Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Terrorism Q&A: Mujahedeen-e-Khalq
Council on Foreign Relations

Posted on 01/23/2004 2:20:11 PM PST by William McKinley

What is Mujahedeen-e-Khalq?
Mujahedeen-e-Khalq (MEK) is the largest and most militant group opposed to the Islamic Republic of Iran. Also known as the People’s Mujahedeen Organization of Iran, MEK is led by husband and wife Massoud and Maryam Rajavi. MEK was added to the U.S. State Department’s list of foreign terrorist groups in 1997 and to the European Union’s terrorist list in 2002 because its attacks have often killed civilians. Despite MEK’s violent tactics, the group’s strong stand against Iran—part of President Bush’s “axis of evil”—and pro-democratic image have won it support among some U.S. and European lawmakers.

What are MEK’s origins?

MEK military commander Masud Rajavi speaking before portrait of group leader Maryam Rajavi, 1996.
(AP Photo/Mujahedin)
MEK was founded in the 1960s by a group of college-educated Iranian leftists opposed to the country’s pro-Western ruler, Shah Mohammad Reza Pahlavi. The group participated in the 1979 Islamic revolution that replaced the shah with a Shiite Islamist regime led by the Ayatollah Khomeini. But MEK’s ideology, a blend of Marxism and Islamism, put it at odds with the postrevolutionary government, and its original leadership was soon executed by the Khomeini regime. In 1981, the group was driven from its bases on the Iran-Iraq border and resettled in Paris, where it began supporting Iraq in its eight-year war against Khomeini’s Iran. In 1986, MEK moved its headquarters to Iraq, which used MEK to harass neighboring Iran. During the 2003 Iraq war, U.S. forces cracked down on MEK’s bases in Iraq, and in June 2003 French authorities raided an MEK compound outside Paris and arrested 160 people, including Maryam Rajavi.

Who are MEK’s leaders?
Maryam Rajavi, who hopes to become president of Iran, is MEK’s principal leader; her husband, Massoud Rajavi, heads up the group’s military forces. Maryam Rajavi, born in 1953 to an upper-middleclass Iranian family, joined MEK as a student in Tehran in the early 1970s. After relocating with the group to Paris in 1981, she was elected its joint leader and later became deputy commander-in-chief of its armed wing. Experts say that MEK has increasingly come to resemble a cult that is devoted to Massoud Rajavi’s secular interpretation of the Koran and is prone to sudden, dramatic ideological shifts. After being released from police custody on bail, Maryam Rajavi was confined to the MEK compound in France, and the investigation continues. Massoud Rajavi was last known to be living in Iraq, but authorities aren’t certain of his whereabouts or whether he is alive.

Where does MEK operate?
The group’s armed unit operated from camps in Iraq near the Iran border since 1986. During the Iraq war, U.S. troops disarmed MEK and posted guards at its bases. In addition to its Paris-based members, MEK has a network of sympathizers in Europe, the United States, and Canada. The group’s political arm, the National Council of Resistance of Iran, maintains offices in several capitals, including Washington, D.C.

How big is MEK?
MEK is believed to have some 10,000 members, one-third to one-half of whom are fighters. Experts say its activities have dropped off in recent years as its membership has dwindled. MEK has had little success luring new recruits and is composed mostly of its founding members.

What major attacks has MEK been responsible for?
The group has targeted Iranian government officials and government facilities in Iran and abroad; during the 1970s, it attacked Americans in Iran. While the group says it does not intentionally target civilians, it has often risked civilian casualties. It routinely aims its attacks at government buildings in crowded cities. MEK terrorism has declined since late 2001. Incidents linked to the group include:

It’s unclear how many attacks MEK has carried out: according to experts, the group’s claims of responsibility for attacks in Iran are often exaggerated, and sometimes MEK is blamed by the Iranian government for attacks it didn’t stage.

How is MEK funded?
When Saddam Hussein was in power, MEK received the majority of its financial support from the Iraqi regime. It also used front organizations, such as the Muslim Iranian Student’s Society, to collect money from expatriate Iranians and others, according to the State Department’s counterterrorism office. In 2001, the Justice Department accused seven Iranians in the United States of funneling donations—between $5,000 and $10,000 per day—collected at Los Angeles International Airport to MEK. The money allegedly was for starving children in Iran; according to the FBI, it was used to buy arms.

Did MEK have ties to Saddam Hussein?
Yes. Iraq was MEK’s primary benefactor. Iraq provided MEK with bases, weapons, and protection, and MEK harassed Saddam’s Iranian foes. Experts say MEK’s attacks on Iran traditionally intensified when relations between Iran and Iraq grew strained. Iraq encouraged or restrained MEK, depending on its Baghdad’s interests.

Did U.S. forces crack down on MEK during the Iraq war?
Yes. In early April, U.S. forces bombed MEK bases. On April 15, though, the United States signed a ceasefire with MEK, the first such agreement between the United States and a terror group. The ceasefire reportedly instigated fierce debate among President Bush’s national security advisers. Under pressure from the State Department, U.S. officials changed course and disarmed MEK, but pledged to guard MEK from attacks by Iranian forces or the Badr Brigade, an Iranian-backed group of Iraqi exiles.

Have there been other anti-terror moves directed at MEK?
Yes. On June 17, French authorities arrested some 160 MEK members, including Maryam Rajavi, outside Paris. They accused MEK of conspiring to prepare and finance acts of terrorism from the group’s French base, where authorities also confiscated $8 million. All the suspects were subsequently released, including Rajavi, but many were confined to their homes while the investigation continues.

When did MEK target Americans?
In the early 1970s, angered by U.S. support for the pro-Western shah, MEK members killed several U.S. soldiers and civilians working on defense projects in Iran. Some experts say the attack may have been the work of a Maoist splinter faction operating beyond the Rajavi leadership’s control. MEK members also supported the 1979 takeover of the U.S. Embassy in Tehran, in which 52 Americans were held hostage for 444 days.

Do some U.S. lawmakers support MEK?
Yes. MEK—or at least its political wing, the National Council of Resistance—has enjoyed the support of some members of Congress for several years. In August 2001, 30 U.S. senators asked the Bush administration to reconsider MEK’s designation as a terrorist group. Since September 11, some U.S. lawmakers have withdrawn their support; others have reiterated it. The European Union added MEK to its roster of terrorist organizations in May 2002, despite some support for the group among European lawmakers.

Why do some U.S. lawmakers support MEK?
Because it opposes Iran—a regime that the U.S. government says sponsors terrorism and seeks to acquire weapons of mass destruction. MEK has reportedly provided the U.S. government with valuable intelligence about Iran’s nuclear program. Over the years, MEK became more palatable to many in Congress by abandoning its Marxist doctrine and recasting itself as a pro-democratic, pro-capitalist organization that supports the rights of women and minorities. The group has a female leader and about half of its troops in Iraq are women. Some skeptics argue that the prominent role of women in MEK is less a reflection of the group’s values than a publicity tool aimed at garnering support among Iranian exiles opposed to the Tehran government’s religious restrictions on women.

Some terrorism experts also call for MEK’s removal from the State Department terror list. They argue that MEK has not attacked Americans in three decades. They also say that placing the group on the terror list was a misguided conciliatory gesture to Iran and that MEK instead should be supported as a legitimate source of resistance to the Iranian government.

Does MEK have support in Iran?
Very little, according to experts and press reports. Iranians criticize MEK for accepting support from Iraq, carrying out attacks against Iran on Iraq’s behalf, and murdering Iranian civilians. Many Iranians consider MEK “as toxic, if not more so, than the ruling clerics,” according to The New York Times Magazine.

Does MEK consider itself a terrorist group?
No, and it has protested being labeled one by the U.S. government. In 2001, MEK was granted a hearing by the State Department after a U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals found that the group’s due-process rights were violated when it was denied the chance to oppose its terrorist-group designation. MEK’s place on the terror-group list was subsequently reaffirmed by Secretary of State Colin Powell. However, the Washington, D.C., office of the National Council of Resistance remains open.

Is MEK a cult?
We don’t know, but it has some of the trappings of a cult. Members reportedly deify Maryam Rajavi; her photographs are found throughout MEK camps, and followers staged public self-immolations to protest her arrest. Members are said to undergo regular self-criticism sessions. They also reportedly are required to divorce; children are separated from their parents and sent to Western nations for adoption by Iranian families. When they reach 18, some of them return to join MEK, because “from the day they were born, these girls and boys were not taught to think for themselves but to blindly follow their leaders,” according to a New York Times Magazine account.


TOPICS: Foreign Affairs; War on Terror
KEYWORDS: iran; mek
Inside a Group Caught Between Three Powers
1 posted on 01/23/2004 2:20:11 PM PST by William McKinley
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: William McKinley
Thanks for the post, WK.

MKO, MEK is a terror group that has no support in Iran.

"Not all opposition is good Opposition"
2 posted on 01/23/2004 3:04:12 PM PST by freedom44
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: William McKinley
Is MEK a cult?

I believe it is. I excerpted key paragraphs on 1/16 from a lengthy article published July '03.

http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1059052/posts?page=6#6
3 posted on 01/23/2004 4:56:01 PM PST by nuconvert ( It's a naive domestic Burgundy without any breeding, ..I think you'll be amused by its presumption)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: nuconvert
I just posted that article a few moments before your reply here. Fascinating stuff.

It sure seems like a cult, doesn't it, with the mandatory celibacy.

Leftist groups can go that way in a hurry.

4 posted on 01/23/2004 4:58:11 PM PST by William McKinley
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: William McKinley
I'd like to know more about TransNational Radical Party.
I saw a complaint against them concerning illegal drugs from several yrs ago. What do you know about them?
5 posted on 01/23/2004 5:10:50 PM PST by nuconvert ( It's a naive domestic Burgundy without any breeding, ..I think you'll be amused by its presumption)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: nuconvert
It's a bigger, more powerful leftist organization than you would expect for a group you have never heard of. Their website is here. Gandhian, socialist, anarchist.

Here is some info on one of the leaders.

In his political career, Mr. Pannella co-founded a series of organizations such as the League for divorce, the League for objection of conscience, the League for the abrogation of the Agreement between the Catholic Church and the Italian State (Concordato), the Centre of legal initiative “Pietro Calamandrei”, as well as the Italian Association for Demographic Education (AIED). He has been at the forefront of the promotion important reforms regarding narcotics, facing incarceration on various occasions for his civil disobediences. He played a prominent role in the pro-choice movement in Italy that led to the legalization of abortion in the early 1980s...

Engaged in the defence of civil rights in Eastern European countries, in 1968, he was arrested in Sofia for having distributed leaflets against the Communist regime. He is one of the first promoters and founders of the “Green” and “ecologist” political movements in Europe....

Mr. Pannella was one of the first European Federalists and fought, through non-violent means, for the creation of the European Union...

He is honorary President of the Party of the Rom (ROI) in the Czech Republic and he is also honorary member of the Socialist Slovene Youth. The KKL, Karen Kalehm Le Israel dedicated him a reforestation area in the desert of Negev in Israel.

They are very tight with the SMCCDI.
6 posted on 01/23/2004 5:16:37 PM PST by William McKinley
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: William McKinley
I knew they were leftist.....

This guy gets around, doesn't he?

7 posted on 01/23/2004 5:26:03 PM PST by nuconvert ( It's a naive domestic Burgundy without any breeding, ..I think you'll be amused by its presumption)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: nuconvert
Sure does. And all about breaking down society and societal norms. The league for divorce (maybe that is where the MEK got the idea)? Pro-drug, pro-abortion. Against the Vatican.

Anything that can destroy, he's for.

8 posted on 01/23/2004 5:32:21 PM PST by William McKinley
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: William McKinley
Anarchists?

What's interesting is that they aren't communist, and Cuba, Pakistan, Iran and China, don't seem to like them.
Iran, Cuba, China - if they Don't like them, that's 3 points in their favor.
9 posted on 01/23/2004 5:39:47 PM PST by nuconvert ( It's a naive domestic Burgundy without any breeding, ..I think you'll be amused by its presumption)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: nuconvert
I am sure those other countries don't like them. Communism and anarchism are competing leftist ideologies. Both oppose capitalism, but both also oppose each other.

And while annoying Castro and others definitely is a point in their favor, they are very much against the US, and their goals are absolutely the opposite of most of what conservatives believe- the sanctity of life, the value of religion in culture, property rights, national sovereignity, etc.

10 posted on 01/23/2004 5:44:00 PM PST by William McKinley
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: William McKinley

11 posted on 01/23/2004 5:44:09 PM PST by jws3sticks (Hillary can take a very long walk on an equally short pier, anytime, the sooner the better!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: William McKinley
"Communism and anarchism are competing leftist ideologies"

"their goals are absolutely the opposite of most of what conservatives believe"

Right. Of course.


Here's something else I saw earlier: (July 27, 2000)
U.N. Press Release
NGO/370

"The Committee was responding to a complaint raised by the Russian Federation that during the fifty-sixth session of the Commission on Human Rights, held in Geneva from 20—27 April, the representative of Chechen separatists and terrorists, A. Idigov, addressed the Commission under the name of the Transnational Radical Party. The Russian Federation also expressed grave concern about narcotic-related activities by the NGO, which currently holds general consultative status within the Council.

On 23 June, a decision had been taken by the Committee to recommend that the Council suspend the consultative status of the NGO for three years. The organization had also been asked to respond to questions raised by Committee members."
12 posted on 01/23/2004 5:50:44 PM PST by nuconvert ( It's a naive domestic Burgundy without any breeding, ..I think you'll be amused by its presumption)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: William McKinley
Over the years, MEK became more palatable to many in Congress by abandoning its Marxist doctrine and recasting itself as a pro-democratic, pro-capitalist organization that supports the rights of women and minorities.

Interesting tid-bit here.

13 posted on 01/23/2004 5:55:02 PM PST by Neets
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Neets
And I am sure that they just totally washed away all of those Marxist egalitarian ideals.

Gonna wash that gray right out of my hair, gonna wash that gray right out of my hair...

14 posted on 01/23/2004 5:57:58 PM PST by William McKinley
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: William McKinley
Indeed...but also remarkable about the women and minority rights....

Any direct or indirect ties to the charitable and caring IAC and Mr. Clark?
15 posted on 01/23/2004 5:59:54 PM PST by Neets
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: Neets
For the MEK?

Why, yes, actually.

A few groups including the MEK went to the courts to sue about them being listed as terrorist groups.

Good ol' Ramsey was one of the attorneys for the complaintants.

16 posted on 01/23/2004 6:02:51 PM PST by William McKinley
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: William McKinley
Read this
17 posted on 01/23/2004 6:14:22 PM PST by Neets
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: Neets
Seems like the Brits don't think very highly of them.
18 posted on 01/23/2004 6:17:36 PM PST by William McKinley
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: William McKinley
Thank you for the post. Could you give me a hot link to it? Thanks.
19 posted on 01/23/2004 8:27:00 PM PST by ShadowDancer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: William McKinley
what info do you have on smccdi connection? I only saw 1 reference
20 posted on 01/24/2004 5:07:42 AM PST by nuconvert ( It's a naive domestic Burgundy without any breeding, ..I think you'll be amused by its presumption)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: ShadowDancer
A hot link to it? I am not sure I understand.
21 posted on 01/24/2004 7:15:16 AM PST by William McKinley
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: nuconvert
I'll probably make a thread on that later today. I think those are two distinct and different issues, and I'd like to keep them segregated.
22 posted on 01/24/2004 7:16:20 AM PST by William McKinley
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: ShadowDancer; alphachild
Ping.
23 posted on 01/25/2004 8:11:04 AM PST by Neets
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson