Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

There are none so blind as those who REFUSE to see.
1 posted on 01/27/2004 7:03:01 AM PST by Wolfstar
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-6061-8081-100101-111 next last
To: Wolfstar
And you know, these things are all great accomplishments that conservatives can take great pride in.

I do.

But, there are also great disappoinments. The most glaring is the amnesty plan. The magnitude of the illegal alien invasion issue is so great, especially in California, that all the good Bush can do on other issues can be negated by his invitation to throngs of economic refugees in Mexico to come here.

What good is giving these "workers" legal status here when they then fall under the same minimum wage laws that employers will STILL try to get around by hiring the new wave of illegals?

What good is beefing up border security when Immigration agents and law enforcement have no power and are in fact barred from arresting illegals and deporting them?

The issue is rightly triggering criticism of Bush. Why he's doing this, I don't know. If he's taking a page from the Gray Davis Playbook of Pandering, this will blow up in his face and he'll have himself and Rove to blame.
390 posted on 01/27/2004 10:09:52 AM PST by StoneColdGOP (McClintock - In Your Heart, You Know He's Right)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Wolfstar; Southack
Great job guys! Major kudos!
406 posted on 01/27/2004 10:24:57 AM PST by NYC Republican
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Wolfstar
Bookmarked and bumped.
407 posted on 01/27/2004 10:25:21 AM PST by Denver Ditdat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Wolfstar
Reference...
Thanks for the hard work
441 posted on 01/27/2004 10:46:25 AM PST by GrandEagle
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Wolfstar
Look what you did now. Left alone, this thread will reach the 65,000 mark...
446 posted on 01/27/2004 10:49:12 AM PST by WinOne4TheGipper (Appease "my-way-or-the-highway" conservatives. Build new roads.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Wolfstar
TERRIFIC!! Thanks for gathering all this info into one place! I've bookmarked it for future reference!!
466 posted on 01/27/2004 11:03:04 AM PST by SuziQ
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Wolfstar; Howlin; deport; onyx; kayak; Miss Marple
Kudos, kudos and more kudos.

You and your partner have done an EXCELLENT job on this compiliation.

I am sending it on via email to a few folks I know who could and will further send it to a few folks they know, etc.

I see already, the reaction of the Johnny One-Noters, the hopelessly blind segment that race along FR, from thread to thread, excoriating The President for failing them on their one or two issues.

For them, I leave this:


493 posted on 01/27/2004 11:23:06 AM PST by Neets (Complainers change their complaints, but they never reduce the amount of time spent in complaining.~)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Wolfstar
Are you so blind to NOT see how encouraging MORE illegal aliens to come over the border RAISES crime and MOCKS our laws? Do you know how much money ILLEGAL aliens eat up in incarceration and how they are NOT deported with NO follow up? Ever talk to someone who lives near the border? The fear they live in? Damage to their property? How often they are robbed or beaten? Yet George Bush insists on allowing this to continue, in fact, WELCOMES more of it.
587 posted on 01/27/2004 12:08:38 PM PST by nmh
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Wolfstar
Very impressive, Wolfstar. I have saved the link to this article for myself and to send to others. Beautiful job.
624 posted on 01/27/2004 12:44:29 PM PST by Humal
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Wolfstar
Thanks for posting...I think President Bush will be one of the GREAT presidents of all time. He doesn't care what people think; he does what he feels is right. He makes difficult choices -- many of them not liked on this forum. They feel he is doing it to get re-elected...I am not one of those who feels that way. I think he went in expecting to be a one-time President and hopefully he could undo many of the things done by the Clintons, whom I sure he dislikes because of what Bill Clinton did to his father. Going back to pre-Clinton days is enough for me too.

But then came 9/11 and it changed him and it certainly changed me. There is one main reason I will vote for Bush...he does not back down to anyone: the French and Germans, the Democrats, the complaining Republicans, the U.N., the press, the opposing candidates, the Taliban, Saddam, the Iranians/Syrians/North Koreans/etc, the anti-religious, the abortion proponents, the progressives,

God bless President Bush

For once, we have a President with guts.

630 posted on 01/27/2004 12:51:51 PM PST by BushisTheMan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Wolfstar; Southack
Great work.

Bookmarking this thread for future reference.
633 posted on 01/27/2004 12:54:26 PM PST by azGOPgal (Reject Socialism Vote Republican)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Wolfstar
Thanks for posting this list and standing up for our great President. I rarely participate in discussions, but recently I am increasingly disturbed by all the anti-Bush threads here on FR. I think President Bush has done a great job, especially given the circumstances of the 2000 election. In this difficult period in our nation's history, he has performed extremely well. I merely voted for him in 2000, but I will work hard for his re-election this year.
658 posted on 01/27/2004 1:14:12 PM PST by cat lover too
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Wolfstar
Bumping and bookmarking.
660 posted on 01/27/2004 1:15:42 PM PST by PogySailor
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Wolfstar
Disarmed Libya of its chemical, nuclear and biological WMD's without bribes or bloodshed.

I wouldn't make that conclusion yet.

Has been one of the strongest, if not THE strongest friend Israel has ever hand in the U.S. presidency.

If that is true, how does the next "accomplishment" back that up?

Part of the coalition for an Israeli/Palestinian "Roadmap to Peace," along with Great Britain, Russia and the EU.

You miss the UN as part of the coalition. In addition, this is a coalition pandering to terror, working to create a terrorist state and one which supports a terrorist regime, called the Palestinian Authority.

Here are things President Bush has not accomplished in regards to Israel:

1. Did not move the US Embassy to Jerusalem (signed executive orders) - election promise

2. Did not close down the PLO offices in DC, place sanctions on them, etc. (by executive order, he posponed it.) In addition, US aid at a rate of $200M continues to flow to the PA terror regime each year.

3. Condemns Israel for "settlements" just like every president since 1967 has done.

4. Supports a PLO terrorist state and by which he supports the Roadmap to "peace."

694 posted on 01/27/2004 2:05:24 PM PST by yonif ("If I Forget Thee, O Jerusalem, Let My Right Hand Wither" - Psalms 137:5)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Wolfstar
That's one awesome list, that will sadly not satisfy the unappeasable RED MEAT crowd.
703 posted on 01/27/2004 2:11:07 PM PST by Tempest
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Wolfstar
Good post. The problem isn't so much what President Bush has done, as the context he's given for his actions. Ronald Reagan got even the staunchest conservatives to accept the existing level of government because he strove to limit the spending of the Democrat Congress and gave conservatives hope that expenditures and government intervention would decrease in the future. Similarly, conservatives strongly supported Reagan's foreign policy, and many of them had the expectation that US intervention abroad would decrease once Communism had been defeated.

President Bush doesn't provide such a bright horizon: his administration seems likely to bring more government spending and more intervention around the world, at a time when many conservatives see little good to come from big government at home or abroad. The problem with using government to "strengthen families" is that the moral resolve fades quickly and the added layers of bureaucracy remain. And some who would think well of war on terrorism argue that President Bush has worsened things by establishing us so firmly in the Middle East. Perhaps his gamble will pay off, but one can't blame people for being skeptical.

717 posted on 01/27/2004 2:29:45 PM PST by x
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Wolfstar
Yawn. In case it hasn't already been posted:

GWB's CONTRIBUTION TO BIG GOVERNMENT
HUNDREDS OF WAYS IN WHICH GEORGE W. BUSH HAS CONTRIBUTED TO THE GROWTH OF GOVERNMENT
THIS LIST LAST UPDATED JANUARY 10, 2004

LV Editor's Note: I'm aware that many links on this page no longer work. The websites to which I link sometimes remove articles or go off-line. This list contains over 200 links and it's very time consuming to verify working links on a regular basis. I also have many more items to add. If a link doesn't work and you're curious about the item then I suggest searching for similar stories using your favorite search engine.

In his nomination acceptance speech in 2000 Bush said, "Big government is not the answer." It reminded me of when Ronald Reagan said that government is not the solution and then presided over a 67% increase in federal spending during his 8-year tenure. Republicans campaign like libertarians but govern like socialists. They increase government spending, drown business in new regulations, create and expand government programs, impose economic sanctions on other countries and meddle in their internal affairs, instigate wars, and curtail freedom. They're willing to pander to virtually any special interest group which throws money in their direction. They even enact gun-control. Republicans have no incentive to reduce government because they can always count on their rank-and-file supporters to vote party-line. If you want to reduce government and get it out of your life then you must stop supporting the people who are making government bigger. Supporting the "lesser of two evils" isn't going to reduce government.Since taking office George W. Bush has increased the national debt by $895.7 billion. [source]
George W. Bush has spent more time campaigning while in office than any of his predecessors. [source]
Bush has never vetoed a spending bill. [source]
With GOP Congress behind him, Bush has yet to use veto [source]
— Aided by a Republican-controlled Congress, President Bush is on track to become the first chief executive since John Quincy Adams in the 1820s to complete a full term without vetoing one bill.

Do Republicans really support smaller government? Here are some interesting facts:

SOCIALIST WELFARE PROGRAMS & POLITICAL BOONDOGGLES


760 posted on 01/27/2004 3:21:47 PM PST by Sir Gawain (Pimptastically ghetto fantabulous)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Wolfstar; Howlin
Wolfstar: Very nice! :)

Howlin: Thanks for pinging me to this! :)

763 posted on 01/27/2004 3:25:14 PM PST by BigSkyFreeper (All Our Base Are Belong To Dubya)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Wolfstar
To me, it's simple.

Bush ended the recession in the first year of his first term and, from Kabul to Baghdad, defeated 2 of our declared enemies in the course of 18 months, with a casualty rate during those 18 months of less than one hundreth of one percent of forces deployed. Properly compared, Bush took Baghdad faster than Clinton took Waco.

This attribute will not be properly bestowed upon him in his lifetime, but GWB is a fantastic military leader. The liberal appeasers and isolationists argued that the taking of Kabul or Baghdad would look like the sands of Iwo Jima, and never have so many been so wrong about so much.

Put simply, GWB has done more to earn my vote than any other American alive today, but there's a larger question for us as a nation to consider.

The long view.

Our enemies looked at punks like Kerry throwing their medals over a fence onto the white house lawn back in the late 60s and wrongly conclude that we, colectivly, as a people lack the vigilance, determination, and fortitude to maintain a long term comitment to defeating our declared enemies.

If Bush looses this term, future Presidents will know that they can't put their faith in the people of this great nation to see a mission through to fruition.

"If Bush couldn't keep the country united in fighting terrorism after an act of war like 9/11, this country simply isn't capable of it.", you'll hear them say. You'll hear appeasers opine: "Bush lost his second term because he couldn't keep the people vigilant to the cause." and on and on.

It's important to future Presidents, who will no doubt have the War On Terrorism on their agenda, to have the confidence that terrorists and their allies should be met with military force. If they are, the good people of a grateful nation will reward them at the ballot box for their vigilance, determination, and fortitude.

Bush 2004. He's Earned It.

771 posted on 01/27/2004 3:36:32 PM PST by ChadGore (<a href="http://www.michaelmoore.com/">Miserable Failure</a>)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Wolfstar
p-p-p-p-ping!
778 posted on 01/27/2004 3:43:15 PM PST by Ignatz (Helping people be more like me since 1960....)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-6061-8081-100101-111 next last

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson