Oppose Mark Leno's "homosexual marriage" bill

Campaign For California Families ^ | Campaign For California Families

[I_Love_My_Husband]

Click the link!

[I_Love_My_Husband]

CLICK HERE

[I_Love_My_Husband]

PING

[writer33]

I knew this was going to happen. As soon as Massachussets' activist judge stepped up to the homosexual plate. I did post about this.

Time for a Constitutional Amendment by Chris Davis.

[concerned about politics]

God didn't put that San Andras Fault around California for decoration.
Hollywood is where the dysfunctional sex fetish movement got it's start. If Hollywood could force it on the nation, they could engage in their various vile behaviors and still sell movies. They don't like us in control. They want to control us. It's all propaganda.
If you picture in your mind homosexuals doing what they do , their diseases, their boy rapists, and their smell of bile, the pretty face Hollywood and it's followers has put on it isn't so pretty anymore. It's one of the ugliest faces this world have ever had to look at.

Time for California to rumble. Literally. You don't mess with natures law.

Massachusetts? If they accept extremely unnatural behavior, they'll be the first to get the next mutating disease. It has to start somewhere, and the homosexuals will be filling up that state with their infections and over use of antibiotics. Many innocent people will die with them for letting it happen, but hey, $hit happens. You get what you ask for.

Where homosexuals are welcomed, there's disease, infections, child molestation, suicides, and misery. That's just the way it is.

[concerned about politics]

PS....The Hollywood jesters are coming out with a homosexual MTV channel.
It's directed at young teens, of course. That way, teens will see it as "normal" and "cool."
Oh no, no homosexual agenda to get the minds of the children going on here - NOT! They're indoctrinating the nations innocent children right before their parents eyes.

Anyone remember this? "All we're asking for is tolerance. That's all we want."

[concerned about politics]

First of all, their is no "right" for the sexually dysfunctional to marry based on the choice of fetish.

Homosexuality is not a gender nor a race. It's a sexual fetish. Nothing more. They confuse "love" with sex. Take away the sex, and the sodomites go their separate ways. Most homosexuals get bored with the various orifices their partners have, and need some new anus on an average of 1.5 years.

If homosexuals marry, anything can marry, otherwise it's discrimination.
People "love" their pets. I'm sure they'd like them to have as many rights as a mate if they're single or windowed. The elderly "love" their pets. They should be allowed to marry them if homosexuals marry, right?
A foot fetishists "loves" shoes. Should he not have the right to marry a few pairs? It's discrimination not to let him marry, too.
What if a father and daughter love each other? Hey, it's discriminatory to deny them their marriage license. That's what the homosexuals are saying.
Some people "love" their cars.
Who draws the line? Homosexuals? What makes them think they're any different or any better than men who have sex with animals? Is it not a "choice" of fetish as well or lifestyle as well?

If homosexuals are allowed to marry, I'm going to buy a new SUV. I'm going to marry it. Why? Because I can't afford to pay for it. If I marry it, they can't come to repossess it. Kidnapping my spouse would be a felony.

[concerned about politics]

Umm, excuse me, but I believe lesbians have the lowest rates of STDs; lower than heterosexuals. By your reasoning, perhaps everything but lesbianism should be outlawed.

Nah. The NOW hags took care of that one. The lesbians are the same as the male butt humpers. Otherwise, it's gender discrimination.
They're equally sexually dysfunctional.

[concerned about politics]

BTW, everything the Democrats are accusing Bush of doing (or not doing) during his National Guard service is being proven wrong. So far, the score is Bush - 100%, Dems - 0%. (That's if anyone in the US is even paying attention.)

[3catsanadog]

People "love" their pets. I'm sure they'd like them to have as many rights as a mate if they're single or windowed. The elderly "love" their pets. They should be allowed to marry them if homosexuals marry, right?

I don't want to marry my pets but I demand equal health benefits for them from the firm I work for. And day care also. It's inhumane to make the dog hold her water for 9 hours while I work.

[concerned about politics]

I don't want to marry my pets but I demand equal health benefits for them from the firm I work for. And day care also. It's inhumane to make the dog hold her water for 9 hours while I work.

Then get a civil union.

[concerned about politics]

Yeah, that makes sense. If you're gay, your main goal in life is to make other people gay. The same way heterosexuals' main goal in life is to heterize other people.

Sure. There's so many homosexual teenagers, they have to start their own homosexual MTV. Tell me another story.

[AndrewC]

They didn't marry each other for the sex, but because they love each other.

I love my mom, but I wouldn't marry her.

[3catsanadog]

I hope you realize my post was in jest!

[concerned about politics]

I know several lesbians in sexless defacto marriages. They didn't marry each other for the sex, but because they love each other.

They can't biologically be "in love" the way the male and female love. It's impossable. They're both female. The pheromones for natural attraction aren't there. Homosexual "love" is a fallacy. "The big lie."
Maybe they're just lonely. That doesn't mean we have to demoralize and entire society to accommodate them. Maybe they can join a club.