Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

No Relation: Cousin Marriage, Birth Defects
San Diego Union-Tribune ^ | January 28, 2004 | Dru Sefton

Posted on 01/28/2004 7:40:39 AM PST by Scenic Sounds

Albert Einstein married his first cousin, Elsa Lowenthal. So did evolutionist Charles Darwin, who wed cousin Emma Wedgwood and had 10 children. The Prophet Muhammad married cousin Zaynab bint Jahsh; Jacob and Rachel in the Old Testament were also cousin-spouses.

Cousin marriage, or consanguineous marriage, is commonplace throughout history and around the world – except in America. Here, many states ban the unions based on the long-held notion that cousin marriages are "inbreeding" that produces defective offspring.

But those laws are based on outmoded social stigmas and incorrect scientific studies, genetics experts say. And cousin couples are increasingly speaking out for their right to marry.

Many of the myths date to one particularly erroneous study issued in 1858, said Martin Ottenheimer, author of "Forbidden Relatives: The American Myth of Cousin Marriage." That study, in the Transactions of the American Medical Association journal, concluded that first cousins were too closely related to safely reproduce.

"The research upon which it was based was very, very, very poor. Absolutely wrong," said Ottenheimer, an anthropology professor at Kansas State University in Manhattan.

But the study gained recognition because it was an era in which Americans were increasingly turning to science for answers. Moreover, Ottenheimer said, the federal government backed the findings, believing that discouraging cousin marriage would more quickly assimilate immigrants.

As a result, many state laws forbidding the marriages date to the late 1800s and early 1900s. Currently:

Twenty states prohibit marriage between first cousins.

Four additionally prohibit unions between cousins once removed (a difference of one generation).

Six states allow cousin marriages only if the couple is above child-bearing age.

One state allows first-cousin marriage but bans "double cousin" unions. (That occurs when, for instance, two brothers from one family marry two sisters from another; if each couple has a child, those offspring are double cousins.)

Nineteen other states, including California, allow first cousins to marry without restrictions.

Because the relationships spark such legal and social turmoil, cousins who fall in love often seek moral guidance.

"My parents had raised me to go to the Bible with any question I had," said Christie Smith of Las Vegas. When she was attracted to her cousin Mark, "I prayed and I studied Scripture. To my surprise, God is OK with cousin marriages."

She found nothing in the Bible forbidding the relationship. Leviticus 18, which details rules regarding incest, does not mention cousins.

Christie and Mark, married five years, host the Web site for CUDDLE International (Cousins United to Defeat Discriminating Laws through Education).

Cousin marriages "aren't nearly as uncommon as people think; they're just kept under wraps," Smith said. Her site at www.cuddleinternational.org gets some 300 hits per day.

Another site, www.cousincouples.com, gets about 600 visitors a day. It's run by Keith Tysinger of Asheboro, N.C., married nearly eight years to his cousin Tammy.

When they announced their plan to wed, "it was terrible," Tysinger said. "My dad said, 'They'll put you in jail in some states for that!' Nearly everyone was against us."

The resentment has slowly faded, he said. Now the two are trying to have a baby. And, contrary to widespread belief, their child will not be at a significantly higher risk of birth defects.

"People in the genetics community know those risks are not high, and they have known that for years," said Robin Bennett, a senior genetic counselor and clinic manager for the University of Washington Medical Genetics Clinic in Seattle.

In 2002, Bennett headed a National Society of Genetic Counselors task force that released an extensive study of consanguineous marriage. It showed that cousin couples were only 1.7 percent to 2.8 percent more likely than a nonrelated couple to have a child with a significant birth defect, such as mental retardation or a genetic disorder.

Ottenheimer said one of the first scientifically sound studies was conducted after World War II by the Atomic Bomb Casualty Commission – Radiation Effects Research Foundation, under the U.S. National Academy of Sciences.

The group was examining genetic problems after the bombings of Hiroshima and Nagasaki. Thousands of Japanese citizens participated.

"In order to determine possible damage, they needed to sift out very carefully the possible contamination of the study due to cousin marriage," because the practice was common in Japan, Ottenheimer said. And at that point, cousin marriages were still thought to produce inbreeding problems.

But when scientists examined that separate group of Japanese cousin-marriage offspring for genetic disorders, they discovered far fewer problems than anticipated.

Stigma persists

Brandon and Andrew Wagner, 11 and 8 years old, are living proof of the healthy children typically born to cousins. Their parents, Caren and Brian Wagner of New Holland, Mich., have been married 12 years.

"One of our great-aunts couldn't believe there wasn't something wrong with the children," Caren said. "She said, 'They look so normal.' It was rather comical."

Wagner said she still faces prejudiced reactions, such as that of the co-worker who recently told her she'd "better not mention to too many people" that she married her cousin.

"People expect some two-headed, toothless redneck," Wagner said. "Walking down the street, you can't tell us from anyone else. We're a middle-class, Midwestern American family."

The stigma persists, as do the laws.

Phyllis Kahn, a member of the Minnesota State Legislature, in January 2003 introduced a bill to repeal cousin marriage restrictions. It remains stalled in committee; senators are reluctant to co-sponsor the measure.

Some of Kahn's constituent groups, including Somalis from Africa and Hmong from Asia, were shocked to find the marriages weren't permitted, she said.

"If some people stand to benefit, and there's no scientific reason for them not to, it should be allowed," Kahn said.

Statistics elusive

Ottenheimer said cousin marriages in other countries serve specific societal purposes, such as promoting equality.

Many cultures practice patrilocality: When a couple marry, the two live with or near the husband's family. "So incoming women are outsiders," Ottenheimer said. But with cousin marriages, "you have a household of groups of related women and groups of related men, each of which have power within the family."

Ottenheimer said reliable statistics on the number of cousin marriages in America are elusive.

But when his book was published in 1996, he was surprised by the hundreds of notes and telephone calls he received.

"A number of people were very threatened by the idea of cousin marriage," he added. "This touches very fundamental notions about being human."


TOPICS: Constitution/Conservatism; Culture/Society; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: health; kissincousins; putsistertothetest; slipperyslope; uncledaddy; westvirginia
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061 next last
Another site, www.cousincouples.com, gets about 600 visitors a day.

Love conquers all!!

1 posted on 01/28/2004 7:40:39 AM PST by Scenic Sounds
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Scenic Sounds
bless their little hearts
2 posted on 01/28/2004 7:42:20 AM PST by cyborg
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: cyborg
Next on Fox.... WHEN COUSINS MARRY!!!


3 posted on 01/28/2004 7:50:54 AM PST by Hillary's Lovely Legs (Saddam feels so bad for Howard Dean that he has offered him his hole.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: cyborg
LOL!!

~</;o)
4 posted on 01/28/2004 7:52:23 AM PST by EggsAckley (..................**AMEND** the Fourteenth Amendment......(There, is THAT better?).................)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Scenic Sounds
What hypocrits. They bitch and moan when this happens to a couple in the Southeast U.S. (which is very, very rare), but they act like it makes them superior in someway when they do it themselves.
5 posted on 01/28/2004 7:56:10 AM PST by Paul C. Jesup
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Hillary's Lovely Legs
LOL! (won't even start talking about the Kennedys!)
6 posted on 01/28/2004 7:57:11 AM PST by cyborg
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: EggsAckley
happy monday...I just burned off the McFlurry I ate yesterday by shoveling the flurries that fell last night
7 posted on 01/28/2004 7:58:05 AM PST by cyborg
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Scenic Sounds
Einstein's kid wasn't with his cousin, though. It was with a crippled Hungarian physicist, his other wife.
8 posted on 01/28/2004 8:00:50 AM PST by Flightdeck (Death is only a horizon)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Scenic Sounds
After listening to the "experts," one would think eros love was the only love known to man. How does all this new "I can have sex with anyone if I love him/her/them/it" affect the other vital forms of human love? What does it do to family love? When your aunt and uncle come over for Christmas, does it change the whole dynamic if the kids are making out in the bedroom, for example?

How does this new found freedom -- especially the same-sex junk -- affect friendship love? Does it change the meaning of an all girls slumber party? Does it ruin the meaning of a hug from a friend, or at least add suspicion? Should a boyfriend/girlfriend worry about those repeated outings with the same person (yeah, sure you're just FRIENDS)?

Certainly it changes the meaning of the mens/ladies restrooms, dressing rooms and locker rooms. I mean, why separate them anymore?

9 posted on 01/28/2004 8:01:06 AM PST by King Black Robe (With freedom of religion and speech now abridged, it is time to go after the press.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Scenic Sounds
Thanks! Most people would be surprised by the number of cousin marriages in their family's history.

I know in my own, there are many...some because of love, others to maintain property in the family, others because of the limited choices...1600s Nantucket!

10 posted on 01/28/2004 8:01:25 AM PST by Molly Pitcher
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: cyborg
As, so it's Monday where you live. Very interesting.


LOL!
11 posted on 01/28/2004 8:01:48 AM PST by EggsAckley (..................**AMEND** the Fourteenth Amendment......(There, is THAT better?).................)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: EggsAckley
Right after I sent that, I said to myself 'isn't it FRIDAY?' bwahahaha
12 posted on 01/28/2004 8:02:42 AM PST by cyborg
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: Scenic Sounds

"YEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEHHHHHHHHHHHAWWWWWWWW!"

13 posted on 01/28/2004 8:04:50 AM PST by KantianBurke (2+2 does NOT equal 5)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: cyborg
Um......it's Wednesday here. But then, you've always been ahead of the pack.....

~</;o)
14 posted on 01/28/2004 8:06:22 AM PST by EggsAckley (..................**AMEND** the Fourteenth Amendment......(There, is THAT better?).................)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: EggsAckley
I give up LMAO
15 posted on 01/28/2004 8:09:03 AM PST by cyborg
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: Molly Pitcher
1600s Nantucket!

It never got much wilder than that!! ;-)

16 posted on 01/28/2004 8:10:52 AM PST by Scenic Sounds (Sí, estamos libres sonreír otra vez - ahora y siempre.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: Scenic Sounds
My wife is from the Appalachian hills. She was talking about her great-grandmother one time and I asked "Which side?". She just stared at me.
17 posted on 01/28/2004 8:11:40 AM PST by AppyPappy (If You're Not A Part Of The Solution, There's Good Money To Be Made In Prolonging The Problem.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: cyborg
Or maybe you're the product of a "cousins" marriage..........

(just kidding, heheheh)

18 posted on 01/28/2004 8:12:23 AM PST by EggsAckley (..................**AMEND** the Fourteenth Amendment......(There, is THAT better?).................)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: Scenic Sounds
Truth is a hard thing to get at.

On the surface, this presents a good arguement (maybe) but I think it is the 2nd, 3rd, and 4th generation that the problems begin.

You solve the problem by stopping it at the first generation.

We always went to the neighbor to borrow the bull.
19 posted on 01/28/2004 8:12:23 AM PST by PeterPrinciple
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: AppyPappy
My wife is from the Appalachian hills. She was talking about her great-grandmother one time and I asked "Which side?". She just stared at me.

ROFL - The post of the day!!

20 posted on 01/28/2004 8:13:00 AM PST by Scenic Sounds (Sí, estamos libres sonreír otra vez - ahora y siempre.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson