Skip to comments.
W-w-wait a minute with your temporary work plan, Mr. President!
AmeriConservative ^
| 8 January 2004
| Dennis Durband
Posted on 01/09/2004 10:46:32 AM PST by Spiff
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-29 next last
1
posted on
01/09/2004 10:46:32 AM PST
by
Spiff
To: HiJinx; Marine Inspector; JackelopeBreeder; SandRat; AZHSer; gubamyster; JustPiper
pint
2
posted on
01/09/2004 10:47:10 AM PST
by
Spiff
(Have you committed a random act of thoughtcrime today?)
To: All
Rank |
Location |
Receipts |
Donors/Avg |
Freepers/Avg |
Monthlies |
|
Kenya |
|
|
|
|
|
20.00
|
1
|
Thanks for donating to Free Republic!
Move your locale up the leaderboard!
To: Spiff
Excellent.
4
posted on
01/09/2004 10:54:42 AM PST
by
SAMWolf
(Ted Kennedy's Bumper Sticker: My other car is underwater.)
To: Spiff
As a postscript, Colorado conservative Cong. Tom Tancredo is vowing that this program will not pass in Congress. Conservatives must pressure their federal representatives to oppose the Temporary Worker Program and assure its defeat.Yes, we need to contact our representatives, but not about THIS plan! I can't believe so many people have forgotten a basic fact that I learned in elementary school...the President does not make law, Congress does! As Tancredo implies, Bush's plan will be in the cross-cut shredder the minute it hits Congress. There are currently two bills being considered, one in the Senate and one in the House:
House Version Sponsored by Tom Tancredo of CO
Senate Version Sponsored by John Cornyn of TX
Tancredo's plan puts the military on the border until we can train enough border patrol, increases the border patrol and detention centers, ends the "anchor child" problem, increases penalties and bonds and much more. We need to forget about Bush's plan and get on the Tancredo bandwagon by writing our Congress-critters!
To: Spiff
BTTT!!!
6
posted on
01/09/2004 11:06:51 AM PST
by
jimkress
(Save America from the tryanny of Republican/Democrat hegemony. Support the Constitution Party.)
To: Spiff
bttt
7
posted on
01/09/2004 11:09:38 AM PST
by
sarcasm
(Tancredo 2004)
To: Spiff
Fundamental premise of Liberalism:
"Laws are to be obeyed only when convenient and then, only by the masses. Us superior folk don't need no stinkin laws nor do we need to obey them"
Bush is ignoring the violation of the law by these illegal alien criminals. Bush is demonstrating he is a CINO Liberal.
8
posted on
01/09/2004 11:09:41 AM PST
by
jimkress
(Save America from the tryanny of Republican/Democrat hegemony. Support the Constitution Party.)
To: Spiff
If this passes.....I'm not voting for Bush!
9
posted on
01/09/2004 11:15:23 AM PST
by
Arpege92
To: Arpege92
I'm with Spiff. Lets ship all of our high paying tech jobs overseas while at the same time inviting illegals here to rum amok. Great re-election plan Jorge!!
To: Spiff
Your posting to a GOP crowd on a conservative forum.
A crowd that firmly beleives its better to utilize the limited resouces of the INS to do back ground checks on perhaps MILLIONS of Latino immigrants then to focus those limited resouces on screening Arabs and Muslims.
We have bought the profiling argument to keep our party guy in power no matter what. Your attempts to uss this site to push the "party" right will not go undebated!
11
posted on
01/09/2004 11:29:29 AM PST
by
Kay Soze
(How will refocusing INS resources from the war on terror to millions of Mexicans make US safer?)
To: Spiff
Bump
12
posted on
01/09/2004 11:33:56 AM PST
by
apackof2
(I won't be satisfied until I am to smart for my own good)
To: Spiff
Contacting the White House Mailing Address
The White House
1600 Pennsylvania Avenue NW
Washington, DC 20500
Phone Numbers
Comments: 202-456-1111
Switchboard: 202-456-1414
FAX: 202-456-2461
TTY/TDD
Comments: 202-456-6213
Visitors Office: 202-456-2121
E-Mail President George W. Bush: president@whitehouse.gov
Vice President Richard Cheney: vice.president@whitehouse.gov
13
posted on
01/09/2004 11:40:55 AM PST
by
apackof2
(I won't be satisfied until I am to smart for my own good)
To: Kay Soze
We have bought the profiling argument to keep our party guy in power no matter what. Your attempts to uss this site to push the "party" right will not go undebated! I will never miss any opportunity to push the Republican Party to the right. To that end, I ran for and was elected Republican Precinct Committeeman in my district so that I could have a vote in the local Republican Party - to push the party to the right. I've introduced resolutions at local party meetings - to push the party to the right. I was elected President of the South East Arizona Republican Club - a very conservative Republican Club whose mission is to push the party to the right.
Is my agenda that obvious?
14
posted on
01/09/2004 11:51:45 AM PST
by
Spiff
(Have you committed a random act of thoughtcrime today?)
To: jimkress
We left the age of the Rule Of Law many years ago.
We have entered the age of the Rule Of Men...
To: Kay Soze
A crowd that firmly beleives its better to utilize the limited resouces of the INS to do back ground checks on perhaps MILLIONS of Latino immigrants then to focus those limited resouces on screening Arabs and Muslims.Funny how the INS still can't do both, in spite of federal spending increasing by 23% since 2001. Why is it we have plenty enough money to explode spending in every area except immigration and border control?
16
posted on
01/09/2004 11:57:23 AM PST
by
kevao
To: Spiff
>>"Following the attacks of September the 11th, 2001, this duty of the federal government has become even more urgent." <<
This is beneath contempt...using murdered Americans as an excuse to advance this agenda. My view of GWB will never be the same, I fear.
17
posted on
01/09/2004 12:00:01 PM PST
by
SerpentDove
(The crux of the biscuit is the apostrophe.)
To: Arpege92
Why? Do you like the prospect of a President Dean or President Clark? Please remember Clinton's 8 years of pillage.
18
posted on
01/09/2004 12:55:31 PM PST
by
pgkdan
To: kevao
Stranger is the argument that while we lack the resources and "cannot set up border guard towers every 500 feet" we will have the resources to do background checks and follow up on perhaps millions of "guest" workers.
I am not saying we should set up such towers but how can a GOPer argue they cannot increase the security of the borders while at the same time argue to increase the resources to monitor people once they have reached base and tagged in as "safe"!
In this case secruing our borders does not garner votes while "monitoring" those that made it past our security does.
I am not even touching on the its a post 9/11 world in which we should use more not less of our INS resources to monitor unfriendlies rather than cheap labor.
Its up to us to push the party right.
19
posted on
01/09/2004 1:28:35 PM PST
by
Kay Soze
(How will refocusing INS resources from the war on terror to millions of Mexicans make US safer?)
Comment #20 Removed by Moderator
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-29 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson