Skip to comments.
Single, but Laying Down Roots [Now, 21% of all home purchases are by single women buyers]
The NY Times - Business Section ^
| Jan 18, 2004
| ABBY ELLIN
Posted on 01/18/2004 10:20:57 AM PST by summer
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 181-200, 201-220, 221-240, 241-251 last
To: summer
Huh! Bugger me! I'm one who is usually behind the times. LOL
241
posted on
01/19/2004 4:43:17 PM PST
by
Ladysmith
(Low-carbing and working out hard - the combination that works. (232.5 (-28.1)))
To: summer
Six desperate responses to one post, that must be a record! All that verbage and not one of your anecdotes backs up the brainless and still un-retracted assertion you made in post #5 that real estate prices in Florida will never go down. Really, your half-witted claim sounds like the kind of lie a deceitful real estate agent would make to a potential buyer.
To: tortoise; summer
Dear tortoise,
Your assumptions are relatively unrealistic.
Most folks in 1971 did not pay $60,000 cash for a house. More likely they put 10% or maybe even 20% down, and paid some closing costs. Perhaps transaction costs were in the range of $2000 - $3000 for a total $14,000 or $15,000 out-of-pocket cash. In most areas of the country, the closing costs would have been significantly lower, but in Maryland, because we have very transfer taxes, etc., that wouldn't be too far off.
Interests rates were still fairly low at that point (I remember my parents got 7.25% in 1969), and the mortgage was likely around $350 per month for principal and interest. I don't know what rent for this particular house might have been in 1971, but I'd be willing to bet if the house is now worth $500,000, to rent it would currently run about $2500 per month or more. In 1971, a house worth about $60,000 would have rented in this region for $400 - $500 per month. I'd wager that total rent over 33 years likely would have exceeded total mortgage payments, including taxes and insurance. In the Washington area, property taxes on a $500,000 property would range from about $400 per month to about $750 per month, depending on the jurisdiction. Insurance could easily be less than $100 per month. So, assuming the fellow paid his 30-year mortgage all the way to the end, as he made his last, 360th payment, he likely paid something like $850 - $1200 per month. Of course, after that 360th mortgage payment, he's just paying taxes and insurance.
Now, that doesn't take into account things like maintenance, etc. Yet, one can see that over the course of a few decades, the advantage of the mortgage vis a vis rent becomes dramatic, and the added savings could easily pay for upkeep, renovations, etc.
And we haven't taken into account the tax savings. In the early years of the mortgage, when most of the principal and interest is INTEREST, the tax savings are significant. In the later years, as property taxes increase, they, too, are tax-deductible. Of course, none of the increasingly-escalating rent payments is ever deductible.
In the meanwhile, the gentleman's likely investment of about $15,000 is now worth about $500,000. That's a compounded rate of return of about 11%. Not all that bad. That's the great thing about leverage. If I put 20% down, even a 4% annual increase in the value of my property is actually a 25% increase in the value of my equity.
Again, homeownership doesn't make most folks wealthy. But in most cases, for folks who plan to live for some time in their home, homeownership can be one of the ways for regular folks to accumulate modest wealthy.
sitetest
To: Ronaldus Magnus
Re your post #242 - no links, again, I see. Just insults and your opinion. Maybe there's no links to info on your posts because there is no info to support your opinion. Just a thought...
244
posted on
01/20/2004 4:13:19 AM PST
by
summer
To: sitetest
But in most cases, for folks who plan to live for some time in their home, homeownership can be one of the ways for regular folks to accumulate modest wealthy.
I agree. Thanks for your thoughtful posts, sitetest.
245
posted on
01/20/2004 4:14:13 AM PST
by
summer
To: Ladysmith
LOL...
246
posted on
01/20/2004 4:14:53 AM PST
by
summer
To: summer
Thanks.
To: summer
Maybe there's no links to info on your posts because there is no info to support your opinion. Just a thought... The burden of proof is with the one who made the assertion. Nothing you have posted substantiates your preposterous statement in post #5 that real estate values in Florida will never fall. It's a ludicrous thing to say, and spending all this time defending it is making you look like the fool and liar you probably are.
To: Ronaldus Magnus
LOL...your posts are a riot. Thank you for entertaining me here.
249
posted on
01/20/2004 11:55:04 AM PST
by
summer
To: sitetest
:)
250
posted on
01/20/2004 11:55:40 AM PST
by
summer
To: summer
this trend of women buying their own homes, is, to me, an encouraging and uplifting trend to follow. Agreed.
251
posted on
01/20/2004 12:01:34 PM PST
by
k2blader
(¡Vote Bush, Amexicanos y Amexicanas!)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 181-200, 201-220, 221-240, 241-251 last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson