Skip to comments.
Fort Stewart to increase its deploying units by 66 percent
Army News Service ^
| Jan. 21, 2004
| Sgt. 1st Class Marcia Triggs
Posted on 01/21/2004 12:43:25 PM PST by Ragtime Cowgirl
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-26 last
To: Cannoneer No. 4
21
posted on
01/21/2004 5:29:54 PM PST
by
Ragtime Cowgirl
("The chapter of Iraq's history - Saddam Hussein's reign of terror - is now closed." Lt. Gen. Sanchez)
To: colorado tanker
Most folks haven't heard of the PENTOMIC Division. If they had, we probably wouldn't be trying to reinvent this wheel. The ROAD structure worked just fine last spring, when we still wanted to kill people and break things.
The laws of physics and the blivet principle dictate that you can divvy up a division worth of 30 pounds of horse manure into three 10-lb brigade bags or five 6-lb battle group bags, but in the end you still only have 30 pounds of it.
22
posted on
01/21/2004 5:32:23 PM PST
by
Cannoneer No. 4
(The road to Glory cannot be followed with too much baggage.)
To: Cannoneer No. 4
What seems to be driving this is the obsession with rapid deployment - the same reason they want to ditch the M-1 and Bradley for the Future Combat System. I wish they'd work as hard at upgrading our lift capabilities as they are at changing the best army in the world.
23
posted on
01/21/2004 5:40:06 PM PST
by
colorado tanker
("There are but two parties now, Traitors and Patriots")
To: colorado tanker
24
posted on
01/21/2004 6:40:42 PM PST
by
Cannoneer No. 4
(The road to Glory cannot be followed with too much baggage.)
To: colorado tanker; SLB; M1Tanker
The US Army is getting out of the business of preparing to engage and defeat other armies. Conventional major theater war is no longer seriously considered.
Nation-states and their armies are now seen as less likely adversaries than irregulars, terrorists, war lords and pirates.
The Army is poorly positioned to prosper in a world in which no other armies exist which can challenge it in conventional combat. They are scrambling for relevance in a future of Fourth Generation Warfare, Asymmetric Warfare and operations other than war
25
posted on
01/21/2004 7:25:28 PM PST
by
Cannoneer No. 4
(The road to Glory cannot be followed with too much baggage.)
To: Cannoneer No. 4
I heard the same thing after Kosovo - no more conventional wars, we're only going to have OOTW. Gen. Zinni was pushing that hard. Then we had to fight a conventional, mechanized war in Iraq. Seems to me Iraq proves we need to be capable of both. There are still potential opponents out there who have large conventional armies, like North Korea and China. We may need the conventional force if diplomacy fails with Iran or Syria. Or, what if a future Russian government turns aggressor with dreams of a renewed Russian empire?
26
posted on
01/22/2004 9:33:59 AM PST
by
colorado tanker
("There are but two parties now, Traitors and Patriots")
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-26 last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson