Skip to comments.
Dean's Wife Shuns Politics
NY Times ^
| January 13, 2004
| JODI WILGOREN
Posted on 01/13/2004 8:04:27 AM PST by Nonstatist
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-64 next last
To: stumpy
Can't tell.
41
posted on
01/13/2004 9:50:26 AM PST
by
TigersEye
("Where there is life there is hope!" - Terri Schiavo)
To: TigersEye
How will that play in the press Democrat or not? That's what I was saying. Even the media, as slanted as they are, will require her to "step up" or it will not play well. Shunning the limelight as the wife of the governor of a bucolic little state might not matter too much, on the national level it ultimately won't fly.
To: Nonstatist
Not trying to start a rumor here, but isn't there some tie between Mrs. Dean and Planned Parenthood and abortion? I thought this was discussed in an earlier Freeper thread.
-- Joe
To: PBRSTREETGANG
And yet another FReeper argues my point for me. Thank you!
44
posted on
01/13/2004 10:06:31 AM PST
by
TigersEye
("Where there is life there is hope!" - Terri Schiavo)
To: Phantom Lord; Ciexyz; Nonstatist
She should be left alone. I agree with you, although I do believe that if he wins the nomination, voters should have the opportunity to see and appraise his wife. They are important--witness the differences in Hillary and Laura and the roles they have played in their husbands' career. However, I respect a man who does not feel the need to use his wife as a prop for his career. I don't think this is necessarily a woman's rights issue. She is a doctor with patients and probably stays on call a lot. Her patients have entrusted their health to her and don't need her leaving to trapse around the country with her husband. And they have two teen-aged children. She's active with the them and their schools. Good on her! That's what moms are supposed to do.
But like I said, this all changes to me if he wins the nomination. Voters need to see her if they are being asked to vote for him. Wives matter--a lot.
45
posted on
01/13/2004 10:11:58 AM PST
by
twigs
To: rabidralph
Such an uproar would only occur if the president were a republican.
46
posted on
01/13/2004 10:14:50 AM PST
by
Phantom Lord
(Distributor of Pain, Your Loss Becomes My Gain)
To: jpl
he sure set the bar pretty low. You think? She's a successful doctor, committed mother and by all accounts, made much higher grades in med school than he did. When he's not acting out, he's not bad looking. I don't like him, but give him credit where it is due. I've always respected men who can handle a more intelligent wife. And the fact that she's not a ravishing beauty is another point in his favor. He doesn't have many points in his favor, but he deserves this one.
47
posted on
01/13/2004 10:17:12 AM PST
by
twigs
To: twigs
Voters also have begun to ask about a marriage in which the partners are so often apart she skipped Dr. Dean's birthday-party fund-raiser, the family-oriented Renaissance Weekend, even the emotional repatriation ceremony of his brother's remains in Hawaii.Sounds like she's ready to jump right in and lend the campaign a helping hand. Not!
48
posted on
01/13/2004 10:17:38 AM PST
by
TigersEye
("Where there is life there is hope!" - Terri Schiavo)
To: Phantom Lord
I'm just recalling the slight uproar that was created when the Clintons sent Chelsea to a private school and some people complained they were setting a bad example by shunning DC's failed public schools.
49
posted on
01/13/2004 10:24:56 AM PST
by
rabidralph
(All your debate are belong to us.)
To: isom35
"Dean saying "hey, you stay out of the limelight all you want..."
Why the long face, Mrs. Dean?
To: twigs
If Dean were to be elected (God help us...) I'm wondering if we would have a first lady. If her practice is so important that she can't take some time off to support her husband, she probably wouldn't move into the White House. I guess I'm just a little old fashioned. I think a woman should support her husband in any worthy endeavor.
51
posted on
01/13/2004 10:31:34 AM PST
by
CarolAnn
To: twigs
Well said.
My take is that she works hard serving her fellow man, and she is probably honest. These two traits, with very rare exception, are not found in politicians of any stripe.
52
posted on
01/13/2004 10:38:41 AM PST
by
VMI70
(...but two Wrights made an airplane)
To: CarolAnn
I said that if her husband wins the Dem nomination, then she should campaign with him. Seeing his wife is an important part of deciding whether or not to vote for the man. I can understand why she didn't campaign until now. She has a medical practice with patients who have entrusted themselves to her. IF she wants to continue this, heaven forbid if Dean should ever get to the WH, then I would think very poorly of her. I just don't see any reason to--yet.
53
posted on
01/13/2004 10:45:05 AM PST
by
twigs
To: Ciexyz
Disagree. The President is there to run the country, not to minister to the spiritual needs of Americans. The job of President is more like that of a CEO than that of a minister.
I've always been annoyed by how large a role the First Lady has. Nowhere in the constitution does it say that the First Lady should have a budget of millions of dollars, an office and a role in governmnet.
I didn't elect the First Lady and I don't want to see her at meetings and she is NOT a representative of the state. Hillary is an example of an empowered First Lady.
I would never vote for Dean, but I find he and his wife's position on this to be quite refreshing and correct.
More power to them!!
To: rabidralph
It was a minimal uproar, and the Clintons were right to do what they did.
55
posted on
01/13/2004 3:00:03 PM PST
by
Phantom Lord
(Distributor of Pain, Your Loss Becomes My Gain)
To: TigersEye
("She got a 99, I got a 35," he said. "34 was passing.")Why in the world do the Democrats want this guy? If they are really serious, why don't they pick Gephardt who at least has experience in government?
There has to be a hidden element in this Democrat Primary thing. Could it be Hitlary?
56
posted on
01/13/2004 3:31:37 PM PST
by
swampfox98
(Tell me it isn't so)
To: swampfox98
It very well could be Hillary. She picked a fine time to relaunch her healthcare plans; the eve of the Iowa caucus!?! But other than that just look at who Dean's followers are; the total nutcakes. Without the young snot-and-rags protester holding a "Bush is Hitler" sign he wouldn't have much.
57
posted on
01/13/2004 4:40:39 PM PST
by
TigersEye
("Where there is life there is hope!" - Terri Schiavo)
To: Dr._Joseph_Warren
Those are very nice sentiments and if I thought that Dr. Dean were sincere about anything I would applaud him for it. But looking at this from another POV; do you think she could maintain her practice if he were elected?
58
posted on
01/13/2004 4:44:29 PM PST
by
TigersEye
("Where there is life there is hope!" - Terri Schiavo)
To: Nonstatist; Howlin; Liz
My guess - she's voting for Dubya...
59
posted on
01/13/2004 4:47:47 PM PST
by
Libloather
(Always remember you're unique - just like everyone else...)
To: Libloather
Maybe Edwards is her guy?
BTW, I'm worried that he may get the nomination by default.
60
posted on
01/13/2004 4:54:31 PM PST
by
Howlin
(WARNING: If you post to me, Tard and Buttie Fred are gonna copy & paste it to LP!!!!!!!)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-64 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson