Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Major Industrial Nations Unprepared for Coming Population Aging and Labour Shortage
LifeSiteNews.com ^ | January 28, 2004 | January 28, 2004

Posted on 01/28/2004 6:22:18 PM PST by Polycarp IV

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-68 last
To: WayneM
"He should not put us in the position of rewarding people who illegally swarmed over the border."

How exactly is Bush to blame for our declining birth rate?

61 posted on 01/29/2004 12:25:35 PM PST by Luis Gonzalez (The Gift Is To See The Trout.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: CAtholic Family Association
Here's something you may find interesting, specifically, page 5 (or six if you count the cover).
62 posted on 01/29/2004 12:29:46 PM PST by Luis Gonzalez (The Gift Is To See The Trout.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 58 | View Replies]

To: Antoninus
"Personally, I think I'd be ok with it if the amnesty was accompanied by some sort of fine--say $500 per person. Then, at least, there'd be some penalty involved."

That may still be the case, don't forget, while Bush may have talked about what he'd like to do, it's up to Congress to actually make the changes.

Back when there was talk of extending section 486i, the outcome would have been exactly what you mentioned, but it didn't go through.

63 posted on 01/29/2004 12:33:46 PM PST by Luis Gonzalez (The Gift Is To See The Trout.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 47 | View Replies]

To: TLI; Antoninus; Luis Gonzalez
Friendly too, eh?

When you've been mocked and derided and marginalized for years, screamed at to "Get your Rosaries off my ovaries!", called the most foul and insulting things, all for defending basic universal and 2000 year old Christian moral theology, then once again as usual been proven to have been right all along, like in this thread, you have to expect a little "I told you so..."

64 posted on 01/29/2004 12:34:37 PM PST by Polycarp IV (PRO-LIFE orthodox Catholic--without exception, without compromise, without apology. Any questions?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 49 | View Replies]

To: Antoninus
I see how my post was unclear. Actually, I'm happily married with one daughter and a second one on the way. We don't know any other couples our age who are interested in having large families. It's good to hear they're out there, but it's uncommon with our generation, and the one prior.
65 posted on 01/29/2004 12:43:30 PM PST by BMiles2112
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 51 | View Replies]

To: Luis Gonzalez; Antoninus
until then, I err on the side of prevention.

Sorry, but I can never err on a side of "prevention" that even PP admits increases abortion rates.

Its bad enough that folks try to do evil thinking good may come of it.

Its far worse to tell people to do evil knowing damn well far worse evil will and does come of it, as even Planned Parenthood admits.

66 posted on 01/29/2004 12:45:37 PM PST by Polycarp IV (PRO-LIFE orthodox Catholic--without exception, without compromise, without apology. Any questions?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 60 | View Replies]

To: Luis Gonzalez
I've never blamed GWB for our declining birth rate. Now I'm asking myself why you would accuse me of making such an accusation. Besides - the declining birth rate is not the reason people are swarming over the border. They are swarming over the border because they want to do so, and because we don't have proper immigration controls to stop them.

I am the product of immigrants also. My grandparents were from German and Holland and Ireland, and one thing I can remember is that they all spoke English although not one of them was born in an English speaking home. I know they struggled, and that the immigration rules in place at that time probably made it even harder. But they all came here legally and under a very specific set of rules.
As for needing immigrants to fill these positions, there may be some truth here. However, that still doesn't mean we should accept with open arms anyone who takes it upon him or herself to come here.

Let me lay out my position in a set of steps. In return, you can tell me which of these positions, or steps, you disagree with.

1) This is our country - it belongs to us, the citizens. It does not belong to citizens of another country.

2) It is our right, as citizens of this country, to pick and choose who we wish to allow to come here - for whatever reason we decide.

3) It is our right to insist that visitors to our country not be criminals. We have enough problem with home-grown criminals, and we have no need to import more of them.

4) We have the right to insist that visitors to our country be willing to assimilate; that is, do their best to join with us and become one with us, as opposed to maintaining their old culture. Why would we wish them to import and transplant problems from their country of origin?

5) We should have the right to control the number of visitors we choose to accept. This means we should not be subjected to an uncontrolled flood of invaders. It is in our (citizens) best interest to limit the number of immigrants in order to assure assimilation and limit the negative impact on our society.

6) We have the right to control immigration by country of origin and set rules to prevent any one culture from dominating the immigration numbers. We have the right to take actions necessary to ensure our home will not become "North Mexico" or "North Aztlan"

Like I said, feel free to voice your objection to any of the points above. Im interested in seeing on what grounds someone can object to control of this ongoing invasion.

In summary, you can easily see how I feel by comparing this country to your own home. To me, my country is an extension of my home.

I would object to any visitor (including my parents or brothers) telling me that he had a right to enter my home any time he wanted. I would object to a visitor telling me he had the right to make the rules in my home - as opposed to him living by my rules and customs. I would object to a visitor, especially an uninvited visitor, telling me that I had to change to accommodate his wishes. I would object to a visitor in my home telling me I was prejudiced or racist because I objected to him doing things his way, instead of my way.

Tell me the truth - does it irritates you when I refer to the USA as "my home"? Does it bother you that I feel as if this country belongs to me and that I have the right to set the rules for foreign visitors?
67 posted on 01/29/2004 2:17:34 PM PST by WayneM (Cut the KRAP (Karl Rove Amnesty Plan). Call your elected officials and say "NO!!")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 61 | View Replies]

To: WayneM
"Now I'm asking myself why you would accuse me of making such an accusation."

Because you responded to a post about the relation between the declining birth rate, and the current issue of immigration, and how Bush was handling it, by questioning why Bush would put us in such a situation.

Bush has not put the nation in any situation, he's trying to deal with the situation he was handed.

"...and one thing I can remember is that they all spoke English."

You missed the word "eventually", right before "they all spoke English."

"We have the right to insist that visitors to our country be willing to assimilate; that is, do their best to join with us and become one with us, as opposed to maintaining their old culture."

This from the product of those famous assimilators that still, to this day, celebrate St. Patrick's Day and Oktoberfest?

Let me put things in perspective for you, assimilation is a generational process...always has been. The first generation immigrant learns to exist in an unfamiliar world, but by the third generation, the world of the first immigrant is an alien land to his descendants. Here's a bit more perspective for you:

"I am perfectly of your mind, that measures of great Temper are necessary with the Germans: and am not without Apprehensions, that thro' their indiscretion or Ours, or both, great disorders and inconveniences may one day arise among us; Those who come hither are generally of the most ignorant Stupid Sort of their own Nation, and as Ignorance is often attended with Credulity when Knavery would mislead it, and with Suspicion when Honesty would set it right; and as few of the English understand the German Language, and so cannot address them either from the Press or Pulpit, 'tis almost impossible to remove any prejudices they once entertain. Their own Clergy have very little influence over the people; who seem to take an uncommon pleasure in abusing and discharging the Minister on every trivial occasion. Not being used to Liberty, they know not how to make a modest use of it; and as Kolben says of the young Hottentots, that they are not esteemed men till they have shewn their manhood by beating their mothers, so these seem to think themselves not free, till they can feel their liberty in abusing and insulting their Teachers. Thus they are under no restraint of Ecclesiastical Government; They behave, however, submissively enough at present to the Civil Government which I wish they may continue to do: For I remember when they modestly declined intermeddling in our Elections, but now they come in droves, and carry all before them, except in one or two Counties; Few of their children in the Country learn English; they import many Books from Germany; and of the six printing houses in the Province, two are entirely German, two half German half English, and but two entirely English; They have one German News-paper, and one half German. Advertisements intended to be general are now printed in Dutch and English; the Signs in our Streets have inscriptions in both languages, and in some places only German: They begin of late to make all their Bonds nad other legal Writings in their own Language, which (though I think it ought not to be) are allowed good in our Courts, where the German Business so encreases that there is continual need of Interpreters; and I suppose in a few years they will be also necessary in the Assembly, to tell one half of our Legislators what the other half say; In short unless the stream of their importation could be turned from this to other colonies, as you very judiciously propose, they will soon so out number us, that all the advantages we have will not in My Opinion be able to preserve our language, and even our Government will become precarious." -- Source

All immigrants assimilate, it's unpreventable.

68 posted on 01/29/2004 8:46:04 PM PST by Luis Gonzalez (The Gift Is To See The Trout.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 67 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-68 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson