Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

BBC BOSS QUITS AS BRIT PROBE BARES PHONY WAR STORY
New York Post ^ | 1/29/04 | Post Wire Services

Posted on 01/29/2004 2:35:46 AM PST by kattracks

Edited on 05/26/2004 5:19:20 PM PDT by Jim Robinson. [history]

January 29, 2004 -- LONDON - The chairman of the British Broadcasting Corporation resigned yesterday and the broadcaster apologized for some of its reporting on the buildup to the war in Iraq after it was lambasted in an inquiry by a senior judge. The inquiry by Lord Hutton criticized journalist Andrew Gilligan, the BBC's management and its supervisory board of governors, for a radio report saying the government "sexed up" intelligence in a dossier on Iraqi weapons. Hutton said the BBC report was unfounded.


(Excerpt) Read more at nypost.com ...


TOPICS: Extended News; News/Current Events; United Kingdom; War on Terror
KEYWORDS: andrewgilligan; bbc; davidkelly; gavyndavies; huttonreport

1 posted on 01/29/2004 2:35:47 AM PST by kattracks
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: pau1f0rd
ping
2 posted on 01/29/2004 2:36:32 AM PST by risk
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: kattracks
I'm glad that the BBC was lambasted, but it puts me off a little that the problem is stated as not enough levels of managerial oversight and prescreening of what the ground-level reporter, Andrew Gilligan, was going to say. I'd prefer a system where reporters and commentators say what they think, but where everyone knows that they have to take things with a grain of salt. Apparently, the British ideal would be to fact-check everything six times before saying anything. Gilligan apparently exaggerated or even lied about what David Kelly had said to him, and that was wrong, especially since it led to an overly sensitive man's death; but the BBC's fault, in my opinion, was not in being too loosely managed but rather in circling the wagons and claiming that they could never have been wrong. What the Brit's seem to want is an authoritative journalism that they can trust and believe in without people having to be skeptical and think for themselves. A dangerous thing to want, I think.
3 posted on 01/29/2004 3:21:16 AM PST by Stirner
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: kattracks
Seems Kelly was right.
4 posted on 01/29/2004 3:27:30 AM PST by Zipporah (Write inTancredo in 2004)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: kattracks
All good, except, of course, he should have fired Andrew Gilligan first.

Looks like Gilligan was the only one sexing anything up...

I see the leftiods on other websites are claiming Hutton is in on some grand conspiracy with Blair though. I guess they can't get it through their heads that the "anti-war" cause always was built on a house of cards and neo-fascist sympathizing.
5 posted on 01/29/2004 3:56:07 AM PST by swilhelm73
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: swilhelm73
I see the leftiods on other websites are claiming Hutton is in on some grand conspiracy with Blair though

yes, it's that grand conspiracy called 'keeping your country safe'.
6 posted on 01/29/2004 4:01:52 AM PST by pau1f0rd
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Stirner
I agree with your post........but OH! think about the New York Times!

Regards,

7 posted on 01/29/2004 4:08:56 AM PST by Jimmy Valentine (DemocRATS - when they speak, they lie; when they are silent, they are stealing the American Dream)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: kattracks
Anyone know if Gilligan is still there?
8 posted on 01/29/2004 4:13:49 AM PST by mewzilla
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: kattracks
"The inquiry by Lord Hutton criticized journalist Andrew Gilligan, the BBC's management and its supervisory board of governors..."

You mean to say they were exposed to be a SHAMELES propaganda outfit for the left?

Go ahead, you can say it!
9 posted on 01/29/2004 4:46:36 AM PST by observer5
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: swilhelm73
BBC wouldn't know waht journalism is if it hit them with a 16 wheeler truck.
10 posted on 01/29/2004 4:48:05 AM PST by observer5
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson