Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Kay "intel community owes the pres. an apologizy, rather than the pres. owing the American people"
wireservice.wired.com ^ | Sunday, January 25, 2004 6:03 p.m. ET | Reuters

Posted on 01/26/2004 7:41:10 PM PST by Destro

Edited on 06/29/2004 7:10:16 PM PDT by Jim Robinson. [history]

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-66 last
To: templar; zygoat
I hope not. We need not think Bush is Clinton. There will be no October suprise. Bush is not that kind of man.
61 posted on 01/26/2004 9:38:33 PM PST by Destro (Know your enemy! Help fight Islamic terrorism by visiting www.johnathangaltfilms.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 60 | View Replies]

To: Miss Marple
Yes, David Frum's analogy and take on the situation was spot on. Unfortunately, most of the liberals I've tried to talk to have an amazing ability to shut off all rational thought.
62 posted on 01/26/2004 9:45:26 PM PST by Oorang ( "If you see a bomb technician running, try to keep up with him." U.S.A.F. Ammo Troop)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 38 | View Replies]

To: Destro
When you read any of the garbage, certain to come, about how Bush misled America regarding the WMDs, remember the Rockefeller Memo, and how the Democrats have intended on using this, and the entire intelligence investigation, for political advantage... regardless of the facts. They deserve to be turned out of office, and relegated to the ash heap of history.
63 posted on 01/26/2004 11:16:07 PM PST by Richard Axtell
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: COEXERJ145
(Although I still say removing Saddam was right and he had every intention to produce WMD's given the chance if he didn't already have them well hidden.)

The line now is that they didn't actually have WMDs (anymore), but that the scientists were bamboozling Hussein. So...documents going down approving various programs, funds being assigned and withdrawn, reports going back up - coupled with absolute confirmation of a previous not only program, but stockpile and use, and a resistance to disclosing information on the program to duly authorized inspectors. What kinda nut would act as though there weren't WMDs?

64 posted on 01/27/2004 1:24:13 PM PST by lepton
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 48 | View Replies]

To: COEXERJ145
Saddam [...] had every intention to produce WMD's given the chance if he didn't already have them well hidden.

All of the Anthrax cited could fit in a single 10'by 12' room.

All of the chemical weapons Powell cited could have been moved to any point in Iraq with roads from any other point with roads in two months out of the six months we gave him while messing around with the U.N. by two guys in a cargo van, in only one trip a day.

65 posted on 01/27/2004 1:28:32 PM PST by lepton
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 48 | View Replies]

To: lepton
U.S. Sen. John Edwards of North Carolina, campaigning in Nashua, New Hampshire, called for an independent probe. "We have a responsibility to have an independent commission that gets to the bottom of this," Edwards told reporters.

Fine. Let's start with Frank Church and work our way forward.

66 posted on 01/27/2004 1:32:12 PM PST by Howlin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 65 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-66 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson