Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Bush Finds Party Faithful In an Ugly Mood
WSJ ^ | 2/12/04 | JACKIE CALMES

Posted on 02/12/2004 5:25:17 AM PST by TomServo

Edited on 04/22/2004 11:51:05 PM PDT by Jim Robinson. [history]

WASHINGTON -- For all the attention paid to partisanship in this town, the more interesting -- and consequential -- fights here in this election year will pit Republicans against Republicans.

A new level of tension is emerging between President Bush and the congressional Republicans he expects to deliver his election-year agenda. Among the sore points, Mr. Bush's initiative to give legal status to immigrant workers who are here illegally, a bid to attract Latino voters, instead has roiled the party's conservative faithful. Republicans have been put on the defensive over the President's policies on Iraq. And record deficits and spending suddenly have Republicans questioning his fiscal stewardship.


(Excerpt) Read more at online.wsj.com ...


TOPICS: News/Current Events; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: 2004; aliens; bush; conservatives; gop; gwb2004
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-5051-100101-150151-200201-241 next last

1 posted on 02/12/2004 5:25:18 AM PST by TomServo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: TomServo
The party faithful are in a difficult mood. GWB is the best one running that can seriously win, but with immigration and the out of control spending there is a lot to concern a conservative.
2 posted on 02/12/2004 5:27:23 AM PST by TXBSAFH
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: TomServo
"There is frustration among some conservatives, but mostly it is focused in the think tanks here," says Ed Gillespie, the Republican Party chairman. "I'm keeping my ear to the ground. But I do not believe we're at a point where concern translates into turnout problems."

Someone needs to tell Ed that those think tanks and associations are funded by conservatives.

3 posted on 02/12/2004 5:28:22 AM PST by anniegetyourgun
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

bttt..
4 posted on 02/12/2004 5:37:20 AM PST by TomServo ("What a day. I invented Gainesburgers and I didn't even mean to!")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: TomServo
No doubt Bush has some things to iron with his fellow conservatives on his immigration plan. He definitely needs to back off this, regardless of what Karl Rove tells him. However before folks start coming out with accusations of RINOism and such, all Republicans need to be focused on the disasterous consequences of Bush losing the election. The assault on the second ammendment that occured under Clinton will only continue and get worse if a Dem gets back in charge. Our intelligence infrastructure will also only further deteriorate, as it has under all of the last several Democratic presidents. Also it is clear the Dems do not take the War On Terror seriously and if they have the White House, their disinterest will only embolden people like Osama Bin Laden. A social agenda of forced secularism will also get worse under a Democrat. As conservatives we must voice our objections to the President's policies where they are wrong, such as the immigration plan. But also as conservatives we must reward Bush for his strong leadership in combating terrorists and give him a second term this year.
5 posted on 02/12/2004 5:37:38 AM PST by miloklancy (The biggest problem with the Democrats is that they are in office.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: anniegetyourgun
Someone needs to tell Ed that those think tanks and associations are funded by conservatives.

No, they're funded by the special interests. Their main function seems to be to promote the spin and furnish paychecks for any of the good ole boys that get kicked out of office.

6 posted on 02/12/2004 5:38:16 AM PST by steve50 ("Every decent man is ashamed of the government he lives under." -H. L. Mencken)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: TomServo
It's OK to be concerned; it's not OK to be foolish.
7 posted on 02/12/2004 5:39:51 AM PST by Consort
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: miloklancy
" Bush has some things to iron with his fellow conservatives on his immigration plan. "

Bush is NO conservative .
8 posted on 02/12/2004 5:40:43 AM PST by sushiman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: TomServo
"There is frustration among some conservatives, but mostly it is focused in the think tanks here," says Ed Gillespie, the Republican Party chairman. "I'm keeping my ear to the ground. But I do not believe we're at a point where concern translates into turnout problems."

How amazingly dense. It really points up the problem when elites completely lose touch, like the average voter even stops to consider, think tanks, as a target in dishing out their flustration and disappointment.

9 posted on 02/12/2004 5:40:44 AM PST by MissAmericanPie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: steve50
Click here.
10 posted on 02/12/2004 5:41:19 AM PST by anniegetyourgun
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: sushiman
That is highly debatable. And keep in mind that not all conservatives are the same. There isn't a blue print for the American conservative. Bush IS conservative on tax policy and security, which for me are the most important issues out there.
11 posted on 02/12/2004 5:44:43 AM PST by miloklancy (The biggest problem with the Democrats is that they are in office.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: TomServo; hellinahandcart; NYC GOP Chick
Thass ok. I expect the Star Chamber to show up now and start hassling people.
12 posted on 02/12/2004 5:46:51 AM PST by sauropod (I'm Happy, You're Happy, We're ALL Happy! I'm happier than a pig in excrement. Can't you just tell?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: TomServo
Anyone in the GOP who turns on Bush and makes life easier for Kerry is a traitor IMO. Lives hang in the balance here, as well the future of America. The stakes are huge and I have no use for idiot turncoats.
13 posted on 02/12/2004 5:48:51 AM PST by veronica ("America will never seek a permission slip to defend the security of our people." GW Bush 1-20-04)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: TXBSAFH
The party faithful are in a difficult mood. GWB is the best one running that can seriously win, but with immigration and the out of control spending there is a lot to concern a conservative.

There's also a lot to please a conservative. Welcome to the forum.

14 posted on 02/12/2004 5:50:35 AM PST by Coop ("Hero" is the last four-letter word I'd use to describe John Kerry.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: veronica
The future of America ? Your great-granchildren will be speaking Spanish ! LOL !
15 posted on 02/12/2004 5:51:22 AM PST by sushiman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: TomServo
"There is frustration among some conservatives, but mostly it is focused in the think tanks here," says Ed Gillespie, the Republican Party chairman. "I'm keeping my ear to the ground. But I do not believe we're at a point where concern translates into turnout problems."

What a boob to think the Grass Roots ain't poed

Rove better realize it was the hatred of Clinton/Gore and not Bush's Compassionate Conservatism BS that enegized the base

He is like that boob Gingrich who still thinks he engineered the 94 revolt of the voters that gave the GOP control of congress
16 posted on 02/12/2004 5:51:29 AM PST by uncbob
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Consort
We do have a choice, a man of character or the botox gigolo. You decide. I do not see how any conservative could even consider a vote for Kerry or to stay home. The downside would be to great.

While Bush has a lot of things to be improved, he is by far the best choice. If the war on terror is allowed to continue under Bush, we may see an actual end or conclusion. Put yourselves in the terrorist shoes the day after the election. Try two takes, Bush wins, Kerry wins. You decide which outcome means the terrorists win.
17 posted on 02/12/2004 5:53:14 AM PST by snooker
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: uncbob
To borrow a phrase :

Bush Pisses Up The Conservative's Sleeve... Just Like His Daddy Did!
18 posted on 02/12/2004 5:53:43 AM PST by sushiman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: uncbob
I read something yesterday or the day before that quoted someone in the WH saying they were baffled as to why the "base" was po'ed. "Bush is doing everything he said he was going to do" or some such hog slop.

UnKerrying believable.

19 posted on 02/12/2004 5:55:25 AM PST by sauropod (I'm Happy, You're Happy, We're ALL Happy! I'm happier than a pig in excrement. Can't you just tell?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: TomServo
Sunset of the AWB is my lithmus test.

I don't care about political rhetoric.

Bush can pretend he would sign renewal of the AWB if that helps him politically.

But if Congress sends one to him and he actually does sign it, I will sit out the next Presidential election.
20 posted on 02/12/2004 5:56:08 AM PST by Reelect President Dubya (Drug prohibition laws help support terrorism.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: TomServo
"There is frustration among some conservatives, but mostly it is focused in the think tanks here," says Ed Gillespie, the Republican Party chairman.

Well, not exactly, Ed. Rove and Co got an ear full of complaining from the Congressmen recently in a party meeting. Those elected reps complained to Rove and Co against amnesty for illegals and out of control spending. Wake up, Ed. Wake up, Carl. Daddy Bush ignored the public view and earned early retirement. Son Bush is on the same path unless things change in a hurry.
21 posted on 02/12/2004 5:57:02 AM PST by TomGuy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: snooker
Yeah, but Gillespie and Rove know that the conservatives "have no place to go." Rove was heard saying that almost immediately after the election of 2000.

Gillespie took no questions after his speech at CPAC this year.

Very telling.

22 posted on 02/12/2004 5:57:16 AM PST by sauropod (I'm Happy, You're Happy, We're ALL Happy! I'm happier than a pig in excrement. Can't you just tell?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: sushiman
You clearly forget how for eight loooong years Slick Willy and his wife pissed over all of us while their media whores kept telling us it was raining...the consequences of that deception are being paid for by the families whose loved one died 9/11. Lets not let the perfect be the enemy of the good here..
23 posted on 02/12/2004 5:57:36 AM PST by mo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: sauropod
I'm so glad that Ed "Take No Questions" Gillespie has his ear to the ground. :P
24 posted on 02/12/2004 5:57:58 AM PST by hellinahandcart
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: hellinahandcart
Certainly tells you what KR, EG, and the Party think of the "base" doesn't it?
25 posted on 02/12/2004 5:58:55 AM PST by sauropod (I'm Happy, You're Happy, We're ALL Happy! I'm happier than a pig in excrement. Can't you just tell?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: mo
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1076554/posts
26 posted on 02/12/2004 6:00:47 AM PST by sauropod (I'm Happy, You're Happy, We're ALL Happy! I'm happier than a pig in excrement. Can't you just tell?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: MissAmericanPie
Eddy's whistling in the dark.
27 posted on 02/12/2004 6:01:27 AM PST by DManA
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: TomServo
"I'm keeping my ear to the ground. But I do not believe we're at a point where concern translates into turnout problems."

The cacophony from the democRATs will get the Republicans out in November. Heck, their lie have me pi$$ed off already, and it's not even tax day.

28 posted on 02/12/2004 6:02:31 AM PST by The_Victor
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: sauropod
Haven't you heard? We're not the base.

Even though I have voted three times so far for a Bush, I'm not part of the base.
29 posted on 02/12/2004 6:03:58 AM PST by hellinahandcart
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: snooker
Yes decide. Just remember that by voting for Mr. Bush you are choosing a Federal Government that consumes 50% GDP (according to his latest budget ).
30 posted on 02/12/2004 6:04:17 AM PST by DManA
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: TomServo
Oh, for Pete's sake. Get the guy elected and argue later!!
31 posted on 02/12/2004 6:04:59 AM PST by mewzilla
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: sushiman
Bush Pisses Up The Conservative's Sleeve... Just Like His Daddy Did!

Wear sleeveless garments and chill out.

32 posted on 02/12/2004 6:05:40 AM PST by Consort
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: sauropod
Yes, I would agree. But I would still rather talk to Bush and try to get what we want than to try and talk to Kerry. Between all the Jane Fonda White House parties, I doubt Kerry will give you the time of day. There is also the very real prospect of MA style gun control 'improvements'.
33 posted on 02/12/2004 6:06:42 AM PST by snooker
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: TomServo
Ed Gillespie, the Republican Party chairman. "I'm keeping my ear to the ground.

Good - Maybe someone will stomp on your stupid head!

But I do not believe we're at a point where concern translates into turnout problems.

Translation: They're pi$$ed, but we still have the 'Hold your nose and vote' crowd.

34 posted on 02/12/2004 6:07:37 AM PST by MamaTexan (Is anyone obligated to obey an unconstitutional government?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: DManA
I remember the Clinton budget which was going to take 80% of all income. So we are making improvements. VBG
35 posted on 02/12/2004 6:08:05 AM PST by snooker
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies]

To: sauropod
Frankly with a Green third party in 2000, Gore still won the popular vote. There will be NO third party this time around. Much of this should be viewed as the real cost of reaching to the center. We can play hard after the elections-most importantly on the COurt.
36 posted on 02/12/2004 6:08:28 AM PST by mo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: snooker
I am not disagreeing with you.
37 posted on 02/12/2004 6:08:33 AM PST by sauropod (I'm Happy, You're Happy, We're ALL Happy! I'm happier than a pig in excrement. Can't you just tell?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies]

To: snooker
Hit post before i finished writing....

The question really is, how to get Mr. Bush to reign in the spending (including axeing the noxious Pills for Grandma program), deep-six the recent immigration proposal, etc.

I don't pretend to have the answer.

38 posted on 02/12/2004 6:10:38 AM PST by sauropod (I'm Happy, You're Happy, We're ALL Happy! I'm happier than a pig in excrement. Can't you just tell?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies]

To: TomServo
Among the sore points, Mr. Bush's initiative to give legal status to immigrant workers who are here illegally, a bid to attract Latino voters, instead has roiled the party's conservative faithful.

Speaking as a former Canadian, now U.S. citizen, who has voted Republican going back to Ford, I'm outraged that Bush would grant illegal immigrants amnesty. I served 3 years active duty in the Marines and lived in this country 10 years before taking out citizenship ... everything I did was legal and above board. Amnesty to illegal aliens is a slap in the face to those of us who did it the right way ... legally. There seems to be something about the term "illegal" that is lost on Washington politicians ... in both parties.

39 posted on 02/12/2004 6:11:21 AM PST by BluH2o
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: mo
The question is,"how?"

Or, shouldn't that have happened this term?

40 posted on 02/12/2004 6:11:50 AM PST by sauropod (I'm Happy, You're Happy, We're ALL Happy! I'm happier than a pig in excrement. Can't you just tell?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 36 | View Replies]

To: BluH2o
Speaking as a former Canadian, now U.S. citizen,..

I didn't know that about you, Blu. Thanks ever so much for doing it the right way - and especially for your service to our Nation.

41 posted on 02/12/2004 6:13:25 AM PST by TomServo ("What a day. I invented Gainesburgers and I didn't even mean to!")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 39 | View Replies]

To: TomServo
From an ultra conservative that is 100% behind President Bush's foreign policy: IF I VOTE, I will have to hold my nose and pull the Bush lever. His domestic policies suck, to put it mildly. How a "conservative" can do all of the idiotic things that Bush is doing is beyond my comprehension, i.e. Budget busting, CFR, Kennedy's Education crap, BENDING OVER AND GRABBING HIS ANKLES FOR ILLEGALimmigrants and on and on and on. What part of illegal doesn't he understand?

Can anyone explain this idiocy?

42 posted on 02/12/2004 6:14:31 AM PST by zip
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: TomGuy
Well, not exactly, Ed. Rove and Co got an ear full of complaining from the Congressmen recently in a party meeting.

And iirc, these congressmen said they were catching 3 kinds of hades from their constituents, not the "think tanks".

43 posted on 02/12/2004 6:14:40 AM PST by steve50 ("Every decent man is ashamed of the government he lives under." -H. L. Mencken)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: veronica
Anyone in the GOP who turns on Bush and makes life easier for Kerry is a traitor IMO

Bull. Bush is the traitor. You (and I) are taken advantage of election after election by these RINOs. And they know they can get away with it becuase most people take your view: Well, we have to kepp the other guys out. So the Pubs live and spend like Dems knowing they will wisper just enough of what you need to hear at election time. And the cycle of ignoring the Convervative base goes on for another four years.

better to blew 'em out of office for the longer view. If they realize their strategy has a price tag they will sober up for the next cycle. I will not vote for Bush if he walks on water between now and election day.

44 posted on 02/12/2004 6:15:59 AM PST by Swanks
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: snooker
Maybe his budget was more honest. Bush's record of estimating cost is not too good.
45 posted on 02/12/2004 6:18:03 AM PST by DManA
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies]

To: veronica
"Anyone in the GOP who turns on Bush and makes life easier for Kerry is a traitor IMO. Lives hang in the balance here, as well the future of America. The stakes are huge and I have no use for idiot turncoats."
Well said! though i would ammend GOP to any conservative and real American who turns on Bush.
You have Liberals then you have real Americans ;)
46 posted on 02/12/2004 6:19:30 AM PST by DM1
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: sushiman
The future of America ? Your great-granchildren will be speaking Spanish ! LOL !

As English becomes the world language.

You guys really have to get over your fear and hyperbole.

47 posted on 02/12/2004 6:19:53 AM PST by Dane
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: Swanks
STAB IN THE BACK...

(Dems stabbing Bush and the US in the back in war time) AND NOT JUST DEMS apparently.

48 posted on 02/12/2004 6:21:32 AM PST by veronica ("America will never seek a permission slip to defend the security of our people." GW Bush 1-20-04)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 44 | View Replies]

To: MamaTexan
'Hold your nose and vote' crowd.

There a he!! of a lot more of us than the WH understands (and maybe more of the "I am not going to vote" crowd). WAKE UP, ROVE.

49 posted on 02/12/2004 6:21:57 AM PST by zip
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies]

To: sushiman
BTW susuhiman, since you are such an English language defender shouldn't you change your screen name to "rawfishman".

Can't have any foreign words corrupt English you know.

50 posted on 02/12/2004 6:22:03 AM PST by Dane
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-5051-100101-150151-200201-241 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson