Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

O'Neill: Iraq Plans Began at Start of Bush's Term
Fox News ^ | 01.10.04 | N.N.

Posted on 01/10/2004 6:04:01 PM PST by Bouldin

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-55 next last

1 posted on 01/10/2004 6:04:01 PM PST by Bouldin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Bouldin
And there is a plan to got to war with North Korea and Red China to. Every White House has had them and if they didn't they would be negligent.
2 posted on 01/10/2004 6:05:09 PM PST by Az Joe
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Bouldin
Who discusses war plans with the treasury guy?
3 posted on 01/10/2004 6:06:29 PM PST by Bogey78O (Why are we even having this debate?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: All
Donate To Free Republic

4 posted on 01/10/2004 6:07:40 PM PST by Support Free Republic (Happy New Year)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Bouldin
Even Trinidad has a war plan for Tobago.
5 posted on 01/10/2004 6:10:55 PM PST by Consort
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Bouldin
If President Bush didn't ask for war plans for our enemies within the first month in office, he wouldn't be doing his job.

We had pilots risking their lives patrolling the "No-Fly Zones" at a huge cat to us, as the U"N. was cashing in on the "Oil for Food" program.

In 1998 Congress passed a resolution calling for Regime change in Iraq, That alone calls for President Bush to make sure he knows all of his options. I'm sure the leftist liberals in the media think they have another scandal to talk about, I guarantee it will back fire on them and only show that the President was just doing his, something his predecessor wasn't capable of.

GOT THAT :-)

6 posted on 01/10/2004 6:13:13 PM PST by MJY1288 (WITHOUT DOUBLE STANDARDS, LIBERALS WOULDN'T HAVE ANY !)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Bouldin
Of course there was a plan. They're called contingency plans.
7 posted on 01/10/2004 6:13:31 PM PST by luvbach1
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Bogey78O
"Who discusses war plans with the Treasury guy?"

Well, someone, hopefully, because any war has to be paid for. And anyway, the point is that we're supposed to be in Iraq because of terrprism and WMDs - but that can't be true if they started planning this war before Bush even knew how to spell Al Qaeda.
8 posted on 01/10/2004 6:14:10 PM PST by Bouldin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Bouldin
We were drawing up plans for the whole middle east when I was in the Air Force back in the 70s. If we didn't have contingency plans built before they happen then the war is lost before it starts. Slick Willie said that he even briefed President Bush about the evils of Iraq and Afghanistan on the turnover. This is not a big revelation it was meant to sell books
9 posted on 01/10/2004 6:14:12 PM PST by wattsup (wattsup)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Bouldin
I would have been extremely disappointed if the had NOT planned the event from then!
10 posted on 01/10/2004 6:14:23 PM PST by L`enn
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Bouldin
The planning for the U.S. invasion of Iraq began early in 2001 - long before 911. If that is the case, then what becomes of our rationale for this war?

It's called a contingency plan. They anticipated the possibility of hostilities down the road and prepared for it. Granted, a nimrod like O'Neill couldn't understand that subtlety, and neither can the "Bush is Hitler" crowd in our major media.

11 posted on 01/10/2004 6:14:39 PM PST by Numbers Guy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Bogey78O
I agree. Who indeed talks to the treasury fellow about war. What an ego this Oneil (sp) has.
12 posted on 01/10/2004 6:14:47 PM PST by roylene
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Bouldin
And anyway, the point is that we're supposed to be in Iraq because of terrprism and WMDs

And you think Iraq's connection to terrorism and WMDs wasn't apparent well before 2001? Ask Bush's predecessor about that one . . .

13 posted on 01/10/2004 6:15:55 PM PST by Numbers Guy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Bouldin
If you don't like Bush just say so - but don't insult him. Besides who knows how to spell L kida anyway? Dose it really matter?
14 posted on 01/10/2004 6:17:38 PM PST by roylene
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Az Joe
Shades of case orange, for you history buffs.
15 posted on 01/10/2004 6:19:36 PM PST by dts32041 ("Taxes are not levied for the benefit of the taxed" RAH)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Bouldin
What is this crap in the 60 Minutes promos running during the football game where O'Neill supposedly says GWB was like a blind man talking to deaf people? How insensitive! He smeared two special interest groups in one sentence. Way to go!
16 posted on 01/10/2004 6:25:45 PM PST by NonValueAdded ("Either you are with us, or you are with the terrorists." GWB 9/20/01)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Bouldin
So, where's the beef?

Everything from O'Neill indicates President Bush hit the ground running, fully engaged on national defense, and fully knowledgeable on the very real threats that were coming due after the Clinton administration swept them under the carpet for 8 years.

But wait! The early rap on Bush was that he was geographically challenged. Couldn't even name other world leaders, and didn't know jack about world affairs. Damn democrats...they can't keep their lying criticisms straight.

17 posted on 01/10/2004 6:33:11 PM PST by YaYa123 (@O'Neill Was Wrong About Bush Tax Cuts, But He's A Bonafide Expert On Being A Jerk.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Bouldin
Al Qaeda is spelled several different ways; perhaps if you read a book about the Middle East you'd know that. So would O'Neil.
18 posted on 01/10/2004 6:33:22 PM PST by Peach (The Clintons have pardoned more terrorists than they ever captured or killed.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: dts32041
"Case orange"?
19 posted on 01/10/2004 6:39:19 PM PST by Az Joe
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: Bouldin
If Colin Powell or Donald Rumsfeld or others with gravitas, were making some kind of allegation,it might be newsworthy. But,this poor guy,with his speech impediment and bug eyes,is more to be pitied. And that picture of O'Neill in Africa with Bono,where he is wearing native garb and looks like Papa Smurf, will be dredged up. Adding to his humiliation.The only loser in this,is Paul O'Neill.
20 posted on 01/10/2004 6:41:44 PM PST by Wild Irish Rogue
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-55 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson