Free Republic
Browse · Search
Topics · Post Article

To: longtermmemmory
=== It may be a simple as teaching children that homsexuality is wrong.

I think you're going to have to dig deeper than that and not only tell them why heterosexuality is right but figure out a way to frame it as exclusive and sacred AND procreative.

Rotsa ruck.

I'm stage-managing a little play by a braindead Tennesse Williams right now. One of the actors picked up on the fact that homosexuality's perpetually a "dirty" thing in the play.

NONE of the actors understand this to have been the case for at least 25 years and offered that gays 35 and under have no comprehension whatsoever of anything but Pride in their homosexuality ... "things have changed!"

All the "pride" indoctrination by organic intellectuals aside for a moment (it's not really THAT effective without some substantive kernel of truth) ... Homosexuality hasn't changed in the last generation.

What's changed is heterosexuality.

It's heterosexuality that's been "liberated" to the homosexual model. Evidence abounds on this conservative forum where patriots commonly glamorize or at least rationalize the "stress relief" of our troops at brothels, husbands and boyfriends ogle strangely boyish but big-boobed images like Gay Porn afficionados -- shoving it the faces of all and sundry with the audacity of queens humping each other in a gay pride parade, birth control is a GIVEN even among so-called "pro-lifers" who can't seem to understand that acceptance of the birth-control mentality as a "right" cannot possibly stop short of the "failsafe" birth control which only selective homicide assures.
24 posted on 02/11/2004 11:14:25 PM PST by Askel5
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies ]

To: Askel5
Does anyone here know how many homosexuals are writers and producers in Hollywood and the New York media? I know about the producer of Sex and the City, Jason Michael Patrick, but I don't know how many others of the writers of that series are gay. I heard that at least half of them were. I believe Sex and the City should receive the Devil's Prize for promoting irresponsible sex throughout America, and creating an image of America for the rest of the world that is decadent and totally materialistic.

This is one of the other purposes of homosexual activists -- to promote heterosexual irresponsibility in order to "desensitize" people to the sex act.

It seems clear that the women on Sex and the City, especially the one named Samantha, were really just the alter-egoes of the homosexual writers who would like nothing more than to hump and jump on every good looking male that comes along. And to do so with verve and the applause of the entire country! Wow, what a rush for a homosexual activist that would be. But they had to dress up their alter-egoes in beautiful women's bodies in order to pass it off to the country.

The more they can desensitize Americans, especially American women, to the spiritual significance of sexual intercourse, the better for the homosexual agenda. That's one reason so many movies are so offensive to me.

Anybody seen the "American Pie" movies? That is another example of the promotion of trash-sex, aimed directly at teenagers. Of course, they are all "R" rated but their target audience is definitely between 14 and 18.

Perhaps someone could offer more names of writers/producers/directors in the mainstream media who are homosexual activists. I think we should OUT them!

175 posted on 02/24/2004 9:52:00 AM PST by Laura Lee (Gays in the media)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794 is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson