Skip to comments.
POLL: Gun buyer background checks - keep on file or destroy?
News Central ^
| 1/25/2004
| News Central
Posted on 01/25/2004 7:36:21 PM PST by disclaimer
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-47 last
To: disclaimer
Must have been a glitch -- it worked this time.
41
posted on
01/26/2004 10:55:20 AM PST
by
bjcintennessee
(Don't Sweat the Small Stuff)
To: disclaimer
The dollar is supposed to be equivelent to x grains of gold according to the Constitution Where in the Consitution does it say this. The Constution, in Art 1 Sec 8, gives Congress the power to:
"To coin Money, regulate the Value thereof and of foreign Coin, and fix the standards of Weights and Measures".
I can find nothing fixing the number of dollars to the grain of gold, or any other metal. (Silver was also used for coins)
42
posted on
01/26/2004 11:14:08 AM PST
by
El Gato
(Federal Judges can twist the Constitution into anything.. Or so they think.)
To: El Gato
I can find nothing fixing the number of dollars to the grain of gold, or any other metal. (Silver was also used for coins) This is what I was thinking of when I wrote what I did - The Coinage Act of 1792: Congress defined the dollar as being 371.25 grains of silver. It then regulated the value of gold coins at 24.75 grains. This means you could exchange 15 grains of silver for every grain of gold.
Nevertheless, the Constitution didn't give Congress the power to delegate its authority to define the dollar and regulate its value to a third party bank otherwise known as the Federal Reserve.
To: disclaimer
"the Constitution didn't give Congress the power to delegate its authority to define the dollar and regulate its value to a third party bank otherwise known as the Federal Reserve.Well, you're right about that. In fact, if you've ever read any of the Founding Father's writings on this subject, the concept of a central bank was hated and feared as being inherently tyrannical in nature.
44
posted on
01/26/2004 12:56:07 PM PST
by
ExSoldier
(When the going gets tough, the tough go cyclic.)
To: disclaimer
I love this stuff. For anyone still skeptical that the gun-control advocates intend to gain their ends through incrementalism, this is a perfect example. The one stipulation for passing this legislation was that this information be destroyed. Now all of a sudden it's negotiable. The answer is a resounding "no."
To: disclaimer
Haha, they got their ass handed to them!
FREEPED HARD.
To: FutureMarine
Haha, they got their a$$ handed to them!
FREEPED HARD Roger that -
8% Yes
92% No
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-47 last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson