Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Kay on Today: "It Was Absolutely Prudent to Go to War Against Saddam" (Remarkable New Info)
The Today Show

Posted on 01/27/2004 5:24:28 AM PST by governsleastgovernsbest

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 101-120121-140141-160 ... 221-239 next last
To: Mo1
Thank you.......... I might have missed this.

Beautiful, this helps greatly!

121 posted on 01/27/2004 6:52:00 AM PST by thesummerwind (Like painted kites, those days and nights, they went flyin' by)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 110 | View Replies]

To: iceskater
Sometimes when Matt or Katie engages in a rare flight of fairness, I wonder if I might be hallucinating. Your confirmation of what I thought I saw is therefore very reassuring. Thanks!
122 posted on 01/27/2004 6:52:13 AM PST by governsleastgovernsbest
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 116 | View Replies]

To: FreeAtlanta
Maybe a wake up call? I hope.

I do too, but I doubt it. He probably just forgot his meds.

123 posted on 01/27/2004 6:52:41 AM PST by 4CJ (||) Support free speech and stop CFR - visit www.ArmorforCongress.com (||)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 111 | View Replies]

To: governsleastgovernsbest
Ha! I left your name off of #113!Good interview!
124 posted on 01/27/2004 6:52:42 AM PST by MEG33 (America will never seek a permission slip to provide for the security of our country)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 114 | View Replies]

To: All
This just proves to show when you place heavy restrictions on your foreign intelligence agents, it will be harder and harder to get on the ground real time intelligence. Look at Libya, that is a case us of our intelligence underestimating the WMD programs they have.
125 posted on 01/27/2004 6:54:18 AM PST by afropick (been off the dem plantation since 1999 and havent looked back!!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 112 | View Replies]

To: governsleastgovernsbest
I've probably watched a total of 20 minutes of the Today show - ever! Most of them just flipping by on the remote.

Amazing that 5 of those minutes just happened to be the interview with Kay.
126 posted on 01/27/2004 6:54:26 AM PST by P.O.E. (Then sigh not so, But let them go, And be you blithe and bonny - Shakespeare)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: P.O.E.
You really got lucky!
127 posted on 01/27/2004 6:55:22 AM PST by MEG33 (America will never seek a permission slip to provide for the security of our country)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 126 | View Replies]

To: governsleastgovernsbest
Fomenting war is , well, fomenting war, even if your real intentions are to hide in a hole when someone calls your bluff.


i'd say the Bush adminstration looks golden right now

128 posted on 01/27/2004 6:56:01 AM PST by Cosmo (Liberalism is for Girls!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MEG33
Thanks MEG. You picked up some good additional statements from the interview.
129 posted on 01/27/2004 6:57:51 AM PST by governsleastgovernsbest
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 124 | View Replies]

To: MEG33
Yeah, I'd already replied to this thread, but thanks for the ping anyway.
130 posted on 01/27/2004 6:58:49 AM PST by GraniteStateConservative ("You can dip a pecan in gold, but it's still a pecan"-- Deep Thoughts by JC Watts)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 99 | View Replies]

To: P.O.E.
Unfortunately the press will slice and dice all of Kay's statement and the same thing will be replayed over and over again. I see why Pres Bush doesnt give much media access. Why do it when most of the important facts will be left on the cutting floor.
131 posted on 01/27/2004 6:59:05 AM PST by afropick (been off the dem plantation since 1999 and havent looked back!!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 126 | View Replies]

To: GraniteStateConservative
I didn't want you to miss this after the naysayer's thread!...;)
132 posted on 01/27/2004 7:00:39 AM PST by MEG33 (America will never seek a permission slip to provide for the security of our country)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 130 | View Replies]

To: governsleastgovernsbest; cyncooper
Incredibly great read. This should be on the front page of every newspaper in the country!!!!

Thanks!

133 posted on 01/27/2004 7:00:49 AM PST by thesummerwind (Like painted kites, those days and nights, they went flyin' by)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 101 | View Replies]

To: afropick
I heard Paula Zahn call this report a blockbuster..no WMD!
134 posted on 01/27/2004 7:02:05 AM PST by MEG33 (America will never seek a permission slip to provide for the security of our country)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 131 | View Replies]

To: Temple Owl
This is great. The Dems are toast.
135 posted on 01/27/2004 7:03:07 AM PST by Tribune7 (Vote Toomey April 27)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: thesummerwind
Incredibly great read. This should be on the front page of every newspaper in the country!!!!

I'm sure the NY Times will cover it prominently. [sarcasm off]

136 posted on 01/27/2004 7:03:46 AM PST by governsleastgovernsbest
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 133 | View Replies]

To: cyncooper
Thanks! According to the FReepers Brokaw was being a horses patoot.

Prairie
137 posted on 01/27/2004 7:03:56 AM PST by prairiebreeze (WMD's in Iraq -- The absence of evidence isn't evidence of absence.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 103 | View Replies]

To: afropick
This just proves to show when you place heavy restrictions on your foreign intelligence agents, it will be harder and harder to get on the ground real time intelligence. Look at Libya, that is a case us of our intelligence underestimating the WMD programs they have.

Your right on the ball with that statement, however I believe that real time humint can be culled over a period of time. Now that we have the requirement, the intel community is probably focusing on getting back into that business.

138 posted on 01/27/2004 7:04:53 AM PST by InShanghai (I was born on the crest of a wave, and rocked in the cradle of the deep.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 125 | View Replies]

To: afropick
No kidding. Just look at how the "stockpile" issue was treated as if it represented the totality of the claims against Iraq. You'd think, based on the reports of saturday and sunday from the AP and NPP (and even Fox), that Kay just told the world that Sadaam was a harmless little bunny.

Again, I think the Bush administration is looking golden right now.
139 posted on 01/27/2004 7:05:54 AM PST by Cosmo (Liberalism is for Girls!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 131 | View Replies]

To: governsleastgovernsbest
For on every issue down the line, Kay forcefully made the case that the Bush administration acted in good faith, that Saddam was indeed a threat, and that war against him was absolutely justified.

Could this be the reason for his "resignation" from his post? To get on the chat circuit and bang the drum for the good guys?

140 posted on 01/27/2004 7:05:57 AM PST by Bloody Sam Roberts (If cats and dogs didn't have fur would we still pet them?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 101-120121-140141-160 ... 221-239 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson