Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Troops find 'chemical weapons' near Basra-Ali
Telegraph (UK) ^ | 01/11/2004 | Colin Freeman

Posted on 01/10/2004 9:59:13 PM PST by Jackson Brown

Here is information (from article below) I have NOT seen anywhere else in all the news articles on these Chem weapons found in Iraq:

Ali Nimir, a former colonel in a Republican Guard artillery unit, said: "I remember seeing boxes of these kinds of armaments in our base two years ago. We were told that they were chemical weapons.

"They made a splashing sound inside if you moved them around. From what I recall they were removed from our bases and distributed to secret hiding places around the country about a year before the war. I never saw them again."

===================

Whole article --

Troops find 'chemical weapons' near BasraAli
By Colin Freeman in Baghdad
(Filed: 11/01/2004)

British officials were called in yesterday to test a batch of liquid-filled mortar bombs found hidden in southern Iraq to discover if they could be chemical weapons.

The 36 Russian-made bombs were found by Danish troops on Friday near Basra. They match the descriptions given by some senior Iraqi army officers of "special weapons" issued to artillery units, which were said to contain poisonous chemicals.

"Most were wrapped in plastic bags, and some were leaking," Brig Gen Mark Kimmitt, of the United States army, said in Baghdad. He added that they were thought to be left over from the 1980-1988 Iran-Iraq war.

A Danish officer said: "The first inspections have shown that the mortars contain some liquid. We don't know what sort."

The results of the tests on the ordnance should be released today. The 120mm mortar rounds are probably the smallest calibre capable of delivering chemical weapons. They have a range of about five miles and were designed to carry a variety of warheads, including chemical, high explosive, smoke and incendiary rounds.

Similar devices were used to deadly effect by Saddam during the Iran-Iraq war, and against Iraq's Kurdish communities during the late 1980s.

America and Britain cited the threat of illicit weapons of mass destruction as a principal reason for launching the war on Iraq in March last year. But no such weapons have been found so far.

Meanwhile, British soldiers in Amara were pelted with hand grenades by a rioting Iraqi mob yesterday during violence that left at least five demonstrators dead.

Troops opened fire on rioters, killing one and injuring another, after bombs were hurled at them as they tried to quell trouble in the predominantly Sh'ite southern city. Iraqi police are thought to have shot dead another four of the demonstrators, who had surrounded a municipal building around 8.30 yesterday morning to demand jobs. No British troops were injured.

A British Army spokesman said the soldiers, believed to be from 1st Battalion, Light Infantry, were called in after Iraqi police apparently came under fire from the several-hundred strong crowd. Yesterday's violence follows other disturbances in the regional capital of Basra last week.

In Baghdad, Dara Nuraddin, a judge who heads the Governing Council's judicial committee, said that Saddam Hussein could stand trial in Iraq by June. But Governing Council members bristled at not having been consulted about Washington's decision to grant the jailed former dicator prisoner of war status.

The US Black Hawk helicopter that crashed in central Iraq two days ago, killing all nine soldiers and crew on board, was shot down by guerrillas, the American military said yesterday after a preliminary investigation.

http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/main.jhtml?xml=/news/2004/01/11/wirq11.xml&sSheet=/news/2004/01/11/ixnewstop.html


TOPICS: Breaking News; Foreign Affairs; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: chemicalweapons; iraq; iraqiwmds; wmd
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-5051-100101-134 next last
Could be just trying to blow smoke for US military, but it's worth mentioning in any case (IMO)
1 posted on 01/10/2004 9:59:13 PM PST by Jackson Brown
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: All
Did you ever dance with the Devil by the pale moonlight?
Make the angry doctor even madder! Make a donation to Free Republic!

2 posted on 01/10/2004 9:59:33 PM PST by Support Free Republic (Freepers post from sun to sun, but a fundraiser bot's work is never done.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Jackson Brown
Thanks for posting this, it is worth mentioning.
3 posted on 01/10/2004 10:02:31 PM PST by Dolphy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Jackson Brown; Ragtime Cowgirl
Here is the latest update from the AP writer - ROBERT H. REID ASSOCIATED PRESS

Today: January 10, 2004 at 21:35:19 PST

BAGHDAD, Iraq (AP) - Danish and Icelandic troops have uncovered a cache of 36 shells buried in the Iraqi desert, and preliminary tests showed they contained a liquid blister agent, the Danish military said Saturday.

The 120mm mortar shells are thought to be left over from the eight-year war between Iraq and neighboring Iran, which ended in 1988, said U.S. Brig. Gen. Mark Kimmitt.

The shells were found by Danish engineering troops and Icelandic de-miners near Al Quarnah, north of the city of Basra where Denmark's 410 troops are based, the Danish Army Operational Command said in a written statement.

The shells were wrapped in plastic but had been damaged, and they appeared to have been buried for at least 10 years, the statement said.

It said British experts did a preliminary test and said the shells contained "blister gas," but did not elaborate.

Before the war, the United States alleged Iraq still had stockpiles of mustard gas, a World War I-era blister agent that is stored in liquid form. The chemical burns skin, eyes and the lungs.

U.S. intelligence officials also claimed Iraq had sarin, cyclosarin and VX, which are extremely deadly nerve agents.

"We're doing some preliminary tests to ensure that if they do contain any kind of blister agent that we can dispose of them properly," Kimmitt said.

The Danish military emphasized that the tests were not definitive. In the weeks after the Iraq war, the U.S.-led coalition found several caches that tested positive for mustard gas but later turned out to contain missile fuel or other chemicals.

Initial tests by field troops are designed to favor a positive reading, erring on the side of caution to protect soldiers. More sophisticated tests are often necessary.

Other discoveries early in the U.S.-led occupation turned out to be old caches that had already been tagged by United Nations inspectors and were scheduled for destruction.

Saddam Hussein's regime used chemical weapons against Iranian soldiers during that war and killed an estimated 5,000 Kurdish civilians in a chemical attack on the northern city of Halabja in 1988.

After the first Gulf War in 1991, a U.N. resolution called for the destruction of all Iraqi nuclear, chemical and biological weapons, as well as missiles with a range of more than 93 miles. The resolution set up a U.N. inspections commission to oversee the process.

The inspectors uncovered hidden nuclear and biological weapons programs in Iraq but found virtually nothing new after 1996. In 1998, Baghdad claimed it no longer had any banned weapons, accused the United States of spying and barred further inspections.

In 2002, President Bush accused Iraq of resurrecting its programs to develop weapons of mass destruction. After Bush called on the United Nations to pressure Iraq, Saddam agreed to let the inspectors return.

The inspectors worked for nearly four months but found no evidence of any of the weapons the Bush administration had alleged. Since the war, a nine-month search by a succession of U.S. teams has failed to find any current stockpiles of chemical, biological or nuclear weapons.

The lack of evidence has led critics to suggest the Bush administration either mishandled or exaggerated its knowledge of Iraq's alleged arsenal.

In October, Dutch marines found several dozen artillery shells dating from the 1991 Gulf War in the southern Iraqi town of Samawah, but the shells contained no biological or chemical agents. Samawah is 100 miles west of the southern region where the Danes discovered shells Saturday.

In April, U.S. troops found a dozen 55-gallon drums in an open field near the northern Iraqi town of Baiji.

Preliminary tests performed at the scene indicated one drum might contain the nerve agent cyclosarin and a blister agent that could be mustard gas. Tests later showed the barrel's contents were not chemical weapons.

--

4 posted on 01/10/2004 10:06:05 PM PST by Ernest_at_the_Beach (Davis is now out of Arnoold's Office , Bout Time!!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Ernest_at_the_Beach
Other discoveries early in the U.S.-led occupation turned out to be old caches that had already been tagged by United Nations inspectors and were scheduled for destruction.

If I read this correctly it infers that we have already found caches of chemical and/or grem weapons. Its simply explained away as "we already knew about them and they were supposed to be destroyed".....

Now wasn't one of the big points of this war that he had the stuff and hand't destroyed it yet, saddam said he didn't have it, we go in and find it and then get to hear about how he didn't have any, "well didn't have any other than the stuff we already knew he had ...."

Exactly how much stuff have we found ?????
5 posted on 01/10/2004 10:17:33 PM PST by festus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Jackson Brown; JustPiper; WestCoastGal
Bump/Ping
6 posted on 01/10/2004 10:18:24 PM PST by Pro-Bush (Homeland Security + Tom Ridge = Open Borders --> Demand Change!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: festus
Great Point!

Scheduled for destruction does not mean they were destroyed. Therefore, they STILL HAD THEM! I wonder how much stuff was "tagged" but not verified as destroyed?
7 posted on 01/10/2004 10:21:46 PM PST by Jackson Brown
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: All
http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,108009,00.html

Saturday, January 10, 2004


ARTICLE SNIPPET: "BAGHDAD, Iraq — Danish and Icelandic troops have uncovered a cache of 36 shells buried in the Iraqi desert, and preliminary tests showed they contained a liquid blister agent, the Danish military said Saturday.


The 120mm mortar shells are thought to be left over from the eight-year war between Iraq and neighboring Iran, which ended in 1988, said U.S. Brig. Gen. Mark Kimmitt."
8 posted on 01/10/2004 10:23:27 PM PST by Cindy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Jackson Brown
Tom Daschle: "But, but, but, 36 of these weapons hardy equal a threat

Howard Dean: "There is an interesting theory out there that I find interesting, It's said that Bush planted those 36 120mm mortar rounds filled with blister agent when he was in Iraq for Thanksgiving"

John Kerry: "George W. Bush should have been in Iraq looking for these WMD's instead of landing on that Carrier, And I know something about landing on Carriers. When I was in Vietnam, I saw those Carries from the Swift Boat I served on. The fact is, George W. Bush rushed to war, we could have dug those 120mm mortar's up anytime"

Richard Gephardt: "This is just another example why George W. Bush is a miserable failure, we had no plan, we should have built a real coalition instead of a fraudulent one. In this struggle for our survival, we need to (as a Nation) get on our knee's and beg the U'N. to join us, we need to surrender our sovereignty for the sake of not being viewed as unilateralist

9 posted on 01/10/2004 10:29:07 PM PST by MJY1288 (WITHOUT DOUBLE STANDARDS, LIBERALS WOULDN'T HAVE ANY !)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MJY1288
You know those guys too well, MJY .... you've got them down to a T.
10 posted on 01/10/2004 10:43:39 PM PST by kayak (Have you prayed for our President and our troops today?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: Cindy
Bump!

Blister Gas?
11 posted on 01/10/2004 11:00:39 PM PST by Pro-Bush (Homeland Security + Tom Ridge = Open Borders --> Demand Change!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: kayak
LOL, They're a broken record, I truly believe I could train a Parrot to do just as good as at least 7 of the Dem simpletons do in repeating the latest DNC talking points.

I would need to read the writings of Carl Marx in order to train a Parrot to imitate Dennis Kucinich and Howard Dean

12 posted on 01/10/2004 11:13:36 PM PST by MJY1288 (WITHOUT DOUBLE STANDARDS, LIBERALS WOULDN'T HAVE ANY !)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: MJY1288
LOL! Points well made.
13 posted on 01/10/2004 11:18:33 PM PST by kayak (Have you prayed for our President and our troops today?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: MJY1288
You forgot one...

John F. Heniz-Kerry: "Oh f***. This isn't good. This isn't at all good."

14 posted on 01/10/2004 11:48:55 PM PST by Keith in Iowa (The only good news for Democrats is they could save $$ by switching to Geico.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: Jackson Brown
A Danish officer said: "The first inspections have shown that the mortars contain some liquid. We don't know what sort."

Well im sure its not aftershave.
15 posted on 01/11/2004 12:37:12 AM PST by Husker24
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Jackson Brown
I wonder how much stuff was "tagged" but not verified as destroyed?

Aren't you aware that the tags will prevent them from being used?

The tags read:

United Nations' Warning!
Use of these chemical weapons shells will cause
United Nations Secretary General Kofi Annan
to issue a strongly worded rebuke and
the United Nations General Assembly to
issue another resolution condemning Iraq.

16 posted on 01/11/2004 1:33:50 AM PST by Swordmaker
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

Funny how I had to DIG for this story in the NYTimes.....
17 posted on 01/11/2004 2:36:14 AM PST by RandallFlagg ("There are worse things than crucifixion...There are teeth.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: RandallFlagg
The NYT had to bury the story.

The front page was full of Paul O'Neill allegations.

18 posted on 01/11/2004 2:45:40 AM PST by daler
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: daler
Heh! Imagine that!

Priorities, ya know...
19 posted on 01/11/2004 2:47:15 AM PST by RandallFlagg ("There are worse things than crucifixion...There are teeth.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: Husker24
Well im sure its not aftershave.

Don't be so certain...I wouldn't be so sure. Many third worlders use heavy applications of bad after shave type perfumes instead of bathing with any regularity. And many are exceedingly overpowering and could quite possibly qualify as chemical weapons. Maybe not on par with VX, but certainly on par with CS gas. Headaches, eyes watering, blurred vision, nausea, vomiting, stomach cramps, muscle spasms....sounds a lot like CS to me.

20 posted on 01/11/2004 2:57:58 AM PST by blanknoone (How long until the 9 dwarves pick up on the 'its only aftershave!!' line of attack?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: Keith in Iowa
>>John F. Heniz-Kerry: "Oh f***. This isn't good. This isn't at all good."

LOL
21 posted on 01/11/2004 3:43:53 AM PST by Future Useless Eater (Freedom_Loving_Engineer)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: Pro-Bush
Bilster Agent: good old-fashioned WWI-era mustard gas. Causes mondo blistering on any flesh in contact - including the inside of the lungs, if inhaled.

Deal is, it's not hard to decontaminate if hit with this. Copious amounts of water will do the trick; it's also so thick, it can be scraped off with something, but only if you catch it quick; it tends to evaporate.

For this reaon, it's referred to as, "Non-Persistent Agent". It's not for long use in a desert scenario; the temps involved usually means it evaporates quickly. In cold or wet climates, this stuff lingers.

22 posted on 01/11/2004 4:21:06 AM PST by Old Sarge (149th Armd' Bde, KyARNG: Bosnia-bound. Remember Them.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: MJY1288
Wesley Clark: ....are you ****ing me?
23 posted on 01/11/2004 4:37:10 AM PST by yoe (Mirror, mirror on the wall, who's the fairest............the Clark mantra)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: Pro-Bush
Blister Gas?

Actually, the correct military phrase is 'Blister agent'.

Like 'Blood agent' and 'Nerve agent'

Bump!

24 posted on 01/11/2004 4:43:16 AM PST by demlosers (Light weight and flexible - radiation shielding is solved.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: Jackson Brown
Please use original article titles only. Thank you.
25 posted on 01/11/2004 4:45:14 AM PST by Admin Moderator
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Support Free Republic
Fox news this A.M. said US tests show the liquid in the shells is a blister agent, so a WMD.
26 posted on 01/11/2004 4:46:25 AM PST by hershey
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Ernest_at_the_Beach
Wow! An American news service spinning this for Sadam. What an obvious effort to influence the reader.

"Scheduled for distruction", "untagged" etcetera go down in my book for about as blatant a flight of imagination for a journalist as can be.

27 posted on 01/11/2004 4:54:46 AM PST by KC Burke
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Jackson Brown
Scheduled for destruction does not mean they were destroyed. Therefore, they STILL HAD THEM! I wonder how much stuff was "tagged" but not verified as destroyed?

Yeah, try using that one on the IRS.

"I know I didn't report this income. But it was scheduled to be reported."

28 posted on 01/11/2004 4:58:18 AM PST by 11th Earl of Mar
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Ernest_at_the_Beach
This story can't be right...

Danish, Icelandic, Dutch...

We all know this is operation is unilateral...don't we? Don't we?
29 posted on 01/11/2004 5:00:37 AM PST by wunderkind54
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Dog Gone; Hon
Dog, I saw you yesterday arguing that if these were things buried right after the Iran/Iraq war, then it wasn't a big deal to you.

According to the Iraqi guy quoted in this article, weapons of this type were deployed within Iraq as little as two years ago.

30 posted on 01/11/2004 5:04:23 AM PST by William McKinley
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Husker24
Corn, "My", "Fair"?
31 posted on 01/11/2004 5:11:32 AM PST by ROCKLOBSTER (The Constitution is a Right Wing Document)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: Jackson Brown
So this is it! The WMD's have been found! The plan was for the Iraqi Navy to sidle up to our coastline and lob these babies onshore, or maybe they had a scheme to smuggle in a Howitzer to shoot these shells anywhere they wanted. I bet they hoped the chemicals hadn't leaked out before their arrival.

Thank goodness this threat has been removed.

32 posted on 01/11/2004 5:13:41 AM PST by St.Chuck
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: St.Chuck
Too bad the threat- the dictator himself- hadn't been removed twelve years ago... if it had, 300,000 + people would still be alive and there wouldn't have been refugees from the regime pouring into western countries such as our own.
33 posted on 01/11/2004 5:42:54 AM PST by piasa (Attitude adjustments offered here free of charge.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies]

And of course, Tom Daschle is deeply saddened that there are no more training camps in Iraq attended by al Qaeda, Ansar al Islam, assorted palestinian suicide bombers and Abu Nidal terrorists.
34 posted on 01/11/2004 5:46:03 AM PST by piasa (Attitude adjustments offered here free of charge.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies]

To: piasa
Jeez!

I was just told on another board that blister agent is not a WMD.

These Saddam loyalists are getting SOOOO desperate!
35 posted on 01/11/2004 5:54:25 AM PST by RandallFlagg ("There are worse things than crucifixion...There are teeth.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies]

To: piasa
Too bad the threat- the dictator himself- hadn't been removed twelve years ago... if it had, 300,000 + people would still be alive and there wouldn't have been refugees from the regime pouring into western countries such as our own.

I've not heard the refugee problem before. Keep those justifications moving about. You might just stumble on one that will stick. And of course, Tom Daschle is deeply saddened that there are no more training camps in Iraq attended by al Qaeda, Ansar al Islam, assorted palestinian suicide bombers and Abu Nidal terrorists.

LOL. What does Tom Daschle have to do with anything? I guess you think that if you smear a democrat, your facts gain credibility. Fact is, there was no evidence of terror training camps supported by Saddam or even on land controlled by Iraq. The Al-Queda camp that Colin Powell highlighted in his presentation to the U.N. was actually in the Kurdish autonomous zone just miles from the Iranian frontier. Keep fishing. Maybe you'll produce the tongue shredders.

36 posted on 01/11/2004 6:14:50 AM PST by St.Chuck
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies]

To: MJY1288
They werre umm.. umm... ummm... filled with INSECTICIDE! YEah, that's the ticket. DUAL-USE, DUAL-USE!

Fox just reported there are over 200 of these.
37 posted on 01/11/2004 6:15:15 AM PST by johnb838 (Understand the root causes of AMERICAN anger.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: blanknoone
There's nothing like the aroma of @ss, sweat, tobacco smoke, and polo after shave.
38 posted on 01/11/2004 6:18:27 AM PST by johnb838 (Understand the root causes of AMERICAN anger.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: RandallFlagg
These Saddam loyalists are getting SOOOO desperate!

Who, exactly, do you characterize as a Saddam loyalist? Come on. Is everyone who might finds flaws in the spin the government cheerleaders feed it's citizens a Saddam loyalist? Get real.

39 posted on 01/11/2004 6:24:26 AM PST by St.Chuck
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies]

To: St.Chuck
Is blister agent a WMD?
40 posted on 01/11/2004 6:25:39 AM PST by RandallFlagg ("There are worse things than crucifixion...There are teeth.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 39 | View Replies]

To: RandallFlagg
yes, it is.


41 posted on 01/11/2004 6:29:24 AM PST by Gringo1 (Might makes......well, it makes might.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 40 | View Replies]

To: Gringo1
Thank you.. That was my point to Chuck.
42 posted on 01/11/2004 6:34:37 AM PST by RandallFlagg ("There are worse things than crucifixion...There are teeth.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 41 | View Replies]

To: St.Chuck
Man, I wish I could be of a state of mind that I could see the removal of a horrible dictator as a bad thing. The presentation of a case for war may have been wanting, but the cause was right. No matter how anyone spins it, the US, and its allies, did the right thing.

One can ignore the fact that the Iraq was in proven (both before and after the war) violation of UN resolutions (Illegal military equipment, black market oil sales, illegal dual use items). One can ignore the fact that Iraq was part of the world wide terror web (Chech. 9-11 intelligence, Salmon Pak(sp), payments to homicide bomber families, attempted assassination of a former US president) that has declared war on the US. One can even ignore the fact that on average over what 2800+/per day Iraqis died during the Hussein reign of terror. Ignore the above, and I can see where one would think that the world is a much dimmer place, without the light that was Saddam Hussein.

People need to hang onto that WMD idea (it wasn't the sole stated reason for the liberation of Iraq, even if it was pushed too far forward), it will make life easier. It will allow them to ignore right and wrong in the world, and they can go on bashing the US.
43 posted on 01/11/2004 6:43:56 AM PST by Turbo Pig (If They Don't Respect US, They Should At Least Fear US.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 36 | View Replies]

To: KC Burke
"Scheduled for distruction"

IMO, it doesn't matter if they're new or old. They were "tagged" for destruction, and they weren't destroyed. Resolution 1441 was about Saddam verifying the destruction of his weapons, not if he had them...everybody already knew that.

It never ceases to amaze me how the criminal liberal media so wantonly attempts to revise history. They want people to think that 1441 was supposed to FIND wmd's, when in truth, the inspectors were just there to verify they had been destroyed.

44 posted on 01/11/2004 6:48:55 AM PST by ItsOurTimeNow ("By all that we hold dear on this Earth I bid you stand, men of the West!")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: Jackson Brown
Deserves a Bump.
45 posted on 01/11/2004 6:49:00 AM PST by DoctorMichael (Thats my story, and I'm sticking to it.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: RandallFlagg
Is blister agent a WMD?

Probably not, in the case of 15 year old, leaky shells that contain it, or the good chance that the chemical agent has lost much of it's potency, and certainly no more a weapon of mass destruction than cluster bombs or depleted uranium shells. So, do you sense a loyalty for Saddam from that answer.

46 posted on 01/11/2004 6:50:33 AM PST by St.Chuck
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 40 | View Replies]

To: RandallFlagg
Yes it is, First Generation. The Germans were the first ones to ever deploy it in World War I on the Western Front.
47 posted on 01/11/2004 6:54:26 AM PST by StAthanasiustheGreat (Vocatus Atque Non Vocatus Deus Aderit)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 40 | View Replies]

To: St.Chuck
Everyone should take notice of the subtle spin here. While all the news so far has quoted 10 years, st. chuck is saying 15 years. A few more posts along and he'll be saying 20 or 30 no doubt.
48 posted on 01/11/2004 7:04:37 AM PST by Hitlerys uterus (I have just about had it up to here with foreigners.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 46 | View Replies]

To: daler
The front page was full of Paul O'Neill allegations.

O'Neill must've or is planning to write a book no doubt.

49 posted on 01/11/2004 7:10:04 AM PST by b4its2late (The Lord made man before woman to give him time to think of an answer for her first question.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: Jackson Brown
I saw a report on FoxNews yesterday that began "This is not a smoking gun, but..."

If the finding of WMD in Iraq is NOT a smoking gun indicative of the existence of WMD in Iraq, what IS a smoking gun?

I'm starting to think the media is talking about an ACTUAL smoking gun here...
50 posted on 01/11/2004 7:10:27 AM PST by Tricorn
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-5051-100101-134 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson