Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

The Real Homosexual Lobby
WND.com ^ | 02-02-04 | Farah, Joseph

Posted on 02/02/2004 6:35:44 AM PST by Theodore R.

The real homosexual lobby

Posted: February 2, 2004 1:00 a.m. Eastern

© 2004 WorldNetDaily.com

The Democratic National Committee is counting heavily on a high turnout of homosexual voters to elect its nominee president in 2004.

According to the DNC's "Pride at the Polls" campaign, "gays, lesbians, bisexual and transgendered" voters totaled 4.2 million in the 2000 campaign.

That number may sound impressive at first glance. But given the fact that more than 105 million Americans voted in that presidential election, we see this special-interest group represents only a tiny 3.9 percent of voters.

Add to this that homosexual activists have been boasting for years that their constituents are far more likely to vote than the average American and we begin to see the truth about the homosexual lobby.

Electorally speaking, it is a paper tiger. It is more myth than reality. The numbers of homosexuals have been inflated for years. It is a fringe vote.

The homosexual activists own numbers, in this case, confirm what serious researchers on sexuality have long maintained: Homosexuals don't represent 10 or 15 percent of the population as they like to suggest, but something more like 2 to 4 percent.

In other words, not only are the Democrats and homosexual activists promoting a degenerate, immoral and sinful lifestyle, they are also lying about how widespread that lifestyle is to perpetrate a political fraud on the American people.

No wonder there's been some public opinion backlash against homosexuals and their politics.

Following the U.S. Supreme Court ruling last June striking down Texas' anti-sodomy laws, the decision was perceived by many as judicial push for the agenda of homosexual political activists eager to see their lifestyle not only accepted nationwide, but promoted by government and major cultural institutions.

Defenders of the Texas law had contended the ultimate goal of the case was not to end sodomy laws, but to advance the "ambitious agenda" of homosexual activists. Justice Antonin Scalia, in a scathing dissent, agreed.

"The court has largely signed on to the so-called homosexual agenda," he wrote.

The public seems to agree as well.

Asked whether same-sex relations between consenting adults should be legal, 48 percent in the new survey said yes, while 46 percent said no.

Prior to the ruling in early May, the ratio peaked at 60 percent in favor, 35 percent opposed. In other words, the ruling may have had just the opposite of its intended effect.

According to the numbers, 49 percent of respondents said homosexuality should not be considered "an acceptable alternative lifestyle," while 46 percent said it should. This marks the first time since 1997 that more people were opposed.

Fifty-seven percent polled said they opposed civil unions – the most opposition since the question was first asked in 2000 – while 40 percent voiced support.

Is public opinion still important when the courts are taking the matter out of the hands of the people? You bet it is. In fact, the majority opinion in the historic Supreme Court decision in the Texas case even cited growing public acceptance of homosexuality as a basis of its ruling.

At a time when more and more people are beginning to agree that basic morality is simply a matter for the public to decide through politics, numbers do count.

When I have asked homosexual activists if the rules about privacy and consent they cite apply to polygamists, those who practice incest, pedophiles, etc., they say there is simply no demand for those practices.

But for how long will that be true?

Polygamists are already getting organized and practitioners number in the tens of thousands in America right now. Just imagine how many more might like to practice it.

It's coming. That's the future. Just watch the news.

That's how America decides what is right and wrong today – based on public-opinion polls and the clout of narrow, special-interest groups.

It was once true in America that our laws were based on such things as the Ten Commandments and biblical law. That is no longer the case. Today, it is simply based on which way the wind is blowing. And the wind is to the backs of the homosexual /transsexual /cross-gendered lobby. They've got America fooled. They've got America hoodwinked. They've got a major voice not just in one political party but in both.

Why? Are there no eternal truths anymore? Is there no right and wrong? Is it all just a question of pop-culture whim?

Today, homosexuals not only are a protected class of people based on their sexual behavior, they are a celebrated group of people on television, in movies, in books and in the media. They are portrayed as heroes, quite literally. And what places them in that category is what they do in their bedrooms – and sometimes in public restrooms.


TOPICS: Culture/Society
KEYWORDS: 2004; antifamily; antimarriage; backlash; degenerateamericans; dnc; farah; gayvote; homosexual; homosexualagenda; homosexuals; lavendermafia; lawrencevtexas; liberalism; polygamists; popculture; popularity; prisoners; scalia; sodomy; thednc; voterdrives

1 posted on 02/02/2004 6:35:46 AM PST by Theodore R.
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Theodore R.
Homosexuality is part of the culture of death. The lifestyle is a public health problem, with the great majority if new AIDS cases in the West still attributed to homosexual lifestyle practices. The rates of hepatitis (for both types A and B) are much higher for homosexuals than for the general population. Most significantly, a Dutch study revealed that after fifty years of high toleration for the lifestyle in the Netherlands, homosexuals were still more than twice as likely to commit suicide than heterosexuals.

It's ironic that liberal DemocRats seem to be killing their own consituencies. Liberals abort their young to increase their lifestyle options, and in so doing destroy what presumably would be a voter influenced by liberal parents to vote liberally. Not only do homosexuals have no children of their own naturally, but the lifestyle generally results in significantly shortened years of life...and so, years of voting. If it weren't so tragic, the irony would be delicious.

2 posted on 02/02/2004 6:52:18 AM PST by TheGeezer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Theodore R.
Homosexuals don't represent 10 or 15 percent of the population as they like to suggest, but something more like 2 to 4 percent.
 
This is the biggest fraud foisted on the American public today.  The gay lobby commissions polls which ask questions like "Have you ever had a dream about gay sex", "Do you own a pink shirt", or "Have you ever seen Steel Magnolias" and if the answer is affirmative the conclusion is "You're gay."
 
Prior to the ruling in early May, the ratio peaked at 60 percent in favor, 35 percent opposed. In other words, the ruling may have had just the opposite of its intended effect.
 
The "Summer of Sodomy" exposed the homosexual agenda and their reckless behavior in the public domain will be their undoing.  The American public does not support the right of homosexual to fornicate in public or wish to afford them access to their adolescent sons.  The push back that they are going to see will stun them and their only weapon, screaming "homophobia" has been so over used, that it's nearly impotent.

3 posted on 02/02/2004 6:55:00 AM PST by South Hawthorne ("24 hours in a day, 24 beers in a case. Coincidence? I think not.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Theodore R.
read later
4 posted on 02/02/2004 7:20:34 AM PST by LiteKeeper
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Theodore R.
The truth of the matter is that homosexual activists -- although small in number -- wield extraordinary influence for several reasons.

1. They are absolutely dedicated to their cause (which is to be accepted as "normal," and then some).

2. They work hard to get into influential positions in hierarchical organizations, and thus can influence policies without need for popular buy-in.

3. They have much more disposable income.

4. They are riding the crest of the cultural wave that tries to make sexual expression superior to anything else.

5. Liberals are sympathetic to homosexuals, and are willing to give them ample air time.

5 posted on 02/02/2004 7:27:36 AM PST by r9etb
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: little jeremiah
Ping
6 posted on 02/02/2004 7:49:17 AM PST by EdReform (Free Republic - Now more than ever! Thank you for your support!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Theodore R.
But given the fact that more than 105 million Americans voted in that presidential election, we see this special-interest group represents only a tiny 3.9 percent of voters.

4% of the vote is extremely significant. Even assuming that those 4% had not voted for any candidate, it would have given Bush a comfortable victory in 2000, no doubt.

7 posted on 02/02/2004 7:52:00 AM PST by Zack Nguyen
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Zack Nguyen
4% of the vote is extremely significant. Even assuming that those 4% had not voted for any candidate, it would have given Bush a comfortable victory in 2000, no doubt.

That 4% is not a solid voting bloc. Remember the Log Cabin Republicans.

8 posted on 02/02/2004 8:02:59 AM PST by Between the Lines ("What Goes Into the Mind Comes Out in a Life")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: r9etb; Grampa Dave; scripter; ArGee
I agree with the reasons you listed. However, the homosexual community's biggest victory came when they infiltrated the APA and got homosexuality delisted from the DSM ( APA Documentation ).

The homosexual community's well planned, well funded propaganda campaign has been going on for years, as documented in the following references:

The Overhauling of Straight America

The Homosexual Propaganda and Media Manipulation Game


Homosexual Agenda: Categorical Index of Links (Version 1.1)
Homosexual Agenda: Categorical Index of Links (Version 1.0)
Homosexual Agenda Index (bump list)
Homosexual Agenda Keyword Search

9 posted on 02/02/2004 8:14:18 AM PST by EdReform (Free Republic - Now more than ever! Thank you for your support!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Theodore R.
The homofoam will be thick enough to do the carpets on this thread.
10 posted on 02/02/2004 11:12:29 AM PST by gcruse (http://gcruse.typepad.com/)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: *Homosexual Agenda; little jeremiah; scripter; GrandMoM; backhoe; Yehuda; Clint N. Suhks; ...
Ping (little jeremiah is busy today)


Homosexual Agenda: Categorical Index of Links (Version 1.1)
Homosexual Agenda: Categorical Index of Links (Version 1.0)
Homosexual Agenda Index (bump list)
Homosexual Agenda Keyword Search

11 posted on 02/02/2004 11:31:43 AM PST by EdReform (Free Republic - Now more than ever! Thank you for your support!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: *Homosexual Agenda; EdReform; scripter; GrandMoM; backhoe; Yehuda; Clint N. Suhks; saradippity; ...
Homosexual Agenda Ping -
Been off duty today (off of FR, that is...) so I'm late with these. Haven't had time to read yet.

If anyone wants on or off etc etc = do pingify me!

Please ask your brains to cooperate and we will have an interactive activist thread SOON!
12 posted on 02/02/2004 6:28:41 PM PST by little jeremiah
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: EdReform
Sorry - I didn't realize you already pung'em!

(Thanks much.)
13 posted on 02/02/2004 6:35:24 PM PST by little jeremiah
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: Theodore R.
The Democratic National Committee is counting heavily on a high turnout of homosexual voters to elect its nominee president in 2004.

And so the DemocRAT Party is officially the Pervert Party.

Now, the Republican Party needs to disenfranchise the Log Cabin Republicans because these perverts will never keep their logs where they belong.

14 posted on 02/03/2004 4:58:38 AM PST by JesseHousman (Execute Mumia Abu-Jamal)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: r9etb
3. They have much more disposable income.

Why save any when you don't know how long (due to your insne, perverted lifestyle) you'll be around?

15 posted on 02/03/2004 5:00:45 AM PST by JesseHousman (Execute Mumia Abu-Jamal)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Theodore R.
There is no threat to our President from the so called "gay" rights lobby. Mr. Bush has the Lord on his side, and after so many young lives have been lost in the Crusade against the Islamists, Americans will rally around the flag. Who cares about a few sodomists?
16 posted on 02/03/2004 6:41:19 PM PST by reborn22
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson