spruce
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: Heuristic Hiker
Ping
30 posted on 01/03/2004 10:07:41 PM PST by Utah Girl
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Holly_P
I can't understand why the military hasn't done two things.

1. Each person that joins the military should be required to learn to speak at least two languages. Each squad should have a variety of languages that can be spoken.

2. Why on earth hasn't the military perfected babelfish? It seems that it would be alot cheaper for the military to issue a small recorder device that can determine what language is being spoken and translate to English and back to the foreign language.
31 posted on 01/04/2004 7:25:08 AM PST by ODDITHER
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ODDITHER
1. Each person that joins the military should be required to learn to speak at least two languages. Each squad should have a variety of languages that can be spoken.

2. Why on earth hasn't the military perfected babelfish? It seems that it would be alot cheaper for the military to issue a small recorder device that can determine what language is being spoken and translate to English and back to the foreign language.

1. Not everyone has the aptitude for secondary language acquisition (they are doing really well just to be proficient in English!) A lot of people rock out of DLI and end up doing other jobs, more suitable to their abilities.

2. Babelfish is a national security risk that US is not ready to take. It would be cool though. Remember those gremlin-looking stuffed animal dolls that would "learn" to speak to you? Those are considered a national security risk, and were outlawed from MI installations (and confiscated from anyone who had 'em) as soon as they were marketed to the public. And all they did was babble.

32 posted on 01/04/2004 8:55:13 PM PST by msdrby (US Veterans: All give some, but some give all.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-32 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson