Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Supreme Court Justice Ginsburg Warns Against Civil Rights Apathy
Associated Press ^ | 01/29/04 | GINA HOLLAND

Posted on 01/29/2004 8:22:03 PM PST by SF Geo

Justice Warns Against Civil Rights Apathy

By GINA HOLLAND, Associated Press Writer

NEW YORK - Supreme Court Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg said Thursday that people concerned about losing freedom to government anti-terrorism efforts should speak out.

The Supreme Court is taking up several terror-related cases this spring, including challenges to the government detention of terror suspects without legal rights.

Ginsburg, speaking to a group of women's rights lawyers, was asked if people's rights were in danger.

"On important issues, like the balance between liberty and security, if the public doesn't care, then the security side is going to overweigh the other," she said.

That would change, Ginsburg said, "if people come forward and say we are proud to live in the USA, a land that has been more free, and we want to keep it that way."

Ginsburg, who argued women's rights cases at the Supreme Court several decades before former President Clinton (news - web sites) named her to the court in 1993, said "an active public" made the difference in the victories of feminism.

Ginsburg, now 70 and one of the more liberal justices, won five of the six Supreme Court cases she argued. She was reunited Thursday with some of the clients she represented during an event held in her honor at the Association of the Bar of the City of New York.

"She was calling to our attention that work in women's rights, civil rights is under threat," said Lisalyn Jacobs, who handles government relations for the National Organization for Women (news - web sites)'s Legal Defense and Education Fund, which co-sponsored the event.

The Bush administration has been criticized by civil libertarians for some of its terror-fighting strategy, including the detentions of hundreds of foreigners at a military prison in Cuba and some U.S. citizens in America.

They are being held without charges or access to attorneys, something the government maintains is necessary for national security.

In April the Supreme Court will consider cases involving detainees in Cuba and America.

The court has refused to take up other cases stemming from the government's response to the Sept. 11, 2001, terrorist attacks, including the handling of immigrants swept up in the investigation.

___

On the Net:

Supreme Court: http://www.supremecourtus.gov/


TOPICS: Constitution/Conservatism; Culture/Society; Government
KEYWORDS: aclu; extremist; ginaholland; liberal; radical; ruthbaderginsburg; secondamendment; socialist; supremecourt
Never forget her when they diss a conservative supreme court appointee. These people must be stopped no matter what it takes!

Ginsburg's bio includes American Civil Liberties Union: Women's Rights Project, Founder and Counsel (1972-80); General Counsel (1973-80); National Board of Directors (1974-80).

1 posted on 01/29/2004 8:22:04 PM PST by SF Geo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: SF Geo
What she sees as apathy is more likely disgust with her twisted anti-freedom agenda.
2 posted on 01/29/2004 8:23:48 PM PST by SF Geo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SF Geo
American public warns Ginsberg about using foreign rulings in her decision making.

Impeachment is one solution to those "justices" that fail to be true to their oath.
3 posted on 01/29/2004 8:28:18 PM PST by 11B3 (Recycle the liberal masses into raw materials.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: 11B3
right on!
4 posted on 01/29/2004 8:31:15 PM PST by SF Geo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: SF Geo
She's basically made up her mind on these cases before even hearing a single argument. While that in itself doesn't surprise me in the least (name one liberal who bothers to trouble him/herself with facts), I find it sort of ominous that she chooses to so blatantly telegraph her decision. Makes me think she's certain that her fellow court Marxists already have O'Connor firmly in hand.
5 posted on 01/29/2004 8:32:47 PM PST by CFC__VRWC (AIDS, abortion, euthanasia - don't liberals just kill ya?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SF Geo
It seems that some in Washington think Scottish law should rule here.

WAKE UP CALL


6 posted on 01/29/2004 8:33:38 PM PST by Diogenesis (If you mess with one of us, you mess with all of us)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SF Geo
Will she need to recuse herself on those aforementioned cases since she has now spoken about the issue? Scalia recused himself after speaking out about "under God."
7 posted on 01/29/2004 9:33:58 PM PST by LiteKeeper
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: LiteKeeper
Ha Ha. That's a good one. A socialist with the integrity to recuse. Ho Ho. That is rich.
8 posted on 01/29/2004 9:38:59 PM PST by SF Geo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: SF Geo
Let us all remember that she is one of the five that decided to rip-up the 1st Amend. concerning political speech (McCain-Fiengold Campaign Law).
9 posted on 01/29/2004 10:06:59 PM PST by fini
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SF Geo
Ginsberg should recuse herself from future civil rights cases. Her words indicate pre-determination.
10 posted on 01/29/2004 10:41:31 PM PST by longtermmemmory (Vote!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: fini
Exactly. She's a total hypocrite.
11 posted on 01/29/2004 10:46:48 PM PST by B Knotts (Recall Arnold!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: SF Geo
Doesn't she realize there's a war on?
12 posted on 01/29/2004 10:46:49 PM PST by pasquale
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: CFC__VRWC
Which means that if the homosexual marriage issue comes before them, ginsberg will submit to them and do her part to destroy marriage.

This is why the FMA is needed. It takes it out of the Ginsbergs hands.
13 posted on 01/29/2004 10:50:55 PM PST by longtermmemmory (Vote!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: longtermmemmory
Supreme Court Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg Warns Against Civil Rights Apathy. -Gina Holland, Associated Press Writer

We need to fight the apathy of people who are sitting idly by while judges run roughshod over the law. Don't let judges change the definition of marriage. Resist their efforts to change America to their liking - who asked them, anyway?

14 posted on 01/29/2004 11:04:41 PM PST by NutCrackerBoy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

Comment #15 Removed by Moderator

To: 11B3
The next step in denying God's sovereignty over the United States will go to these nine people . .

"The question is or at least ought to be, how can such a small, godless, minority have such influence over our courts and legislative processes?"

Answer:

U.S. Supreme Court, 2003 - The Oligarchy*

(All Your Sovereignty Are Belong To Us!)

Justices of the Supreme Court

Back Row (left to right): Ginsburg, Souter, Thomas, Breyer
Front Row (left to right): Scalia, Stevens, Rehnquist, O'Connor, Kennedy

ol•i•gar•chy
Pronunciation: 'ä-l&-"gär-kE, 'O-
Function: noun
Inflected Form(s): plural -chies
Date: 1542
1 : government by the few
2 : a government in which a small group exercises control especially for corrupt and selfish purposes; also : a group exercising such control
3 : an organization under oligarchic control

sov•er•eign•ty
Variant(s): also sov•ran•ty /-tE/
Function: noun
Inflected Form(s): plural -ties
Etymology: Middle English soverainte, from Middle French soveraineté, from Old French, from soverain
Date: 14th century
1 obsolete : supreme excellence or an example of it
2 a : supreme power especially over a body politic b : freedom from external control : AUTONOMY c : controlling influence
3 : one that is SOVEREIGN; especially : an autonomous state


16 posted on 01/30/2004 12:15:36 AM PST by Happy2BMe (U.S. borders - Controlled by CORRUPT Politicians and Slave-Labor Employers)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: SF Geo
This is LAUGHABLE!

This idiot ruled that we have no rights to freedom of speech (a la CFR) and now whines about "Civil Rights Apathy".

What a hypocrite!
17 posted on 01/30/2004 5:47:30 AM PST by jimkress (Save America from the tyranny of Republican/Democrat hegemony. Support the Constitution Party.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SF Geo
How about a right to life, Ms Ginsburg?
18 posted on 01/30/2004 5:48:17 AM PST by AppyPappy (If You're Not A Part Of The Solution, There's Good Money To Be Made In Prolonging The Problem.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SF Geo
Let's see--Estrada was not confirmed because of his "conservative activist views", but this witch can promote her liberal activist views publicly as a sitting justice?
19 posted on 01/30/2004 5:51:48 AM PST by freeangel (freeangel)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SF Geo
Also, wasn't it Ruth Bader Ginsburg who, as an official with the ACLU (I believe she was its General Counsel at the time), said the age of consent for enganging in sex acts should be 12 years of age?
20 posted on 01/30/2004 5:55:15 AM PST by ought-six
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SF Geo
Now I Hope GINSBURG is forced to RECUSE herself from any and all cases involving the Terrorist Act.

You know, like Scalia recused himself recently.

She's a Bolshevik B#tch, another gift from Klinton.
21 posted on 01/30/2004 6:09:32 AM PST by ZULU (GOD BLESS SENATOR JOE MCCARTHY!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Anubus
I think it is pretty clear she lost the battle with the stick. Lost BAD! I hate marxists, truely evil.
22 posted on 01/30/2004 7:44:11 AM PST by SF Geo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: SF Geo
"By GINA HOLLAND, Associated Press Writer "

"Strother-Duffy-Strother is the "Oldest Existing Democratic Media Firm." This distinction comes from more than 20 years of experience and the ability to win tough campaigns despite long odds. A combination of seasoned political experience, successful media strategies and young, creative talent helps us position our candidates and develop the key messages that resonate with voters. "

http://www.magnoliareport.com/report20.html
"Gina Holland and George Shelton will be married on May 4. Shelton was communications director for Governor Ronnie Musgrove's 1999 campaign and later went on to work for the Democratic Governors Association and now is employed as a political consultant with the firm Strother-Duffy-Strother in Washington, DC. Holland is Mississippi's former Associated Press correspondent and currently serves as the AP's national writer covering the Supreme Court. "

It's so good of AP to make sure that they have nonpolitical coverage of the Supreme Court- "nonpolitical" as defined by Strother-Duffy-Strother.

23 posted on 01/30/2004 9:34:00 AM PST by mrsmith
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson