Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

POLL: Gun buyer background checks - keep on file or destroy?
News Central ^ | 1/25/2004 | News Central

Posted on 01/25/2004 7:36:21 PM PST by disclaimer

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-47 last
To: disclaimer
Must have been a glitch -- it worked this time.
41 posted on 01/26/2004 10:55:20 AM PST by bjcintennessee (Don't Sweat the Small Stuff)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 38 | View Replies]

To: disclaimer
The dollar is supposed to be equivelent to x grains of gold according to the Constitution

Where in the Consitution does it say this. The Constution, in Art 1 Sec 8, gives Congress the power to:

"To coin Money, regulate the Value thereof and of foreign Coin, and fix the standards of Weights and Measures".

I can find nothing fixing the number of dollars to the grain of gold, or any other metal. (Silver was also used for coins)

42 posted on 01/26/2004 11:14:08 AM PST by El Gato (Federal Judges can twist the Constitution into anything.. Or so they think.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: El Gato
I can find nothing fixing the number of dollars to the grain of gold, or any other metal. (Silver was also used for coins)

This is what I was thinking of when I wrote what I did - The Coinage Act of 1792: Congress defined the dollar as being 371.25 grains of silver. It then regulated the value of gold coins at 24.75 grains. This means you could exchange 15 grains of silver for every grain of gold.

Nevertheless, the Constitution didn't give Congress the power to delegate its authority to define the dollar and regulate its value to a third party bank otherwise known as the Federal Reserve.

43 posted on 01/26/2004 12:30:13 PM PST by disclaimer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 42 | View Replies]

To: disclaimer
"the Constitution didn't give Congress the power to delegate its authority to define the dollar and regulate its value to a third party bank otherwise known as the Federal Reserve.

Well, you're right about that. In fact, if you've ever read any of the Founding Father's writings on this subject, the concept of a central bank was hated and feared as being inherently tyrannical in nature.

44 posted on 01/26/2004 12:56:07 PM PST by ExSoldier (When the going gets tough, the tough go cyclic.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 43 | View Replies]

To: disclaimer
I love this stuff. For anyone still skeptical that the gun-control advocates intend to gain their ends through incrementalism, this is a perfect example. The one stipulation for passing this legislation was that this information be destroyed. Now all of a sudden it's negotiable. The answer is a resounding "no."
45 posted on 01/26/2004 1:02:01 PM PST by Billthedrill
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: disclaimer
Haha, they got their ass handed to them!

FREEPED HARD.

46 posted on 01/26/2004 7:38:55 PM PST by FutureMarine (OoOORAH!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: FutureMarine
Haha, they got their a$$ handed to them!
FREEPED HARD

Roger that -
8% Yes
92% No

47 posted on 01/27/2004 10:01:13 AM PST by disclaimer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 46 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-47 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson