Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

VANITY: The best way to keep America a sovereign free nation is to keep the Democrats out of power!
Free Republic

Posted on 01/29/2004 5:54:35 PM PST by Jim Robinson

Will Bush solve the illegal immigration problem? Probably not. But neither will Kerry, Edwards, Dean, Clark or Hillary. Chances are, they'd make it worse. Probably far worse.

Will Bush solve the government spending problem? Probably not. But neither will Kerry, Edwards, Dean, Clark or Hillary. Chances are, they'd make it worse. Probably far worse.

Will Bush solve the campaign finance problem? Probably not. But neither will Kerry, Edwards, Dean, Clark or Hillary. Chances are, they'd make it worse. Probably far worse.

Will Bush solve the drug war problem? Probably not. But neither will Kerry, Edwards, Dean, Clark or Hillary. Chances are, they'd make it worse. Probably far worse.

Will Bush solve the nation's education problems? Probably not. But neither will Kerry, Edwards, Dean, Clark or Hillary. Chances are, they'd make it worse. Probably far worse.

Will Bush solve the so-called healthcare problems? Probably not. But neither will Kerry, Edwards, Dean, Clark or Hillary. Chances are, they'd make it worse. Probably far worse.

Will Bush solve the so-called environmental problems? Probably not. But neither will Kerry, Edwards, Dean, Clark or Hillary. Chances are, they'd make it worse. Probably far worse.

Will Bush solve the social security problems? Probably not. But neither will Kerry, Edwards, Dean, Clark or Hillary. Chances are, they'd make it worse. Probably far worse.

Will Bush solve the medicare problems? Probably not. But neither will Kerry, Edwards, Dean, Clark or Hillary. Chances are, they'd make it worse. Probably far worse.

Will Bush defend America from those bent on destroying her? You'd better bet your sweet bippy he will.

Will any of the Democrats defend America? Hell no they won't. They'd rather turn us over to the U.N. They'd surrender to the French Foreign Legion if given the chance.

Will Bush appoint conservative judges? Yup!

Will Kerry, Edwards, Clark, Hillary, et al, appoint conservative judges? Yeah, right. And hell will freeze over tomorrow.

Will Bush continue reducing taxes? Yup.

Will Kerry, Edwards, Clark, Hillary, et al, raise your taxes as soon as they possibly can if given the opportunity and continue raising them until hell freezes over? Yup.

Will Bush defend the right to life? Check

Will Bush defend marriage between a man a woman? Check

Will Bush defend the right to keep and bear arms? Check

Will Bush say no to Kyoto? Check.

Will Bush say no to a world court? Check.

Will Bush say no to the U.N.? Check.

Will Kerry, Edwards, Clark, Hillary, et al, remove our national sovereignty and subjugate America to world government? Just as quickly as they possibly can if given the opportunity.

Will any other person be elected to the Presidency in 2004 other than Bush (God willing) or a Democrat? Obviously not.

Doesn't make a lick of sense to me to allow the America hating, freedom hating Democrats back into power now that we've kicked them out.

Say yes to sovereignty for America and continued freedom for all Americans.

Say no to the RATS!!


TOPICS: Your Opinion/Questions
KEYWORDS: electionpresident; gwb2004; jimroblist
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-50 ... 301-350351-400401-450 ... 1,251-1,271 next last
To: Howlin; PhiKapMom; nopardons

BTW, it's a really good book.

351 posted on 01/29/2004 8:02:04 PM PST by onyx (Your secrets are safe with me and all my friends.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 333 | View Replies]

To: Brad's Gramma
Sorry Mo, for being too lazy to not go find my own pic and stealing yours.

Don't worry and Great Post!!

352 posted on 01/29/2004 8:02:08 PM PST by Mo1 (Join the dollar a day crowd now!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 342 | View Replies]

To: Jim Robinson
Ain't nobody safe as long as Congress is in session (plagiarized).

Samuel Clemens is gonna sue yer butt. ;^)

353 posted on 01/29/2004 8:02:10 PM PST by Lazamataz (Have you prayed to President Bush today?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 345 | View Replies]

To: rintense
sitting out the election also means you have no right to bitch and complain when you don't like policy or things don't go your way... because YOU CHOSE NOT TO BE HEARD WHEN IT MATTERED.

This is for sale, you know?

:-)

354 posted on 01/29/2004 8:03:22 PM PST by Howlin (http://www.icomm.ca/dragon/image/hbook3.gif)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 309 | View Replies]

To: Brad's Gramma
And your point is? You think a Dem is going to want this to happen? Who was Prez when this happened? Did it make a difference? As I recall, at the time Dubya was more concerned with amnesty for illegals than securing the border. Life has changed as a result of 9/11 and any prez will be a little more concerned with security be he a dem or a rep.
355 posted on 01/29/2004 8:03:41 PM PST by Nanodik (Bush! The next best thing to a real "conservative")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 342 | View Replies]

To: nopardons
#348 -- You go girl. :)
356 posted on 01/29/2004 8:04:37 PM PST by onyx (Your secrets are safe with me and all my friends.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 348 | View Replies]

To: ohioWfan
That's all you have to say to the core communication of my post?

(shrugs)

357 posted on 01/29/2004 8:04:50 PM PST by Lazamataz (Have you prayed to President Bush today?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 350 | View Replies]

To: ohioWfan; Lazamataz
Laz thinks it's cute.....Probably would really like the art work or Urine in the bottle with the crucifix.....IMO He complains about money for the arts and then uses his creative writing talents to support the very thing he complains about...LIAO?
358 posted on 01/29/2004 8:05:34 PM PST by hoosiermama (prayers for all)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 350 | View Replies]

To: MEG33
One cannot train and arm in short order.

You mean like we did in WWII? Guess we are less of a nation today.

359 posted on 01/29/2004 8:05:45 PM PST by Nanodik (Bush! The next best thing to a real "conservative")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 314 | View Replies]

To: ohioWfan
Holding my place for tomorrow.
360 posted on 01/29/2004 8:06:33 PM PST by Maigrey ("I wasn't disengaged. I was bored as hell and my mother told me never to interrupt." -Dubya)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 303 | View Replies]

To: Extremely Extreme Extremist
I've never stood on any soapboxes preaching about principles. All I'm merely doing is discussing my unhappiness with Bush's liberal policies. The last time I looked, this was a conservative news discussion forum, not a Republican Party feel-good rabble-rouser.

We've heard the objections to some of Bush's policies, and we've debated them. Fair enough.

But it's an election year. And unless we prefer to throw away all the accomplishments and the progress we've made under Bush I'de say it is definitely time for a "Republican Party feel-good rabble-rouser."

Unless of course you would prefer a liberal Dem in the White House.

361 posted on 01/29/2004 8:06:58 PM PST by Jorge
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 262 | View Replies]

To: nopardons
I didn't " attack " his " ctizesnship ". Take some reading comprehensiion classes.

You started out saying "Just how long have you lived in America, you Canadian transplant ?", then proceeded to claim Canadians speak out of both sides of their mouth. That's pretty clearly an attack.

You self appointed yourself toATTACK those you disagree with, who posted to those THEY disagree with and who,BTW, are diametrically opposed to the vast majority of the members of this site and its owner. Jim is here, I'm certain that the Mods are too, and YOU are not needed here,pretending that you are some kind of "peace officer ". Take your smarmy,supercilious, pompous postings someplace else.

First I'll point out that now you're attacking me (but that's okay). Second I'll point out that the Lead Moderator him/herself has encouraged self policing on the part of posters. That's all I'm attempting here. No "smarmy, supercilious pompous" manner intended. Sorry you took it that way.

As far as going somewhere else, I'll be going to bed soon, so I guess in that respect I'll be obliging your offer. You have a nice night.

362 posted on 01/29/2004 8:07:42 PM PST by NittanyLion
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 348 | View Replies]

To: Nanodik
You claimed the economy was more important to you then national security. You answered with more absurdity. I never claimed Kerry would do any of those things. Your answer was worse then even being specious.
363 posted on 01/29/2004 8:07:52 PM PST by woodyinscc
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 346 | View Replies]

To: hoosiermama
Laz thinks it's cute...

Actually, I do. However, it seems to be distracting people who are easily distracted. Therefore, to faciliate communication, I'll take it off.

364 posted on 01/29/2004 8:08:10 PM PST by Lazamataz
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 358 | View Replies]

To: Lazamataz
Yes. The rest was silly. Your tagline was sinful.
365 posted on 01/29/2004 8:08:11 PM PST by ohioWfan (BUSH 2004 - Leadership, Integrity, Morality)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 357 | View Replies]

To: Nanodik
? You think a Dem is going to want this to happen?

So the want it?? ... No

However, Do you think a Dem President will have the balls to fight and prevent it??

The way they are talking about getting a permission slip from the French .. Just shows they have no balls

366 posted on 01/29/2004 8:08:30 PM PST by Mo1 (Join the dollar a day crowd now!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 355 | View Replies]

To: ItisaReligionofPeace
I wonder what your response would have been to the Declaration of Independence?

Sadly, I wouldn't have had a say. I'm a girl.

367 posted on 01/29/2004 8:08:53 PM PST by onyx (Your secrets are safe with me and all my friends.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 341 | View Replies]

To: ohioWfan
Yes. The rest was silly.

You think that Bush hewing to socialist and unconsitutional ideas is silly.

I view it as more tragic than silly.

368 posted on 01/29/2004 8:09:41 PM PST by Lazamataz
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 365 | View Replies]

To: Nanodik
Again, read ALL THREE books then get back to me!

Additionally, if you believe President Reagan avoided all of the fiscal errors that you accuse President Bush of then I suggest you add David Stockman and Don Regan's books to your reading list [FYI: Reagan still holds the record for the largest deficit relative to GDP in the country's history! FYI2: Before you attempt to blame this on a Democrat House, you should know that Congress returned budgets to Reagan within 1% of what he requested Hmmmmmmmmmm!]
369 posted on 01/29/2004 8:09:48 PM PST by DrDeb
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 299 | View Replies]

To: JulieRNR21
I love that picture of Bush on the flight deck!!
370 posted on 01/29/2004 8:10:07 PM PST by Ernest_at_the_Beach (The terrorists and their supporters declared war on the United States - and war is what they got!!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 233 | View Replies]

To: Jim Robinson
Thank you Jim. You are someone to be admired and I do. I also stand with our President George W. Bush. The alternative is atrocious. I could not even imagine any of the democrats getting their filthy, dirty hands into our White House. I shudder at the thought.
371 posted on 01/29/2004 8:10:07 PM PST by rep-always
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 59 | View Replies]

To: Lazamataz
Thanks
372 posted on 01/29/2004 8:10:23 PM PST by MEG33 (America will never seek a permission slip to provide for the security of our country)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 364 | View Replies]

To: PhiKapMom; Extremely Extreme Extremist
EEE may have been a Pattie supporter in 2000. I can't remember for sure, but it wasn't President Bush.....
373 posted on 01/29/2004 8:10:29 PM PST by deport (BUSH - CHENEY 2004.........)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 330 | View Replies]

To: Howlin; Neets
```Then, the anti-Bush attacks are predictable and repeatative so the digression there gets pretty boring.```

Neets has taken care of that

Yep, Neets listed a bunch from the nauseating litany.... puts it into perspective!

374 posted on 01/29/2004 8:10:34 PM PST by Tamzee (W '04..... America may not survive a Democrat at this point in our history....)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 285 | View Replies]

To: NittanyLion
I thought you were posting for him -- that's how it came across to me. I have seen him post a lot of things about this Country that off the mark IMO.

Just don't appreciate someone from another Country on this thread telling us what is wrong. This thread was put up by Jim telling why he is supporting the President for reelection. I thought his comments were out of place if he couldn't vote in this Country.
375 posted on 01/29/2004 8:10:47 PM PST by PhiKapMom (AOII Mom -- Support Bush-Cheney '04)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 344 | View Replies]

To: Nanodik
Curious..... just who would you prefer to be elected? name and party if you have one?
376 posted on 01/29/2004 8:11:42 PM PST by deport (BUSH - CHENEY 2004.........)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 329 | View Replies]

To: Howlin
Dear lord......what we have here is someone playing "the reasonable man" dealing with silly, vapid women. :-)

What a strange comment. I couldn't care less what gender you are, although folks like yourself continue to try and make it an issue on this thread. All I'm interested in is good conversation - I've seldom bothered myself with finding out poster's demographics.

377 posted on 01/29/2004 8:12:05 PM PST by NittanyLion
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 333 | View Replies]

To: ItisaReligionofPeace
Well, I'm not so sure about that. Review the statistics gathered by the ACU. I believe the Republicans are much more conservative than the Democrats and I believe there are many more Republicans who are supporters of private property and of state and local power than there are Democrats. In fact, I doubt there are any Democrats at all who support state and local power. Hell, they don't even truly support federal power. That's just a means to their end goal. Most of them want to dissolve the US and turn us over to the UN and a world government. Hmmmm... and I think that's where we came in.
378 posted on 01/29/2004 8:12:23 PM PST by Jim Robinson (I don't belong to no organized political party. I'm a Republycan.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 272 | View Replies]

To: Ernest_at_the_Beach
It's one of my favorites also! He sure looks great in that flightsuit. No wonder the Dems got so steamed up over it!
379 posted on 01/29/2004 8:13:10 PM PST by JulieRNR21 (One good term deserves another! Take W-04....Across America!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 370 | View Replies]

To: Howlin
"Don''t you hate it when that happens on a LONG thread? :-)"

Yep. I feel like I went and painted a bullseye on myself. All for being a smartass. :D
380 posted on 01/29/2004 8:13:17 PM PST by Tempest
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 228 | View Replies]

To: Jim Robinson
Thank you.
381 posted on 01/29/2004 8:13:39 PM PST by cyncooper
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Lazamataz
Thank you.....Not distracted just holding your feet to the fire. Either you are conservative or not! If you hold "W" to a higher standard the same should be true for yourself. Practice what you preach!
382 posted on 01/29/2004 8:13:58 PM PST by hoosiermama (prayers for all)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 364 | View Replies]

To: hoosiermama
Now, now, he's only trying to make the people who are a little too seduced by the Cult of Personality check their motives.

He's here to help up.

383 posted on 01/29/2004 8:13:59 PM PST by Howlin (http://www.icomm.ca/dragon/image/hbook3.gif)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 358 | View Replies]

To: You Dirty Rats
Cult of Personality? So we who admire Dubya for his strong defense of this country and telling the French and other fair-weather friends to are not thinking rationally; we're just drinking Dubya's kool-aid.

I admire him for that as well. But, lets be frank here. Even if we got hit with another 100 World-Trade-centers, that's only 300,000 citizens. Tragic, yes -- but we lost more people in World War Two, and the country went on.

I think that more damage will be done to our way of life by rampant spending -- e.g., turning us into a socialist European-style country -- and by overturning the Bill of Rights by Executive and Congressional fiat than by terrorism.

384 posted on 01/29/2004 8:14:04 PM PST by Lazamataz
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 347 | View Replies]

To: PhiKapMom
Just don't appreciate someone from another Country on this thread telling us what is wrong. This thread was put up by Jim telling why he is supporting the President for reelection. I thought his comments were out of place if he couldn't vote in this Country.

We'll just have to agree to disagree, but there's no reason we can't do that amicably. I think we've agreed on more than one occasion that we're both after the same goal, even if our views on how to get there differ.

Have a nice night...

385 posted on 01/29/2004 8:14:22 PM PST by NittanyLion
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 375 | View Replies]

To: hoosiermama
Thank you.....Not distracted just holding your feet to the fire. Either you are conservative or not! If you hold "W" to a higher standard the same should be true for yourself. Practice what you preach!

Fair enough.

386 posted on 01/29/2004 8:14:55 PM PST by Lazamataz
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 382 | View Replies]

To: I got the rope
I'm hoping that the Senate will go 60+ Republican in '06. It is highly probable IMO that this will happen.

I think it more likely that one or both houses will return to effective Dim control than that Bush would lose. Even without any leadership from House/Senate Dims comparable to Gingrich's takeover in '94.

Control of both houses and the presidency by one party is an anomaly in modern times. Given the kind of spending we're seeing, I can't see what a GOP supermajority would get us. Lower spending? I can't quite believe it.

The GOP Congress spends like drunken Democrats, knowing Bush won't veto because Bush proposed the high deficit spending. And Bush, once re-elected, won't need them much anyway. Despite all his wailing, Clinton never seemed to miss his Dim-majority Congress. At least, until we impeached his lying ass.

Bush may not actually care much whether the GOP majority in Congress gets re-elected. And true enough, they're the ones to blame for the spending. Bush won't really need them after this year, judging by the priorities of his first term. They might even be a liability to him.
387 posted on 01/29/2004 8:15:33 PM PST by George W. Bush
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 143 | View Replies]

To: Howlin
Now, now, he's only trying to make the people who are a little too seduced by the Cult of Personality check their motives.

Give it a whirl.

388 posted on 01/29/2004 8:15:38 PM PST by Lazamataz
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 383 | View Replies]

To: NittanyLion
Same to you!
389 posted on 01/29/2004 8:15:56 PM PST by PhiKapMom (AOII Mom -- Support Bush-Cheney '04)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 385 | View Replies]

To: Lazamataz
You are forgiven!
390 posted on 01/29/2004 8:15:56 PM PST by hoosiermama (prayers for all)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 386 | View Replies]

To: onyx
A most EXCELLENT point.

Alas, there are some here who probably wish you STILL didn't have the vote.

I know the "boy friends" feel that way.
391 posted on 01/29/2004 8:16:18 PM PST by Howlin (http://www.icomm.ca/dragon/image/hbook3.gif)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 367 | View Replies]

To: PhiKapMom
I thought you were posting for him -- that's how it came across to me. I have seen him post a lot of things about this Country that off the mark IMO.

I meant to respond to this as well and forgot...sorry.

It wasn't my intent to respond for him (I guess yonif is a "him" based on your pronoun). If you have prior experience, then perhaps I lack that perspective regarding this person's intent.

392 posted on 01/29/2004 8:16:59 PM PST by NittanyLion
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 375 | View Replies]

To: MEG33
Thanks

n/p. If a tagline distracts from the message, it's gone.

393 posted on 01/29/2004 8:17:11 PM PST by Lazamataz
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 372 | View Replies]

To: Ernest_at_the_Beach
I love that picture of Bush on the flight deck!!

CULTIST!!!!

Picture licker!!!

:-)

394 posted on 01/29/2004 8:17:43 PM PST by Howlin (http://www.icomm.ca/dragon/image/hbook3.gif)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 370 | View Replies]

To: Jim Robinson
Will Bush defend the right to life? Check

Sending our tax dollars to UNESCO is an attack on the right to life, not a defense. (It is also an attack on the pocketbooks of pro-lifers, too).

Signing the Bipartisan Campaign Finance Reform act is an attack on the freedom of speech.

Granting visas to illegal immigrants is a breach in the defense of our borders and an abdication of responsibility to uphold the law.

I agree with you that we should say no to the socialist Democrats, but we should also say no to people like Bush who usurp the Constitution and outspend the previous Democrat administrations.

Those who value the integrity of the Constitutional repuhblic should hold the presidency accountable and support someone who respects the oath of office. One such candidate is Michael Peroutka, and I ask that you would consider voting for him and offering him, or someone like him, your support.

395 posted on 01/29/2004 8:17:59 PM PST by The_Eaglet (Michael Peroutka for President)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ItisaReligionofPeace
I'm afraid that there is actually little difference between the Demicans and Republicrats. None of them actually believe in freedom.

I know the Dopertarians and the Constipation Party will save us from ourselves.. except, they genrally don't do a thing at the dog catcher level, let alone on a national level.

So, in the end, they are pointless exercises in marginalization.

396 posted on 01/29/2004 8:18:01 PM PST by gatorbait (Yesterday, today and tomorrow......The United States Army)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 140 | View Replies]

To: Lazamataz
But, lets be frank here. Even if we got hit with another 100 World-Trade-centers, that's only 300,000 citizens. Tragic, yes -- but we lost more people in World War Two, and the country went on.

you're all heart /s>

397 posted on 01/29/2004 8:18:10 PM PST by Mo1 (Join the dollar a day crowd now!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 384 | View Replies]

To: deport
Curious..... just who would you prefer to be elected? name and party if you have one?

In a perfect world, Harry Browne - Libertarian. Other than that, anybody but Bush.

398 posted on 01/29/2004 8:18:24 PM PST by Nanodik (Bush! The next best thing to a real "conservative")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 376 | View Replies]

To: NittanyLion
I, for one, appreciate your call for civility. Thanks.

IMO, GW is conservative on some things, esp. taxes and defending the country. Possibly free enterprise. But CFR, medicine handouts, amnesty, NEA, these things let me know that he is not conservative on others. Although I like and respect GW, I find he's getting a little difficult to define.

Still voting for him, though, the alternative is out of the question.
399 posted on 01/29/2004 8:18:45 PM PST by Sam Cree (Democrats are herd animals)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 362 | View Replies]

To: Jim Robinson
Brilliant piece of work, Jim. You simplified it, turned it into a refrain like Mike Kelley's famous "I believe." And in that sttaightforward way, you told the truth. That's the best there is.

John / Billybob

400 posted on 01/29/2004 8:19:17 PM PST by Congressman Billybob (www.ArmorforCongress.com Visit. Join. Help. Please.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-50 ... 301-350351-400401-450 ... 1,251-1,271 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson