Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Katherine Harris Planning US Senate Run
Drudge ^

Posted on 01/08/2004 8:42:04 AM PST by Bush Cheney

Edited on 01/08/2004 11:40:39 AM PST by Admin Moderator. [history]

Watch your makeup compact, Hillary, Florida's Katherine Harris may have her eyes on the United States Senate, the DRUDGE REPORT has learned.

MORE

Against the apparent wishes of senior Bush strategists, Harris has decided in her heart and mind that she will seek the Republican nomination for the U.S. Senate seat, sources close to Harris tell DRUDGE.

"She wants it, wants it badly!" a top source said Thursday. "She'll make her decision public within the next week."

The source, who has daily contact with Harris, cautions the congresswoman still could hold back and not make the run, in deference to the president and his brother's wishes.

Sarasota County's GOP chairman, Tramm Hudson, said he spoke to Harris Tuesday night and that she seemed ready to run, according to reports. Harris continues to be one of the party's top fund-raisers.

Elsewhere, Texas Senator Kay Hutchison has reportedly advised her republican counterpart to "Go for it!"

If elected Harris would join a select group of women ever to serve in the United States Senate.

MORE Harris advisers dispel any notion that bad blood still runs in Florida over Harris's role in the 2000 election drama.

"Look, Governor Bush handily won re-election last year, after 2000, and the state's voters did not punish him," notes one top Harris strategist who asked not to be named.

"And they will not punish Katherine. The senate campaign will be on the issues, and electing the best person to represent Florida in the senate!"

Developing...


TOPICS: Breaking News; Government; Miscellaneous; News/Current Events; US: Florida
KEYWORDS: 2004; electionussenate; katherineharris
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-6061-8081-100 ... 301-304 next last
To: MindBender26
I hppe you are right because I agree with your assessment.

I must also renew my complaint that the Republicans are doing a LOUSY job about developing a pipeline of quality candidates. We make so much fun of the RATs and the nine dwarfs fighting amongst themselves. Well, what is going to happen for 2008? It is going to start day one of Bush's next term. I'm afraid the republican senate race for Graham's seat will be the model.

I don't mean to imply we should have an heir-apparent for each office. The idea that it is person x's turn is what gave us Bob Dole. Still, we need to have a leadership plan where we are cycling people through the right experiences to be ready for the next step. Another term or two for KH and she is ready to take on Nelson when he's up for re-election.

61 posted on 01/08/2004 9:49:28 AM PST by NonValueAdded ("Either you are with us, or you are with the terrorists." GWB 9/20/01)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies]

To: OneTimeLurker
She executed the law as she interpreted it. Nothing wrong with that.

That's not in dispute.

62 posted on 01/08/2004 9:51:28 AM PST by Republican Wildcat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 50 | View Replies]

To: Sloth
Who is that in the photo in post 8?
63 posted on 01/08/2004 9:54:04 AM PST by Dog (Bin Laden turns up dead or captured in '04!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: OneTimeLurker
I'm with you.

Conservatives for a moment should stop being "compaaaaaasionate", and grow a damned backbone.

What she did was legally the right thing to do, and what the Democrats tried to do in Florida was clearly an attempt at America's first coup d'etat. They failed. We won. She won. America won.

No apologies. No wavering. She's good enough for the Senate for me.

And if she is running against something Karl Rove is up promoting, that is even more tasty tabasco in the soup for me. Go for it.

64 posted on 01/08/2004 9:55:31 AM PST by AmericanInTokyo (I argue as passionately on FR against ILLEGAL ALIENS as I would if Gore, not Bush were President.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 50 | View Replies]

To: dts32041
How is "The Bush bots are here...Bush can do no wrong" and someone expressing disappointment that Harris is entering the race have to do with anything?
65 posted on 01/08/2004 9:55:35 AM PST by Republican Wildcat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 59 | View Replies]

To: Republican Wildcat
I see. Still, has Bush's popularity in Florida gone down after the last election? If not, wouldn't someone who was perceived to help Bush get elected be a positive?
66 posted on 01/08/2004 9:55:59 AM PST by Stone Mountain
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 60 | View Replies]

To: krb
That's not her?
67 posted on 01/08/2004 9:56:54 AM PST by Republican Wildcat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Republican Wildcat
Cause the white house doesn't want her to run, she is not Hispanic enough.
68 posted on 01/08/2004 9:58:52 AM PST by dts32041 ("Taxes are not levied for the benefit of the taxed" RAH)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 65 | View Replies]

To: OXENinFLA
Think for how the left will bring up (aka attack) her involvement w/ the 2000 election.

That argument was made in 2002 and look what happened.

69 posted on 01/08/2004 10:01:24 AM PST by McGruff (Borders? We don' need no steenkin' borders!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 40 | View Replies]

To: Stone Mountain
If not, wouldn't someone who was perceived to help Bush get elected be a positive?

No, but bringing the news of the election debacle back to the forefront (not only in Florida, but nationwide) would not be a plus...at all. She's perceived by many to have abused her office (a lie, but it's still what's out there) to get Bush in office. That's not a positive, no matter how much people like or dislike Bush.

70 posted on 01/08/2004 10:02:06 AM PST by Republican Wildcat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 66 | View Replies]

To: NonValueAdded
We did have a plan for 2008. It was Steve Largent and he screwed up the plan by losing last year.
71 posted on 01/08/2004 10:02:27 AM PST by GraniteStateConservative ("Howard Dean is incontrovertible proof that God is on Bush's side in the 2004 election"- Dick Morris)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 61 | View Replies]

To: NonValueAdded
We do have Craig Benson in the 2008 pipe line.
72 posted on 01/08/2004 10:04:04 AM PST by GraniteStateConservative ("Howard Dean is incontrovertible proof that God is on Bush's side in the 2004 election"- Dick Morris)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 61 | View Replies]

To: Reagan Man
In a Harris-Martinez-McCollum primary (they're the three most likely to compete), I'd go with Harris.

Reason? The Democratic base will be energized by presumtpive nominee Howard Dean. Harris will mobilize our base just as much. Mel Martinez can then take this primary as a dry run for governor to succeed Jeb Bush.
73 posted on 01/08/2004 10:04:12 AM PST by hchutch (Why did the Nazgul run from Arwen's flash flood? All they managed to do was to end up dying tired.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: ClintonBeGone
Funny how the statistics don't back you up one bit. Tell those friends/voices in high places they're betting wrong on this fine lady

What statistics? References, please, because if they were valid numbers, we would be using them.

There is no though that Katherine is not a fine woman. I have spent enough time with her and her husband to know that. That is not the issue. The issue is wether or not she is the candidate most likely to win the Senate race in Florida, and to what extent she would help or hurt the President's reelection efforts.

She truly is a fine woman. Mel, Bill, Dr. Dave and Dan are all fine men. This is simply not her time. It will come.

74 posted on 01/08/2004 10:06:20 AM PST by MindBender26 (For more news as it happens, stay tuned to your local FReeper Network station)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 46 | View Replies]

To: Bush Cheney
We have no idea what kind of senator she would make because we have no idea what kind of congresswoman she is.

However, it is never a good idea to ramp up the opposition and you can count on Harris doing just that, jeopardizing other republicans on the ticket.

75 posted on 01/08/2004 10:06:50 AM PST by OldFriend (Always understand, even if you remain among the few)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: dts32041
That still has nothing to do with that post. Input from the White House is irrelevant for political analysis of this situation.
76 posted on 01/08/2004 10:07:22 AM PST by Republican Wildcat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 68 | View Replies]

To: MindBender26
What statistics? References, please, because if they were valid numbers, we would be using them.

The statistics show that she actually did better with voters in her congressional district than Bush did when he ran in 2000. That's hardly someone who voters run from.

77 posted on 01/08/2004 10:08:54 AM PST by ClintonBeGone
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 74 | View Replies]

To: Republican Wildcat
That still has nothing to do with that post. Input from the White House is irrelevant for political analysis of this situation.

In the world of Realpolitic, completely incorrect. Association with, linkage with, and campaigning with a sitting president, in a battleground state, is critical.

78 posted on 01/08/2004 10:09:38 AM PST by MindBender26 (For more news as it happens, stay tuned to your local FReeper Network station)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 76 | View Replies]

To: Bush Cheney

FL GOP poll

Harris 24%
McCollum 23%
Crist 19%
Mel 6%
Byrd 3%
Webster 2%
Todd 1%
Larry <1%
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Harris 27% v McCollum 24% McCollum 29% v mel 11% -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Vs Rat *Castor 42 v Harris 37% *Castor 35 v Martinez, 32% *Castor 36 v McCollum 35% *Crist 41% V Castor 35 % http://www.wesh.com/politics/2664621/detail.html

79 posted on 01/08/2004 10:10:32 AM PST by KQQL (^@__*^)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: jern
No, not good at all. I like Harris, but she could not only lose the seat, but bring down Bush in the process.

I'm in the ABH camp in that primary. = Anybody but Harris.

80 posted on 01/08/2004 10:10:46 AM PST by zbigreddogz
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-6061-8081-100 ... 301-304 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson