Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

US weapons hunter won't return to Iraq: report
ABC News ^ | 1/16/2004

Posted on 01/16/2004 7:23:00 AM PST by JohnGalt

US weapons hunter won't return to Iraq: report

David Kay, the chief United States weapons hunter in Iraq, has told the CIA he will not return to his post, a US government source said today.

"He has told the DCI (Director of Central Intelligence George Tenet) that he doesn't want to go back, they have been trying to get him to stay," the source told Reuters on condition of anonymity.

It was unclear whether the CIA had had any success in persuading Mr Kay, who came back to the United States for the Christmas holidays, to stay on the job, the source said.

A CIA spokesman declined to comment.

Mr Kay, reached earlier this week, also declined to comment and referred questions about his status to the CIA.

Tenet last June appointed Mr Kay, a former United Nations weapons inspector, as a special adviser to lead the search for biological and chemical weapons and any signs of a resurrected nuclear weapons program in Iraq.

But the hunt, which is being conducted by the Defence Department's Iraq Survey Group, has come up empty, finding no stockpiles of biological and chemical weapons or any evidence that Iraq had restarted a program to develop nuclear weapons.

The Bush administration cited weapons of mass destruction as its main justification for the war against Iraq that ousted Saddam Hussein from power last April.

A US official, who also spoke on condition of anonymity, called Mr Kay's status "up in the air."

Major General Keith Dayton of the Defence Intelligence Agency, who heads the Iraq Survey Group under Mr Kay's guidance, was returning to Iraq this week to continue the weapons search.

US officials last month said Mr Kay had told administration officials he was considering leaving the job as early as January, citing family obligations.

At that time, officials described Mr Kay as frustrated that no banned weapons were found and that some of his staff had been diverted to other tasks.

The White House also said the weapons hunt was a priority for the administration whether or not Mr Kay stayed on the job.

The Carnegie Endowment for International Peace last week issued a report that accused the Bush administration in the lead-up to the war of making the threat from Iraq sound more dire than the underlying information warranted.

The report's authors said they did not expect any large stockpiles of biological and chemical weapons to be found.

--Reuters


TOPICS: Crime/Corruption; Extended News
KEYWORDS: 1billion; cia; davidkay; feathers; iraq; iraqiwmds; isg; tar
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-25 next last
David Kay made a living in the 1990s collecting speaking fees on all these great scary weapons Iraq supposedly had. Let alone refunding the US taxpayers for the billion he spent searching for these weapons, I wonder if he will refund the people who paid him to speak?

What a maroon.

1 posted on 01/16/2004 7:23:01 AM PST by JohnGalt
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: JohnGalt
Let alone refunding the US taxpayers for the billion he spent searching for these weapons, I wonder if he will refund the people who paid him to speak?

About as likely as getting a refund from the Y2K disaster promoters.

2 posted on 01/16/2004 7:32:19 AM PST by templar
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: billbears
David Kay update.

12/18/2003 Kay Plans to Leave Search for Iraqi Arms

3 posted on 01/16/2004 7:34:06 AM PST by JohnGalt (And I'm saying that men can live together without butchering one another. -Josey Wales)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: templar
LOL

BTW, Know anyone interested in 2 tons of powdered milk?
4 posted on 01/16/2004 7:35:28 AM PST by JohnGalt (And I'm saying that men can live together without butchering one another. -Josey Wales)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: JohnGalt
I don't know if you've read about or recall the defection of Saddam's sons-in-law (and their subsequent assassination by Saddam's hitmen when they were lured back to Iraq). The men told the CIA, Britain's M16 and Rolf Ekeus, the head of UNSCOM, detailed accounts of Iraq's weapons program, including previously hidden chemical weapons plants and frnot companies helping Iraq's weapons procurement and Saddam's VX nerve agent program.

When UNSCOM was permitted back into the country, they were able to verify what the men had told them, since such specific hiding places were disclosed and Saddam was forced to update his submissions to UNSCOM, including new data on biological weapons such as anthrax and botulism, VX nerve gas and new information on Iraq's attempts to acquire nuclear weapons. UNSCOM was readmitted to Iraq and Ekeus was able to incontrovertibly provide evidence of Iraq's nonconventional weapons infrastructure.

When UNSCOM inspections ended in 1998, Saddam still had not accounted for 20 tons of complex growth media, essential for the production of biological weapons such as anthrax together with 200 tons of precursor chemicals for the production of VX nerve gas.

We certainly know he had them. He used them. If he destroyed them, then he certainly miscalculated by not letting in the UN and thus averting the war.

5 posted on 01/16/2004 7:45:50 AM PST by Peach (The Clintons have pardoned more terrorists than they ever captured or killed.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Peach
You are right, Saddam's Son-in-law Kamal told the truth, the weapons in question were destroyed between '93 and '95.

Are you sure you read what he had to say?

6 posted on 01/16/2004 7:54:08 AM PST by JohnGalt (And I'm saying that men can live together without butchering one another. -Josey Wales)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: JohnGalt
LOL! That's your source? Hah

I guess all those authors of books written in the 90's, before this became a political football, are lying too.

And I guess UNSCOM, which found the weapons where the sons said they would be is lying too.

You're a riot.
7 posted on 01/16/2004 7:55:41 AM PST by Peach (The Clintons have pardoned more terrorists than they ever captured or killed.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: JohnGalt
"But the hunt, which is being conducted by the Defence Department's Iraq Survey Group, has come up empty, finding no stockpiles of biological and chemical weapons or any evidence that Iraq had restarted a program to develop nuclear weapons."

STATEMENT BY DAVID KAY ON THE INTERIM PROGRESS REPORT ON THE ACTIVITIES OF THE IRAQ SURVEY GROUP (ISG) BEFORE THE HOUSE PERMANENT SELECT COMMITTEE ON INTELLIGENCE, THE HOUSE COMMITTEE ON APPROPRIATIONS, SUBCOMMITTEE ON DEFENSE, AND THE SENATE SELECT COMMITTEE ON INTELLIGENCE:

"We have not yet found stocks of weapons, but we are not yet at the point where we can say definitively either that such weapon stocks do not exist or that they existed before the war and our only task is to find where they have gone. We are actively engaged in searching for such weapons based on information being supplied to us by Iraqis.

Why are we having such difficulty in finding weapons or in reaching a confident conclusion that they do not exist or that they once existed but have been removed? Our search efforts are being hindered by six principal factors...yada, yada, yada..."

Oh, here it is:

"...What have we found and what have we not found in the first 3 months of our work?

• We have discovered dozens of WMD-related program activities and significant amounts of equipment that Iraq concealed from the United Nations during the inspections that began in late 2002. The discovery of these deliberate concealment efforts have come about both through the admissions of Iraqi scientists and officials concerning information they deliberately withheld and through physical evidence of equipment and activities that ISG has discovered that should have been declared to the UN. Let me just give you a few examples of these concealment efforts, some of which I will elaborate on later:

• A clandestine network of laboratories and safehouses within the Iraqi Intelligence Service that contained equipment subject to UN monitoring and suitable for continuing CBW research.

• A prison laboratory complex, possibly used in human testing of BW agents, that Iraqi officials working to prepare for UN inspections were explicitly ordered not to declare to the UN

• Reference strains of biological organisms concealed in a scientist's home, one of which can be used to produce biological weapons.

• New research on BW-applicable agents, Brucella and Congo Crimean Hemorrhagic Fever (CCHF), and continuing work on ricin and aflatoxin were not declared to the UN.

• Documents and equipment, hidden in scientists' homes, that would have been useful in resuming uranium enrichment by centrifuge and electromagnetic isotope separation (EMIS).

• A line of UAVs not fully declared at an undeclared production facility and an admission that they had tested one of their declared UAVs out to a range of 500 km, 350 km beyond the permissible limit.

• Continuing covert capability to manufacture fuel propellant useful only for prohibited SCUD variant missiles, a capability that was maintained at least until the end of 2001 and that cooperating Iraqi scientists have said they were told to conceal from the UN.

• Plans and advanced design work for new long-range missiles with ranges up to at least 1000 km - well beyond the 150 km range limit imposed by the UN. Missiles of a 1000 km range would have allowed Iraq to threaten targets through out the Middle East, including Ankara, Cairo, and Abu Dhabi.

• Clandestine attempts between late-1999 and 2002 to obtain from North Korea technology related to 1,300 km range ballistic missiles --probably the No Dong -- 300 km range anti-ship cruise missiles, and other prohibited military equipment. In addition to the discovery of extensive concealment efforts, we have been faced with a systematic sanitization of documentary and computer evidence in a wide range of offices, laboratories, and companies suspected of WMD work. The pattern of these efforts to erase evidence - hard drives destroyed, specific files burned, equipment cleaned of all traces of use - are ones of deliberate, rather than random, acts. For example,

• On 10 July 2003 an ISG team exploited the Revolutionary Command Council (RCC) Headquarters in Baghdad. The basement of the main building contained an archive of documents situated on well-organized rows of metal shelving. The basement suffered no fire damage despite the total destruction of the upper floors from coalition air strikes. Upon arrival the exploitation team encountered small piles of ash where individual documents or binders of documents were intentionally destroyed. Computer hard drives had been deliberately destroyed. Computers would have had financial value to a random looter; their destruction, rather than removal for resale or reuse, indicates a targeted effort to prevent Coalition forces from gaining access to their contents.

• All IIS laboratories visited by IIS exploitation teams have been clearly sanitized, including removal of much equipment, shredding and burning of documents, and even the removal of nameplates from office doors.

• Although much of the deliberate destruction and sanitization of documents and records probably occurred during the height of OIF combat operations, indications of significant continuing destruction efforts have been found after the end of major combat operations, including entry in May 2003 of the locked gated vaults of the Ba'ath party intelligence building in Baghdad and highly selective destruction of computer hard drives and data storage equipment along with the burning of a small number of specific binders that appear to have contained financial and intelligence records, and in July 2003 a site exploitation team at the Abu Ghurayb Prison found one pile of the smoldering ashes from documents that was still warm to the touch. I would now like to review our efforts in each of the major lines of enquiry that ISG has pursued during this initial phase of its work…"

The rest can be found here:
October '03 Kay Report

8 posted on 01/16/2004 8:01:37 AM PST by Hatteras
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Peach
LOL

I could hope for no better 'adversary' in exposing the sophistry of the WMDead Enders.
9 posted on 01/16/2004 8:04:05 AM PST by JohnGalt (And I'm saying that men can live together without butchering one another. -Josey Wales)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: JohnGalt
The article does not support the headline. The article says basically, We don't know whether or not Kay is leaving, but the search continues to be a priority of the White House.
10 posted on 01/16/2004 8:20:17 AM PST by alnick (The American people would rather reach for the stars than reach for excuses why we shouldn't.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: JohnGalt
And from the current posts I see we need to throw out all factual evidence and continue to believe what the administration and other neocon sources for news tell us. I also find it strangely curious that 'conservatives', who ten years ago were calling on this nation of states to leave the UN, are now relying more and more on UN arguments to justify the $200 billion search for already destroyed WMDs
11 posted on 01/16/2004 8:30:36 AM PST by billbears (Deo Vindice)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: JohnGalt
U.S. intelligence suspects Iraq's weapons of mass destruction have finally been located. Unfortunately, getting to them will be nearly impossible for the United States and its allies, because the containers with the strategic materials are not in Iraq.

Instead they are located in Lebanon's heavily-fortified Bekaa Valley, swarming with Iranian and Syrian forces, and Hizbullah and ex-Iraqi agents, Geostrategy-Direct.com will report in tomorrow's new weekly edition.

U.S. intelligence first identified a stream of tractor-trailer trucks moving from Iraq to Syria to Lebaon in January 2003. The significance of this sighting did not register on the CIA at the time.

U.S suspects Iraqi WMD in Lebanon's Bekaa Valley

Oct 28, 2003 - The director of a top American spy agency said Tuesday that he believed that material from Iraq's illicit weapons program had been transported into Syria and perhaps other countries as part of an effort by the Iraqis to disperse and destroy evidence immediately before the recent war.

The official, James R. Clapper Jr., a retired lieutenant general, said satellite imagery showing a heavy flow of traffic from Iraq into Syria, just before the American invasion in March, led him to believe that illicit weapons material "unquestionably" had been moved out of Iraq.

"I think people below the Saddam Hussein-and-his-sons level saw what was coming and decided the best thing to do was to destroy and disperse," General Clapper, who leads the National Imagery and Mapping Agency, said at a breakfast with reporters.

General Clapper's agency is responsible for interpreting satellite photographs and other imagery. He declined to answer a question about whether he believed that illicit Iraqi weapons material might have been smuggled into any other country.

Iraqis Removed Arms Material, U.S. Aide Says

Iraq is said to have transported chemical and biological weapons to the borders with Syria and Turkey. U.S. officials said an Iraqi intelligence unit was spotted transporting the nonconventional weapons about six weeks ago from facilities in Baghdad to the Syrian and Turkish borders. They said the transfer of the weapons appeared to be part of an effort to conceal them from United Nations inspectors and spare them from any expected U.S. attack.

"We know that in late January, the Iraqi Intelligence Service transported chemical and biological agents to areas far away from Baghdad, near the Syrian and Turkish borders, in order to conceal them," U.S. Secretary of State Colin Powell said on Wednesday. "And they have concealed them from the prying eyes of inspectors."

In an address to the Washington-based Center for Strategic and International Studies, Powell did not identify or say how many BW and CW weapons were transferred by Iraq. But Powell and other officials said Iraq is believed to have produced such agents as anthrax, VX and botulinum toxin.

Iraq Transports WMD TO Syrian, Turkish Borders

12 posted on 01/16/2004 8:33:50 AM PST by ravingnutter
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ravingnutter
So you agree that David Kay wasted a billion dollars searching for weapons that were not in Iraq?

I knew we could find common ground.
13 posted on 01/16/2004 8:36:58 AM PST by JohnGalt (And I'm saying that men can live together without butchering one another. -Josey Wales)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: JohnGalt
So you agree that David Kay wasted a billion dollars searching for weapons that were not in Iraq?

No common ground here. The operative word in your reply is "were". Yes, the WMD in the articles I cited "were" in Iraq prior to the war. After they were shipped out of the country, the operative word should be "are", as in they "are" not in Iraq. Got it? With your ringing endorsements of WND as a credible source, I am surprised that you missed this story. An excerpt:

The vial of botulinum bacteria discovered in Iraq by U.S. arms inspectors – which experts call the most poisonous substance known to man – is "a weapon of mass destruction," the State Department's top spokesman announced yesterday.

"Botulinum kills people, it kills people in large quantities. Botulinum is a weapon of mass destruction, yes," said State spokesman Richard Boucher," according to an Agence France-Presse report. "Anything that destroys on a massive scale is a weapon of mass destruction."

So WMD "are" in Iraq as well, which makes your whole premise wrong.
14 posted on 01/16/2004 9:59:53 AM PST by ravingnutter
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: ravingnutter
So which is it: are the WMDs in Iraq, Syria or Boise?
15 posted on 01/16/2004 10:05:10 AM PST by JohnGalt (And I'm saying that men can live together without butchering one another. -Josey Wales)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: Hatteras
So much blather, to but hide the fact that no weapons were found. Kay's report is a study in obfuscation.
16 posted on 01/16/2004 10:16:59 AM PST by pickemuphere
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: JohnGalt
Top ten reasons Bush wants to send a manned mission to Mars:

7. Maybe we'll find some weapons of mass destruction there.

17 posted on 01/16/2004 10:51:25 AM PST by Burkeman1 ("If you see ten troubles comin down the road, nine will run into the ditch before they reach you")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: JohnGalt
So which is it: are the WMDs in Iraq, Syria or Boise?

Geez, I learn something new every day on FR...I didn't know that Iran had a town called Boise! : )

18 posted on 01/16/2004 11:03:55 AM PST by ravingnutter
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: ravingnutter
So let me get this straight. We "knew" the WMD's were in Iraq before the war. Rumsfeld said he knew where they were a week before the war started. But then Iraq "shipped" them out of the country? Wait a second. So are we "safer" or not now? It seems if we "knew" where they were before the war- but don't know- means we are at a greater risk than before we invaded. Is my logic flawed here?

PS- we didn't task a satellite to watch the sites we "knew" had WMDs before the war?
19 posted on 01/16/2004 11:11:46 AM PST by Burkeman1 ("If you see ten troubles comin down the road, nine will run into the ditch before they reach you")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: Burkeman1
See my #12...yes, we had satellite imagery showing the convoys moving, verified by the CIA, James R. Clapper Jr. (whose agency is responsible for interpreting satellite photographs and other imagery) and Powell. Shipments went to Syria and Turkey. Why do you think Bush, Powell and Congress have been doing so much sabre rattling at Syria? No, we are not safer...not sure if it is the same WMD or WMD developed in Iran, but Iran is reportedly shipping some WMD back across the border to attack our troops. Story at:

Ijaz: Spectacular WMD Attack Planned for Iraq

20 posted on 01/16/2004 1:57:39 PM PST by ravingnutter
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-25 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson