Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

How we infuriated a Liberal Idiot Teacher for MLK day.
MLK Estate ^ | 4 November 1956 | MLK

Posted on 01/19/2004 10:20:35 PM PST by mr. mojo risin

My 11th grade daughter has a liberal idiot American History Teacher.

This teacher hates America. He uses every lecture to deconstruct and revise history to fit the demoncrat Marxist agenda of brainwashing our youth. He wants them to hate America too. He wanted to use MLK (never says Reverend) as a tool to this end.

Her assignment, read a speech in class by MLK.

I suggested she search for sermons.

Not one student knew he was a Reverend, since that title has been removed by the PC police.

She siad the teacher squirmed, scowled and bit his lip off as she read the following sermon:

-------------------------------------------------

Sermon of Reverend Martin Luther King, Jr.

Paul's Letter to American Christians

I would like to share with you an imaginary letter from the pen of the Apostle Paul. The postmark reveals that it comes from the city of Ephesus. After opening the letter I discovered that it was written in Greek rather than English. At the top of the first page was this request: "Please read to your congregation as soon as possible, and then pass on to the other churches."

For several weeks I have worked assiduously with the translation. At times it has been difficult, but now I think I have deciphered its true meaning. May I hasten to say that if in presenting this letter the contents sound strangely Kingian instead of Paulinian, attribute it to my lack of complete objectivity rather than Paul's lack of clarity.

It is miraculous, indeed, that the Apostle Paul should be writing a letter to you and to me nearly 1900 years after his last letter appeared in the New Testament. How this is possible is something of an enigma wrapped in mystery. The important thing, however, is that I can imagine the Apostle Paul writing a letter to American Christians in 1956 A.D. And here is the letter as it stands before me.

I, an apostle of Jesus Christ by the will of God, to you who are in America, Grace be unto you, and peace from God our Father, through our Lord and Savior, Jesus Christ.

For many years I have longed to be able to come to see you. I have heard so much of you and of what you are doing. I have heard of the fascinating and astounding advances that you have made in the scientific realm. I have heard of your dashing subways and flashing airplanes. Through your scientific genius you have been able to dwarf distance and place time in chains. You have been able to carve highways through the stratosphere. So in your world you have made it possible to eat breakfast in New York City and dinner in Paris, France. I have also heard of your skyscraping buildings with their prodigious towers steeping heavenward. I have heard of your great medical advances, which have resulted in the curing of many dread plagues and diseases, and thereby prolonged your lives and made for greater security and physical well-being. All of that is marvelous. You can do so many things in your day that I could not do in the Greco-Roman world of my day. In your age you can travel distances in one day that took me three months to travel. That is wonderful. You have made tremendous strides in the area of scientific and technological development.

But America, as I look at you from afar, I wonder whether your moral and spiritual progress has been commensurate with your scientific progress. It seems to me that your moral progress lags behind your scientific progress. Your poet Thoreau used to talk about "improved means to an unimproved end." How often this is true. You have allowed the material means by which you live to outdistance the spiritual ends for which you live. You have allowed your mentality to outrun your morality. You have allowed your civilization to outdistance your culture. Through your scientific genius you have made of the world a neighborhood, but through your moral and spiritual genius you have failed to make of it a brotherhood. So America, I would urge you to keep your moral advances abreast with your scientific advances.

I am impelled to write you concerning the responsibilities laid upon you to live as Christians in the midst of an unChristian world. That is what I had to do. That is what every Christian has to do. But I understand that there are many Christians in America who give their ultimate allegiance to man-made systems and customs. They are afraid to be different. Their great concern is to be accepted socially. They live by some such principle as this: "everybody is doing it, so it must be alright." For so many of you Morality is merely group consensus. In your modern sociological lingo, the mores are accepted as the right ways. You have unconsciously come to believe that right is discovered by taking a sort of Gallup poll of the majority opinion. How many are giving their ultimate allegiance to this way.

But American Christians, I must say to you as I said to the Roman Christians years ago, "Be not conformed to this world, but be ye transformed by the renewing of your mind." Or, as I said to the Phillipian Christians, "Ye are a colony of heaven." This means that although you live in the colony of time, your ultimate allegiance is to the empire of eternity. You have a dual citizenry. You live both in time and eternity; both in heaven and earth. Therefore, your ultimate allegiance is not to the government, not to the state, not to nation, not to any man-made institution. The Christian owes his ultimate allegiance to God, and if any earthly institution conflicts with God's will it is your Christian duty to take a stand against it. You must never allow the transitory evanescent demands of man-made institutions to take precedence over the eternal demands of the Almighty God.

I understand that you have an economic system in America known as Capitalism. Through this economic system you have been able to do wonders. You have become the richest nation in the world, and you have built up the greatest system of production that history has ever known. All of this is marvelous. But Americans, there is the danger that you will misuse your Capitalism. I still contend that money can be the root of all evil. It can cause one to live a life of gross materialism. I am afraid that many among you are more concerned about making a living than making a life. You are prone to judge the success of your profession by the index of your salary and the size of the wheel base on your automobile, rather than the quality of your service to humanity.

The misuse of Capitalism can also lead to tragic exploitation. This has so often happened in your nation. They tell me that one tenth of one percent of the population controls more than forty percent of the wealth. Oh America, how often have you taken necessities from the masses to give luxuries to the classes. If you are to be a truly Christian nation you must solve this problem. You cannot solve the problem by turning to communism, for communism is based on an ethical relativism and a metaphysical materialism that no Christian can accept. You can work within the framework of democracy to bring about a better distribution of wealth. You can use your powerful economic resources to wipe poverty from the face of the earth. God never intended for one group of people to live in superfluous inordinate wealth, while others live in abject deadening poverty. God intends for all of his children to have the basic necessities of life, and he has left in this universe "enough and to spare" for that purpose. So I call upon you to bridge the gulf between abject poverty and superfluous wealth.

I would that I could be with you in person, so that I could say to you face to face what I am forced to say to you in writing. Oh, how I long to share your fellowship.

Let me rush on to say something about the church. Americans, I must remind you, as I have said to so many others, that the church is the Body of Christ. So when the church is true to its nature it knows neither division nor disunity. But I am disturbed about what you are doing to the Body of Christ. They tell me that in America you have within Protestantism more than two hundred and fifty six denominations. The tragedy is not so much that you have such a multiplicity of denominations, but that most of them are warring against each other with a claim to absolute truth. This narrow sectarianism is destroying the unity of the Body of Christ. You must come to see that God is neither a Baptist nor a Methodist; He is neither a Presbyterian nor a Episcopalian. God is bigger than all of our denominations. If you are to be true witnesses for Christ, you must come to see that America.

But I must not stop with a criticism of Protestantism. I am disturbed about Roman Catholicism. This church stands before the world with its pomp and power, insisting that it possesses the only truth. It incorporates an arrogance that becomes a dangerous spiritual arrogance. It stands with its noble Pope who somehow rises to the miraculous heights of infallibility when he speaks ex cathedra. But I am disturbed about a person or an institution that claims infallibility in this world. I am disturbed about any church that refuses to cooperate with other churches under the pretense that it is the only true church. I must emphasize the fact that God is not a Roman Catholic, and that the boundless sweep of his revelation cannot be limited to the Vatican. Roman Catholicism must do a great deal to mend its ways.

There is another thing that disturbs me to no end about the American church. You have a white church and you have a Negro church. You have allowed segregation to creep into the doors of the church. How can such a division exist in the true Body of Christ? You must face the tragic fact that when you stand at 11:00 on Sunday morning to sing "All Hail the Power of Jesus Name" and "Dear Lord and Father of all Mankind," you stand in the most segregated hour of Christian America. They tell me that there is more integration in the entertaining world and other secular agencies than there is in the Christian church. How appalling that is.

I understand that there are Christians among you who try to justify segregation on the basis of the Bible. They argue that the Negro is inferior by nature because of Noah's curse upon the children of Ham. Oh my friends, this is blasphemy. This is against everything that the Christian religion stands for. I must say to you as I have said to so many Christians before, that in Christ "there is neither Jew nor Gentile, there is neither bond nor free, there is neither male nor female, for we are all one in Christ Jesus." Moreover, I must reiterate the words that I uttered on Mars Hill: "God that made the world and all things therein . . . hath made of one blood all nations of men for to dwell on all the face of the earth."

So Americans I must urge you to get rid of every aspect of segregation. The broad universalism standing at the center of the gospel makes both the theory and practice of segregation morally unjustifiable. Segregation is a blatant denial of the unity which we all have in Christ. It substitutes an "I-it" relationship for the "I-thou" relationship. The segregator relegates the segregated to the status of a thing rather than elevate him to the status of a person. The underlying philosophy of Christianity is diametrically opposed to the underlying philosophy of segregation, and all the dialectics of the logicians cannot make them lie down together.

I praise your Supreme Court for rendering a great decision just two or three years ago. I am happy to know that so many persons of goodwill have accepted the decision as a great moral victory. But I understand that there are some brothers among you who have risen up in open defiance. I hear that their legislative halls ring loud with such words as "nullification" and "interposition." They have lost the true meaning of democracy and Christianity. So I would urge each of you to plead patiently with your brothers, and tell them that this isn't the way. With understanding goodwill, you are obligated to seek to change their attitudes. Let them know that in standing against integration, they are not only standing against the noble precepts of your democracy, but also against the eternal edicts of God himself. Yes America, there is still the need for an Amos to cry out to the nation: "Let judgement roll down as waters, and righteousness as a mighty stream."

May I say just a word to those of you who are struggling against this evil. Always be sure that you struggle with Christian methods and Christian weapons. Never succumb to the temptation of becoming bitter. As you press on for justice, be sure to move with dignity and discipline, using only the weapon of love. Let no man pull you so low as to hate him. Always avoid violence. If you succumb to the temptation of using violence in your struggle, unborn generations will be the recipients of a long and desolate night of bitterness, and your chief legacy to the future will be an endless reign of meaningless chaos.

In your struggle for justice, let your oppressor know that you are not attempting to defeat or humiliate him, or even to pay him back for injustices that he has heaped upon you. Let him know that you are merely seeking justice for him as well as yourself. Let him know that the festering sore of segregation debilitates the white man as well as the Negro. With this attitude you will be able to keep your struggle on high Christian standards.

Many persons will realize the urgency of seeking to eradicate the evil of segregation. There will be many Negroes who will devote their lives to the cause of freedom. There will be many white persons of goodwill and strong moral sensitivity who will dare to take a stand for justice. Honesty impels me to admit that such a stand will require willingness to suffer and sacrifice. So don't despair if you are condemned and persecuted for righteousness' sake. Whenever you take a stand for truth and justice, you are liable to scorn. Often you will be called an impractical idealist or a dangerous radical. Sometimes it might mean going to jail. If such is the case you must honorably grace the jail with your presence. It might even mean physical death. But if physical death is the price that some must pay to free their children from a permanent life of psychological death, then nothing could be more Christian. Don't worry about persecution America; you are going to have that if you stand up for a great principle. I can say this with some authority, because my life was a continual round of persecutions. After my conversion I was rejected by the disciples at Jerusalem. Later I was tried for heresy at Jerusalem. I was jailed at Philippi, beaten at Thessalonica, mobbed at Ephesus, and depressed at Athens. And yet I am still going. I came away from each of these experiences more persuaded than ever before that "neither death nor life, nor angels, nor principalities, nor things present, nor things to come . . . shall separate us from the love of God, which is in Christ Jesus our Lord." I still believe that standing up for the truth of God is the greatest thing in the world. This is the end of life. The end of life is not to be happy. The end of life is not to achieve pleasure and avoid pain. The end of life is to do the will of God, come what may.

I must bring my writing to a close now. Timothy is waiting to deliver this letter, and I must take leave for another church. But just before leaving, I must say to you, as I said to the church at Corinth, that I still believe that love is the most durable power in the world. Over the centuries men have sought to discover the highest good. This has been the chief quest of ethical philosophy. This was one of the big questions of Greek philosophy. The Epicurean and the Stoics sought to answer it; Plato and Aristotle sought to answer it. What is the summon bonum of life? I think I have an answer America. I think I have discovered the highest good. It is love. This principle stands at the center of the cosmos. As John says, "God is love." He who loves is a participant in the being of God. He who hates does not know God.

So American Christians, you may master the intricacies of the English language. You may possess all of the eloquence of articulate speech. But even if you "speak with the tongues of man and angels, and have not love, you are become as sounding brass, or a tinkling cymbal."

You may have the gift of prophecy and understanding all mysteries. You may be able to break into the storehouse of nature and bring out many insights that men never dreamed were there. You may ascend to the heights of academic achievement, so that you will have all knowledge. You may boast of your great institutions of learning and the boundless extent of your degrees. But all of this amounts to absolutely nothing devoid of love.

But even more Americans, you may give your goods to feed the poor. You may give great gifts to charity. You may tower high in philanthropy. But if you have not love it means nothing. You may even give your body to be burned, and die the death of a martyr. Your spilt blood may be a symbol of honor for generations yet unborn, and thousands may praise you as history's supreme hero. But even so, if you have not love your blood was spilt in vain. You must come to see that it is possible for a man to be self-centered in his self-denial and self-righteous in his self-sacrifice. He may be generous in order to feed his ego and pious in order to feed his pride. Man has the tragic capacity to relegate a heightening virtue to a tragic vice. Without love benevolence becomes egotism, and martyrdom becomes spiritual pride.

So the greatest of all virtues is love. It is here that we find the true meaning of the Christian faith. This is at bottom the meaning of the cross. The great event on Calvary signifies more than a meaningless drama that took place on the stage of history. It is a telescope through which we look out into the long vista of eternity and see the love of God breaking forth into time. It is an eternal reminder to a power drunk generation that love is most durable power in the world, and that it is at bottom the heartbeat of the moral cosmos. Only through achieving this love can you expect to matriculate into the university of eternal life.

I must say goodby now. I hope this letter will find you strong in the faith. It is probable that I will not get to see you in America, but I will meet you in God's eternity. And now unto him who is able to keep us from falling, and lift us from the fatigue of despair to the buoyancy of hope, from the midnight of desperation to the daybreak of joy, to him be power and authority, forever and ever. Amen.

Delivered at Dexter Avenue Baptist Church, Montgomery, Alabama, on 4 November 1956. MLKP.


TOPICS: Culture/Society; Miscellaneous
KEYWORDS: king; liberal; marxist; mlk
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-5051-57 next last
Yes, I lived through the 60's.
1 posted on 01/19/2004 10:20:36 PM PST by mr. mojo risin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: mr. mojo risin
I learned about this because I went to a Roman Catholic school where the word Christ isn't banned. You never hear that MLK was a reverend or were it not for the black church, civil rights would have never happened.
2 posted on 01/19/2004 10:23:17 PM PST by cyborg (feed marmite to the prisoners and they'll never go there again)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: mr. mojo risin
"Not one student knew he was a Reverend..."

Surely, you jest?

No, I suppose you're not. How sad. How very, very sad.

Excellent selection. One that surely had the teacher squirming. And, hopefully, her classmates learned a little something. About Reverend King. And about their country and themselves.

3 posted on 01/19/2004 10:27:50 PM PST by okie01 (www.ArmorforCongress.com...because Congress isn't for the morally halt and the mentally lame.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: mr. mojo risin
What a great work by a great man whose views have been twisted by modern day racists. A shame that this piece is not more widely known.
4 posted on 01/19/2004 10:29:13 PM PST by scarface367 (This tagline known to the state of California to cause cancer in laboratory animals)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: mr. mojo risin
But America, as I look at you from afar, I wonder whether your moral and spiritual progress has been commensurate with your scientific progress. Debatable in 1956. In 2004, it's not even close. :(
5 posted on 01/19/2004 10:35:15 PM PST by MamaLucci (Clinton met with a White House intern more than he did with his CIA director)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

bookmark
6 posted on 01/19/2004 10:35:28 PM PST by WSGilcrest (maybe I misread the title?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: mr. mojo risin
read later
7 posted on 01/19/2004 10:49:49 PM PST by LiteKeeper
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: mr. mojo risin
"The misuse of Capitalism can also lead to tragic exploitation. This has so often happened in your nation. They tell me that one tenth of one percent of the population controls more than forty percent of the wealth. Oh America, how often have you taken necessities from the masses to give luxuries to the classes. If you are to be a truly Christian nation you must solve this problem. You cannot solve the problem by turning to communism, for communism is based on an ethical relativism and a metaphysical materialism that no Christian can accept. You can work within the framework of democracy to bring about a better distribution of wealth. You can use your powerful economic resources to wipe poverty from the face of the earth. God never intended for one group of people to live in superfluous inordinate wealth, while others live in abject deadening poverty. God intends for all of his children to have the basic necessities of life, and he has left in this universe "enough and to spare" for that purpose. So I call upon you to bridge the gulf between abject poverty and superfluous wealth."

I have heard rumors that he was a Communist. Though he protests against it, notice the Marxist language. Funny how it just slips into the middle of this learned and eloquent piece.

8 posted on 01/19/2004 11:01:45 PM PST by The Westerner
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: mr. mojo risin
Excellent. You did good, Mr. Mojo.

Don't you just love revisionist history? For Christmas this year, I gave a liberal friend the memoirs of William Bradford, "On Plymouth Plantation".

She are always telling me how this is NOT a Christian Country. She is descended from him, so I just mentioned, innocently, that I thought she might like to read his book....
9 posted on 01/19/2004 11:03:12 PM PST by I still care
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: mr. mojo risin
And the teacher went "oink oink oink" alll the way home. (With a bow to Orwell)
10 posted on 01/19/2004 11:46:42 PM PST by Waco
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: mr. mojo risin
They tell me that one tenth of one percent of the population controls more than forty percent of the wealth. Oh America, how often have you taken necessities from the masses to give luxuries to the classes.

---------------------

Thank you Reverand Doctor Martin Luther Marx.

11 posted on 01/20/2004 12:00:26 AM PST by RLK
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: The Westerner
I've mentioned this before, on other threads, but you MUST consider the timeframe during which King wrote this. There was 1) flat out racism - if you were Black, you could NOT live where you choose no matter how wealthy you were. 2) there was poverty the likes of which rivaled Calcutta at its worst in places like TN, MS, AL, LA, ... And the people in those conditions were truly trapped there. No amount of hard-work-bootstrapping was going to pull them out.
12 posted on 01/20/2004 12:03:25 AM PST by Clock King (If I die, my associates will avenge my death; and some of them are Vulcan.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: The Westerner
I have heard rumors that he was a Communist. Though he protests against it, notice the Marxist language.

---------------------

And Marxist logic. You can smell it 1/4 mile down wind.

13 posted on 01/20/2004 12:06:47 AM PST by RLK
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: mr. mojo risin
So the students didn't know that MLK, Jr. was a Reverend?!

Then they also probably didn't know that Robert E. Lee was a Democrat and that MLK was a Republican.

The poor Marxist teacher's head might explode if that were mentioned...

14 posted on 01/20/2004 12:07:28 AM PST by Southack (Media bias means that Castro won't be punished for Cuban war crimes against Black Angolans in Africa)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: The Westerner
Did you miss this..."You cannot solve the problem by turning to communism, for communism is based on an ethical relativism and a metaphysical materialism that no Christian can accept."

I don't believe he was a commie.

15 posted on 01/20/2004 12:09:10 AM PST by NewLand (Dean blames Bush for his poor showing in Iowa...Clark guarantees he would have won Iowa)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: The Westerner
But he followed that with this: "You cannot solve the problem by turning to communism, for communism is based on an ethical relativism and a metaphysical materialism that no Christian can accept."

I don't think what he says goes against what the Founding Fathers said either ---"God never intended for one group of people to live in superfluous inordinate wealth, while others live in abject deadening poverty." Instead of the Constitution which is by the people, for the people --- they could have built and aristocracy.
16 posted on 01/20/2004 12:12:26 AM PST by FITZ
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: mr. mojo risin
And to think all I did was to make a toast at breakfast with my team to General Robert E. Lee in celebration of his birthday........ guess that would have pissed off the teacher too.

Good work on your daughters part......:o)

Stay safe !

17 posted on 01/20/2004 12:12:52 AM PST by Squantos (Cache for a rainy day !)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: mr. mojo risin
ping
18 posted on 01/20/2004 12:20:43 AM PST by JOAT
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: NewLand
Did you miss this..."You cannot solve the problem by turning to communism, for communism is based on an ethical relativism and a metaphysical materialism that no Christian can accept."

-------------------------

He was a Christian Marxist. He wanted a socialistic state in which he would remain in the pulpit.

19 posted on 01/20/2004 12:25:47 AM PST by RLK
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: The Westerner
This is from a much older tradition of Christianity than Marxism. There was an anti-heirarchical, "levelling" strain of thought from very early on, carried through the Catholic church and persisting in some types of Protestantism.

I once read somewhere the claim that Marxism was a Christian heresy. There is a grain of truth there.
20 posted on 01/20/2004 12:28:20 AM PST by buwaya
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: RLK
He was about as much a Christian Marxist as Pope John Paul II, who has said the same things often enough, as have other Popes.
21 posted on 01/20/2004 12:29:38 AM PST by buwaya
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: NewLand
He did play ball with some unsavory types, and he became a very pro-welfare liberal at the end, maybe to head off where the movement was going (nowhere healthy, as we know).
22 posted on 01/20/2004 12:31:45 AM PST by buwaya
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: RLK
In Christian Marxism/communism the Commisaars are clergy who beat you over the head with a bible to produce irrational guilt with one hand while demanding control of the economy with their other hand in your pocket. It's one of the most refined sysyems of self-serving manipulation known with an all-powerful self-righteous parasite commanding every church.
23 posted on 01/20/2004 12:35:23 AM PST by RLK
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: buwaya
It all started with Plato. Some of the folks on this thread have become conditioned to Marxist speech, such as the idea that in America we take from the masses to give to the ruling class.

I have heard that King was in direct contact with Communists, thus J Edgar Hoover's file on him. I believe the form of government that King would have favored, since he neither liked Communism (or so he said), nor Capitalism, would be Fascism. Which is where we are heading today. The government allows the individual to retain private property, but regulates down to the trash containers, how you may use it.
24 posted on 01/20/2004 12:36:40 AM PST by The Westerner ((I refuse to recycle on principle. ))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: buwaya
He was about as much a Christian Marxist as Pope John Paul II, who has said the same things often enough, as have other Popes.

----------------------

There are some things popes do and say that make me puke.

25 posted on 01/20/2004 12:38:04 AM PST by RLK
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: mr. mojo risin
well, so MLK was anti-Catholic ....

I guess we are all supposed to be one, big happy family with one unisex religion that we all agree on....

26 posted on 01/20/2004 12:52:25 AM PST by cherry
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: okie01
When my daughter was in pre k in a private school she came home singing in Janaury that year

"Martin luther king was a mighty mighy man a teacher a creature a man of God.

Creature was supposed to be preacher...we still laugh about this.

Anyway she is now in 2nd and I have been hearing all about MLK since they returned to school after Christmas break on January 5th. I have heard all about him daily including sidebars such as Ruby Bridges and a whole slew of civil rights leaders....

On Friday in her back pack were at least 5 handouts and a coloring page she did of MLK, a word find, more info etc.

I have never heard her talk about another American as much in my entire life. I am almost tempted to send a note to principal that I hope they cover George Washington and Abe Lincoln just as much. Also not a mention of her when I asked who Ben Franklin was since his BDAY was Friday, after all why mention him what did Ben contribute to society.....

On and let me not forget the Kwanzaa word find and puzzle that came home right before the Christmas break and the amount of times she asked me does so and so celebrate Kwaanza...

Now my husband reminds me that February is Black HIstory month.....so I am sure more to come.

Mind you I think there are 2 blacks in her school of 300.
27 posted on 01/20/2004 6:23:41 AM PST by alisasny (Thankyou to all who made 12/28 party so wonderful in NYC)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: RLK
They tell me that 90% of the insane, who might have been in institutions 50 years ago, now wander through the streets loose... and they write a lot too.

Oh, incidentally, that would be Reverend Doctor MLK.

28 posted on 01/20/2004 6:38:45 AM PST by Publius6961 (40% of Californians are as dumb as a sack of rocks.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: NewLand; The Westerner
The Beast as Saint: The Truth About "Martin Luther King, Jr." - by Kevin Alfred Strom Excerpt:

Communist Beliefs and Connections

Well friends, he is not a legitimate reverend, he is not a bona fide PhD, and his name isn't really "Martin Luther King, Jr." What's left? Just a sexual degenerate, an America-hating Communist, and a criminal betrayer of even the interests of his own people.

On Labor Day, 1957, a special meeting was attended by Martin Luther King and four others at a strange institution called the Highlander Folk School in Monteagle, Tennessee. The Highlander Folk School was a Communist front, having been founded by Myles Horton (Communist Party organizer for Tennessee) and Don West (Communist Party organizer for North Carolina). The leaders of this meeting with King were the aforementioned Horton and West, along with Abner Berry and James Dumbrowski, all open and acknowledged members of the Communist Party, USA. The agenda of the meeting was a plan to tour the Southern states to initiate demonstrations and riots.

From 1955 to 1960, Martin Luther King's associate, advisor, and personal secretary was one Bayard Rustin. In 1936 Rustin joined the Young Communist League at New York City College. Convicted of draft-dodging, he went to prison for two years in 1944. On January 23, 1953 the "Los Angeles Times" reported his conviction and sentencing to jail for 60 days for lewd vagrancy and homosexual perversion. Rustin attended the 16th Convention of the Communist Party, USA in February, 1957. One month later, he and King founded the Southern Christian Leadership Conference, or SCLC for short. The president of the SCLC was Dr. Martin Luther King, Jr. The vice-president of the SCLC was the Reverend Fred Shuttlesworth, who was also the president of an identified Communist front known as the Southern Conference Educational Fund, an organization whose field director, a Mr. Carl Braden, was simultaneously a national sponsor of the Fair Play for Cuba Committee, of which you may have heard. The program director of the SCLC was the Reverend Andrew Young, in more recent years Jimmy Carter's ambassador to the UN and mayor of Atlanta. Young, by the way, was trained at the Highlander Folk School, previously mentioned.

Soon after returning from a trip to Moscow in 1958, Rustin organized the first of King's famous marches on Washington. The official organ of the Communist Party, "The Worker,- - openly declared the march to be a Communist project. Although he left King's employ as secretary in 1961, Rustin was called upon by King to be second in command of the much larger march on Washington which took place on August 28, 1963.

Bayard Rustin's replacement in 1961 as secretary and advisor to King was Jack O'Dell, also known as Hunter Pitts O'Dell. According to official records, in 1962 Jack O'Dell was a member of the National Committee of the Communist Party, USA. He had been listed as a Communist Party member as early as 1956. O'Dell was also given the job of acting executive director for SCLC activities for the entire Southeast, according to the St. Louis "Globe-Democrat - -of October 26, 1962. At that time, there were still some patriots in the press corps, and word of O'Dell's party membership became known.

What did King do? Shortly after the negative news reports, King fired O'Dell with much fanfare. And he then, without the fanfare, "immediately hired him again- - as director of the New York office of the SCLC, as confirmed by the "Richmond News-Leader - -of September 27, 1963. In 1963 a Black man from Monroe, North Carolina named Robert Williams made a trip to Peking, China. Exactly 20 days before King's 1963 march on Washington, Williams successfully urged Mao Tse-Tung to speak out on behalf of King's movement. Mr. Williams was also around this time maintaining his primary residence in Cuba, from which he made regular broadcasts to the southern US, three times a week, from high-power AM transmitters in Havana under the title "Radio Free Dixie." In these broadcasts, he urged violent attacks by Blacks against White Americans.

During this period, Williams wrote a book entitled "Negroes With Guns." The writer of the foreword for this book? None other than Martin Luther King, Jr. It is also interesting to note that the editors and publishers of this book were to a man all supporters of the infamous Fair Play for Cuba Committee.

According to King's biographer and sympathizer David J. Garrow, "King privately described himself as a Marxist." In his 1981 book, "The FBI and Martin Luther King, Jr.", Garrow quotes King as saying in SCLC staff meetings, "...we have moved into a new era, which must be an era of revolution.... The whole structure of American life must be changed.... We are engaged in the class struggle."

Jewish Communist Stanley Levison can best be described as King's behind-the-scenes "handler." Levison, who had for years been in charge of the secret funnelling of Soviet funds to the Communist Party, USA, was King's mentor and was actually the brains behind many of King's more successful ploys. It was Levison who edited King's book, "Stride Toward Freedom." It was Levison who arranged for a publisher. Levison even prepared King's income tax returns! It was Levison who really controlled the fund-raising and agitation activities of the SCLC. Levison wrote many of King's speeches. King described Levison as one of his "closest friends."

29 posted on 01/20/2004 6:50:56 AM PST by NotJustAnotherPrettyFace
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: NotJustAnotherPrettyFace
MLK was not only a Marxist but the original race-baiting, poverty pimp and mentor of Jesse Jackson.
30 posted on 01/20/2004 6:59:26 AM PST by N. Theknow (Be a glowworm, a glowworm's never glum, cuz how can you be grumpy when the sun shines out your bum.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]

To: Clock King; All
12 - this is worth repeating:

"you MUST consider the timeframe during which King wrote this. There was 1) flat out racism - if you were Black, you could NOT live where you choose no matter how wealthy you were. 2) there was poverty the likes of which rivaled Calcutta at its worst in places like TN, MS, AL, LA, ... And the people in those conditions were truly trapped there. No amount of hard-work-bootstrapping was going to pull them out."

31 posted on 01/20/2004 8:53:47 AM PST by XBob
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: NotJustAnotherPrettyFace
Thank you for posting that excellent and detailed history. There is no doubt that King was the front man for the Communist movement in the United States. He was obviously clever enough to disguise his true sentiments, or else he was simply an opportunist willing to be used. The fact is we have elevated to sainthood a man who had a dubious moral character.
32 posted on 01/20/2004 11:17:37 AM PST by The Westerner
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]

To: The Westerner
I enjoyed the speech except for some suspicious views on money. If MLK is promoting legalized theft, then this in not commendable. True voluntary giving is another matter.

Oh America, how often have you taken necessities from the masses to give luxuries to the classes.

This was uttered in the 50's. Does anyone recall what the highest income tax rate was then? Weren't the upper classes taxed much more heavily than now? If anything, the wealth of the upper classes was being given to the masses. Paul would object--3 Thess. 3:10 -- ... "if anyone will not work, neither let him eat."

I still contend that money can be the root of all evil.

The bible contends that "the LOVE of money is a root of all sorts of evil." (1 Tim. 6:10). Not an unimportant distinction.

33 posted on 01/20/2004 11:34:02 AM PST by nonsporting
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: nonsporting
For a different take on money, see Atlas Shrugged. There is an eloquent speech delivered by one of the characters which has been titled, "Money, the Root of All Good." You see, I am not a follower of the Judeo-Christian ethic on this point. I am a lover of Capitalism, unlike Mr King who was simply propagandizing in this speech. He or his speechwriter cleverly slipped in the anti-Capitalist rhetoric.

Prior to the Communist infiltration of America after the 1900's, Americans did not talk in such terms as classes and other nonsense. Remember "up by the bootstraps" philosophy that guided most of the great industrialist and inventors and innovators of the industrial revolution?
34 posted on 01/20/2004 11:39:43 AM PST by The Westerner
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies]

To: The Westerner; RLK
Did you read the next sentence?
He may talking about a rising tide lifting all boats. An admitted Capitalistic approach. ;-)
Being disenfranchised by the state, he was probably loathe to extend such practices.
I am not a historian, however.
35 posted on 01/20/2004 11:40:23 AM PST by dyed_in_the_wool (Sic semper tyrannis)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: mr. mojo risin
I can't believe this, a Black author and professor at the University of Washington wrote an article for Marting Luther King Day in which he paraphrased this speech as though the thoughts were his own. I almost posted it on Free Republic, thinking that it was so insightful. The only thing that stopped me was a remark in the last paragraph that said that, as all Bhuddists know, desire is the cause of all unhappiness. It seemed so incongruous with the tone of the rest of the article. Now I know why.

I think that I will have to write a letter to the Seattle Times and let them know.
36 posted on 01/20/2004 11:41:41 AM PST by Eva
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: mhking
`
37 posted on 01/20/2004 11:44:51 AM PST by Coleus (STOPP Planned Parenthood http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/892053/posts)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: mr. mojo risin; scholar; FBD; Mudboy Slim
Too bad this wasn't taped.

I'd have paid [you] for a copy.

...an entirely new kind of "reality television." :o)

38 posted on 01/20/2004 11:46:22 AM PST by Landru (Tagline Schmagline...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: The Westerner
Money, The Root of All Good

(From, Atlas Shrugged, by Ayn Rand)

So you think that money is the root of all evil? Have you ever asked what is the root of money? Money is a tool of exchange, which can't exist unless there are goods produced and men able to produce them. Money is the material shape of the principle that men who wish to deal with one another must deal by trade and give value for value. Money is not the tool of the moochers, who claim your product by tears, or of the looters, who take it from you by force. Money is made possible only by the men who produce. Is this what you consider evil?

When you accept money in payment for your effort, you do so only on the conviction that you will exchange it for the product of the effort of others. It is not the moochers or the looters who give value to money. Not an ocean of tears nor all the guns in the world can transform those pieces of paper in your wallet into the bread you will need to survive tomorrow. Those pieces of paper, which should have been gold, are a token of honor--your claim upon the energy of the men who produce. Your wallet is your statement in hope that somewhere in the world around you there are men who will not default on that moral principle which is the root of money. Is this what you consider evil?

Have you ever looked for the root of production? Take a look at an electric generator and dare tell yourself that it was created by the muscular effort of unthinking brutes. Try to grow a seed of wheat without the knowledge left to you by men who had to discover it for the first time. Try to obtain your food by means of nothing but physical motions--and you'll learn that man's mind is the root of all the goods produced and of all the wealth that has ever existed on earth.

But you say that money is made by the strong at the expense of the weak? What strength do you mean? It is not the strength of guns or muscles. Wealth is the product of man's capacity to think. Then is money made by the man who invents a motor at the expense of those who did not invent it? Is money made by the intelligent at the expense of the fools? By the able at the expense of the incompetent? By the ambitious at the expense of the lazy? Money is made--before it can be looted or mooched--made by the effort of every honest man, each to the extent of his ability. An honest man is one who knows that he can't consume more than he has produced.

To trade by means of money is the code of the men of good will. Money rests on the axiom that every man is the owner of his mind and his effort. Money allows no power to prescribe the value of your effort except the voluntary choice of the man who is willing to trade you his effort in return. Money permits you to obtain for your goods and your labor that which they are worth to the men who buy them, but no more. Money permits no deals except those to mutual benefit by the unforced judgment of the traders. Money demands of you the recognition that men must work for their own benefit, not for their own injury, for their gain, not their loss--the recognition that they are not beasts of burden, born to carry the weight of your misery--that you must offer them values, not wounds--that the common bond among men is not the exchange of suffering, but the exchange of goods. Money demands that you sell, not your weakness to men's stupidity, but your talent to their reason; it demands that you buy, not the shoddiest they offer, but the best that your money can find. And when men live by trade--with reason, not force, as their final arbiter--it is the best product that wins, the best performance, the man of best judgment and highest ability--and the degree of a man's productiveness is the degree of his reward. This is the code of existence whose tool and symbol is money. Is this what you consider evil?

But money is only a tool. It will take you wherever you wish, but it will not replace you as the driver. It will give you the means for the satisfaction of your desires, but it will not provide you with desires. Money is the scourge of the men who attempt to reverse the law of causality--the men who seek to replace the mind by seizing the products of the mind.

Money will not purchase happiness for the man who has no concept of what he wants: money will not give him a code of values, if he's evaded the knowledge of what to value, and it will not provide him with a purpose, if he's evaded the choice of what to seek. Money will not buy intelligence for the fool, or admiration for the coward, or respect for the incompetent. The man who attempts to purchase the brains of his superiors to serve him, with his money replacing his judgment, ends up by becoming the victim of his inferiors. The men of intelligence desert him, but the cheats and the frauds come flocking to him, drawn by a law that he has not discovered: that no man may be smaller than his money. Is this the reason why you call it evil?

Only the man who does not need it, is fit to inherit wealth--the man who would make his own fortune no matter where he started. If an heir is equal to his money, it serves him; if not, it destroys him. But you look on and you cry that money corrupted him. Did it? Or did he corrupt his money? Do not envy a worthless heir; his wealth is not yours and you would have done no better with it. Do not think that it should have been distributed among you. Loading the world with fifty parasites instead of one would not bring back the virtue which was the fortune. Money is a living power that dies without its root. Money will not serve the mind that cannot match it. Is this the reason why you call it evil?

Money is your means of survival. The verdict you pronounce upon the source of your livelihood is the verdict you pronounce upon your life. If the source is corrupt, you have damned your own existence. Did you get your money by fraud? By pandering to men's vices or men's stupidity? By catering to fools, in the hope of getting more than your ability deserves? By lowering your standards? By doing work you despise for purchasers you scorn? If so, then your money will not give you a moment's or a penny's worth of joy. Then all the things you buy will become, not a tribute to you, but a reproach; not an achievement, but a reminder of shame. Then you'll scream that money is evil. Evil, because it would not pinch-hit for your self-respect? Evil, because it would not let you enjoy your depravity? Is this the root of your hatred of money?

Money will always remain an effect and refuse to replace you as the cause. Money is the product of virtue, but it will not give you virtue and it will not redeem your vices. Money will not give you the unearned, neither in matter nor in spirit. Is this the root of your hatred of money?

Or did you say it's the love of money that's the root of all evil? To love a thing is to know and love its nature. To love money is to know and love the fact that money is the creation of the best power within you, and your passkey to trade your effort for the effort of the best among men. It's the person who would sell his soul for a nickel, who is loudest in proclaiming his hatred of money--and he has good reason to hate it. The lovers of money are willing to work for it. They know they are able to deserve it.

Let me give you a tip on a clue to men's characters: the man who damns money has obtained it dishonorably; the man who respects it has earned it.

Run for your life from any man who tells you that money is evil. That sentence is the leper's bell of an approaching looter. So long as men live together on earth and need means to deal with one another--their only substitute, if they abandon money, is the muzzle of a gun.

But money demands of you the highest virtues, if you wish to make it or keep it. Men who have no courage, pride or self-esteem, men who have no moral sense of their right to their money and are not willing to defend it as they defend their life, men who apologize for being rich--will not remain rich for long. They are the natural bait for the swarms of looters that stay under rocks for centuries, but come crawling out at the first smell of a man who begs to be forgiven for the guilt of owning wealth. They will hasten to relieve him of the guilt--and of his life, as he deserves.

Then you will see the rise of the men of the double standard--the men who live by force, yet count on those who live by trade to create the value of their looted money--the men who are hitchhikers of virtue. In a moral society, these are the criminals, and the statutes are written to protect you against them. But when a society establishes criminals-by-right and looters-by-law--men who use force to seize the wealth of disarmed victims--then money becomes its creators' avenger. Such looters believe it safe to rob defenseless men, once they've passed a law to disarm them. But their loot becomes the magnet for other looters, who get it from them as they got it. Then the race goes, not to the ablest at production, but to those most ruthless at brutality. When force is the standard, the murderer wins over the pickpocket. And then that society vanishes, in a spread of ruins and slaughter.

Do you wish to know whether that day is coming? Watch money. Money is the barometer of a society's virtue. When you see that trading is done, not by consent, but by compulsion--when you see the in order to produce, you need to obtain permission from men who produce nothing--when you see that money is flowing to those who deal, not in goods, but in favors--when you see that men get richer by graft and by pull than by work, and your laws don't protect you against them, but protect them against you--when you see corruption being rewarded and honesty becoming a self-sacrifice--you may know that your society is doomed. Money is so noble a medium that it does not compete with guns and it does not make terms with brutality. It will not permit a country to survive as half-property, half-loot.

Whenever destroyers appear among men, they start by destroying money, for money is men’s protection and the base of a moral existence. Destroyers seize gold and leave to its owners a counterfeit pile of paper. This kills all objective standards and delivers men into the arbitrary power of an arbitrary setter of values. Gold was an objective value, an equivalent of wealth produced. Paper is a mortgage on wealth that does not exist, backed by a gun aimed at those who are expected to produce it. Paper is a check drawn by legal looters upon an account which is not theirs: upon the virtue of the victims. Watch for the day when it bounces, marked: "Account overdrawn."

When you have made evil the means of survival, do not expect men to remain good. Do not expect them to stay moral and lose their lives for the purpose of becoming the fodder of the immoral. Do not expect them to produce, when production is punished and looting rewarded. Do not ask, "Who is destroying the world?" You are.

You stand in the midst of the greatest achievements of the greatest productive civilization and you wonder why it’s crumbling around you, while you’re damning its life-blood--money. You look upon money as the savages did before you, and you wonder why the jungle is creeping back to the edge of your cities. Throughout men’s history, money was always seized by looters of one brand or another, whose names changed, but whose method remained the same: to seize wealth by force and to keep the producers bound, demeaned, defamed, deprived of honor. That phrase about the evil of money, which you mouth with such righteous recklessness, comes from a time when wealth was produced by the labor of slaves--slaves who repeated the motions once discovered by somebody’s mind and left unimproved for centuries. So long as production was ruled by force, and wealth was obtained by conquest, there was little to conquer. Yet through all the centuries of stagnation and starvation, men exalted the looters, as aristocrats of the sword, as aristocrats of birth, as aristocrats of the bureau, and despised the producers, as slaves, as traders, as shopkeepers--as industrialists.

To the glory of mankind, there was, for the first and only time in history, as country of money--and I have no higher, more reverent tribute to pay to America, for this means: a country of reason, justice, freedom, production, achievement. For the first time, man’s mind and money were set free, and there were no fortunes-by-conquest, but only fortunes-by-work, and instead of swordsmen and slaves, there appeared the real maker of wealth, the greatest worker, the highest type of human being--the self-made man--the American industrialist.

If you ask me to name the proudest distinction of Americans, I would choose--because it contains all the others--the fact that they are the people who created the phrase "to make money." No other language or nation had ever used these words before; men had always thought of wealth as a static quantity--to be seized, begged, inherited, shared, looted, or obtained as a favor. Americans were the first to understand that wealth has to be created. The words "to make money" hold the essence of human morality.

Yet these were the words for which Americans were denounced by the rotted cultures of the looters’ continents. Now the looters’ credo has brought you to regard your proudest achievements as a hallmark of shame, your prosperity as guilt, your greatest men, the industrialists, as blackguards, and your magnificent factories as the product and property of muscular labor, the labor of whip-driven slaves, like the pyramids of Egypt. The rotter who simpers that he sees no difference between the power of the dollar and the power the whip, ought to learn the difference on his own hide--as, I think, he will.

Until and unless you discover that money is the root of all good, you ask for your own destruction. When money ceases to be the tool by which men deal with one another, then men become the tools of men. Blood, whips and guns--or dollars. Take your choice--there is no other--and your time is running out.

39 posted on 01/20/2004 11:48:46 AM PST by TomServo ("Why does the most evil man in the world live in a Stuckeys?")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies]

To: Eva
I apologize to the author, he did give King the credit for the remarks. I should not have been so hasty in my criticism, nor so ready to criticize.

The author went on to say that if King returned today, he would be amazed and impressed by all the technological advances since the sixties, but in despair over the the violence and lack of civility in our public and private lives; the vulgarity in in entertainment and the prevailing attitude of survival of the slickest.

I have to say in my defense that it was the author's mix of supposition and actual quotes within the same paragraph that confused me.
40 posted on 01/20/2004 11:53:08 AM PST by Eva
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 36 | View Replies]

To: Clock King
You are right. Also, if black in the south during this time, and you let it out that you were moving out and north, you would be killed. Sort of like the Nazis and Commies wanting to get rid of Jewish people and yet would not let them leave.
41 posted on 01/20/2004 11:53:08 AM PST by 7thson (I think it takes a big dog to weigh a 100 pounds.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: mr. mojo risin
This was meant to be addressed to you, so I repeat.


I apologize to the author, he did give King the credit for the remarks. I should not have been so hasty in my criticism, nor so ready to criticize.

The author went on to say that if King returned today, he would be amazed and impressed by all the technological advances since the sixties, but in despair over the the violence and lack of civility in our public and private lives; the vulgarity in in entertainment and the prevailing attitude of survival of the slickest.

I have to say in my defense that it was the author's mix of supposition and actual quotes within the same paragraph that confused me.



42 posted on 01/20/2004 11:54:54 AM PST by Eva
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: mr. mojo risin
To get through that in one class period, your daughter must be a quick reader.
43 posted on 01/20/2004 11:58:51 AM PST by Xenalyte (I may not agree with your bumper sticker, but I'll defend to the death your right to stick it)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: The Westerner
I have heard rumors that he was a Communist. Though he protests against it, notice the Marxist language. Funny how it just slips into the middle of this learned and eloquent piece.

He was indeed a Commie, if by "Commie" we both understand that he favored state redistribution of wealth and/or goods.
44 posted on 01/20/2004 12:00:34 PM PST by Xenalyte (I may not agree with your bumper sticker, but I'll defend to the death your right to stick it)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: The Westerner
I have heard rumors that he was a Communist. Though he protests against it, notice the Marxist language. Funny how it just slips into the middle of this learned and eloquent piece.

I suspect Jesus Christ himself would have felt more in tune with marxist ideology than capitalist ideology.

45 posted on 01/20/2004 12:05:57 PM PST by Labyrinthos
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: mr. mojo risin
"The poor you will always have with you." Someone fairly well known once said that.

Great sermon as far as moralizing goes. Salutary message insofar as we are reminded that ultimately our allegiance is to God alone. The teacher probably suffered from acute diarhhea of the brain as it was being read.

Thanks for the post.

46 posted on 01/20/2004 12:26:08 PM PST by Fester Chugabrew
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: mr. mojo risin
Nice post! Hope the teacher's lip was infected.
47 posted on 01/20/2004 12:32:33 PM PST by <1/1,000,000th%
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: TomServo
. . . money is the root of all evil?

"The LOVE of money is the root of all evil." Big difference. "Beware of every kind of greed," is another one, spoken by Christ. Poor and rich alike have problems with that one.

48 posted on 01/20/2004 12:32:48 PM PST by Fester Chugabrew
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 39 | View Replies]

To: Publius6961
Why call any man reverend when the Bible only subscribes the name to God?
49 posted on 01/20/2004 12:39:40 PM PST by BSunday (Error 409: Tagline Not Found)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]

To: The Westerner
This is a Nazi tract, you realize.

Some of this stuff is true, but the mass of it is ridiculous.
50 posted on 01/20/2004 12:42:44 PM PST by buwaya
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-5051-57 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson