Skip to comments.
'Senator Kerry would seek direct talks with Iran'
Iran Mania ^
| 02.07.04
| Unknown
Posted on 02/07/2004 1:58:08 AM PST by kcvl
'Senator Kerry would seek direct talks with Iran'
Saturday, February 07, 2004 - ©2003 IranMania.com
Washington, Feb 6 (IranMania) -- According to Irans State News Agency (IRNA) democratic presidential hopeful John Kerry will seek direct talks with Iran if he wins the White House, his foreign policy chief said.
Rand Beers, national security issues coordinator for the Massachusetts senator, was critical of President George W Bush for shunning direct dialogue with Iran after branding it a member of an "axis of evil," dispatches indicated.
Speaking to a foreign policy forum, Beers said the question of nuclear non-proliferation was one of the most significant issues facing the world and Washington should press harder to advance negotiations.
Beers said Kerry, currently leading the pack in the race for the Democratic presidential nomination, sought more direct efforts to thaw relations with Iran that have been frozen since the 1979 Islamic Revolution.
"John Kerry is not saying that he is looking for better relations with Iran. He is looking for a dialogue with Iran," Beers said. "There are some issues on which we really need to sit down with the Iranians."
He listed the cultivation of opium poppies in neighboring Afghanistan, terrorism and nuclear non-proliferation as among the questions Kerry would like to take up directly with Tehran.
"It`s a realistic sitting down and having the kinds of discussions that we`re just not having because this administration is so tied in its own ideological views of Iran and waiting for the Iranian regime to collapse."
He said Kerry would want to work with a "broad range of countries" to stem the traffic in materials that could fall into the wrong hands and help make nuclear, biological or chemical weapons.
"We`re going to have look at international (non-proliferation) regimes that currently exist and probably go through some revisions of those regimes in order to find a way to approach and address
TOPICS: News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: 2004; iran; johnkerry; southasia
John Kerry will seek direct talks with Iran if he wins the White House
1
posted on
02/07/2004 1:58:08 AM PST
by
kcvl
To: kcvl
What an idiot.
To: kcvl
Direct talks with a regime (that is unpopular with the masses and is doing everything to hang on to power) will do nothing but slow the revolution.
Another liberal plan for appeasement.
Of course Mr Kerry is great at changing colors.
3
posted on
02/07/2004 2:12:41 AM PST
by
chachacha
To: CasearianDaoist
Perhaps Kerry can have a "sit down" with Kim and find out how much treasure it requires to get Kim to pretend to stop nuclear armament of North Korea.
Maybe he can invite Arafat for sleepovers at the White House again.
Disband the State Dept..except for a liason to the UN.It can decide foreign policy for the US.
4
posted on
02/07/2004 3:00:03 AM PST
by
MEG33
(BUSH/CHENEY '04)
To: MEG33; AmericanInTokyo
the right ait ping :)
and bump
5
posted on
02/07/2004 3:10:37 AM PST
by
risk
To: F14 Pilot
Here is a discussion on the article.
6
posted on
02/07/2004 3:14:16 AM PST
by
MEG33
(BUSH/CHENEY '04)
To: MEG33
And maybe Tuh-ra-za can share a hug with Mrs. Terrorist like Mrs. Clintoon did.
7
posted on
02/07/2004 3:18:13 AM PST
by
beckysueb
(Lady Liberty is in danger! Bush/Cheney 04.)
To: beckysueb
That certainly works well,we see...;(
8
posted on
02/07/2004 3:19:40 AM PST
by
MEG33
(BUSH/CHENEY '04)
To: kcvl
John "Frenchy" Kerry wants your vote for prez so he can get real nice and cozy with the terrorists so they won't want to hurt us any more. And we though bill and hill were bad.
9
posted on
02/07/2004 3:19:56 AM PST
by
dc-zoo
To: kcvl
John Kerry will seek direct talks with Iran if he wins the White House And will his special envoy will be Jimmy Carter?
To: kcvl
Smart move, just give them time to work on that nuclear weapons technology they 'bought' from the paki rat-traitor.
And aren't the mad mullahs about to host a big "Ayatollah Day" bash with invites to all the worlds terrorists orgs?
The most effective way to end war and ensure peace is to kill the enemy.
End terrorism, kill terrorists.
11
posted on
02/07/2004 3:44:41 AM PST
by
MrBambaLaMamba
(Buy 'Allah' brand urinal cakes - If you can't kill the eneny at least you can piss on their god)
To: kcvl
I can't wait for this election. No opinion polls, no surveys, just referendum or mandate. It's gonna be mandate, or else we're not worthy to call ourselves American.
12
posted on
02/07/2004 3:47:38 AM PST
by
risk
To: DoctorZIn; McGavin999; freedom44; nuconvert; Eala; AdmSmith; dixiechick2000; onyx; Pro-Bush; ...
Ping you all again here!
13
posted on
02/07/2004 3:57:03 AM PST
by
F14 Pilot
("Terrorists declared war on U.S. and War is what they Got!")
To: chachacha
Right, here is another one he had direct talks with:

14
posted on
02/07/2004 3:57:56 AM PST
by
W04Man
(Bush2004 Grassroots Campaign visit W-04.com for FREE STICKERS)
To: MEG33
Disband the State Dept..except for a liason to the UN.It can decide foreign policy for the US.Yep, good call Meg. State is riddled with liberals and Clintonistas. They are a drag on US politics.
15
posted on
02/07/2004 4:07:32 AM PST
by
cardinal4
(Hillary and Clark rhymes with Ft Marcy park...)
To: cardinal4
I have no love for a lot of career State Dept. employees , for they often forget the US is the country whose interests are to be attended,not the country they are working in overseas!
I ,however do not wish to turn foreign policy over to the UN..they certainly don't want to advance the interests of the US!
16
posted on
02/07/2004 4:13:55 AM PST
by
MEG33
(BUSH/CHENEY '04)
To: kcvl
Senator Kerry would seek direct talks with IranAnd shortly thereafter hand over United States security over to the U.N. - where it will be determined that we must pay reparations to Iran and North Korea for including it in "The Axis of Evil".
17
posted on
02/07/2004 4:16:39 AM PST
by
capydick
("it's time for America to wake up and smell the Kerry".)
To: F14 Pilot
"Rand Beers, national security issues coordinator for the Massachusetts senator, was critical of President George W Bush for shunning direct dialogue with Iran after branding it a member of an "axis of evil," dispatches indicated."Good riddance to anyone that thinks you can reason with terrorists. I guess we're not understanding and sympathizing with why they hate us.
Info on Beers link: Ex-Bush Aide: Terror War A Bust
18
posted on
02/07/2004 4:22:07 AM PST
by
windchime
(Podesta about Bush: "He's got four years to try to undo all the stuff we've done." (TIME-1/22/01))
To: windchime
I have a question from Mr. Kerry and that is if he is ready to talk directly with a few un-elected Mullahs in Tehran and forget the Iranian freedom fighters?
19
posted on
02/07/2004 4:24:59 AM PST
by
F14 Pilot
("Terrorists declared war on U.S. and War is what they Got!")
To: kcvl
He might as well seek direct talks with Santa Claus, the Tooth Fairy and Easter Bunny as well. All those conferences would be about as effective as talking to Iran.
20
posted on
02/07/2004 4:26:21 AM PST
by
Beck_isright
(" I cannot vote for a liberal whatever his party label happens to be."-Lazamataz, FR 2004)
To: kcvl
John F'n Kerry, the French-looking appeaser, wants to legitimize an evil regime that is about to collapse, much like his bid for the presidency.
21
posted on
02/07/2004 4:30:43 AM PST
by
PGalt
To: cardinal4
Can't the new president fire all former administration employees? And if so, I wonder why President Bush didn't just fire all these Clinton troublemakers when he took office.
22
posted on
02/07/2004 4:34:43 AM PST
by
beckysueb
(Lady Liberty is in danger! Bush/Cheney 04.)
To: F14 Pilot
Apparently. The Mullahs that are hosting the party for international terrorists would surely be receptive to our requests.
23
posted on
02/07/2004 4:35:12 AM PST
by
windchime
(Podesta about Bush: "He's got four years to try to undo all the stuff we've done." (TIME-1/22/01))
To: PGalt
perhaps, he is getting support, money and other aids from them? Who knows?
24
posted on
02/07/2004 4:36:28 AM PST
by
F14 Pilot
("Terrorists declared war on U.S. and War is what they Got!")
To: kcvl
I see Kerry's still channelling Neville Chamberlain.
25
posted on
02/07/2004 4:36:36 AM PST
by
mewzilla
To: F14 Pilot
Bumper sticker:
Bush or Kerry: Which one would the mullahs vote for?
To: windchime
I love your tagline!
27
posted on
02/07/2004 4:39:04 AM PST
by
beckysueb
(Lady Liberty is in danger! Bush/Cheney 04.)
To: kcvl
Well let's put him on his former boat he used in Vietnam and send him on his way.
To: kcvl
John Kerry will seek direct talks with Iran if he wins the White House
=
Back to the good old days of Carter and Clinton
29
posted on
02/07/2004 4:39:43 AM PST
by
DoctorMichael
(Thats my story, and I'm sticking to it.)
To: F14 Pilot
I was thinking the same thing. Given this article he may be pandering for money from friends of our enemies, enemies of freedom.
30
posted on
02/07/2004 4:42:19 AM PST
by
PGalt
To: Don'tMessWithTexas
They'll vote for Kerry, for sure.
31
posted on
02/07/2004 4:42:59 AM PST
by
F14 Pilot
("Terrorists declared war on U.S. and War is what they Got!")
To: mewzilla
LOL..great!
32
posted on
02/07/2004 4:44:28 AM PST
by
MEG33
(BUSH/CHENEY '04)
To: MEG33

Johnny's hero...
33
posted on
02/07/2004 4:46:44 AM PST
by
mewzilla
To: kcvl
UNILATERAL TALKS, without the UN.........
Horrors!
34
posted on
02/07/2004 4:51:29 AM PST
by
OldFriend
(Always understand, even if you remain among the few)
To: ambrose
35
posted on
02/07/2004 4:51:29 AM PST
by
F14 Pilot
("Terrorists declared war on U.S. and War is what they Got!")
To: All
This is the original piece of News from the IRNA News Agency --- Pilot
Senator Kerry would seek direct talks with Iran: adviser
IRNA
6 Feb 2004
Washington, Feb 6, IRNA -- Democratic presidential hopeful John Kerry
will seek direct talks with Iran if he wins the White House, his
foreign policy chief said Thursday.
Rand Beers, national security issues coordinator for the
Massachusetts senator, was critical of President George W. Bush for
shunning direct dialogue with Iran after branding it a member of an
"axis of evil," dispatches indicated.
Speaking to a foreign policy forum, Beers said the question of
nuclear non-proliferation was one of the most significant issues
facing the world and Washington should press harder to advance
negotiations.
Beers said Kerry, currently leading the pack in the race for the
Democratic presidential nomination, sought more direct efforts to thaw
relations with Iran that have been frozen since the 1979 Islamic
Revolution.
"John Kerry is not saying that he is looking for better relations
with Iran. He is looking for a dialogue with Iran," Beers said. "There
are some issues on which we really need to sit down with the
Iranians."
He listed the cultivation of opium poppies in neighboring
Afghanistan, terrorism and nuclear non-proliferation as among the
questions Kerry would like to take up directly with Tehran.
"It`s a realistic sitting down and having the kinds of discussions
that we`re just not having because this administration is so tied in
its own ideological views of Iran and waiting for the Iranian regime
to collapse."
He said Kerry would want to work with a "broad range of countries"
to stem the traffic in materials that could fall into the wrong hands
and help make nuclear, biological or chemical weapons.
"We`re going to have look at international (non-proliferation)
regimes that currently exist and probably go through some revisions of
those regimes in order to find a way to approach and address these
problems," Beers said.
http://www.irna.ir/?LANG=EN&PART=_HOME&TYPE=HP#2004_02_0618_59_176
36
posted on
02/07/2004 4:54:54 AM PST
by
F14 Pilot
("Terrorists declared war on U.S. and War is what they Got!")
To: F14 Pilot
Well, Kerry's got the Islamist vote locked up. Wonder if he's taking their money, too..?
37
posted on
02/07/2004 4:56:17 AM PST
by
mewzilla
To: PGalt
Considering that Kerry took campaign money from a lobbyist for the Iraqi Baathist regime...I think you are correct.
38
posted on
02/07/2004 4:57:48 AM PST
by
piasa
(Attitude adjustments offered here free of charge.)
To: kcvl
"It`s a realistic sitting down and having the kinds of discussions that we`re just not having because this administration is so tied in its own ideological views of Iran and waiting for the Iranian regime to collapse."
Ideological views of Iran?
"We`re going to have look at international (non-proliferation) regimes that currently exist and probably go through some revisions of those regimes in order to find a way to approach and address"
Go thru revisions of regimes?
What the heck is he talking about?
39
posted on
02/07/2004 5:06:28 AM PST
by
nuconvert
("Why do you have to be a nonconformist like everybody else?")
To: mewzilla
Why not??? He is happy with the helps from the Mullahs.
I am sure he is getting money or different kinds of support from them and he made them sure about their safety.
40
posted on
02/07/2004 5:08:53 AM PST
by
F14 Pilot
("Terrorists declared war on U.S. and War is what they Got!")
To: F14 Pilot
There have been articles to this affect. He has taken money from pro-regime groups in located U.S..
BWT - like your 'Rat Pack' pic lol
41
posted on
02/07/2004 5:14:58 AM PST
by
nuconvert
("Why do you have to be a nonconformist like everybody else?")
To: nuconvert
"Revisions of regimes?"How..do we revise other countries' regimes?Is he going to use assassintion or(horrors) military invasion?
42
posted on
02/07/2004 5:27:49 AM PST
by
MEG33
(BUSH/CHENEY '04)
To: kcvl
I always suspected Kerry had a drinking problem and now i find out he can't handle his Beers.
43
posted on
02/07/2004 8:15:25 AM PST
by
hflynn
To: F14 Pilot
Freedom now ~ Bump!
44
posted on
02/07/2004 12:41:30 PM PST
by
blackie
(Be Well~Be Armed~Be Safe~Molon Labe!)
To: F14 Pilot
Bump!
To: beckysueb
Thanks! It's just my little reminder that with the many accomplishments of President Bush that we can see, in addition, he's also had to address the equivalent of 'leftist landmines'. From Podesta's statement, it seems they tried to lay enough of them to occupy 100% of President Bush's time.History of Tagline: Rolling Back Clinton
Excerpt: One morning at the nub end of Bill Clinton's presidency, Clinton chief of staff John Podesta walked into a senior staff meeting in the Roosevelt Room waving a copy of USA Today. Holding the paper aloft, Podesta read the headline out loud, "Clinton actions annoy Bush." The article detailed the new rules and Executive Orders the outgoing President was issuing in his final days, actions aimed in equal measure at locking in Clinton's legacy (in areas like environmental protection) and bedeviling his successor. "What's Bush so annoyed about?" Podesta asked with a devilish smile. "He's got four years to try to undo all the stuff we've done."
46
posted on
02/07/2004 4:25:04 PM PST
by
windchime
(Podesta about Bush: "He's got four years to try to undo all the stuff we've done." (TIME-1/22/01))
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson