Posted on 02/12/2004 12:22:24 AM PST by ParsifalCA
The fiscal news out of the White House continues to be appalling. Last week, the Bush administration admitted that the recently enacted $400-billion prescription-drug program would actually cost $534 billion. This week President Bush submits a record $2.4 trillion budget proposal to Congress. Federal spending is spinning out of control and a key reason is Mr. Bush's flawed fiscal philosophy.
The president has been right on target when it comes to taxes and their effect on the economy. Because of Mr. Bush's persistence, federal income taxes have been lowered, the marriage penalty has been reduced, the death tax is being phased out, and taxes on capital gains and stock dividends have been cut. The economy has responded with higher growth and increased productivity.
Yet Mr. Bush fails to tie his tax cutting to anything resembling spending discipline.
The president seems to believe that if something is a noble cause, then it is worth spending the people's money on it. Besides his costly prescription-drug program, Mr. Bush wants to spend billions of tax dollars on new government initiatives ranging from a manned moon mission to programs to strengthen marriages.
The president seems not to realize fully that taxation and spending policies are more than just fiscal tools to improve economic performance or address group demands, but rather determine the extent of individual liberty in our society. In this regard, Mr. Bush would do well to heed the advice of Milton Friedman, who has always supported tax cuts for more than just their effect on the economy. A few years ago, he wrote:
"I have long favored cutting taxes at any time, in any manner, by as much as possible as the only way of bringing effective pressure on Congress to cut spending. Like every teenager, Congress will spend whatever revenue it receives plus as much more as it collectively believes it can get away with. Reducing spending requires cutting its allowance."
Mr. Bush, however, has not used lower taxes as leverage to cut Congress's allowance, but has acted like the parent that gives his child everything she wants. Looking back on past federal budget agreements, Dr. Friedman pointed out that cuts in taxes were not financed by cuts in government spending but actually called for higher spending. He noted, "The hypothetical balance is to be brought about by higher tax revenue, not by lower spending." This supply-side effect, though, does not address the impact of increased government spending on individual liberty.
For Dr. Friedman, taxation and spending policies are not ends in themselves, but rather, "are means to the ultimate objective of increasing the freedom of the individual to use their resources in accordance with their own values - as President Reagan put it, to get government to get off our back."
To get government off our backs, spending, in addition to taxation, must be curtailed. Dr. Friedman's recommendation: "A real cut in direct and indirect government spending as a fraction of national income is required to achieve that basic objective."
Expansionist government, even if pursuing noble causes, reduces our freedom. That is why the current federal spending spree is not just a budget issue, but a freedom issue. Mr. Bush must rediscover the importance of limited government to the maintenance of a free people and the promotion of a free society.
Listen to Friedman Advice for Mr. Bush... [Lance T. Izumi] 2/10/04
The fiscal news out of the White House continues to be appalling. Last week, the Bush administration admitted that the recently enacted $400-billion prescription-drug program would actually cost $534 billion. This week President Bush submits a record $2.4 trillion budget proposal to Congress. Federal spending is spinning out of control and a key reason is Mr. Bush's flawed fiscal philosophy.
The president has been right on target when it comes to taxes and their effect on the economy. Because of Mr. Bush's persistence, federal income taxes have been lowered, the marriage penalty has been reduced, the death tax is being phased out, and taxes on capital gains and stock dividends have been cut. The economy has responded with higher growth and increased productivity.
Yet Mr. Bush fails to tie his tax cutting to anything resembling spending discipline.
The president seems to believe that if something is a noble cause, then it is worth spending the people's money on it. Besides his costly prescription-drug program, Mr. Bush wants to spend billions of tax dollars on new government initiatives ranging from a manned moon mission to programs to strengthen marriages.
The president seems not to realize fully that taxation and spending policies are more than just fiscal tools to improve economic performance or address group demands, but rather determine the extent of individual liberty in our society. In this regard, Mr. Bush would do well to heed the advice of Milton Friedman, who has always supported tax cuts for more than just their effect on the economy. A few years ago, he wrote:
"I have long favored cutting taxes at any time, in any manner, by as much as possible as the only way of bringing effective pressure on Congress to cut spending. Like every teenager, Congress will spend whatever revenue it receives plus as much more as it collectively believes it can get away with. Reducing spending requires cutting its allowance."
Mr. Bush, however, has not used lower taxes as leverage to cut Congress's allowance, but has acted like the parent that gives his child everything she wants. Looking back on past federal budget agreements, Dr. Friedman pointed out that cuts in taxes were not financed by cuts in government spending but actually called for higher spending. He noted, "The hypothetical balance is to be brought about by higher tax revenue, not by lower spending." This supply-side effect, though, does not address the impact of increased government spending on individual liberty.
For Dr. Friedman, taxation and spending policies are not ends in themselves, but rather, "are means to the ultimate objective of increasing the freedom of the individual to use their resources in accordance with their own values - as President Reagan put it, to get government to get off our back."
To get government off our backs, spending, in addition to taxation, must be curtailed. Dr. Friedman's recommendation: "A real cut in direct and indirect government spending as a fraction of national income is required to achieve that basic objective."
Expansionist government, even if pursuing noble causes, reduces our freedom. That is why the current federal spending spree is not just a budget issue, but a freedom issue. Mr. Bush must rediscover the importance of limited government to the maintenance of a free people and the promotion of a free society.
>Lance Izumi is Director of Education Studies for the Pacific Research Institute and Senior Fellow in California Studies.
Washington Times - 01/23/04 - Spending under Mr. Bush has been coming down drastically, [White House spokesman]Mr. [Trent] Duffy said.."In Bill Clinton's last year, fiscal year 2001, the growth rate in this category was 15 percent."
Mr. Bush trimmed spending growth in the non-homeland security, nondefense category, to 6 percent, then to 5 percent, and then, in the omnibus bill passed yesterday, to 4 percent.
Critics, however, say the bill just passed by Congress would increase discretionary spending — federal outlays on programs not including automatic payments such as Social Security and Medicare — by about 9 percent. In the two previous years, they say growth was 13 percent and 12 percent, respectively.
Although Mr. Bush proposed far less spending, critics say, Congress upped the amount, and Mr. Bush, who has not yet wielded his veto pen once, did nothing to stop it.
The president actually began making decisions for the budget in early December, long before the recent grumbling by Republicans, Mr. Duffy said, and thus is not responding to GOP complaints.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.